「cis」の検索結果

Decision guide for delegating to caveman-style subagents. Tells the main thread WHEN to spawn `cavecrew-investigator` (locate code), `cavecrew-builder` (1-2 file edit), or `cavecrew-reviewer` (diff review) instead of doing the work inline or using vanilla `Explore`. Subagent output is caveman-compressed so the tool-result injected back into main context is ~60% smaller — main context lasts longer across long sessions. Trigger: "delegate to subagent", "use cavecrew", "spawn investigator/builder/reviewer", "save context", "compressed agent output".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve an explanation with a bounded critique-and-revision pass and unresolved-evidence notes. Use for this Bot Generator Bot template; creates drafts or simulations within its declared scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a concrete implementation plan for missing decisions, feasibility and risk before execution; read-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize React rendering, bundle size, and data flow with profiler-led decisions. Use when reducing re-renders, fixing waterfalls, or deciding whether memoization is warranted in React.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts bounded cybersecurity engagement plans with objectives, scope, exclusions, roles, authorization, runtime controls, evidence, stop criteria, and restart gates. Use when preparing an exercise or assessment plan before execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Captures redacted, provenance-aware cybersecurity observations with shared status fields, independent ground truth, and honest limitations. Use when recording exercise evidence, findings, validation results, or security-review handoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates cyber exercise authorization, scope, exclusions, runtime controls, expiry, stop and restart gates. Use when planning or reviewing authorized security activity, scope drift, or unsupported execution environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintains sparse, reviewable cybersecurity framework edges with versioned IDs, relation, rationale, source, and review status. Use when mapping exercise observations or procedures to NIST, ATT&CK, or another named framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standardizes the creation and evaluation of high-density Agent Skills (Claude, Cursor, Windsurf). Ensures skills achieve high Activation (specificity/completeness) and Implementation (conciseness/actionability) scores. Use when: writing or auditing SKILL.md, improving trigger accuracy, or refactoring skills to reduce redundancy and maximize token ROI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rules for writing concise, token-efficient workflow and skill files. Prevents over-building that requires costly optimization passes. Use when creating or editing workflow files, SKILL.md files, or new skill definitions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates bounded cybersecurity exercise observations against approved scope, expected behavior, runtime controls, and redacted evidence. Use when performing safe offline validation or authorized runtime checks with explicit stop and status gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan a rewrite as vertical slices and hand each one to /phx:plan as a requirements seed with binding decisions, contracts and acceptance criteria. Use after /rewrite:architect, or for the next slice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Document tested Elixir APIs; may update README/ADRs. Not for docs lookup, audits/reviews, or standalone decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive briefing of a plan file — explains reasoning, schema decisions, component choices. Use when developers need to understand a plan before approving.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactive briefing of a plan file — explains reasoning, schema decisions, component choices. Use when developers need to understand a plan before approving.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The Balanced Coupling model for software design. Use when: designing modular architectures, evaluating coupling between components, reviewing code modularity, deciding whether to split or merge modules/services, assessing integration patterns, classifying coupling as balanced or unbalanced, applying DDD strategic and tactical patterns, reasoning about cohesion vs coupling trade-offs, identifying distributed monolith risks, or explaining why a system is hard to change. Provides the three-dimensional framework (integration strength, distance, volatility) and the balance rule for making coupling decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when a Ralph phase must identify critical user decisions, run a layered grill, persist partial answers, obtain explicit approval, or resume an interrupted phase interview before delegating artifact work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when generating spec artifacts (research.md, requirements.md, design.md, tasks.md), formatting agent output, structuring phase results, or when any Ralph agent needs guidance on concise, scannable output formatting. Applies to all Ralph spec phase agents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Output rules for all agents - concise, scannable, actionable. Based on Matt Pocock's planning principles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set a tracking document as the source of truth for the current feature or task. Use when starting work on a feature, bug fix, or multi-step task that benefits from a persistent record of decisions, discoveries, and progress. Keeps the document updated as work proceeds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and manage todo tracking documents for features, bugs, and multi-step tasks. Use when starting new work that benefits from a persistent record of decisions, progress, and context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agents should invoke this skill for academic or technical papers, arXiv/PubMed/IEEE/ACM links, PDFs, methodology review, limitations, practical implications, or extracting findings for engineering decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the full speckit workflow end-to-end — specify, plan, critique, tasks, implement, review — making all decisions autonomously. Stops before extract; run that manually.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。