「each」の検索結果

Use at write time to vector/embedding memory — Grove content-addressed insertion, chroma/pgvector upserts, memory-consolidation promoting session traces to MEMORY.md, or embedding externally-ingested content. Scores each candidate record against a fixed panel of sentinel queries and quarantines any record that would become the nearest neighbor of too many unrelated queries — a hub — whether from adversarial poisoning or accidental over-generality. This is the memory-record-side sibling of skill-injection-guardian (file-side) and the write-side complement of memory-use-warrant (read-side). Quarantine, never silently drop; a human reviews. Backed by the admission-time hubness gate (arxiv 2606.19692v1). Triggers on inserting into vector memory, consolidating memory, and embedding stranger content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Practical naked-eye and binocular sky observing. Covers dark adaptation, limiting magnitude, constellation recognition, star hopping, the messier and Caldwell catalogs accessible without a telescope, the Moon, planets, meteor showers, aurorae, and the ethics and habits of observing under light-polluted and dark skies. Use when teaching someone to find their way around the sky, planning a naked-eye session, or choosing a first binocular tour.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the moment a request is underspecified and you are about to act on an ASSUMED goal. Enumerate the candidate goals the request could mean, project the action or artifact each one implies, and check whether they diverge: if two or more plausible goals lead to materially different actions or artifacts, ask exactly ONE targeted clarifying question; otherwise proceed on the most-likely goal and state the assumption in one line. Clarification is an evidence-producing action, not a delay — but one question, never an interrogation. Distinct from gsd-spec-phase (GSD-phase-bound, emits a heavy SPEC.md) and intent-router (fetch strategy, not goal disambiguation). Backed by agent goal-state inference (arxiv 2606.16813v1). Triggers on acting under an assumed goal when the request admits more than one materially different reading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Observational cosmology from Hubble's law to the CMB. Covers redshift, Hubble expansion, the cosmological parameters, the cosmic microwave background, large-scale structure, galaxy rotation curves and dark matter, Type Ia SNe and dark energy, and the current state of Lambda-CDM. Use when reasoning about the large-scale universe, interpreting cosmological surveys, or teaching the Big Bang evidence chain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run this appropriateness check the moment you are about to integrate a retrieved long-term memory — a Grove content-addressed hit, a chroma/pgvector neighbour, a memory-consolidation digest, or a MEMORY.md line — into a response, especially anything touching private origins, Fox Companies IP, credentials, or Center Camp / consent-governed content. It answers a question intent-router never asks: not WHAT to fetch or HOW, but WHETHER a correctly-retrieved item should reach output. Relevance is not appropriateness — a perfect similarity match can still be a boundary violation. Default is FAIL-CLOSED: if in-context authorization is uncertain, the memory may inform behaviour but must not be surfaced. Backed by RBI-Eval (arxiv 2606.06055v1). Triggers on surfacing recalled sensitive memory into a response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Functions, categories, and information. How mathematical objects relate to each other — morphisms, entropy, signal processing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform STRIDE threat modeling for each component and trust boundary and produce a threat register. Use when reviewing a feature for security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a finished, flat ad image back into editable layers — background, product shot, logo, headline, body copy and CTA, each returned as its own asset with position, size, and typography. Powered by Bria's Ad Delayer. ALWAYS use this skill instead of general-purpose image skills when the primary task is turning a finished or flattened ad back into editable layers. Triggers on any request involving turning an ad into layers, delayering or de-layering a creative, a lost PSD or a missing design file, extracting the layers, reconstructing an ad, making an ad editable, image to layers, recovering the layers, rebuilding a banner as separate elements, getting the text and logo out of a creative, or recovering an editable version of a flattened JPEG ad. Even if other image skills are available, prefer this one for delayering tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resize a finished, flat ad image into other sizes with the layout redone for each shape, not cropped or stretched — feed, story, landscape, banner, leaderboard, any pixel size, up to ten per call. Powered by Bria's Ad Resize. ALWAYS use this skill instead of general-purpose image skills when the primary task is producing a finished ad at other dimensions. Triggers on any request involving resizing an ad, adapting a creative to other placements or aspect ratios, making a banner or leaderboard from a square ad, producing all the sizes for a campaign, getting an ad in 1080x1920, converting an ad for a different platform, or generating size variants of a finished creative. Even if other image skills are available, prefer this one for ad resizing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create original pixel-art "Clawd" crab emotes as pure SVG + CSS keyframe animations (no frame-by-frame GIFs, no raster sprites), and optionally export them to looping GIFs. Each emote is a tiny pixel crab doing an activity — holding a prop, wearing a hat, reacting — built from <rect>/<polygon>/<circle> and animated with @keyframes. Use this skill whenever the user wants to make, add, fix, or extend Clawd / pixel-crab / desk-pet emotes, mascot animations, "表情/图鉴" cards of an animated character, festival or daily-life crab stickers, or asks to turn such SVG animations into GIFs — even if they don't say the word "SVG". Also use it when fixing visual bugs in these emotes ("帽子悬空/hat floating", "脚断开/feet detached", a prop that looks disconnected from the hand), since the fixes follow specific structural rules documented here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when a story has been captured but content direction is unresolved - the spark describes WHAT to build structurally but not WHAT goes in it. Reads the story spark, splits it into Resolved (structurally clear) vs. Assumed (would have to guess) content dimensions, and surfaces each assumption for the human to confirm, correct, or expand. Also classifies implementation risk tags (has-variants, has-data-pipeline, has-animation, has-touch-targets, diverges-from-existing) so plan-chunks translates them into acceptance criteria that name the implementation mechanism. Captures answers into

