「state」の検索結果

Use when implementing guide users when no content is available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing handling AI-specific errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-stack autonomous math modeling agent for CUMCM (全国大学生数学建模竞赛). Reads the problem statement and data, iterates through research → coding → verification → LaTeX writing, and produces a publication-quality PDF paper. Use when the user provides a CUMCM problem and wants end-to-end automated modeling, coding, and paper generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically generate TLA+ specifications from source code (C/C++, Python) for formal verification of distributed systems. Use when users need to: (1) Generate TLA+ specs from program implementations, (2) Model distributed systems, consensus protocols, or concurrent algorithms, (3) Extract state variables, actions, and invariants from code, (4) Create formal specifications for model checking with TLC, (5) Verify safety and liveness properties of distributed systems. Particularly effective for message-passing systems, replication protocols, consensus algorithms, and distributed transactions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze source code statically to detect potential functional bugs including null dereferences, incorrect condition checks, unreachable code, inconsistent state updates, logic errors, resource leaks, and type mismatches. Report suspicious code locations with detailed explanations, severity levels, and confidence assessments. Use when reviewing code for bugs, performing code audits, or when the user asks to find bugs, detect issues, analyze code for problems, or perform static analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically simplify and minimize TLA+ specifications by reducing redundant state variables, merging equivalent actions, and minimizing invariants while preserving specified properties. Use when working with TLA+ specifications that need optimization, simplification, or reduction. Triggers when users ask to minimize, reduce, simplify, or optimize TLA+ specs, or when they want to remove redundancy from formal specifications while maintaining semantic equivalence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze proof states in Isabelle or Coq and suggest applicable tactics to make progress. Use when users need help with: (1) Choosing the next tactic in an interactive proof, (2) Understanding what tactics apply to their current goal, (3) Getting unstuck in a proof, (4) Learning which tactics work for specific goal structures (conjunctions, implications, induction, etc.). Provides 3-5 ranked tactic suggestions with explanations for intermediate-level proofs in both Isabelle/Isar and Coq.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs symbolic execution to detect potential errors by exploring execution paths, solving path constraints, and generating test inputs. Use when you need to analyze code for bugs like null dereferences, division by zero, buffer overflows, or assertion violations. Also use to generate test inputs that exercise different code paths, find edge cases, or explore all reachable program states. Supports Python, Java, and C/C++ through manual symbolic execution techniques and integration with tools like KLEE, angr, Z3, and Symbolic PathFinder.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and explain why Isabelle or Coq proofs fail, identifying the root cause such as type mismatches, missing assumptions, incorrect goals, unification failures, or inapplicable tactics. Use when the user encounters proof failures, error messages in formal verification, stuck proof states, or asks why their Isabelle/Coq proof doesn't work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hardware verification tool for checking functional equivalence between two RTL designs (Verilog). Use when users need to: (1) Verify if two RTL versions are functionally equivalent, (2) Compare original vs. refactored RTL code, (3) Validate design changes or optimizations, (4) Identify semantic vs. cosmetic differences, (5) Generate counterexamples for non-equivalent designs. Analyzes interface alignment, state variables, logic differences, and produces detailed equivalence verdicts with plain language explanations. Particularly effective for design verification, code reviews, and regression testing of RTL modifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks whether a new version of a repository preserves the behavior observed by tests on the old version. Use this skill when comparing two versions of code to detect regressions, verify refactoring safety, validate bug fixes don't break existing functionality, or ensure backward compatibility. Detects differences in function outputs, exceptions, observable states, and performance between versions. Generates reports highlighting potential regressions (critical, high, medium, low severity), improvements, and areas requiring verification. Triggers when users ask to check for regressions between versions, compare test behavior across versions, verify behavior preservation, or validate that changes don't break existing tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Instruments authentication, authorization, and input-handling code paths to monitor security-relevant events and states at runtime. Use this skill when developers need to add security monitoring and logging to their code, including tracking authentication attempts (login/logout), authorization decisions (access control checks), input validation failures, session management events, and other security-critical operations. Supports Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, and Java with structured logging patterns. Triggers when users ask to add security instrumentation, monitor security events, log authentication/authorization, track security-sensitive operations, or add security observability to their codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically generate TLA+ specifications from program code, repositories, or system implementations. Use when asked to generate TLA+ spec, create TLA+ specification from code, convert program to TLA+, formalize system in TLA+, extract TLA+ model from code, or when working with formal specification of concurrent systems, distributed systems, protocols, algorithms, or state machines that need to be verified.