1,316 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Perform codebase analysis and architecture mapping as the first phase of a security assessment. Explores the tech stack, frameworks, entry points, data flows, and trust boundaries. Outputs sast/architecture.md. Run this before any vulnerability detection skill. Use when asked to analyze a codebase for security or when sast/architecture.md does not yet exist.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive SEO analysis for any website or business type. Full site audits, single-page analysis, technical SEO (crawlability, indexability, Core Web Vitals with INP), schema markup, content quality (E-E-A-T), image optimization, sitemap analysis, and GEO for AI Overviews/ChatGPT/Perplexity. Industry detection for SaaS, e-commerce, local, publishers, agencies. Triggers on: SEO, audit, schema, Core Web Vitals, sitemap, E-E-A-T, AI Overviews, GEO, technical SEO, content quality, page speed, structured data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive SEO analysis for any website or business type. Full site audits, single-page analysis, technical SEO (crawlability, indexability, Core Web Vitals with INP), schema markup, content quality (E-E-A-T), image optimization, sitemap analysis, and GEO for AI Overviews/ChatGPT/Perplexity. Industry detection for SaaS, e-commerce, local, publishers, agencies. Triggers on: SEO, audit, schema, Core Web Vitals, sitemap, E-E-A-T, AI Overviews, GEO, technical SEO, content quality, page speed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when assembling the data, code, and documentation package for an American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics (AEJ: Macro) manuscript to pass the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy and the AEA Data Editor's pre-publication reproducibility check. Covers macro specifics (simulation/calibration code, restricted-access data); it does not write the analysis itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze code coverage and CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) scores to identify high-risk code. Use OpenCover format with ReportGenerator for Risk Hotspots showing cyclomatic complexity and untested code paths.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to verify a Simulink model is compatible with SLCI code inspection, or to apply fixes for identified incompatibilities. Checks model configuration, identifies incompatibilities, and explains why each constraint is required for verification. Also invoked by slci-inspection-incompatibility-analysis to fix constraints and obtain compatibility results. Trigger keywords: checkCompatibility, SLCI compatibility, code inspection readiness, Model Advisor compatibility report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses RNA-seq data quality specifically for alternative splicing analysis. QC layers include experimental design audit (library prep, read length, depth, replicates), STAR 2-pass cohort-style alignment, junction saturation curves and discovery plateau detection, novel-vs-known junction ratio diagnostics, junction-overhang distribution, splice-site strength scoring (MaxEntScan intrinsic + SpliceAI context-aware), strandedness verification, GENCODE basic vs comprehensive choice, and rRNA contamination screening. Splicing analysis is more demanding than DGE on read length, depth, library prep, alignment strategy, and annotation choice — failures silently bias PSI estimates and inflate novel-junction false positives. Use when evaluating data suitability for splicing analysis, troubleshooting low event detection, or designing sequencing experiments where AS is a primary endpoint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PDN DC voltage/current analysis, IR drop, design rule checking, and multi-net batch analysis on imported PCB layouts. TRIGGER: user asks about power integrity, PDN analysis, IR drop, voltage distribution, current density, power nets, or design rule checking on a PCB. Invoke BEFORE writing code — the PDN API chain is specialized and non-obvious. SKIP: importing a PCB file (use matlab-read-pcb-layout), EM field/S-parameter extraction (use matlab-analyze-em), material/stackup setup only (use matlab-manage-pcb-material), transmission line design (use matlab-design-pcb-transmission-line).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate code (especially LLM-generated) for structural simplicity using Rich Hickey's "Simple Made Easy" framework. Use this skill whenever reviewing a PR, diff, or code snippet for accidental complexity — particularly when the code was generated by an AI coding assistant and line-by-line review isn't feasible. Also use when the user asks about complecting, simplicity vs. easiness, structural coupling, or concept deduplication. Trigger on phrases like "is this simple", "does this complect", "review for complexity", "structural analysis", or any reference to Hickey, Simple Made Easy, or grey-box review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrate, modernize, and upgrade codebases to AWS. Run analysis on repos for tech debt, security vulnerabilities, and modernization opportunities. Transforms .NET Framework to .NET 8/10, mainframe COBOL to Java, VMware VMs to EC2, SQL Server to Aurora, and upgrades Java/Python/Node.js versions and AWS SDKs. Use when the user says "migrate .NET to AWS", "upgrade Java to 17/21", "modernize COBOL", "modernize mainframe", "move VMware to EC2", "convert SQL Server to Aurora", "upgrade Python version", "migrate AWS SDK", "transform this codebase", "analyze for issues", "find tech debt", "what tech debt", "security vulnerabilities", "CVEs", "what's wrong with my code", "assess my repos", "where do I start", "find what's outdated", "analyze my repos", "AWS Transform - continuous modernization", "continuous modernization" or "continuous-modernization". Don't use for infrastructure provisioning, CI/CD pipelines, or general coding tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Brief statutes and legislative Acts using the MAPS + RULES framework. Use when briefing statutes, analyzing legislative text, mapping statutory structure, extracting rule-modules from provisions, applying statutes to scenarios, or any statutory analysis task. Triggers include "brief this statute," "analyze this Act," "map the statute," "apply [statute] to [scenario]," "what are the elements of [provision]," "statutory analysis," or references to codified sections (such as 42 U.S.C. sections or Texas Health & Safety Code). Supports two modes - (A) text-only briefing for structural analysis, and (B) scenario-driven briefing that applies statutory provisions to specific facts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
