「gate」の検索結果

Walks a person through code changes one step at a time in conversation, starting at the entry point and following the flow that changes, showing a small chunk per step and explaining it in plain language. Defaults to the current branch's changes, and walks the code from the perspective of any context provided instead — a file, directory, symbol, pull request, plan, or ticket. Use when someone wants to be walked through, taught, paced through, or shown around code or a branch step by step, or to learn how a change works before reviewing or extending it. Stops after every step and waits, so the learner sets the pace. Paces through code that already exists and builds nothing — to build new work while being paced through it, use pairing. Does not produce a written overview to read alone — use code-overview. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not diagnose bugs — use investigate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-based investigation of issues, bugs, API calls, integrations, and other aspects of software development that need a deep dive to find the root cause and solutions. Use when you need to debug, troubleshoot, diagnose, or figure out why something is broken. Does not review code for quality or style — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting review feedback to GitHub. Does not assess architectural health or structural risk — use architectural-analysis for architectural concerns. Does not research open-ended options, prior art, or how something works when nothing is broken — use research for that. Does not plan the structural change a root cause calls for — use plan-a-change. Does not map bounded contexts or domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches an open-ended question — options, possible solutions, prior art, trade-offs, or how something works — and produces a durable, evidence-backed, adversarially-validated report that recommends an option without committing the team to any artifact. Use when you want to research approaches, weigh options, survey prior art or the state of the art, or understand how something works before committing to a direction. Does not diagnose a bug, failure, or root cause — use investigate. Does not specify a feature — use plan-a-feature. Does not create or update a coding standard — use coding-standard. Does not compare two concrete artifacts for gaps — use gap-analysis. Does not assess an existing module's architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Restructure existing code without changing its behavior, through a test-gated refactoring loop: a named target, a green suite over that target before any edit, a planned sequence of small named refactorings, and the full suite re-run after every step. Use when the user wants to refactor, restructure, clean up, simplify, or improve the design of existing code, or to apply refactoring recommendations from a code-review or architectural-analysis report. This skill changes code; it does not review code (use code-review), assess architecture (use architectural-analysis), plan a multi-module restructure before executing it (use plan-a-change), map domain boundaries before restructuring along them (use ddd-analysis), or build new behavior test-first (use tdd). Do not use it on code inside an active tdd loop; the refactor step of tdd owns that cleanup. Runs its planned sequence to completion without pausing for review; to review each named refactoring as it lands, use pairing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes an existing codebase using strategic Domain-Driven Design to discover bounded contexts, surface ubiquitous language and semantic collisions, find places where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries, and produce an evidence-backed domain and context map. Use when the goal is DDD-specific: bounded context discovery, ubiquitous language analysis, domain model discovery, or mapping contested ownership and responsibility. The entire repository is a valid scope; no module or directory must be named first. Does not assess architectural coupling, cohesion, or technical debt — use architectural-analysis. Does not design service communication, integration patterns, or deployment topology — use architectural-analysis or plan-a-feature. Does not refactor code, diagnose bugs, or review code quality — use refactor, investigate, or code-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sharpens and stress-tests an existing plan file through multiple codebase-grounded review passes, editing it in place and recording every finding and iteration in cross-referenced companion files. Use this skill whenever the user wants to iterate on, refine, tighten, or improve a plan. Also use it when the user asks to verify, validate, or confirm feasibility of an approach. Does not implement plan steps, write test plans, review code, or investigate bugs, and does not generate new plans from scratch — use plan-a-feature for a new plan. Runs its review rounds to completion without pausing between them; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans an architecture-driven change to code that already exists: module boundaries, type responsibilities, layering, coupling, and the public surface a revision moves. Produces a buildable change plan that names the types, modules, and methods involved and records the surface delta each change makes. Use when the user wants to plan, scope, or sequence a restructure, extraction, split, consolidation, responsibility shift, or API revision of existing code, including "these responsibilities are wrong, plan the fix". Does not assess an area and stop at findings — use architectural-analysis. Does not specify new behavior — use plan-a-feature. Does not diagnose a bug — use investigate. Does not write the code — use refactor to restructure it or tdd to build it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes with code-overview and publishes the resulting overview to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants code or a PR explained, oriented, or made sense of AND the overview posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not produce the overview to a local file only — use code-overview. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not document an already-understood feature to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence. Does not root-cause a bug to Confluence — use investigate-to-confluence. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence. Does not publish to Jira — use work-items-to-jira.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the Crabbox wrapper for OpenClaw remote validation across Linux, macOS, Windows, and WSL2, including delegated Blacksmith Testbox proof. Report the actual provider and id.