「data framework」の検索結果

Map advanced persistent threat (APT) group TTPs to the MITRE ATT&CK framework using the attackcti Python library to query STIX/TAXII data for group-technique associations, then generate ATT&CK Navigator layer files to visualize and compare defensive coverage against adversary profiles. Use when profiling an APT group's techniques, building Navigator coverage heatmaps, or assessing technique coverage gaps against a specific threat actor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes RAM memory dumps from compromised systems using the Volatility framework to identify malicious processes, injected code, network connections, loaded modules, and extracted credentials. Supports Windows, Linux, and macOS memory forensics. Activates for requests involving memory forensics, RAM analysis, volatile data examination, process injection detection, or memory-resident malware investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes malware C2 communication over HTTP, HTTPS, DNS, and custom protocols to reverse-engineer beacon patterns, command structures, data encoding, and infrastructure (primary servers, fallback domains, dead drops). Use after reverse engineering reveals network traffic needing protocol analysis or when building detection signatures for a framework like Cobalt Strike, Metasploit, or Sliver.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

UX research and design toolkit for Senior UX Designer/Researcher including data-driven persona generation, journey mapping, usability testing frameworks, and research synthesis. Use for user research, persona creation, journey mapping, and design validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides guidance for LLM post-training with RL using slime, a Megatron+SGLang framework. Use when training GLM models, implementing custom data generation workflows, or needing tight Megatron-LM integration for RL scaling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for Vercel cost and performance optimization on deployed projects, especially Next.js, SvelteKit, Nuxt, and limited Astro apps. Collect Vercel metrics, usage, project config, and code scan results first; investigate only metric-backed candidates; produce ranked recommendations grounded in verified files and version-aware Vercel/framework docs. Trigger for Vercel bill reduction, slow or expensive routes, caching opportunities, Function Invocations, Build Minutes, Fast Data Transfer, Core Web Vitals, Bot Management, Fluid compute, or cost breakdown requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, modify, test, or package Python provider adapters under python/providers, including framework-specific dependencies, public imports, type inference, and provider metadata. Use for Python provider work only; use python-sdk for core SDK changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use TanStack Table v9 core architecture, stable data and columns, and inferred types. Route setup, missing APIs, row models, state, features, and framework-specific work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates high-converting landing pages as complete Next.js/React (TSX) components with Tailwind CSS. Creates hero sections, feature grids, pricing tables, FAQ accordions, testimonial blocks, and CTA sections using proven copy frameworks (PAS, AIDA, BAB). Outputs SEO meta tags, structured data, and performance-optimised code targeting Core Web Vitals (LCP < 1s, CLS < 0.1). Use when the user asks to create a landing page, marketing page, homepage, single-page site, lead capture page, campaign page, promo page, or conversion-optimised web page — or when they want to A/B test landing page variants or replace a static page with one designed to convert.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