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect semantic-level bugs by analyzing whether code behavior matches its intended purpose inferred from function/variable names, comments, docstrings, and documentation. Use when users need to: (1) Find logic errors where implementation contradicts stated intent, (2) Identify off-by-one errors and boundary mismatches, (3) Detect inverted logic or wrong operators, (4) Catch missing edge case handling, (5) Verify code matches its documentation. Highlights mismatches between intent and implementation across multiple programming languages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare behavior across multiple versions of programs or repositories. Use when you need to analyze how functionality changes between versions, identify regressions, compare outputs and exceptions, or validate upgrades. The skill compares execution behavior, test results, outputs, exceptions, and observable states across versions, generating detailed reports showing behavioral divergences, potential regressions, added/removed functionality, and areas requiring validation. Supports multiple programming languages and can work with test suites or execution traces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically repair code violations of temporal properties using model-checking counterexamples as guidance. Use when working with formal verification results, temporal logic property violations (LTL, CTL), model checking counterexamples, or when asked to repair property violations, fix counterexamples, repair temporal properties, fix model checking violations, or repair code based on counterexamples. Applicable to concurrent systems, state machines, synchronization issues, safety/liveness properties, and resource management violations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically infer loop invariants for code verification and correctness proofs. Use when analyzing loops to identify properties that hold throughout execution, generating assertions for verification, proving loop correctness, or documenting loop behavior. Supports Python, Java, C/C++, and language-agnostic analysis. Generates invariants as code assertions (assert statements). Triggers when users ask to infer invariants, find loop properties, generate loop assertions, prove loop correctness, or verify loop behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CLI-based browser automation with persistent page state using ref-based element interaction. Use when users ask to navigate websites, interact with web pages, fill forms, take screenshots, test web applications, or extract information from web pages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate concrete counterexamples when formal verification, assertions, or specifications fail. Use this skill when debugging failed proofs, understanding why verification fails, creating minimal reproducing examples, analyzing assertion violations, investigating invariant breaks, or diagnosing specification mismatches. Produces concrete input values, execution traces, and state information that demonstrate the failure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically generates executable test cases from model checking counterexample traces. Translates abstract counterexample states and transitions into concrete test inputs, execution steps, and assertions that reproduce property violations. Use when working with model checker outputs (SPIN, CBMC, NuSMV, TLA+, Java PathFinder, etc.) and needing to create regression tests, validate bug fixes, or reproduce verification failures in executable test suites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs abstract interpretation to produce summarized execution traces and high-level program behavior representations. Highlights key control flow paths, variable relationships, loop invariants, function summaries, and potential runtime states using abstract domains (intervals, signs, nullness, etc.). Use when analyzing program behavior, understanding execution paths, computing loop invariants, tracking variable ranges, detecting potential runtime errors, or generating program summaries without concrete execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer questions about a GRACE 4 project by navigating .grace current-state artifacts and file-local semantic markup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ACTIVATE when developing long-term strategy, setting OKRs, creating vision statements, building SWOT analyses, designing strategic frameworks, defining company direction, planning multi-year initiatives, or aligning organizational strategy with business goals. Executive must think through market positioning, competitive advantage, and measurable strategic objectives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ACTIVATE when drafting all-hands speeches, investor updates, quarterly letters to stakeholders, press statements, CEO announcements, crisis communications, customer updates, or any mission-critical communication to employees, investors, customers, or media. Executive communications require persuasion, clarity, emotional intelligence, and alignment with company values and strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。