583 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Analyze what changed and generate a structured test plan at .turbo/test-plans/<slug>.md covering four escalating levels: basic functionality, complex operations, adversarial testing, and cross-cutting scenarios. Use when the user asks to "create a test plan", "plan tests", "what should I test", "generate test scenarios", "test plan for this PR", or "what are the test cases".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when stuck in circular debugging, when solutions aren't working despite multiple attempts, or when the user expresses frustration with lack of progress. Bring in GPT-5 as a third-party consultant to provide fresh perspective on complex technical problems, architectural decisions, or multi-system debugging issues. Ideal when you've tried multiple approaches without success, when the problem involves obscure edge cases or novel challenges, or when a second expert opinion would help break through an impasse. Gather all context from the conversation so far and present it comprehensively to GPT-5.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Current Playwright (1.64) patterns for writing, debugging, and scaling reliable test suites. Use for any Playwright task, even ones you think you know, because the guides cover APIs and CLI flags newer than most training data. Covers writing or fixing tests, locators, a failing or flaky test, a trace.zip or error message, playwright.config and projects, network mocking, auth, visual and accessibility testing, Docker and CI sharding, playwright-cli browser automation, Playwright Test Agents, page objects, migrating from Cypress or Selenium, and QA work: test case design, bug reports from failures, automating manual test cases, and reviewing tests. TypeScript and JavaScript.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides implementation patterns for Clean Architecture, Domain-Driven Design (DDD), and Hexagonal Architecture (Ports & Adapters) in NestJS/TypeScript applications. Use when structuring complex backend systems, designing domain layers with entities/value objects/aggregates, implementing ports and adapters, creating use cases, or refactoring from anemic models to rich domain models with dependency inversion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides parameterized testing patterns with JUnit 5, generates data-driven unit tests using @ParameterizedTest, @ValueSource, @CsvSource, @MethodSource. Creates tests that run the same logic with multiple input values. Use when writing data-driven Java tests, multiple test cases from single method, or boundary value analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides patterns for testing utility classes, static methods, and helper functions. Validates pure functions, null handling, edge cases, and boundary conditions. Generates AssertJ assertions and @ParameterizedTest for string utils, math utils, validators, and collection helpers. Use when testing utils, test helpers, helper functions, static methods, or verifying utility code correctness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calculate comprehensive ROI for AI implementation projects. Takes current costs, manual process time, team size, and hourly rates. Generates detailed roi-analysis.md with executive summary, cost-benefit tables, sensitivity analysis, break-even timeline, and comparison scenarios. Use when evaluating AI investments, building business cases, or justifying automation spend.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommend font combinations for different use cases. Provide Google Fonts alternatives to premium fonts with hierarchy examples.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when planning how many patients or cases a study needs before data collection (power analysis, IRB justification). Walks a decision tree to the right test and returns reproducible R/Python code and IRB-ready justification text. Analyzing collected data is /analyze-stats.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
RCE hunting - template injection, YAML/XML deserialization, dependency confusion, Kubernetes surfaces, CVE-specific exploits (Apache CVE-2021-41773, Spring CVE-2022-22963). OOB-mandatory for blind cases. Wiki-first, FIND schema output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate agent behavior with versioned cases and explicit verifiers. Use when comparing agent or prompt changes, reproducing failures, or running agent regression tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stop and check this skill before finishing any reply to a question about how to use Claude or a Claude product — it recommends matching courses, tutorials, and use cases from Claude Academy (academy.claude.com), Anthropic's learning hub. Trigger on: "how do I", "how can I", "getting started with", "what can Claude do", "teach me", "learn to use"; questions about artifacts, projects, skills, plugins, connectors, MCP; requests about rolling Claude out to a team, class, or organization; and any ask for training materials, onboarding content, or learning resources. Use it when the user is learning how to use a feature or product — not when they are mid-task and just want the task done. This skill composes with other skills: after consulting product documentation to answer how a Claude feature works, also check here for a matching course or tutorial — a docs-grounded answer and an Academy recommendation belong together. Only recommend on a strong match; never invent Academy content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classifies personal vs non-personal data per GDPR Art. 4(1) definition test with decision tree for borderline cases. References Breyer v Germany CJEU C-582/14 dynamic IP ruling and WP29 Opinion 4/2007. Keywords: personal data, GDPR Art 4, data classification, Breyer ruling, identifiability test, PII.