「aims」の検索結果

[omh] Deep dive before a decision: deep research engine - grounding for specs and decisions: study open-source reference implementations with pinned refs, gather live web evidence with citation discipline, verify contested claims, and distill a decision-grounding dossier that planning consumes; for a decision brief use research-brief, for upstream guidance use web-research. Use when the user says: research plan, literature review, research literature, review recent papers, deep research, deep-research, exhaustive research, saturation research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Outdated or wrong Hermes memory entries: English-canonical Hermes memory-review guidance: inspect USER.md and MEMORY.md claims and prepare a native write diff without invoking, applying, or observing a native write; for a new fact use memory-new, and for a past decision use decision-recall. Use when the user says: memory-sync, memory curation, memory review, memory inspect, memory check, memory update, context cleanup, curate memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct enterprise-grade research with multi-source synthesis, citation tracking, and verification. Use when user needs comprehensive analysis requiring 10+ sources, verified claims, or comparison of approaches. Triggers include "deep research", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "compare X vs Y", or "analyze trends". Do NOT use for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate research rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, evidence quality (GRADE, Cochrane ROB), for critical analysis of scientific claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Health-check the wiki for contradictions, stale claims, orphan pages, missing cross-references, and knowledge gaps. Use periodically or when the user says 'lint the wiki' or 'check wiki health'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "turn this idea into posts for every platform", "write the X thread / LinkedIn post / 小红书 note", or "spec the carousel slides"; turns one idea into N platform-native ready-to-paste packages — post/thread, caption, Threads text, 小红书 note, link post with first-comment placement — each adapted per the dated platform norm card (never verbatim cross-posting), every product claim held to approved claims-ledger wording or flagged [needs source], every variant tagged {formula | hook family | CTA type | signal optimized}, plus a carousel slide-spec mode (intro/content/outro slide roles, per-element char budgets, 小红书 3:4 / IG 4:5 / LinkedIn document PDF artboards, text-safe-zone + alt-text checklist). Not for creator deliverable briefs — use brief-generator; not for repurposing existing assets with paid boost — use content-amplifier. 社媒文案/一稿多发改写/小红书笔记/轮播图脚本

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "design our change narrative", "build the old-world-to-new-game story arc", or "frame the shift our category is undergoing"; produces a Raskin-style strategic narrative arc — old world → the undeniable shift → winners vs losers under the new rules → the promised land → proof the promised land is real — derived from the positioning truth set and the belief/objection map, feeding the TALE Architecture arc sub-item. Every proof beat is labeled Measured / User-provided / [needs source] and this skill never adjudicates a claim. Not for the message house hierarchy — use message-system-architect; not for the pitch deck narrative — use pitch-narrative-builder; not for claim substantiation — use offer-claims-registry. 变革叙事弧/旧世界/应许之地/战略叙事结构

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "map what our surfaces say today", "inventory our current messaging", or "find the gap between what we say and what we mean"; produces the narrative baseline — a surface-by-surface inventory of what every owned touchpoint (homepage, pricing, docs, decks, social bios, email footers) claims RIGHT NOW, each line labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated, plus a per-surface gap read vs the intended message and the drift-baseline snapshot the Evaluate phase measures future drift against. Not for authoring the canon — use message-system-architect; not for scoring the surfaces or running the vetoes — use narrative-quality-auditor. 现状叙事盘点/各触点口径/意图差距/漂移基线

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build a message house", "write a PR-FAQ for our launch", or "define the launch narrative and value pillars"; derives from the positioning canvas a message house — tagline, one-liner, three value pillars, per-persona proof points (each labeled Measured / User-provided / [needs source]) — plus a working-backwards PR-FAQ narrative spine (launch-day tense, empty-chair test, five external + five internal FAQs) and per-channel message angle packs (angles, not finished copy). Not for the positioning canvas itself — use positioning-mapper; not for finished blog posts or pages — use content-writer; not for ad or email units — use each discipline creative builder; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry. 消息屋/PR-FAQ/价值支柱/发布叙事

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "map the category narrative", "tear down how competitors tell their story", or "find the language conventions in our market"; produces a category narrative map — the dominant stories and points of view in the category, its language conventions and framing clichés, and a per-competitor narrative teardown (arc, claimed onlyness, proof pattern) plus how each rival's messaging has shifted over time (scraped copy vs archived copy). Not for the positioning canvas itself — use positioning-mapper; not for the beachhead's beliefs and objections — use audience-belief-mapper; not for SERP keyword targeting — use keyword-research; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry. 品类叙事/竞争叙事拆解/语言惯例/叙事演变

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "map our positioning", "name our competitive alternatives", or "pick a beachhead segment for the launch"; produces a Dunford-style positioning canvas — named competitive alternatives (including spreadsheet and status quo), unique attributes (verifiable, or routed to the claims ledger), value themes (attribute→benefit→value chains), a target beachhead segment scored on serviceability / pain intensity / reachability, and a one-sentence onlyness statement — the sole upstream of the message house and the entity-signal source for the canonical entity profile. Not for the message house or per-channel launch copy — use message-house-builder; not for audience/persona profiling itself — use audience-mapper; not for SEO keyword positioning — use keyword-research. 定位画布/竞争替代品/独特价值/滩头细分

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "author our durable brand message hierarchy", "build the brand message house that seeds the canon", or "define the main narrative, three pillars, and tagline for the whole brand"; produces the DURABLE brand message system — main narrative, three value pillars, per-persona proof points (each labeled Measured / User-provided / '[needs source]'), and the tagline/one-liner — that seeds the narrative-registry canon and from which every per-launch house derives. Not for a single launch's message house or PR-FAQ — use message-house-builder; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry; not for the change-narrative arc itself — use strategic-narrative-designer. 品牌消息屋/主叙事/三支柱/标语/持久叙事 canon

