「report」の検索結果

Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided statistical analysis for research data - test selection, assumption checking, effect sizes, power analysis, Bayesian alternatives, and APA-formatted reporting. Use whenever a user wants to compare groups, test a hypothesis, analyze experimental or survey data, check statistical assumptions, compute required sample sizes, or write up results - even if they never name a specific test. Covers t-tests, ANOVA, chi-square, correlation, regression, non-parametric and Bayesian methods. For low-level model APIs, see the statsmodels and pymc skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sample-size and statistical power calculations for planning studies. Use whenever someone asks "how many subjects/samples/replicates do I need", wants an a priori power analysis, a minimum detectable effect (MDE), a power curve, or needs to justify a sample size for a grant, IRB protocol, or pre-registration. Covers closed-form power for t-tests, ANOVA, proportions, correlations, chi-square, and regression, plus simulation-based (Monte Carlo) power for designs with no formula — logistic/Poisson regression, mixed models, cluster-randomized trials, survival, and interactions. Use this skill even when the request only mentions an effect size, alpha, or "80% power" without saying "power analysis" explicitly. For laying out the study (randomization, blocking, factorial/DOE, crossover, sequential designs) use experimental-design; for analyzing data already collected and reporting it use statistical-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform comprehensive exploratory data analysis on scientific data files across 200+ file formats. This skill should be used when analyzing any scientific data file to understand its structure, content, quality, and characteristics. Automatically detects file type and generates detailed markdown reports with format-specific analysis, quality metrics, and downstream analysis recommendations. Covers chemistry, bioinformatics, microscopy, spectroscopy, proteomics, metabolomics, and general scientific data formats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enforces completion discipline for substantial autonomous work by writing acceptance gates before execution, decomposing work with the Depth Tree, running approved checks, and re-verifying evidence before reporting. Use when an agent faces a long or multi-part task, work that has returned half-done, an exhaustive audit or build, parallel leaves or pipelines, or explicit triggers such as /unlazy, $unlazy, "tree N", "gates", and "do not stop until it is done".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write or rewrite text in plain, layman-readable English in the spirit of ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English: short sentences, active voice, simple tenses, one word one meaning, condition before command, every technical term defined at first use, no AI slop. Default mode is Plain. Strict mode applies full STE vocabulary compliance when the user names STE, ASD-STE100, or compliance. Use for documentation, READMEs, runbooks, procedures, error messages, release notes, incident reports, API guides, and explanations for readers outside the field. Also use when the user says "STE", "Simplified Technical English", "ASD-STE100", "plain English", "layman's terms", "explain it simply", "no jargon", "de-slop", "make this readable", "write for non-native readers", or asks for docs that translate well. The same rules govern the reply: answer first, prose only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the read-only infra/lint PR reporter only when invoked by CI or explicitly requested; do not select it for the commit workflow's fix-and-respond review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply Marin house style when producing or revising commit, pull-request, issue, comment, documentation, report, or blog prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans a website to find broken links (404s, 500s). Crawls internal pages, identifies broken outbound links, and reports source pages for easy fixing. Use this when the user asks to "check for broken links", "find 404s", "audit my links", or "is my site healthy".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Backlink / off-page SEO audit. Works WITHOUT a paid tool by default — it uses the Google Search Console Links report (your top linking sites, most-linked pages, and anchor text) plus any backlink export the user provides (Ahrefs / Semrush / Majestic / DataForSEO CSV). Analyzes referring-domain profile, anchor-text distribution (over-optimized / spammy patterns), most-linked pages vs. money pages (internal-linking opportunity), toxic/spam link signals, and link-building priorities. Use this skill when the user asks about backlinks, link building, off-page SEO, referring domains, anchor text, toxic/spam links, disavow, or their link profile. Trigger on: "backlinks", "backlink audit", "link building", "off- page SEO", "referring domains", "anchor text", "toxic links", "spam links", "disavow file", "who links to me", "link profile", "domain authority". NOTE: rich third-party metrics (DR/DA, full link index) require a paid data source; this skill is explicit about what it can and can't see without one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a read-only, evidence-based paid-media performance review across connected platforms or supplied exports. Use for weekly or monthly reports, scorecards, performance, CPA, ROAS, CTR, spend trends, pacing, or conversion-tracking health.