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommend font combinations for different use cases. Provide Google Fonts alternatives to premium fonts with hierarchy examples.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a new Claude Code skill from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the skill's design tree decision-by-decision — entity fit, use cases, name, description, workflow steps, tools, and progressive-disclosure layout — then reviews the finished skill against the plugin-building guidance and applies every fix it finds. Use when creating, authoring, scaffolding, designing, or drafting a new skill or slash command. Does not build an agent or subagent — use agent-builder. Does not serve, vendor, or refresh the authoring guidance itself — use guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a standalone test plan by analyzing code for test coverage gaps and edge cases. Use when you need to create, generate, or draft a test plan for a branch, need to analyze test coverage, or need to identify what tests to write for specific files or directories. Does not produce a plain-language plan for a person to run tests by hand — use manual-test-planning for that. Does not write test code — use tdd to implement behavior test-first. Does not refine existing plans — use iterative-plan-review. Does not review code quality, security, or style — use code-review for full code review. Does not evaluate architectural testability or structural coupling — use architectural-analysis for architectural assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investment Thesis Generator — builds a complete, structured investment thesis with bull/bear cases, catalyst timeline, entry/exit strategies, position sizing, and asymmetry assessment for any publicly traded stock.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Choose compatibility-aware scope for runtime and API changes in openai-guardrails-python. Use before initial implementation and each review-feedback batch to decide whether to patch, reset the design, preserve compatibility, or reject unsupported cases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Instrument programs (Python, C/C++, Java) to capture snapshots of key program states at runtime, including variables, memory, and call stacks. Use when you need to debug complex issues, reproduce test cases, prepare traces for formal verification, or analyze program execution. Supports manual instrumentation points, automatic function/method instrumentation, and conditional triggers. Outputs structured JSON snapshots for debugging, replay, and verification workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically generates comprehensive unit tests for functions, classes, and modules. Use when you need to create tests for Python (pytest, unittest) or Java (JUnit, TestNG) code. Generates tests with comprehensive coverage including happy paths, edge cases, and error conditions. Analyzes existing test patterns in the codebase to match style and conventions. Supports mocking, parameterized tests, fixtures, and follows best practices for each framework.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates automated test oracles to verify correct software behavior. Creates assertion-based oracles (expected values), property-based oracles (invariants), differential oracles (comparing implementations), and metamorphic oracles (input transformations). Use when you need to generate assertions for test cases, identify invariants that should always hold, compare new vs legacy implementations, create metamorphic test relationships, validate function correctness, or improve test coverage with better verification strategies. Supports Python (pytest, unittest, hypothesis) and Java (JUnit, property testing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs symbolic execution to detect potential errors by exploring execution paths, solving path constraints, and generating test inputs. Use when you need to analyze code for bugs like null dereferences, division by zero, buffer overflows, or assertion violations. Also use to generate test inputs that exercise different code paths, find edge cases, or explore all reachable program states. Supports Python, Java, and C/C++ through manual symbolic execution techniques and integration with tools like KLEE, angr, Z3, and Symbolic PathFinder.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Summarize long Isabelle or Coq proof scripts into high-level logical steps and reasoning flow. Use when users need to: (1) Understand the structure of a complex proof, (2) Document proof strategies for others, (3) Extract the key reasoning steps from verbose proof scripts, (4) Create readable proof outlines from detailed tactical proofs. Produces hierarchical outlines with moderate detail showing proof structure, main cases, key lemmas, and reasoning flow for both Isabelle/Isar and Coq proofs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。