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "plan how our narrative lands on every surface", "write per-surface message-match specs", or "brief each creative builder from the canon"; maps the narrative-registry canon onto every flagship surface (homepage, pricing, store listing, sales deck, social bio, docs, email) as a per-surface message-match spec — what claim, pillar, proof, and objection reframe each surface must carry — and cuts a handoff brief to each discipline's creative builder (content-writer, ad-creative-builder, email-creative-builder, social-creative-builder, message-house-builder), so the same story lands consistently everywhere. Not for writing the finished surface copy — use each discipline creative builder; not for the tier-scoped launch asset manifest — use launch-asset-packager; not for scoring cross-surface consistency — use narrative-quality-auditor; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry. 叙事落地/逐面消息一致/创意交接简报/画布传导

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "map what our buyers believe", "capture the objections we keep hearing", or "find the switching forces that move the beachhead"; produces a belief map of the beachhead — held beliefs and mental models, the recurring objections and their reframes, and the JTBD four forces (push of the problem, pull of the new, anxiety of switching, habit of the present) — each item sourced from interviews or win-loss notes (User-provided) and labeled Measured / User-provided / Estimated, with any unverified quote or comparative claim marked "[needs source]" and routed to the claims candidates, never adjudicated here. Not for demographic or persona profiling — use audience-mapper; not for the positioning canvas — use positioning-truth-tracer. 受众信念/异议地图/切换四力/流失语言

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "codify our brand voice", "define naming rules for our products and tiers", or "write the tone-of-voice guide with banned phrases"; produces the brand-level voice canon (register, tone spectrum, banned-phrase list, few-shot examples drawn only from the brand's own published material) and the naming tax (product / feature / tier naming rules plus approved and banned terms) that seeds the narrative-registry canon and that every channel's voice adaptation points up to. Not for per-platform voice adaptation — use channel-registry's voice-dossier; not for finished copy or blog posts — use content-writer; not for the message hierarchy itself — use message-system-architect; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry. 品牌语气/词汇表/命名税/禁用词/品牌语言规范

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "write the email", "draft subject lines", or "build email creative"; produces the pre-click unit — subject-line variants + preheader, body copy, one clear CTA, and a plain-text alt — message-matched to the destination page and claims-ledger-aware. Not for pre-scoring or ranking subject-line variants (spam/truncation/render pre-score) — use subject-line-lab; not for scoring the email or computing EQS — use email-quality-auditor; not for the multi-step flow — use email-sequence-designer; not for the A/B test plan — use send-experiment-designer. 邮件文案/主题行/邮件创意

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render a self-contained HTML viewer for a pro-workflow wiki. Pages, sources, claims, seed queue, page-link graph and full-text search all in one file. No external dependencies, no JS framework, S3-uploadable. Use when the user wants to browse a wiki visually, share its current state with someone, audit research progress, or hand off a knowledge base. Inspired by Thariq Shihipar's "Unreasonable Effectiveness of HTML" — favors information density and shareability over markdown-only outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-grow a pro-workflow wiki by running a budget-capped BFS research loop over pluggable source fetchers (web, arXiv, GitHub). Each iteration pops a seed from the queue, fetches sources, drafts a wiki page, dedupes claims against existing pages, enqueues follow-up seeds. Halts on budget cap, depth cap, or convergence. Use when the user says "research <topic>", "grow the <slug> wiki", "auto-research", or wants a knowledge base that builds itself overnight.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when doing ANY task involving Supabase. Triggers: Supabase products (Database, Auth, Edge Functions, Realtime, Storage, Vectors, Cron, Queues); client libraries and SSR integrations (supabase-js, @supabase/ssr) in Next.js, React, SvelteKit, Astro, Remix; auth issues (login, logout, sessions, JWT, cookies, getSession, getUser, getClaims, RLS); Supabase CLI or MCP server; schema changes, migrations, declarative schemas, security audits, Postgres extensions (pg_graphql, pg_cron, pg_vector); debugging and troubleshooting errors or unexpected behavior on Supabase projects (HTTP errors, Postgres errors, RLS surprises, permission denied, schema cache issues, timeouts, Edge Function crashes, Realtime drops, Storage failures) and reading or querying logs (Logs Explorer, ClickHouse).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Formulate evidence-bounded scientific questions, candidate hypotheses, rival explanations, causal or associational claims, discriminating predictions, measurements, and preregistration-ready analysis plans. Use when turning observations or preliminary findings into transparent, testable research plans without treating hypotheses as facts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Standards and audits for writing academic papers, especially ML/NLP submissions to NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, EMNLP, NAACL. Covers the author's house prose rules (zero em dashes, zero fluff, every sentence earns its place), verification of hallucinated claims and hallucinated or malformed bibliography entries, the ACL policy on AI writing assistance and what must be disclosed, and best practices for paper structure, experiments, reproducibility checklists, and rebuttals. Use this skill whenever the user is drafting, editing, polishing, restructuring, or reviewing a paper, abstract, intro, related work, rebuttal, or camera-ready; whenever they ask to "clean up" or "tighten" academic writing; whenever citations or a .bib file need checking; and whenever they ask what has to be disclosed about AI assistance. Reach for it even when the user only says "make this section better", "check my references", or "is this ready to submit".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aligns learning material to the standard it claims — choosing the right framework for the grade and subject, citing standards by code rather than reproducing their text, and telling a real alignment from a decorative one. Use this to align a worksheet, lesson or workbook to Common Core, NGSS or a state framework, to check an alignment claim before publishing, or to decide what may lawfully be printed on the cover.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。