1,528 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Multi-agent orchestration: lane contracts, worker-model doctrine, fault tolerance. Triggers: orchestrate, coordinate, agents, parallel, spawn, contract, tier 2, tier 3.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build reactive/event-driven C# with R3 (Cysharp's modern reimplementation of Reactive Extensions). Covers the Observable<T>/Observer<T> model, the OnErrorResume error contract, async dispatch with AwaitOperation, Task/IAsyncEnumerable integration, TimeProvider/FrameProvider scheduling, the concurrency contract, and how R3 differs from System.Reactive (Rx.NET).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Model gene-family birth-death dynamics across a species tree using CAFE5 (Mendes et al 2020 Bioinformatics 36:5516 gamma-distributed rate categories), CAFE5-error (annotation-error-aware), Count (Csurös 2010 ancestral state reconstruction), BadiRate (Librado 2012 likelihood + parsimony), DupliPHY-Family, and ALE/AleRax (for per-family DTL; see [[gene-tree-species-tree-reconciliation]]). Test lineage-specific gene-family expansions and contractions, distinguish biological dynamics from annotation artifacts, account for assembly fragmentation, identify functional enrichment in expanded / contracted families. Use when correlating gene-family changes with phenotype evolution, ranking lineages by adaptive gene-family-rate shifts, post-WGD dosage-balance analysis, or building Birth-death models from OrthoFinder presence/absence matrices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides Metronome usage-based billing integration decisions — event ingestion (single and batch, idempotency, billable metrics), contract design (rate cards, overrides, dimensional pricing, products), invoicing lifecycle (grace periods, finalization, Stripe sync), credit and commit management (prepaid, postpaid, thresholds, auto-recharge), and Stripe integration (arrears invoicing, tax providers, line item limits). Use when building, modifying, or reviewing any Metronome integration — including ingesting usage events, creating customers, contracts, or rate cards, designing billable metric group keys, managing credits and commits, configuring invoicing, syncing invoices with Stripe Billing, billing AI applications for token usage, setting up self-serve (PLG) pricing, reviewing customer health, commit burn, portfolios, or renewals, or migrating from Stripe Billing Meters to Metronome.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing CloudBase cloud API wrappers, MCP tools, generated action metadata, or related docs for outdated or incorrect action names, parameters, casing, request shapes, or missing contract tests, especially during periodic quality review or before preparing corrective PRs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read the approved PRD.md and generate the native sources for a third-party PAM control (the compiled `.ppmplugin` track) — iOS Obj-C `<Pascal>Module` plus optional system-frameworks podspec, Android Kotlin `<Pascal>Module` with build.gradle, AndroidManifest and ReactPackage, a dev-only private package.json (react + react-native devDeps for the builds), and the committed `./manifest.json` dispatch contract the PCF and build stage both read. No TypeScript INativeExtension layer — the contract is the manifest plus the native modules' dispatch surface. Emits the layout in shared/repo-layout.md and generates substantially complete native code (compiled later by /build-android-binary and /build-ios-binary, not here). Local only — writes files, runs no git and touches no remote or feed. PCF is generated by /generate-pcf-companion; the bundle is built by /generate-ppmplugin.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and reduce infrastructure and tooling costs without sacrificing reliability or velocity. Use this skill when reviewing monthly cloud or SaaS spend, finding unused resources, rightsizing infrastructure, negotiating vendor contracts, deciding what to consolidate, or planning for budget cuts. Triggers on cost optimization, cloud spend, SaaS spend, rightsizing, unused resources, FinOps, infrastructure audit, vendor consolidation, budget cut, cost review. Also triggers when finance flags rising costs or when a contract renewal is up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 — Digital Operational Resilience Act) compliance advisor for EU financial entities. Use this skill whenever a user asks about DORA compliance, ICT risk management frameworks, ICT incident classification or reporting, threat-led penetration testing (TLPT), ICT third-party risk management, Register of Information, contractual provisions with ICT providers, ICT concentration risk, oversight of critical ICT third-party service providers (CTPPs), or any DORA RTS/ITS obligation. Also trigger for: "DORA gap analysis", "DORA readiness", "Art. 6 ICT risk framework", "Art. 17 incident reporting", "Art. 26 TLPT", "Art. 28 third-party policy", "Art. 30 contractual provisions", "Register of Information CIR 2024/2956", "critical TPSP designation", "DORA vs NIS2", "DORA simplified framework", or EBA/ESMA/EIOPA digital resilience guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate business documents — contracts, proposals, SOWs, NDAs, MSAs — with jurisdiction-aware clauses for US, EU, UK, and DACH. Use when starting client engagements, writing proposals, drafting agreements, or needing GDPR-compliant DPAs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts a customized Customer Agreement starting from the Y Combinator standard form SaaS template. Tailors the agreement through structured intake questions covering fee structure, data handling, ML rights, implementation services, and more. Applies 18 always-on defaults that transform the raw YC form into a professional starting point (renamed to "Customer Agreement", data privacy section added, warranty restructured, consolidated SLA/support exhibit, etc.). Produces a clean .docx and a lawyer-facing memo explaining every change from the YC standard. Use when user says "draft a SaaS agreement", "YC SaaS", "startup SaaS contract", "customer agreement", "SaaS subscription agreement", or "I need a SaaS agreement starting from the YC form". Also trigger when the user is a startup founder discussing SaaS contracting, even if they don't mention YC specifically.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pick the right LLM for LEGAL TRANSLATION — translating contracts, statutes, case law, and legal correspondence across languages, including Arabic/MENA. Vendor-neutral routing triangulated from mid-2026 evidence (WMT25 human eval, SwiLTra-Bench legal-MT, multilingual-reasoning proxies, ArabLegalEval). There is NO clean legal-translation leaderboard, so this vertical is directional and treats human legal-linguist review as mandatory. Asks up to 4 quick questions (language pair, cost, speed, privacy/certification), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model to translate this contract/statute", "best AI for legal translation", "translate this legal doc to/from Arabic", or is about to machine-translate legal text without a fixed model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pick the right LLM for LEGAL INFO EXTRACTION — pulling facts, clauses, dates, parties, obligations, and structured fields out of contracts and legal documents. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 benchmarks (legalbenchmarks.ai Info Extraction; CUAD/MAUD/ACORD). Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model should I use to extract clauses/data from these documents", "best AI for contract data extraction", "route this extraction task", or is about to pull structured fields from legal docs without a fixed model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide to analyze multiple documents (PDF, DOCX) against user-defined columns and produce a structured Excel output with citations. Use when the user wants to: (1) Extract specific information from multiple documents into a table, (2) Compare clauses or provisions across contracts, (3) Create a document review matrix with source citations. Triggers on: 'tabular review', 'document matrix', 'extract from documents', 'compare across documents', 'review multiple contracts'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Swiss legal source and authority triage. Use when a user asks a Swiss legal, regulatory, compliance, contract, employment, corporate, litigation, IP, tax, privacy, public-law, fintech, register, or cantonal-law question; when Swiss law may apply; or when an AI legal answer needs source routing across federal, cantonal, communal, regulator, register, contractual, professional, soft-law, multilingual, or open-data layers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes any legal task to the right LLM, like OpenRouter but for legal work and grounded in benchmarks instead of brand loyalty. Built from mid-2026 legal evals (legalbenchmarks.ai, Vals AI × Stanford LegalBench across 124 models, Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark, the Atticus Project's CUAD/MAUD/ACORD) plus translation evidence (WMT25, SwiLTra-Bench, ArabLegalEval). Covers five verticals: contract drafting, info extraction, legal research, contract review, and legal translation (including Arabic/MENA). Each asks up to four questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then returns a primary model, a fallback, what to avoid, and what a human must verify. Core principle: capability is not controllability, so every route ends with a verification step. Not legal advice; a lawyer owns the output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a legal question, a set of draft questions, or source material such as a statute, jury instruction, rubric, contract checklist, or coding manual into a battery of narrow questions that TypeSafe's Jev, a fast classifier that returns probabilities rather than prose, can answer reliably across many documents. The skill breaks conclusions such as negligence, felony murder, or standing into element-level questions, writes the governing rule into each question, and delivers the questions alone, in Jev's request format or in plain English. Built for legal work that asks the same questions of many texts: coding statutes across jurisdictions, coding opinions or case files for empirical research, checking contracts against a review checklist, screening intake narratives, and grading student work against a rubric. Use when asked to write Jev questions, build a classifier for legal documents, or turn a legal test into yes-or-no questions. Running the questions requires Jev access; writing them does not.