5.7万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Saga patterns, compensating actions, and two-phase commit for distributed transactions. Activate on: distributed transaction, saga, compensating action, two-phase commit, eventual consistency, cross-service transaction. NOT for: single-database transactions (use database-connection-pool-manager), event sourcing (use cqrs-event-sourcing-architect).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI-powered autonomous data extraction that navigates complex sites and returns structured JSON. Use this skill when the user wants structured data from websites, needs to extract pricing tiers, product listings, directory entries, or any data as JSON with a schema. Triggers on "extract structured data", "get all the products", "pull pricing info", "extract as JSON", or when the user provides a JSON schema for website data. More powerful than simple scraping for multi-page structured extraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Combine React's official "You Might Not Need an Effect" guidance with this project's stricter no direct useEffect stance. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React components that might reach for useEffect, derived state, event relays, reset logic, subscriptions, or client fetching.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns corrective and preventive actions from NCRs, audit reports, action forms, minutes or a tracker into one DRAFT tracker: action as stated, source, owner, due date, evidence expected and status, with flags for overdue, unowned, undated, stale and closed-without-evidence items and one question per flag. Never closes, verifies, reassigns or re-dates an action. Use when the user asks to "build the CAPA tracker", "update the corrective action log from these audit reports", "which actions are overdue or have no owner" or "draft the chase notes for open actions". Do not use for writing up the nonconformity itself, use nonconformance-report-drafter instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and review Action Scheduler jobs in WordPress plugins using Action Scheduler 3.9.x public APIs - async, single, recurring, and cron-expression actions; action_scheduler_init load timing; hook/args/group naming; unique and priority parameters; idempotent callbacks; chunked workloads; activation/deactivation cleanup; WooCommerce-bundled or standalone dependency usage; admin and WP-CLI debugging; queue runner limits; and safe operational troubleshooting. Use when a plugin schedules background jobs with as_enqueue_async_action, as_schedule_single_action, as_schedule_recurring_action, as_schedule_cron_action, as_get_scheduled_actions, or integrates with WooCommerce background queues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
テストは存在するがアサーションが実質何も検証しておらず、実装が壊れても落ちない（常に PASS する）構造を diff-time で検出する。Check 1 missing assertion（テスト本体にアサーションが無い）、Check 2 tautological assertion（定数同士・入力自身・mock の戻り値自身を assert し SUT に依存しない）、Check 3 nonexistent expected literal（assertDontSee / assertNotContains 等の期待文字列が対象ファイルに実在しない）、Check 4 stale expected value（同一 diff で対象の出力が変わったのに期待値が据え置き）、Check 5 unscoped expectation（汎用的な属性・クラスを応答全体に対して assert し対象要素にスコープされていない）、Check 6 swallowed failure（例外の握り潰しや到達しない位置のアサーションで判定が成立しない）、の 6 Check を対象とする report-only。テストの有無は test-existence、未テスト経路の量は coverage-gap、非決定性は flaky-test、命名は test-naming、JS/TS の un-awaited resolves / rejects は vitest-mock-isolation、tdd-ledger artifact ベースの RED/GREEN 検証は plangate-tdd-evidence、.only / .skip / xit / @ts-ignore と空の catch は heuristic-review.mjs の決定論検出器へ委譲する
Expert-level guidance for Flutter production applications: architecture decisions (Clean/Layered/Hexagonal/Feature-First), advanced state management (BLoC/Riverpod/GetX), performance optimization (eliminating jank, memory profiling, reducing rebuild overhead), code review with design pattern enforcement, scalability assessments, native platform integration (MethodChannel/EventChannel/FFI), complex UI challenges (custom render objects, slivers), testing strategies (unit/widget/integration/golden), CI/CD pipeline architecture, build optimization, and accessibility compliance. Triggers: 'architecture decision', 'design pattern', 'performance issue', 'code review', 'production problem', 'scaling concerns', 'best practices', 'technical debt', 'refactoring strategy'. Essential for complex enterprise apps, critical production debugging, architectural refactors, or when choosing between competing technical approaches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
リポジトリの構造・技術スタック・機能一覧・セットアップ手順を動的に解析し、 包括的なドキュメントを自動生成するスキル。言語・フレームワーク問わず汎用的に動作する。 Use this skill whenever the user asks to: - Explain a repository / リポジトリの説明 / リポジトリの概要 - Generate a README / README生成 / README作成 - Understand project structure / プロジェクト構成を教えて / 構造を説明して - Learn how to run a project / 使い方を教えて / 動かし方 / セットアップ方法 - Get a repo overview / repo overview / explain this repo / what does this repo do - List features / 機能一覧 / このプロジェクトは何ができる？ - Onboard to a new codebase / コードベースのキャッチアップ / 新しいリポジトリに入った - "このリポジトリ何？" "プロジェクトの全体像" "how to run this project" - "コードの全体を把握したい" "ドキュメントを整備して" "技術スタックを知りたい" This skill is especially useful when joining a new project, onboarding team members, or when a repository lacks proper documentation. It works with ANY repository regardless of programming language, framework, or project type.
