3,637 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Guides agents through scorecards, outcomes, model profiles, and eval suites. Use when running /cc-scorecard or /cc:scorecard, measuring a deliverable, or checking workflow gates with suite-run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit web pages for performance optimization following PageSpeed Insights guidelines. Use when analyzing page performance, optimizing web applications, reviewing performance metrics, implementing Core Web Vitals improvements, or when the user mentions page speed, performance optimization, Lighthouse scores, or Core Web Vitals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run multiple Reforge-guided section-refactor lanes in parallel, each in its own worktree/branch off origin/main, with a score-blind adversarial review panel gating every commit, one draft PR per section. Use when the user wants to reduce Reforge surface/internal score across several sections at once via architecturally-correct deletions (dead surface, entity-leak removal, cross-section read-splits) — not by relocation, parameter bags, or accessibility-dodging. Wraps the per-lane process in .codex/skills/humans-refactor. Triggers: 'refactor swarm', 'parallel section refactors', 'run reforge refactor on Users/Tickets/...', 'burn down surface score across sections'. Has an intensity dial (light|standard|deep) and a workflow|solo execution mode to trade token burn against autonomy per unit of output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous Reforge-guided refactor workflow for the Humans repository. Use when the user wants Codex to target a section such as Shifts, Users, Teams, Tickets, Camps, or Store, create a dedicated worktree/branch from origin/main, run iterative architecture-focused improvements, score each stage with Reforge, gate commits through a score-blind read-only architecture review, append score and verdict details to commit messages after review acceptance, push progress, and open a PR when the loop reaches stasis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Score LLM and agent outputs using LLM-as-judge techniques — direct scoring against rubrics or pairwise comparison between two outputs. Includes built-in bias mitigation for position bias, length bias, and self-enhancement bias. Load when the user asks to score an output, judge a response, evaluate against a rubric, compare two outputs, do direct scoring, run pairwise comparison, or says "rate this", "which response is better", "score this against the rubric", "judge this output", "LLM as judge this". Sub-skill of eval-output orchestrator.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rank and prioritize neoantigen/epitope candidates by likely T-cell response using NeoFox feature annotation, PRIME2.0, BigMHC-IM, the Łuksza/Balachandran fitness model (agretopicity + foreignness), and pVACtools tiering. Encodes the field's hard truths that immunogenicity is the least-solved layer (dedicated scores ~AUROC 0.6-0.7, modest PPV), that scores are valid only for RANKING within one patient (never absolute go/no-go or cross-patient), that DAI has anchor-inflation and WT-denominator traps, and that stacking weak correlated scores into one number is a red flag. Use when ordering a candidate list for a vaccine. Binding lives in mhc-binding-prediction; calling in neoantigen-prediction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects TAD boundaries from balanced Hi-C contact matrices via the diamond-window insulation score (cooltools insulation) and HiCExplorer hicFindTADs, returning a continuous log2 insulation track, valley-prominence boundary_strength, and Li/Otsu-thresholded is_boundary flags across a list of window sizes. Covers the multi-scale window sweep (sub-TAD to compartment-domain), why the boundary is reproducible but the domain