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a high-fidelity interactive legal assessment as a single self-contained HTML artifact. Output includes a live countdown timer, contract review tasks with hover-annotated problem clauses, candidate answer textareas, model answers hidden behind reveal blocks, scenario-based legal memo tasks, strategy and function-building questions, and a pre-submission checklist that encodes the marking criteria. Use when the user needs to (1) assess a legal candidate with a realistic timed exercise, (2) train or onboard junior lawyers using problem sets rather than doctrine, (3) help a candidate prepare for a real take-home assessment they are facing, (4) build educational materials for law students, in-house teams, or compliance training, or (5) produce scenario-based training modules on specific legal topics. Triggers on "legal test", "take-home", "mock exam", "contract redline exercise", "candidate assessment", "legal training exercise", "practice test", or similar phrasing even when informal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translate legal documents from any language into English while preserving .docx formatting and translating track changes and headers/footers. Use this skill whenever the user asks to translate a legal document, contract, deed, agreement, or any formal legal text into English. Also trigger when the user mentions translating .docx files that contain legal content, or asks for a "format-preserving translation" of a legal document. This skill covers all legal domains: finance, M&A, corporate, IP, real estate, regulatory, consumer, taxes, litigation, SaaS and more. Even if the user just says "translate this contract" or "translate this into English", use this skill if the document is legal in nature.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert DORA (Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 — Digital Operational Resilience Act) compliance advisor for EU financial entities. Use this skill whenever a user asks about DORA compliance, ICT risk management frameworks, ICT incident classification or reporting, threat-led penetration testing (TLPT), ICT third-party risk management, Register of Information, contractual provisions with ICT providers, ICT concentration risk, oversight of critical ICT third-party service providers (CTPPs), or any DORA RTS/ITS obligation. Also trigger for: "DORA gap analysis", "DORA readiness", "Art. 6 ICT risk framework", "Art. 17 incident reporting", "Art. 26 TLPT", "Art. 28 third-party policy", "Art. 30 contractual provisions", "Register of Information CIR 2024/2956", "critical TPSP designation", "DORA vs NIS2", "DORA simplified framework", or EBA/ESMA/EIOPA digital resilience guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Translate legal documents from any language into English while preserving .docx formatting and translating track changes and headers/footers. Use this skill whenever the user asks to translate a legal document, contract, deed, agreement, or any formal legal text into English. Also trigger when the user mentions translating .docx files that contain legal content, or asks for a "format-preserving translation" of a legal document. This skill covers all legal domains: finance, M&A, corporate, IP, real estate, regulatory, consumer, taxes, litigation, SaaS and more. Even if the user just says "translate this contract" or "translate this into English", use this skill if the document is legal in nature.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
EU Data Act (Regulation (EU) 2023/2854) skill for lawyers. Use when the user asks about Data Act classification, drafting, lookup, analysis, or audit. Triggers include "Data Act", "Regulation 2023/2854", "connected product", "related service", "data processing service", "DPS switching", "Article 3(2) pre-contract", "Article 25 contract", "trade-secret handbrake", "international government access", "Chapter VI cloud switching", "Article 50 timeline", "FAQ Q22a", "data holder", "exportable data", "functional equivalence", "Art. 4(10) competing product", and similar EU Data Act phrases. The skill produces lawyer-style Word output and cites verbatim from bundled regulation and FAQ source texts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyses contracts for risk across five critical clauses (Limitation of Liability, Indemnities, IP Ownership, Data Protection, Termination). Built for founders with no legal background. Flags red flags, explains risks in plain language, and provides negotiation guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate protocol/interface test suites that any implementation must pass. Define the contract once, test every implementation. Use when designing protocols or swapping implementations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Negotiate a pre-code contract between generator and evaluator personas that defines what "done" means before any code is written. Turns fuzzy specs into a testable target the evaluator can hold the generator to.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。