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze connected Google Analytics 4 traffic, acquisition, engagement, landing pages, ecommerce, events, and conversions, and safely manage supported GA4 key events or custom dimensions through NotFair MCP. Use for GA4, Google Analytics, traffic or conversion drops, channel attribution, realtime activity, report requests, measurement configuration, or Analytics MCP setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Single-page SEO audit: content quality under Google's E-E-A-T framework and Helpful Content guidelines, on-page factors, search intent, technical signals and readability. Pulls GSC data for the page, crawls the live HTML, checks metadata, schema, internal linking and depth, and produces a scored report with fixes. Use whenever the user wants to analyze a specific page or URL, not the whole site. Trigger on: "analyze this page", "audit this URL", "how is this page doing", "evaluate my blog post", "check this landing page", "page SEO", "content quality check", "is this page good enough", "review this page's SEO", "what's wrong with this page", "how can I improve this page", "page analysis", "single page audit", "content audit for [URL]", or any request naming a specific URL/page for SEO evaluation. If the user provides a specific URL (not just a domain), this is likely the right skill; use /seo-analysis for full-site audits instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect a CMS to notfair SEO tools. Guides users through configuring WordPress, Strapi, Contentful, or Ghost — tests the connection, and writes credentials to .env.local. Once set up, seo-analysis automatically cross- references CMS content against Google Search Console data. Use whenever the user says "connect my CMS", "set up WordPress", "configure Strapi", "add Contentful", "connect Ghost", or "CMS setup". Also trigger if the user asks why no CMS data appears in a seo-analysis report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and, after explicit approval, execute runtime-behavior probes for local or live integrations. Use only when explicitly invoked to verify behavior that code review and normal tests cannot settle; define a controlled validation matrix, keep disposable JS probes outside tracked paths, and report observed evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate, export, load, and verify forensic evidence from GitHub sources. Use when creating verifiable evidence objects from GitHub API, GH Archive, Wayback Machine, local git repositories, or security vendor reports. Handles evidence storage, querying, and re-verification against original sources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates multi-agent forensic investigations on public GitHub repositories, coordinating parallel evidence collection, hypothesis formation, verification, and report generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Open or file a GitHub issue, bug report, feature request, docs issue, or chore. Add evidence to an existing issue. Run gh issue create or gh issue comment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review how the lean-ctx ctx_* MCP tools performed in the current session and file upstream issues for confirmed problems. Use when the user asks to review/audit lean-ctx tool performance, says "lean-ctx review", asks why ctx_* tools failed or fell back to native tools, or wants to report a lean-ctx bug.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep research with hyperresearch, for Claude Code and OpenAI Codex. Use when the user asks for deep research, a research report, a literature review, or a multi-source analysis with verified citations. Checks that the hyperresearch CLI is installed, sets it up in the current project for the agent you are running in, then hands off to the hyperresearch pipeline (a tier-adaptive 16-step pipeline with a persistent source vault). Not for quick lookups one or two searches can answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user asks for a Word document, a .docx file, or a report/memo/letter/proposal delivered as one — creating a new document from scratch, editing an existing .docx, or reading/summarizing the contents of one. Covers page layout, headings, tables, numbered/bulleted lists, page breaks, and a table of contents. Does not cover converting a .docx to PDF or .doc to .docx (see file-conversion for what conversions ARE supported in this environment).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user asks you to load, clean, aggregate, join, or otherwise analyze tabular data (csv, xlsx, json, or a database export) — 'what's the total revenue by region', 'clean up this dataset', 'join these two files on customer id'. Establishes a verification discipline so reported numbers are always numbers the code actually printed, never numbers you inferred or estimated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user asks for a PowerPoint presentation, a .pptx file, or slides for a talk/pitch/report — creating a new deck from scratch, editing an existing .pptx, or reading/summarizing an existing deck's content. Covers slide layout, color/typography choices, and a content-quality checklist for professional-looking output. Does not cover rendering slides to images for visual QA (see the 'Not supported' section).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever the user asks for a PDF — generating a new one from scratch (reports, invoices, letters), extracting text/tables from an existing PDF, or filling in an existing PDF form. Does not cover converting an existing Word/PowerPoint/Excel file to PDF (that requires LibreOffice, not available in this environment — see file-conversion).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。