EU Digital Regulation Legal Analysis Forge — generates a tailored expert prompt for structured legal analysis of an EU digital-regulation document, optionally executes it in-session, and always produces a plain-English explainer alongside the formal output. Handles Regulations, Directives, Commission Guidelines, EDPB Opinions, CJEU and AG judgments, national DPA decisions, codes of conduct, and draft consultations across the EU digital stack.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive SEO analysis for any website, page, business, or topic. Full site audits, SEO checks, single-page analysis, technical SEO (crawlability, indexability, Core Web Vitals with INP), schema markup, content quality (E-E-A-T), image optimization, sitemap analysis, GEO for AI Overviews/ChatGPT/Perplexity, and SEO best-practice planning. Industry detection for SaaS, e-commerce, local, publishers, agencies. Triggers on: SEO, audit, full SEO check, SEO best practices, optimize my site, ranking, organic search, schema, Core Web Vitals, sitemap, E-E-A-T, AI Overviews, GEO, technical SEO, content quality, page speed, structured data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
General code quality review — project guideline compliance, bug detection, code quality analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Parses and processes SARIF files from static analysis tools like CodeQL, Semgrep, or other scanners. Triggers on "parse sarif", "read scan results", "aggregate findings", "deduplicate alerts", or "process sarif output". Handles filtering, deduplication, format conversion, and CI/CD integration of SARIF data. Does NOT run scans — use the Semgrep or CodeQL skills for that.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs security-focused differential review of code changes (PRs, commits, diffs). Adapts analysis depth to codebase size, uses git history for context, calculates blast radius, checks test coverage, and generates comprehensive markdown reports. Automatically detects and prevents security regressions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Token-efficient code analysis via 5-layer stack (AST, Call Graph, CFG, DFG, PDG). 95% token savings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan code changes for security vulnerabilities using Bug Hunter-native artifacts and STRIDE context. Use whenever the user asks for PR security review, commit-diff scanning, staged-change security checks, branch-comparison security review, or pre-merge security analysis of changed code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ALWAYS USE for test work that requires changes: write, add, generate, repair, or strengthen tests for existing code in xUnit, MSTest, NUnit, pytest, Vitest/Jest, Go, or another framework. Includes regression cases, failing or flaky tests, coverage-driven additions, and audit-then-fix requests. Focused work stays direct; broad or multi-stage work invokes test-engineer. DO NOT USE for only running tests, analysis-only audits, framework/platform migrations, a test blocked on a missing production seam (testability-obstacle), or MSTest API/configuration corrections that do not design new cases (writing-mstest-tests). Within an active test-engineer pipeline, reuse supplied guidance and do not re-enter this skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate MSBuild binary logs (binlogs) for build diagnostics and analysis. USE FOR: adding /bl:{} to any dotnet build, test, pack, publish, or restore command to capture a full build execution trace, prerequisite for binlog-failure-analysis and build-perf-diagnostics skills, enabling post-build investigation of errors or performance. Requires MSBuild 17.8+ / .NET 8 SDK+ for {} placeholder; PowerShell must quote the complete switch as '-bl:{}'. DO NOT USE FOR: non-MSBuild build systems (npm, Maven, CMake), analyzing an existing binlog (use binlog-failure-analysis instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the free official JetBrains ReSharper Command Line Tools for .NET repositories. USE FOR: `jb inspectcode`; `jb cleanupcode`; stronger C# inspections, cleanup profiles, and CI-friendly JetBrains analysis. DO NOT USE FOR: replacing tests with inspection output; ad-hoc formatting-only work when the repo intentionally standardizes on another formatter. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classifies existing tests by standard traits and reports their distribution. USE FOR: tagging all tests with category attributes, categorizing/tagging/ labeling each test, compare happy vs error paths, audit the test mix, describe coverage shape by test type, or tag then verify the project builds. Read bodies when names mislead. Apply canonical attributes; otherwise report only. DO NOT USE FOR: requests owned by test-anti-patterns, coverage-analysis, crap-score, test-gap-analysis, code-testing, or migration skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SSL/TLS auditing, cipher suite analysis, hash algorithm identification, encryption implementation review, and cryptographic weakness detection in code
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Binary analysis, assembly interpretation, disassembly, decompilation, firmware RE, and protocol reverse engineering
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。