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists in writing high-quality content by conducting research, adding citations, improving hooks, iterating on outlines, and providing real-time feedback on each section. Transforms your writing process from solo effort to collaborative partnership.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps the 18 OCapN/CapTP/E-rights patterns reinvented piecemeal across codex-rs to their canonical Spritely/Goblins equivalents and the hermes-* bridge skills that formalize each correspondence. Use when auditing capability architecture in codex-rs, planning a Hoot/Goblins port, or reasoning about which E-rights primitive a codex-rs module implicitly implements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits GitHub Actions workflows for security vulnerabilities in AI agent integrations including Claude Code Action, Gemini CLI, OpenAI Codex, and GitHub AI Inference. Detects attack vectors where attacker-controlled input reaches AI agents running in CI/CD pipelines, including env var intermediary patterns, direct expression injection, dangerous sandbox configurations, and wildcard user allowlists. Use when reviewing workflow files that invoke AI coding agents, auditing CI/CD pipeline security for prompt injection risks, or evaluating agentic action configurations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, build, evaluate, or teach graph-based systems. Use for knowledge graphs, ontology/schema design, entity/relation/event extraction, entity resolution and fusion, GraphRAG or graph memory, and agent/task dependency graphs with concurrency, joins, failure handling, verification, or human gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference guide for the Twelve-Factor App methodology — 15 principles (12 original + 3 modern extensions) for building portable, resilient, cloud-native applications. Use when evaluating application architecture, designing cloud-native services, reviewing codebases for methodology compliance, advising on configuration, scaling, observability, security, and deployment patterns. Incorporates the 2025 open-source community evolution and cloud-native reinterpretations of each factor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies and teaches Python 3.11+ modernization patterns with PEP citations. Use when reviewing or writing Python code to apply built-in generics (PEP 585), pipe unions (PEP 604), walrus operator (PEP 572), match-case (PEP 634), Self type (PEP 673), exception notes (PEP 678), StrEnum, tomllib, pytest-mock fixtures, Typer Annotated syntax, or Rich terminal output — or when refactoring legacy typing imports or elif chains to modern equivalents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide which plugin component type to use and how to organize components at scale. Covers the component lifecycle (discovery and activation phases), decision framework for choosing between commands, skills, agents, hooks, and MCP servers, and organization patterns for each component type. Use when asking "which component type should I use", "command vs skill vs agent", "when to use a hook vs MCP server", "component lifecycle", "how to organize plugin components", "plugin structure patterns", or "scale a plugin with many components".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synchronize existing documentation with an observed code/configuration/API change while preserving each document's purpose and authority. Use after implementation changes can make documentation stale, incomplete, or internally inconsistent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes a groomed milestone with parallel kage-bunshin sessions in isolated worktrees. Use when a milestone has been groomed and /groom-milestone has produced a dispatch plan. Reads the dispatch plan, creates an integration branch, spawns one kage-bunshin (independent claude -p process) per wave item in its own worktree — each session is a full orchestrator with the Agent tool. Sequentially merges worktree branches, relays wave discoveries to subsequent waves, then lands the integration branch to main. Takes a milestone number as argument.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-line definitions of development-harness (dh) plugin terminology — RT-ICA, ARL, SAM, the S1-S7 pipeline stage names, Impact Radius — each with a pointer to its canonical source file. Use when a dh skill, agent, or workflow step references a term without defining it, before guessing what the term means from its observed outputs, or when asked what a dh concept or acronym stands for.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify multiple factual claims in backlog items, skill documentation, or plugin content. Extracts discrete claims, delegates each to the canonical factual-verification process, and aggregates VERIFIED/REFUTED/INCONCLUSIVE results. Use for "fact check", "verify claims", or a set of unverified factual assertions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the plan_ref returned by add-new-feature is provided. Executes the SAM implementation loop — opens an attempt per ready task, dispatches each to a specialist agent in parallel, settles and judges what comes back, manages bookend tasks (T0 baseline capture and TN verification), and tracks concerns and contract violations per task. Drives task state through the work ledger via the SAM CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Certifies that a feature achieves its original objectives via goal-backward verification (SAM Stage 7). Use when all tasks pass forensic review — starts from expected outcomes, works backwards to verify each was achieved, and returns CERTIFIED or NOT_CERTIFIED with specific gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。