Liquid Glass material best practices for SwiftUI, UIKit, and AppKit on iOS 26+/macOS 26+ (Tahoe) through iOS 27/macOS 27. Use when implementing, reviewing, or migrating to glass: glassEffect, Glass variants (.regular/.clear/.identity), tint, interactive(), GlassEffectContainer, glassEffectUnion, toolbar glass, ToolbarSpacer, scrollEdgeEffectStyle, sharedBackgroundVisibility, tabBarMinimizeBehavior, backgroundExtensionEffect, NSGlassEffectView, UIGlassEffect, Tahoe window chrome, glass accessibility (Reduce Transparency/Increase Contrast), pre-26 Material fallbacks, UIDesignRequiresCompatibility. Also fires on symptoms: glass renders dark or muddy, glass looks like a flat tinted rectangle, glass button doesn't register taps, tap passes through glass, "'glassEffect' is only available in iOS 26.0 or newer", "ambiguous use of 'opacity'", "'cornerRadius' was deprecated", glass looks different in simulator vs device, screenshots of glass UI don't match. For glass animation, morphing, glassEffectID, transitions, Metal shaders, or performance profiling use the liquid-glass-motion skill instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
tespit etme (s) and prevents code injection attacks targeting serverless functions (AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, Google Cloud Functions) through event source poisoning, malicious layer injection, runtime command execution, and IAM privilege escalation via function modification. The analyst combines static analysis of function code, CloudTrail event correlation, runtime behavior monitoring, and IAM policy auditing to identify injection vectors across the expanded serverless attack surface including AP...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tests APIs for injection vulnerabilities including SQL injection, NoSQL injection, OS command injection, LDAP injection, and Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) through API parameters, headers, and request bodies. The tester crafts malicious payloads targeting different backend technologies and injection contexts to extract data, execute commands, or access internal services. Maps to OWASP API8:2023 Security Misconfiguration and API7:2023 SSRF. Activates for requests involving API injection te...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to write or review programmatic JDBC with Spring — including JdbcClient (Spring Framework 7+) as the default API, JdbcTemplate only where batch/streaming APIs require JdbcOperations, NamedParameterJdbcTemplate for legacy named-param code, parameterized SQL, RowMapper mapping to records, batch operations, transactions, safe handling of generated keys, DataAccessException handling, read-only transactions, streaming large result sets, and @JdbcTest slice testing. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for Spring JDBC (JdbcTemplate, JdbcClient, NamedParameterJdbcTemplate); Apply best practices for Spring JDBC data access in Java code; Detect and fix SQL injection risks in JDBC code; Improve transaction boundaries or exception handling for JDBC operations. Part of cursor-rules-java project
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Windows アプリ開発 (Windows AI Foundry) の AI/ML 統合リファレンス。 Windows AI APIs、LanguageModel, TextRecognizer, ImageScaler, ImageObjectExtractor, ImageObjectRemover, ImageDescriptionGenerator, SemanticSearch, ContentModeration, Phi Silica LoRA、Windows ML、ONNX Runtime、execution providers、LearningModel、 Foundry Local、CLI、REST API、SDK、model catalog、MCP サーバー、App Actions、 IActionProvider、Agent Launchers、DirectML、IDMLDevice、operators、tensors。
