「audit」の検索結果

Audits existing landing pages for conversion rate optimization. Scores hero section, CTA placement, social proof, objection handling, and form friction on a 1-10 scale. Use when someone says 'audit my landing page', 'improve conversions', 'why isn't my page converting', 'CRO audit', 'landing page feedback', 'optimize my signup page', 'page review', 'conversion rate', 'bounce rate is high', 'nobody is signing up', or anything about improving an existing page's performance. Even if they just share a URL and say 'what do you think' or 'how can I improve this' — if there's a page involved and conversion matters, this is the skill. Always use this over generic advice when an actual page exists to audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits brand/ files for completeness, consistency, and freshness. Use when the agent or user wants to review brand files, audit marketing docs, check brand consistency, verify brand health, or assess what's missing from brand memory. Produces a structured audit report with per-file scores, cross-file contradiction detection, staleness flags, and recommended next skills to run. This is the quality gate for the brand memory system. Also use when someone says 'check my brand', 'brand audit', 'what's missing', 'is my brand ready', 'brand health', 'review my marketing docs', or before running any campaign to verify brand foundations are solid.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess organizational readiness for financial audits (internal or external). Map assertions to account balances, check evidence completeness, score readiness using a Red/Amber/Green framework, and generate a remediation timeline. Aligned with SOX, IFRS, and GAAP audit standards. Use before scheduled audits or when preparing for first-time compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Focused single-target audit of one Gaia skill, named skill, or real-skill catalog item. Use this skill when: auditing a specific skill by ID or name, a skill looks overpromoted, evidence feels thin or dead, a contributor's skill seems outdated or superseded, the rank doesn't match the source quality, evidence is mapped to the wrong Evidence Type, a skill at 3★+ is missing a working GitHub link, someone asks "does this skill deserve its stars?", or you want the smallest possible correction with validation — not a bulk sweep. This is NOT for bulk curation passes (use /gaia-curate for that) or meta-level registry sweeps (use /gaia-meta-audit). It is specifically for "fix this one skill, get it right."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a prompt the user is about to send to Claude (or another coding AI) for completeness and effectiveness. Use this skill whenever the user shares a prompt and asks for feedback — phrases like "is this prompt good", "audit my prompt", "review this prompt", "will Claude understand this", "improve this prompt", "is this enough context". Also trigger proactively when you notice the user is about to dispatch a vague, under-specified, or over-constrained prompt for non-trivial work. Checks the 6 essential elements (goal, scope, existing patterns, constraints, verification, done definition), flags what's missing, explains why each gap matters, and produces an improved rewrite. Treat this skill as the litmus test for "Be Claude's PM" — if the prompt fails the audit, the work that follows will probably fail too.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Energy Auditor — running a blower-door/duct-leakage diagnostic sequence on a home or light-commercial building, testing combustion appliances for worst-case backdraft risk before recommending air sealing, reconciling utility billing history against walkthrough findings, ranking retrofit measures by savings-to-investment ratio (SIR) for a weatherization or utility rebate program, or writing the prioritized scope of work an install crew executes without the auditor on site. Distinct from an energy-engineer (industrial/commercial capital planning, IPMVP measurement and verification, calibrated simulation) — this role owns the field diagnostics and the residential/light-commercial audit-to-scope handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit markdown files for SEO before publishing. Checks heading structure, meta description, keyword density, content length, link quality, image alt text, and frontmatter completeness. Use when user says "markdown audit", "check my markdown", "SEO check markdown", or "audit this post".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a repo's agent context — CLAUDE.md files, codebase docs, skills, and tool/MCP designs — against Anthropic's Claude 5 context-engineering guidance ("unhobbling": Anthropic cut ~80% of Claude Code's system prompt with no eval loss). Finds overconstraint, conflicting instructions, redundancy, stale facts, and missing "unknown knowns"; produces a scored findings report with concrete rewrites, then applies approved fixes. Use when someone says "audit my CLAUDE.md", "context audit", "unhobble this repo", "review our agent docs/skills/tools", or after upgrading to Claude 5-generation models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a deterministic, read-only health check on an Obsidian wiki. Use for lint, vault health check, audit wiki health, find orphans, find dead links, frontmatter audit, provenance audit, or wiki audit. Reports graph, link, frontmatter, provenance-ledger, empty-section, and stale-index findings; it does not reason broadly or repair files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits, configures, and hardens workload-level security controls for Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) applications and namespaces. Covers running cluster security audits (`audit_cluster.sh`), configuring Workload Identity Federation (impersonation, KSA/GSA binding, and pod setup), enforcing Network Policies (default-deny and Dataplane V2 logging), isolating high-risk pods inside GKE Sandbox (`gVisor`), enforcing Pod Security Standards (`restricted` labeling), and mounting Secret Manager secrets via CSI (`SecretProviderClass`). Use when auditing cluster security posture, isolating namespaces, applying pod security standards, setting up Workload Identity, or configuring network policies and secret volume mounts. Don't use for cluster-wide control plane security, RBAC hardening, Binary Authorization, Shielded Nodes, or enabling platform-level GKE add-ons (use gke-platform-security instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan code for security vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and exposed secrets. Use when a user asks to audit security, find vulnerabilities, check for OWASP issues, scan for secrets, review dependencies for CVEs, detect SQL injection, find XSS vulnerabilities, or harden an application. Covers OWASP Top 10, dependency auditing, secrets detection, and generates fix recommendations with severity ratings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "site isn't ranking," "Google update hit me," "page speed," "core web vitals," "crawl errors," or "indexing issues." Use this even if the user just says something vague like "my SEO is bad" or "help with SEO" — start with an audit. For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema-markup. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," "SEO health check," "my traffic dropped," "lost rankings," "not showing up in Google," "site isn't ranking," "Google update hit me," "page speed," "core web vitals," "crawl errors," or "indexing issues." Use this even if the user just says something vague like "my SEO is bad" or "help with SEO" — start with an audit. For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema. For AI search optimization, see ai-seo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Whole site or product — a full web accessibility (a11y) audit against WCAG 2.2, following the WCAG-EM methodology. Defines scope, samples representative pages and flows, runs the automated tier (`accessibility-scan`) and the hands-on manual tier (`accessibility-inspect`), and produces one conformance report. Grades each finding by severity and evidence basis, and states per-criterion conformance as pass, fail, or undetermined (needs a human). Use it for 'audit my site for accessibility', 'is this product accessible', 'a11y audit', 'WCAG or Section 508 conformance report', or any multi-page assessment. Assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`) or diff (use `accessibility-diff`). For a single page use `accessibility-scan`; for hands-on keyboard and screen-reader checks use `accessibility-inspect`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WCAG 準拠のアクセシビリティチェックをチェックリスト駆動で実行するスキル。 コンポーネント・ページ・PR に対して Pass/Fail/N/A/Needs review の構造化レポートを 生成し、エビデンスと修正案を提示する。 「アクセシビリティチェック」「a11y チェック」「WCAG をチェック」「a11y レビュー」 「アクセシビリティ監査」「WCAG 準拠確認」「アクセシビリティレポート」への言及、 または PR やコンポーネントのアクセシビリティレビュー依頼で発動する。 English: "check accessibility", "a11y audit", "a11y check", "WCAG review", "accessibility report", "screen reader test", "review for a11y", "review this PR for accessibility", "axe audit"

Use when forensically auditing a Claude Code skill/agent/command/workflow library against RULESET.md by a fixed mechanical protocol — probing every file against the mechanically-checkable rules and reporting CONFORMS / VIOLATES / UNVERIFIABLE / N-A counts with quoted evidence. It casts NO judgment and emits NO pass/fail verdict; counts are the headline. Triggers on "investigate the library", "audit against RULESET", "find every violation", "forensic library audit", "evidence-only check". Not for routing/quality/single-responsibility judgment — use skill-library-review. Not the full sharded sweep — use the audit-library command.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform comprehensive technical reviews of Ruby on Rails applications. Runs automated analysis tools (RubyCritic, Brakeman, bundler-audit, Gitleaks, Debride, linters, SimpleCov, Rails stats, Rails ERD), analyzes code for architecture, security, authorization (Pundit/CanCanCan), dead code, and design issues, and produces a structured markdown report with prioritized findings and a 0-10 score. Use when the user requests a tech review, code audit, project assessment, or quality analysis of a Rails application.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audita los metadatos SEO de una página o ruta (title, description, canonical, Open Graph, robots) frente a las convenciones de SEO del proyecto y enumera lo que falta o está mal. Úsalo cuando la persona pida revisar/auditar el SEO, revisar las meta tags o verificar que una página esté lista para buscadores (p. ej. "audita el SEO de la página de precios", "revisa las meta tags de esta ruta").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only audit of `.claude/` structural overhead. Reports prioritized "remove X save Y tokens" recommendations against the model context window. NOT for monetary cost tracking — that's /mk:budget. NOT for transcript size monitoring — long-session continuity defers to Claude Code native compaction. NOT for runtime context decisions (what to read, when to compact) — see mk:context-engineering. Use when planning to add context capacity, diagnosing perceived slowdowns, or auditing health.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chief Security Officer mode. Infrastructure-first security audit: secrets archaeology, dependency supply chain, CI/CD pipeline security, LLM/AI security, skill supply chain scanning, plus OWASP Top 10, STRIDE threat modeling, and active verification. Two modes: daily (zero-noise, 8/10 confidence gate) and comprehensive (monthly deep scan, 2/10 bar). Trend tracking across audit runs. Use when: "security audit", "threat model", "pentest review", "OWASP", "CSO review".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit an existing UI for usability, hierarchy, accessibility, and conversion problems. Reviews a live URL, screenshot, or codebase against heuristics and reports prioritized issues with fixes. Use when the user says "audit this UI", "what's wrong with this screen", "UX review", "find the problems", "why is this confusing", or has existing interface to critique. Part of the Product Design set. Can drive a browser for live audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit LLM token cost estimates against actual API usage. Activate on 'cost verification', 'token estimate accuracy', 'API cost audit', 'estimation variance'. NOT for pricing lookups, budget planning, or cost optimization strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/cs:aims-audit <scope> — ISO/IEC 42001 AIMS internal-audit 6-question forcing interrogation. Use before certification stage 1, before annual internal audit cycles, or when onboarding a new AI system into an existing AIMS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) skill — optimize content to be cited by AI language models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Mistral) as authoritative sources. Distinct from SEO — AEO optimizes for citation in LLM-generated responses, not search rankings. Use when planning content for AI-first search audiences, auditing existing content for E-E-A-T signals, tracking which pages get cited by which LLMs, or building a citation-friendly content strategy. Triggers — 'AEO audit', 'optimize for ChatGPT', 'get cited by Perplexity', 'LLM citation strategy', 'answer engine optimization', 'content for AI search', 'E-E-A-T audit'. Output is a markdown audit report (default) or JSON for pipeline integration. Stdlib-only Python tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。