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing, testing, or preparing ANY contribution or pull request to the JSONbored/awesome-claude (HeyClaude) repo — adding a community content entry (agent/MCP server/skill/hook/command/rule/guide/collection/statusline), or making a platform/code change (website, registry package, MCP package, scripts). The repo has two separate review paths: a private, one-shot "HeyClaude submission gate" that decides single-file content PRs, and the shared gittensory-orb bot that posts an advisory readiness/linked-issue comment on platform/code PRs but does not itself merge or close content PRs. Unlike JSONbored/gittensory and JSONbored/metagraphed, a linked issue is OPTIONAL here — do not import their mandatory-linked-issue rule into this repo. Invoke for any "contribute to / open a PR against / submit an entry to / fix a bug in awesome-claude (HeyClaude)" task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scores a riso film or reworks its score. Designs the cue list from the film's FILM.md events, builds a deterministic renderAudio() from the sound kit in studies/sound.html, iterates with tools/audio.mjs, gates determinism, length, loudness and sync, and records measured results in FILM.md. Use for "score this film", "add sound/music", "the climax is too loud", "fix the handoff at 16 s", "check the mix", sound effects, foley or a soundtrack on a riso film. Not for drawing or motion (riso-film) or changing tools/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publication-figure overlay for draw.io. Use instead of drawio whenever the diagram is for a paper, thesis, dissertation, journal, conference, IEEE/ACM submission, manuscript, camera-ready, Word/LaTeX figure, or other publication. Applies venue, figure-type, color, caption/legend, formula, and paper-readability gates for architecture, workflow, roadmap, network-topology, and replicated paper figures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create original short videos using the 连续变线｜逐层防守到垂直终结 Creative DNA for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when the user wants this causal, camera, motion, rhythm, or payoff structure with new subjects and surfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create original short videos using the 图形赛道｜穿越圆门、障碍升级与单人收束 Creative DNA for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when the user wants this causal, camera, motion, rhythm, or payoff structure with new subjects and surfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when scanning code for security vulnerabilities. Use when user says "scan security", "kiểm tra bảo mật", "security audit", "review security", or invokes `/vbs-scan-security`. Auto-delegates to sub-agents for large scans (>20 main-language files OR >30 total OR >14 days). Outputs bilingual reports (vi/en). Optional `--auto-fix` (agentic patch + verify loop) and `--sca` (live CVE lookup via OSV.dev).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate MCP tool availability, discovery, and selection, including controlled adoption evaluations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate how a concept, code path, application, network flow, system, incident, document, or local artifact actually works, then deliver a two-depth visual HTML explainer with a dead-simple big-picture first layer and source-backed technical depth behind it. Use when the user invokes $xray, asks how something works under the hood, wants a module or app behavior traced across boundaries, requests web, code, network, or safe static artifact research before explanation, or asks for an evidence-backed explainer. Do not use for answer-only definitions, general web design, full codebase audits, or invasive binary reverse engineering without explicit authorization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, diagnose, and verify performance budgets, latency targets, load tests, capacity estimates, bottleneck analysis, caching strategy, query efficiency, queue throughput, and regression gates. Use when a feature may be slow, a system must scale, a performance regression is suspected, or release readiness depends on throughput, cost, memory, CPU, or response time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user explicitly asks for $threads, Codex-native subagents, 开几个子 agent, or a GitHub issue/PR queue needing parallel lanes, worktrees, review/merge gates, and closure audit. Do not use for OS/language threads, chat/email/forum threads, or Assistants product threads unless Codex workflow orchestration is explicit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and verify software releases with versioning, changelogs, release branches, feature flags, canaries, migration gates, rollback, deployment checks, and release readiness. Use when preparing a release, shipping a risky PR, coordinating app/backend/database rollout, recovering from a bad deploy, or defining release policy for a repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guard long, ambiguous, or stateful AI-agent work from drift. Use when the user asks to run or continue a multi-step task, autonomous loop, bug fix, repo change, PR readiness check, compaction handoff, resume from previous context, cost-control checkpoint, or any task likely to span many tool calls, files, sessions, agents, or verification gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the mental models and frameworks of Andrej Karpathy (deep learning, former Director of AI at Tesla, founding member of OpenAI, Eureka Labs). Use this skill whenever you are helping the user build neural networks from scratch, debug deep learning pipelines, evaluate AI agent workflows, design LLM apps, or navigate the transition to Software 3.0 (vibe coding). It is highly relevant for pedagogy (untangling complex knowledge), assessing AI capabilities vs. limitations (jagged intelligence, tokenization limits), and architectural decisions (end-to-end optimization vs. complex pipelines). Reach for this whenever discussing LLM training, autonomous systems, or AI-assisted coding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a Rezolus performance recording (.parquet, .rez, .dendro) through the rezolus MCP server. Discovery before query, verdicts and marks written back, links to the viewer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Native Rust browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, navigate pages, fill forms, click buttons, take screenshots, share a live browser view, narrate browser actions, extract structured data, run assertions, test web apps, mock network requests, or automate any browser task. Triggers include "open a website", "fill out a form", "take a screenshot", "show me the browser", "share the screen", "pause the browser", "step through this", "scrape data", "test this web app", "login to a site", "visual regression test", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。