「architecture analysis」の検索結果

Choose multi-agent architectures using environment-first analysis, coordination pressure, commitment tuning, and knowledge levels. Use for autonomy design, protocol choice, and coordination failures. NOT for single-agent planning, centralized schedulers, or prompt-only swarms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architecture decisions, trade-off analysis, and ADR authoring. Trigger when a significant technical decision needs to be made, documented, and owned — not when an implementation detail needs a choice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explore open-source GitHub repository source trees via web browsing to analyze and compare feature implementations at the code level. Supports two modes: cross-project comparison and single-project deep dive. Use when evaluating how OSS projects implement a specific feature, choosing architecture patterns, or benchmarking implementation strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Architecture] Use when you need to analyze business domain: bounded contexts, aggregates, entities, ERD, domain events, and cross-context integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing a repository for evidence-backed gaps between code, SPECs, architecture, and documentation — before a release, after a review, or when the user asks what is missing or divergent. Confirmed gaps become Draft SPECs via write-specs, a tracked GitHub Epic via create-issues, and orchestrated execution via orchestrator, with an explicit approval gate before any external action.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for Salesforce system development and operations management. Use this skill when working with Salesforce configuration, customization, bug analysis, troubleshooting access/permission issues, designing system architecture, or implementing custom Apex/LWC development. Covers sharing settings, approval processes, trigger patterns, integration design, and data modeling best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NASA Fault Management Handbook (NASA-HDBK-1002, Draft 2, April 2012). Use for the systems-engineering discipline of designing what a system does when it fails — the fault/failure/anomaly vocabulary, the five FM strategies (two prevention strategies — design-time fault avoidance and operational failure avoidance — plus three tolerance strategies — failure masking, failure recovery, and goal change), the six FM process activities across NASA mission phases Pre-A to E, response-latency-versus-time-to-criticality (TTC) design trades, fault/failure containment regions and FEPPs, the four redundancy approaches, top-down FM requirements development, FM verification vs. validation, the seven dedicated FM milestone reviews (FMCR/FMARR/FMPDR/FMCDR/FMTRR/FMLRR/FMCERR), FM organizational structure, and mined NASA Lessons Learned. Space-mission oriented (flight/ground/operations); spacecraft examples throughout. IMPORTANT: built from an UNAPPROVED DRAFT — several sections (detailed architecture building blocks, the Assessment & Analysis guidance, and Operations & Maintenance) are placeholders in the source and are thin here. Thin on detailed FDIR algorithms, terrestrial/IT fault management, and any approved-standard terminology that may have changed since Draft 2.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision protocol for strategic work: recall the knowledge vault, run a gap analysis, emit a deep-research prompt for external tools, then synthesize the returned reports into a decision memo. Use before any new product, feature, market, pricing, GTM or architecture call, where local recall alone is not enough. Triggers: "/alfa-search-recall-deepresearch", "alpha protocol", "R+DR".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured decision-making framework for technical proposals and trade-off analysis. When the user faces a choice between multiple approaches (architecture decisions, tool selection, refactoring strategies, migration paths), this skill produces a 1-3-1 format: one clear problem statement, three distinct options with pros/cons, and one concrete recommendation with definition of done and implementation plan. Use when the user asks for a "1-3-1", says "give me options", or needs help choosing between competing approaches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a documentation expert specializing in creating comprehensive, maintainable documentation from code. Generate API docs, architecture diagrams, user guides, and technical references using AI-powered analysis and industry best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a documentation expert specializing in creating comprehensive, maintainable documentation from code. Generate API docs, architecture diagrams, user guides, and technical references using AI-powered analysis and industry best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive fullstack development skill for building complete web applications with React, Next.js, Node.js, GraphQL, and PostgreSQL. Includes project scaffolding, code quality analysis, architecture patterns, and complete tech stack guidance. Use when building new projects, analyzing code quality, implementing design patterns, or setting up development workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review