「ide」の検索結果

Initialize an Adobe App Builder project end-to-end without Developer Console UI clicks. Creates the Console project and workspace, subscribes APIs (including those needing a product profile), maps user intent to the right template, runs non-interactive `aio app init`, and guides post-init customization. Use whenever the user mentions creating an App Builder app, scaffolding a project, `aio app init`, setting up an Experience Cloud extension, adding actions or web assets, creating a Console project or workspace, adding APIs, or bootstrapping App Builder — even if they don't say "App Builder". Also for SPA templates, AEM extensions, API Mesh, Asset Compute workers, and MCP server projects. Also handles debugging init failures — template not found, `aio app init` hangs or times out, Node version mismatches, npm install failures, post-init build errors, `aio login` issues, `aio app run` showing nothing, or `aio console project create` / `workspace create` / `workspace api add` errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates complete AEM components with dialog, HTL template, Sling Model, unit tests, and clientlibs. Supports extending Core Components and project components. When a Figma design URL is provided, fetches the design via Figma MCP (get_design_context) and translates it into pixel-perfect HTL, CSS, and JS. Follows Adobe Experience League best practices for AEM Cloud Service and 6.5. Use this skill whenever the user mentions creating, building, generating, or scaffolding an AEM component, or mentions component types like teaser, card, hero, banner, accordion, tabs, carousel, list, navigation, breadcrumb, or any custom AEM component. Also trigger when the user wants to extend a Core Component, create a component dialog, add a Sling Model, or convert a Figma design into an AEM component.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan an AEM Edge Delivery Services page for WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility violations and generate specific fixes. Identifies missing alt text, heading hierarchy issues, link text problems, color contrast concerns, and EDS-specific accessibility patterns. Use when fixing accessibility issues, preparing for compliance audits, or remediating WCAG violations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for any question about a codebase, its architecture, file relationships, or project content — especially when graphify-out/ exists, where the question should be treated as a graphify query first. Turns any input (code, docs, papers, images, videos) into a persistent knowledge graph with god nodes, community detection, and query/path/explain tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimized workflows for OpenCode IDE with MiMo v2.5 free model

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize OpenCode IDE configuration and workflows for this portfolio

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create new React components, API routes, SWR hooks, and context providers following repo patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build beautiful, responsive, accessible UIs using React, Tailwind CSS, Framer Motion, and the Vercel Web Interface Guidelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides advanced UI/UX design intelligence for portfolio and app work, including design system selection, palette and typography guidance, and implementation checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create clear, concise technical documentation, READMEs, and guides.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Silent failure hunting routing. Use when a change might pass while skipping work, swallowing errors, losing evidence, weakening gates, or reporting false success; do not use for broad code review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve one exact official/current documentation gap when the user requests source verification or a version-sensitive API/SDK/provider/framework question can materially change the current decision; do not trigger for every implementation decision, ordinary framework code, local business logic, or broad research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run one bounded adversarial pass when the user explicitly requests a report-style stress test or ROSE identifies a concrete material loophole in an existing strategy, spec, plan, review, or claim; do not trigger for an interactive grill/frontier interview or merely before write-back, implementation, reconciliation, or completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a bounded red-green-refactor feedback loop only when the user explicitly requests TDD, accepts reproduction-first proof for a bug, or an accepted high-risk behavior specifically requires red/green evidence; do not trigger for every logic, bug, behavior, or implementation change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, revise, or evaluate repository Agent Skills when the user asks to write a SKILL.md, improve triggers or information hierarchy, restructure references/scripts/assets, or diagnose skill predictability; do not use for product code, AGENTS.md initialization, general prompt editing, or automatic repository-wide cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, edit, fix, or explain Mermaid diagrams for relationships, decision branches, interactions, lifecycles, and data models; also use when the parent selects a diagram to materially clarify an explanation. Do not trigger for simple status, one fact, short lists, quantitative charts, or marketing slides.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a single academic paper, preprint, DOI, arXiv link, or user-provided PDF/text with source-grounded critique. Use for paper summaries, methodology review, novelty checks, reproducibility concerns, or "review this paper" requests; do not use for multi-paper surveys, systematic literature reviews, citation management, or implementation from a paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or modify production UI components, layouts, client state, responsive behavior, accessibility, or UX inside an app when that frontend surface is the primary deliverable; do not trigger for rich campaign/media pages, backend integration, every user-facing text change, delegated browser QA, or review alone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research one bounded mature-project/prior-art question when the user explicitly asks how established projects handle it or ROSE names a decision-shaping prior-art gap; do not trigger automatically for IDEATE, DEFINE, BUILD, implementation, local review, or every design choice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code-review quality gate and test-enhancement rubric. Use when ROSE needs sharper review output contracts, severity and risk prioritization, evidence anchors, negative review cases, fixture or golden-output drift guidance, or a Chinese review report profile; do not use as a duplicate code-review agent or final PASS authority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optional focused post-implementation review routing. Use only when the user requests review or the changed surface has a clear specialist evidence need that direct diff inspection and the smallest relevant check cannot cover. Never creates an automatic review swarm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate or edit a source-grounded newsletter issue, digest, or briefing from provided or researched sources. Use for weekly/monthly updates, curated links, executive digests, community newsletters, or "turn these sources into a newsletter"; do not use for UI landing pages, marketing campaign design, unsourced news claims, or long-form research reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

E2E artifact handling routing. Use when traces, videos, screenshots, reports, or failure bundles need controlled repository-local placement; do not use for simple unit tests or production-mutating E2E flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides stable API and interface design. Use when designing APIs, module boundaries, or any public interface. Use when creating REST or GraphQL endpoints, defining type contracts between modules, or establishing boundaries between frontend and backend.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。