「brain」の検索結果

Use to run the second-brain loop — turn captures in raw/ into clean, cross-linked knowledge in wiki/, and to answer questions from past thinking. Trigger on "/wiki", "process my raw notes", "update the wiki", "add this to my brain/wiki", "what did I think about X", "what do my notes say about X". Follows references/sops/wiki-translate.md. Enforces the admission policy: no PHI, no live financials, no secrets in the committed wiki.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to use Google Gemini for analysis, large files or codebases, sandbox execution, or brainstorming. Uses headless Gemini CLI scripts (no MCP). Triggers on "use Gemini", "analyze with Gemini", "large file", "sandbox", "brainstorm with Gemini".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Socratic design refinement before implementation — challenges assumptions, surfaces alternatives, identifies risks before code is written

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when creating or editing notes inside an Obsidian-compatible vault, to write correct Obsidian Flavored Markdown — wikilinks, embeds, callouts, YAML properties (frontmatter), tasks, highlights, and block references. Use whenever writing .md notes for a second brain / Obsidian vault so links resolve and metadata is queryable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user wants to capture a web page / article / docs into their second brain vault as clean Markdown — stripping ads, navigation, and sidebars to save tokens. Trigger on "clip this URL", "save this article to my vault", "ingest this page into raw/", or when gathering source material for the knowledge base.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when checking Agent Brain inside a real agent runtime or adapter before trusting harness usability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an agent runtime must choose or verify a /brain-* command route from a user request, handoff, adapter transcript, or stale command catalog.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户需要启动AI项目的创意发现阶段，组织跨职能团队寻找AI应用场景时使用。 用户在问"我们该做什么AI项目"、"怎么找到AI落地场景"、"brainstorm AI ideas"时激活。 不适用于: 组织完全没有AI专业知识（无内外部顾问可用）、问题已明确定义无需创意探索的场景。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a bounded Proto UI Contract, Prototype, Module, Host Capability, Adapter, schema, or ownership question and turn a genuinely unresolved direction into one semantic decision packet. Use for spec brainstorming, admission questions, competing semantic models, uncataloged behavior, or unresolved cross-layer boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured marketing brainstorming when direction is unclear. Use when the agent doesn't know which skill to run, the user is vague about what they need, there are multiple valid marketing paths, or someone says 'I don't know where to start', 'what should we market', 'explore approaches', 'help me think through this', 'marketing ideas', 'what campaign should I run', 'where do I start with marketing', 'what's our marketing plan', or 'I have no idea how to promote this'. Explores 2-3 approaches and recommends the best path forward with a specific next-skill handoff. Even vague frustration like 'nobody knows about my product' or 'how do I get users' should trigger this when no specific channel or tactic is mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

캠페인 브레인스토밍 에이전트. 3인 전문가 에이전트(전략가/크리에이터/데이터분석가)가 개별 브레인스토밍 후 크로스리뷰 토론으로 최적안을 도출합니다. campaign_brief.md 생성 → 제안서 파이프라인(Step 3)으로 연계. 트리거: 브레인스토밍, 캠페인 기획, 아이디어, brainstorm, 캠페인 전략, 크리에이티브

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You MUST use this before any creative work — creating features, building components, drafting documents, designing workflows, or modifying behavior. Explores your human partner's intent, requirements, and design before any implementation begins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Divergent ideation across model families — the same brainstorm, but each cognitive frame is handed to a different model (Claude sub-agent, OpenAI Codex, a cheap third via OpenCode) so the ideas diverge by frame and by model priors at once. Use for open design questions, architecture and API shape, naming, schema choices, fuzzy bugs with no known root cause, or on "multi adhd", "brainstorm with everyone", "wide ideas from all models". Skip for lookups, syntax, and anything phrased as "quick", "standard" or "canonical".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structural and functional brain connectivity — tractography, functional networks, and graph-theoretic analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a complete feature workflow in one skill — brainstorm, plan, TDD implementation, self-review, delivery summary — with hard gates between stages: no stage starts until the prior stage's artifact exists on disk (brainstorm note, plan doc, green tests per step)..