Stellar Community Fund (SCF) Build Award applications. Use when evaluating SCF submissions, covering project fit assessment, technical architecture evaluation, team readiness, traction validation, budget analysis, and funding recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tech health check: documentation, security, architecture, data analysis. Use when user requests project audit, tech debt review, or health check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform 12-Factor App compliance analysis on any codebase. Use when evaluating application architecture, auditing SaaS applications, or reviewing cloud-native applications against the original 12-Factor methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fits structural equation models to GWAS summary statistics using GenomicSEM (Grotzinger 2019), including common-factor models, confirmatory factor models, ESEM, common-factor GWAS with Q_SNP heterogeneity, multivariate Wald tests, and stratified GenomicSEM partitioned heritability. Reconciles results against MTAG multi-trait analysis. Handles sample overlap via the LDSC sampling-covariance matrix, identifies and resolves Heywood cases, and verifies model fit with CFI / RMSEA. Use when modeling latent genetic architecture across correlated traits, running multivariate GWAS on a shared factor, distinguishing factor-mediated from trait-specific SNP effects, or comparing GenomicSEM common-factor results against MTAG when both depend on accurate sampling covariance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fits structural equation models to GWAS summary statistics using GenomicSEM (Grotzinger 2019), including common-factor models, confirmatory factor models, ESEM, common-factor GWAS with Q_SNP heterogeneity, multivariate Wald tests, and stratified GenomicSEM partitioned heritability. Reconciles results against MTAG multi-trait analysis. Handles sample overlap via the LDSC sampling-covariance matrix, identifies and resolves Heywood cases, and verifies model fit with CFI / RMSEA. Use when modeling latent genetic architecture across correlated traits, running multivariate GWAS on a shared factor, distinguishing factor-mediated from trait-specific SNP effects, or comparing GenomicSEM common-factor results against MTAG when both depend on accurate sampling covariance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic SEO planning for new or existing websites. Industry-specific templates, competitive analysis, content strategy, and implementation roadmap. Use when user says "SEO plan", "SEO strategy", "SEO planning", "content strategy", "keyword strategy", "content calendar", "site architecture", or "SEO roadmap".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform 12-Factor App compliance analysis on any codebase. Use when evaluating application architecture, auditing SaaS applications, or reviewing cloud-native applications against the original 12-Factor methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured decision-making framework for technical proposals and trade-off analysis. When the user faces a choice between multiple approaches (architecture decisions, tool selection, refactoring strategies, migration paths), this skill produces a 1-3-1 format: one clear problem statement, three distinct options with pros/cons, and one concrete recommendation with definition of done and implementation plan. Use when the user asks for a "1-3-1", says "give me options", or needs help choosing between competing approaches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate wiki docs + Mermaid diagrams for any codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert database optimizer specializing in modern performance tuning, query optimization, and scalable architectures. Masters advanced indexing, N+1 resolution, multi-tier caching, partitioning strategies, and cloud database optimization. Handles complex query analysis, migration strategies, and performance monitoring. Use PROACTIVELY for database optimization, performance issues, or scalability challenges.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are a documentation expert specializing in creating comprehensive, maintainable documentation from code. Generate API docs, architecture diagrams, user guides, and technical references using AI-powered analysis and industry best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data structures and algorithms for AI agent episodic memory. Covers vector stores (HNSW, IVF, PQ), temporal indexing, knowledge graphs with triple stores, hierarchical summarization, forgetting curves, working/long-term/ procedural memory, and memory consolidation. Deep analysis of MemGPT/Letta, Zep/Graphiti, Mem0, and the Stanford generative agents memory architecture. Teaches the CS fundamentals behind how agents remember, retrieve, and forget. Activate on: "agent memory", "episodic memory", "vector search algorithm", "HNSW", "memory retrieval", "forgetting curve", "knowledge graph memory", "MemGPT", "Letta", "Zep", "Mem0", "memory consolidation", "temporal retrieval", "agent long-term memory", "memory layer". NOT for: conversation protocol design (use agent-conversation-protocols), agent infrastructure selection (use agentic-infrastructure-2026), building RAG pipelines (use ai-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。