Validates Conductor project artifacts for completeness, consistency, and correctness. Use after setup, when diagnosing issues, or before implementation to verify project context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
249 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Validates Conductor project artifacts for completeness, consistency, and correctness. Use after setup, when diagnosing issues, or before implementation to verify project context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review and fix OpenMetadata connector documentation against JSON schema and source code. Validates availableFeatures, permissions, yaml.mdx configuration, and overall completeness. Automatically fixes gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a Go design spec before implementation begins - dispatch a subagent that checks a design doc for completeness, consistency, and idiomatic Go (simplicity, small consumer-defined interfaces, explicit wrapped errors, context propagation) plus Cobra/Viper conventions where applicable. Use when a user has a Go spec to review, asks "is this spec ready?", or is about to implement from a written design. Distilled from spf13/go-skills and adapted to this repo's conventions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Data quality audit on CRM with completeness scoring and specific fix recommendations
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit whether a "current product focus receipt" (Decision/Now/Why-now/Evidence/Not-now/Cut-suspend/First-visible-proof/ Acceptance-gate/Kill-revisit-trigger/Owner/Review-date) and the work order it gates state a real, testable decision and a real agent launch — not planning-placeholder prose that sounds like an assignment but can't be proven. Use when deciding whether to launch an agent chain against a milestone or a stated "focus," when a work order lacks explicit input/output/owner/proof-gate, or when an acceptance gate would only prove a cached UI state instead of daemon truth. NOT for distinguishing roadmap items from energy-driven sidequests (legible-roadmap-with-sidequests), reviewing a PRD/prototype for product-completeness gaps like cold start or pricing (product-reality-reviewer), or accepting already-finished work against a personal acceptance bar (port-daddy-user-surrogate-pm-review).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
An innate exploratory drive that guarantees no graph node remains permanently invisible to an agent population. After a warm-up period (step > 3), each agent fires a coverage scan with probability |unseen_nodes| / |all_nodes|. When triggered, the agent teleports directly to the globally unseen node with the highest belief uncertainty, works it, and returns control to the normal action-selection loop. Probability is self-annealing: it starts near 1.0 when almost everything is unseen and decays toward 0.0 as coverage saturates, requiring no manual schedule. The mechanism is "innate" (hard-coded into the agent step loop) as distinct from the "adaptive" EFE path, which requires local neighbors and learned precision weights. Together they form a two-layer exploration architecture: adaptive for locally-guided foraging, innate for topological completeness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs or reviews provenance-bound DAG attempt traces, coverage gaps, cancellation, and unknown-effect reconciliation. NOT for claiming execution completeness, deployment monitoring, or root-cause proof.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verifies build output integrity after code changes. Runs builds, validates artifact structure, checks for regressions in bundle size, asset references, and static export completeness. The last line of defense before a bad deploy ships.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-PR code review checklist for this repo. Plan alignment, security gates, layering, dead code, API-surface completeness. Used by the code-reviewer agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。