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage persistent coding sessions across Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity (agy), Grok Build, and OpenCode engines. Use when orchestrating multi-engine coding agents, starting/sending/stopping sessions, running multi-agent council collaborations, cross-session messaging, ultraplan deep planning, ultrareview parallel code review, autoloop autonomous workspace iteration, ultraapp building deployable web apps from a structured Q&A interview, switching models/tools at runtime, exposing the orchestrator's 78 tools as an MCP server to Hermes Agent / Claude Desktop / Cursor / Cline / Continue / Zed / Windsurf / Goose, or running as an Agent Client Protocol (ACP) agent that Zed / JetBrains / Neovim / Emacs / VS Code / dsh can drive directly. Triggers on "start a session", "send to session", "run council", "ultraplan", "ultrareview", "autoloop", "ultraapp", "Forge tab", "build a web app", "one-click app", "AppSpec", "autonomous iteration", "iterate until goal", "auto research", "switch model", "hand off a session", "session handoff", "switch engine", "continue on codex", "continue on claude", "move this session to another engine", "multi-agent coding", "coding session", "session inbox", "grok session", "grok build", "opencode", "mcp server", "clawo-mcp", "hermes mcp", "model context protocol", "ultracode", "dynamic workflow", "fanout", "fan-out", "best-of-N", "steer turn", "interrupt turn", "fork thread", "rollback turns", "acp", "agent client protocol", "clawo acp", "zed agent", "jetbrains agent", "external agent", "dsh subagent", "deepseek harness", "clawo runs", "run ledger", "session cost", "coding-agent token usage", "spend cap", "budget limit", "maxBudgetUsd", "durable workflow", "resume a run", "verify a coding run", "acceptance contract", "evidence bundle", "did the agent's tests actually pass", "protected tests", "agent edited the tests", "human gate", "repair loop", "clawo workflow", "clawo verify", "clawo solve", "clawo fanout", "fix and verify", "solve from the terminal".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates creative domain name ideas for your project and checks availability across multiple TLDs (.com, .io, .dev, .ai, etc.). Saves hours of brainstorming and manual checking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explore and debate solutions before writing code. Use when the user poses a design question, asks "how should I approach X", wants to think through options before committing, or says anything like "let's brainstorm", "what's the best way to...", "I'm not sure how to tackle this", or "should I use X or Y". Always runs before /ck:plan for novel or ambiguous features. No code is written — only: explore → clarify → spec → report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 1 of the SRS workflow. User gives a project topic → AI runs a deep, categorized brainstorm (5 mandatory rounds) to fully understand actors, features, scope boundary, tech constraints, and business rules before writing anything.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explore and debate solutions before writing code. Use when the user poses a design question, asks "how should I approach X", wants to think through options before committing, or says anything like "let's brainstorm", "what's the best way to...", "I'm not sure how to tackle this", or "should I use X or Y". Always runs before /ck:plan for novel or ambiguous features. No code is written — only: explore → clarify → spec → report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 1 of the SRS workflow. User gives a project topic → AI runs a deep, categorized brainstorm (5 mandatory rounds) to fully understand actors, features, scope boundary, tech constraints, and business rules before writing anything.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to explore options, weigh approaches, or think through uncertainty before committing to a direction. Collaborative brainstorming and rubber ducking — divergence-first thinking partner.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Timeboxed ideation on a topic where lens-driven proposers generate structurally different ideas, blind critics cull them, and pairwise judges rank the survivors on a tournament ladder instead of 1-10 scores, evolving the leaders until the clock runs out. Use when the user wants to brainstorm, explore ideas, discover features, generate options, or think through possibilities for a specified duration. Triggers on requests like "brainstorm X for 30 minutes", "ideate on X", "spend an hour thinking about X", "what features should we build", "explore options for X". Not for executing a task over time (timeboxed-iterating) or optimizing a measurable metric (autoresearch).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Two superpowers for AI agents: a collective brain and a Base ecosystem mentor. BRAIN: Before debugging/compiling/architecting, search for existing solutions. After solving, propose so no agent repeats your mistake. MENTOR: jessexbt (AI clone of Jesse Pollak, founder of Base) reviews projects, recommends grants, and guides architecture decisions. Consult him directly when building on Base/crypto/onchain/web3. Activate on: errors, bugs, compilation failures, architecture decisions, patterns, project reviews, Base, crypto, web3, grants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。