Daily per-section review cycle driving a section toward the smallest, clearest form that still does everything it does today. Selects its section live each run (scripted), inventories every file, derives the target shape before any scan, works parallel reading threads into one ranked list and strikes it on a 2-3h budget. One PR per run; each run's report and Needs-Peter queue live in its own docs/health/runs/ file; 'resume' applies Peter's answers later. Use for the morning section-improvement run, 'doctor <section>', or 'run section doctor'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Saga patterns, compensating actions, and two-phase commit for distributed transactions. Activate on: distributed transaction, saga, compensating action, two-phase commit, eventual consistency, cross-service transaction. NOT for: single-database transactions (use database-connection-pool-manager), event sourcing (use cqrs-event-sourcing-architect).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Own whether a multi-document product-architecture binder is internally consistent, complete against its stated customer/contingency/architecture coverage, and honest about which older product ambitions it has absorbed, superseded, deferred, contradicted, orphaned, or rejected. Use when running a binder Architect of Record pass, before an implementation chain cites a binder chapter as ready, when a proof-gate owner is missing, or when reconciling the binder against the older ambition corpus (website, plans, examples, ADRs). NOT for auditing a single Claude Skill bundle's structure or frontmatter (use skill-hygiene), rendering a single-PM accept/reject verdict on one finished deliverable (use port-daddy-user-surrogate-pm-review), or sequencing/stewarding a roadmap's sidequests once a gap or operator decision has been surfaced (use legible-roadmap-with-sidequests).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI-powered autonomous data extraction that navigates complex sites and returns structured JSON. Use this skill when the user wants structured data from websites, needs to extract pricing tiers, product listings, directory entries, or any data as JSON with a schema. Triggers on "extract structured data", "get all the products", "pull pricing info", "extract as JSON", or when the user provides a JSON schema for website data. More powerful than simple scraping for multi-page structured extraction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Requires OFOX_API_KEY — create one at https://app.ofox.ai. Generate a clean, catalog-style e-commerce product video from a real product photo (or, for a generic or fictional product, a text description) using the Ofox video API (Seedance 2.5) — runs a short creative brief (product photo, target platform and aspect ratio, background, camera orbit or turntable) when the request leaves them open, writes a plain-background, literal-accuracy prompt (precise product description, a simple camera orbit or turntable motion, no dramatic cinematography), shows a cost estimate, then calls ofox-video-core to submit, poll, download, and report the real cost. Use when a user asks to turn a product photo into catalog/listing footage, e.g. "make this product photo a 360-degree white-background showcase", "turn this photo into a white-background product video", "make a clean turntable video of this item", or "give me a 5-second white-background rotation video of this product for my listing". Do not use for cinematic brand/mood advertising (see seedance-ad-creative) or for anything involving people/dialogue (see seedance-short-drama).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OpenClawのブラウザ画面や公式アプリが接続できない原因を調べます。通信経路、認証、端末登録、再接続を切り分け、対象端末の接続を確認します。
写真や動画、公開記録の少ない手がかりをつなぎ、場所・日時・組織の関係などを検証します。根拠と仮説を分け、反証や未確認事項も整理する調査スキル。
Reactで動画を作る際に、Remotionの実装例と制作ルールを参照できるスキル。アニメーション、音声、字幕、グラフ、3D表現や場面転換を扱います。
ReactやNext.jsで、ドラッグ操作、スワイプ、文字やSVGのアニメーションを実装します。複数段階の動きや読み込み表示まで扱い、用途に合うAPI選びも支えるスキル。
新機能や企画案を、PM・設計・開発・QAの4つの立場から同時に検討します。各役割の懸念や最初の行動を整理し、共通点と意見の対立をまとめるスキルです。
既存プロジェクトの設計に合わせて、外部APIとの連携機能を追加するスキル。設定、認証、エラー処理から登録、テストまで、既存の実装方式に沿って整えます。