UX research and design toolkit for Senior UX Designer/Researcher including data-driven persona generation, journey mapping, usability testing frameworks, and research synthesis. Use when conducting user research, creating personas, mapping user journeys, planning usability tests, or validating designs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates Google Cloud workloads for cost efficiency and FinOps alignment using the Google Cloud Well-Architected Framework Cost Optimization pillar. Use when the user asks to analyze Google Cloud spend, reduce cloud bills, rightsize resources (for example, Compute, GKE, Storage, Databases), evaluate discount options (for example, CUDs, SUDs, Spot VMs), or eliminate idle capacity. Do not use for standalone product pricing lookups or non-cost architecture design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates security-focused guidance for Google Cloud workloads based on the design principles and recommendations in the Google Cloud Well-Architected Framework (WAF). Use this skill to evaluate workloads, identify security requirements, and provide actionable recommendations for IAM, network security, data protection, and operational security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Publish a website or web app from the sandbox to a public URL, and deploy to cloud providers — get a live link to share, ship a static site or SPA, put a built site online, or deploy a framework app / container. Use when the user says 'publish this', 'deploy it', 'put it online', 'give me a live URL', 'host this', 'share a preview link', or wants to make a site/app they (or you) just built reachable on the web. Covers the zero-account instant path (Cloudflare) and permanent hosting (Vercel, incl. any Dockerfile). Also owns the publish GUARDRAILS: never publish unprompted, how to honestly take a site down, the runtime-dependency and data-persistence checks, and the mandatory pre-publish security review. Prefers Kortix Apps (a stable Kortix URL behind Kortix sign-in) when the project has Apps on. Points at kortix-marketplace for other providers and deeper provider-specific skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Export raw OpenTelemetry traces from an AI application to Confident AI's Observatory. TRIGGER when the user wants to send OpenTelemetry or OTLP traces/spans from an LLM app, agent, RAG pipeline, or chatbot to Confident AI; configure the Confident AI OTLP endpoint; set confident.span.* or confident.trace.* attributes; export AI-app traces without the deepeval Python package; wire an OTLPSpanExporter, OpenTelemetry Collector, or vendor-neutral OTel SDK to Confident AI; or pick the US vs EU OTLP endpoint. Language-agnostic: the mechanism is OTLP attribute keys plus an exporter endpoint. DO NOT TRIGGER for building DeepEval pytest eval suites, datasets, goldens, metrics, or deepeval test run (use the `deepeval` skill); for instrumenting with the DeepEval SDK's @observe decorator or framework integrations (use the `deepeval-tracing` skill); or for non-AI software such as web servers, CRUD backends, or infrastructure: the confident.* attributes describe AI components only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DeepEval evaluation workflow for AI agents and LLM applications. TRIGGER when the user wants to evaluate or improve an AI agent, tool-using workflow, multi-turn chatbot, RAG pipeline, or LLM app; add evals; generate datasets or goldens; use deepeval generate; use deepeval test run; send results to Confident AI; monitor production; run online evals; inspect traces; or iterate on prompts, tools, retrieval, or agent behavior from eval failures. AI agents are the primary use case. Covers Python SDK, pytest eval suites, CLI generation, traced evals, Confident AI reporting, and agent-driven improvement loops. DO NOT TRIGGER for unrelated generic pytest, non-AI test setup, or non-DeepEval observability work unless the user asks to compare or migrate to DeepEval; for instrumenting an app with DeepEval tracing, @observe, or framework integrations (use the `deepeval-tracing` skill); or for raw OpenTelemetry / OTLP export without the deepeval package (use the `deepeval-otel` skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to build desktop applications with GPUI Kit, the Rust framework published as the gpui-kit crate (GPUI plus gpui_kit::component, gpui_kit::base, gpui_kit::assets). Use when setting up a gpui-kit app, choosing or using a component (Button, Input, Select, Dialog, Sheet, Tabs, Sidebar, List, DataTable, Tree, Chart, etc.), handling component state, theming, or window overlays, and for GPUI mechanics: actions and keybindings, async tasks, contexts, custom elements, entities, events, focus, global state, layout and styling, ElementId, and tests including UI integration testing. Holds the normative Coding Guides: read them before any architecture, state-ownership, public API, naming, or testing decision. Pairs with the gpui-kit-design-guides skill for the Design Guides.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides guidance for LLM post-training with RL using slime, a Megatron+SGLang framework. Use when training GLM models, implementing custom data generation workflows, or needing tight Megatron-LM integration for RL scaling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Graph-informed mutation testing triage. Parses codebases with Trailmark, runs mutation testing and necessist, then uses survived mutants, unnecessary test statements, and call graph data to identify false positives, missing test coverage, and fuzzing targets. Use when triaging survived mutants, analyzing mutation testing results, identifying test gaps, finding fuzzing targets from weak tests, running mutation frameworks (including circomvent and cairo-mutants), or using necessist.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Insecure deserialization exploitation across Java, PHP, .NET, Python, Node.js, and Ruby. Covers gadget chain construction with ysoserial/phpggc/ysoserial.net, ObjectInputStream and BinaryFormatter sink identification, pickle __reduce__ RCE, phar:// wrapper abuse, Jackson polymorphic typing, Json.NET TypeNameHandling, ViewState tampering, node-serialize IIFE injection, Ruby Marshal.load and YAML.load gadgets, framework-specific chains for Spring/Hibernate/Laravel/Symfony, modern attack surfaces including Kubernetes admission webhooks and message queue consumers, WAF bypass through encoding layers and content-type manipulation, and serialVersionUID/JMX/RMI vectors. Activate when the engagement involves deserialization sinks, serialized data in cookies or request bodies, gadget chain development, magic method abuse, ysoserial payload generation, or any review of marshalling and unmarshalling logic in target applications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide developers through capturing diagnostic artifacts to diagnose production .NET performance issues. Use when the user needs help choosing diagnostic tools, collecting performance data, or understanding tool trade-offs across different environments (Windows/Linux, .NET Framework/modern .NET, container/non-container).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and optimize application data access that uses Entity Framework Core (EF Core). Use for EF Core performance and correctness reviews of services, repositories, imports, and background jobs: slow or memory-heavy queries, excessive round-trips, hidden SaveChanges, premature materialization, dynamic query construction, result-graph tracking, bulk writes, DbContext lifetime or overlapping operations, search semantics, paging, raw SQL, and model/index coverage. Use whether or not EF Core owns the schema. For EF Core, not Dapper or raw ADO.NET.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Causal inference framework for answering "does X cause Y?" beyond correlation. DoWhy (Microsoft Research) provides the identify-estimate-refute loop: define a causal graph (DAG), identify the causal effect using backdoor/frontdoor/instrumental variable criteria, estimate treatment effects with multiple estimators, and validate results with automated refutation tests. Use when: distinguishing causation from correlation, estimating treatment effects (ATE, ATT, CATE), designing and analyzing A/B tests with confounders, using instrumental variables, performing counterfactual reasoning ("what would have happened if..."), validating causal claims with sensitivity analysis, working with observational data where randomization is impossible, or any analysis where the question is "what is the CAUSAL effect of X on Y" rather than just "how do X and Y relate?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct rigorous thematic analysis (TA) of qualitative data following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-phase framework. Use whenever the user mentions 'thematic analysis', 'TA', 'Braun and Clarke', 'qualitative coding', 'identifying themes', or asks for help analysing interviews, focus groups, open-ended survey responses, or transcripts to identify patterns. Also trigger for questions about inductive vs theoretical coding, semantic vs latent themes, essentialist vs constructionist epistemology, building a thematic map, or writing up a qualitative findings section. Covers all six phases, the four upfront analytic decisions, the 15-point quality checklist, and the five common pitfalls. Produces a Word document write-up and an annotated thematic map. Does NOT cover IPA, grounded theory, discourse analysis, conversation analysis, or narrative analysis — use a different method for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。