partition is not, cross-condition comparison via differential SCORE not differential partition, and the insulation-vs-compartment orthogonality. Use when calling TADs or domain boundaries, computing insulation scores, choosing a window size, ranking boundary strength, comparing boundaries across conditions, or annotating CTCF-backed boundaries; route domain rendering to hic-visualization and boundary-feature overlap to genome-intervals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks how to design or improve a fleet safety scorecard — what KPIs to track, how to weight them, telematics signals vs document compliance vs roadside outcomes, monthly cadence, driver-facing vs admin-facing dashboards, gamification considerations, peer-comparison metrics, and how a scorecard ties to insurance premiums + retention. Reference SMS Methodology v3.20 for industry-standard weights.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end Coval adversarial / red-team testing workflow. Builds one adversarial test set (12 core attack vectors plus legitimate controls, each with an expected-behavior checklist), creates a persistent "Adversarial User" persona and a Composite Evaluation metric that scores each scenario against its own expected behaviors, launches a multi-iteration run against the agent (voice or chat), polls for completion, builds a per-scenario pass/fail scorecard, and creates a saved report grouped by Test Case. Use when a user wants to follow the Adversarial & Red-Team Testing cookbook (https://docs.coval.dev/guides/adversarial-red-team-testing) without doing each step by hand. Triggers: "adversarial test set", "red team my agent", "jailbreak / prompt-injection testing", "test my agent against bad actors".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
(core) route header and body-height conformance via PageHeader. Use when fixing a (core) page's header, title bar, breadcrumbs, sub-route nav, body height (h-page, calc(100dvh…)), mobile header, or buttons hidden behind the avatar, or on a header-conformance assignment. NOT for /administration/* routes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and run multi-agent content production teams on OpenClaw with single-repo architecture, symlink-based file sharing, role-specialized AGENTS.md, and automated review-fix-score loops. Use when: (1) Setting up a team of 3+ agents with writer/reviewer/scorer/fixer roles for content creation, (2) Creating a quality-controlled publishing pipeline, (3) Bootstrapping agent workspaces with symlinks and tool configs from scratch, (4) Running multi-round review→fix→score cycles until a quality threshold is met, (5) Debugging agent spawn permissions, tool-call loops, or symlink issues. Based on real production experience building a 6-agent content team (2026-03-30).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
電子カルテに組み込む臨床判断支援を設計し、薬の相互作用や用量の検証、臨床スコアの計算、警告の重要度に応じた画面制御とテストを実装するスキル。
採点済みの競合情報を、市場マップや比較表、差別化の余地、優先施策を含むレポートにまとめます。経営層への報告や、チームで競争方針を決める場面に役立ちます。
Webページの表示や操作、APIの応答、ビルド・テストの所要時間を計測するスキル。変更前後の結果を比較し、Gitで共有する基準値をもとに性能の悪化を確認します。
自社の強みや顧客像を基に、比較すべき競合と調査先を選びます。直接競合・周辺競合・目標となる企業に分類し、根拠付きの候補一覧を作って詳しい比較の準備を整えます。
競合のブランド表現やサービス、実績などを共通の基準で採点し、根拠付きの比較カードと戦略上の二軸図にまとめ、自社が狙う位置の競合を把握するスキル。
大規模言語モデルの知識・推論・コード生成を共通の課題で評価するスキル。複数モデルの比較表や学習途中の成績推移を作り、評価結果と個別の回答を保存します。
Ponytail 5の公開ベンチマークに基づき、コード量・出力トークン・費用・時間などの比較結果を棒グラフで表示します。現在の作業対象の削減量は算出しません。
既存の型チェック、静的解析、テスト、未使用コード検出などをまとめて実行し、コード品質を0〜10の総合点で可視化します。継続的な品質の変化も追跡するスキルです。
実機のiPhoneでiOSアプリの各画面を撮影し、Appleの設計指針やDESIGN.mdに照らして見た目を評価。項目別の採点と改善点を示すスキル。
Caveman Cloudの費用や応答時間、エラーを読み取り専用で調べます。集計と個別の実行記録を照合し、支出の内訳や改善余地を根拠付きで整理するスキルです。
claude-flow v3の実装を15のエージェントに分担し、セキュリティ、基盤、統合、品質確認からリリースまで、依存関係と14週間の工程を管理するスキル。
人とAIが実装役・案内役を分担し、役割を切り替えながら開発を進めるスキル。テスト生成やコードレビュー、デバッグ、学習向けの説明にも対応します。
海運会社や運賃関連の市場指標から、現在の海運市場とサプライチェーンへの圧力を確認し、総合スコアとその算出に使われた指標を合わせて把握するスキル。