4,137 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Measure and audit C/C++ code size, namespace distribution, function complexity, nesting, recurrence, and namespace coupling in the EMULATORS framework. Use when Codex needs codebase statistics, complexity baselines, namespace comparisons, duplication indicators, hotspots, architectural growth analysis, or before/after complexity reports while excluding third-party code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a structured SOC incident response playbook for ransomware attacks covering detection, containment, eradication, and recovery phases with specific SIEM queries, isolation procedures, and decision trees. Use when SOC teams need formalized response procedures for ransomware incidents aligned to NIST SP 800-61 and MITRE ATT&CK ransomware techniques.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes UEFI bootkit persistence mechanisms including firmware implants in SPI flash, EFI System Partition (ESP) modifications, Secure Boot bypass techniques, and UEFI variable manipulation. Covers detection of known bootkit families (BlackLotus, LoJax, MosaicRegressor, MoonBounce, CosmicStrand), ESP partition forensic inspection, chipsec-based firmware integrity verification, and Secure Boot configuration auditing. Activates for requests involving UEFI malware analysis, firmware persistence investigation, boot chain integrity verification, or Secure Boot bypass detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze inbox emails to identify action-required items, prioritize by urgency/importance, classify by topic, and draft contextual replies. Use when triaging unread emails, prioritizing inbox, generating response drafts, or tracking email response status.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a DRAFT weighted supplier evaluation matrix from supplier responses and the panel's agreed criteria, weights and scale: a provisional score per cell with the quoted evidence and anchor behind it, a register of every missing or partial answer, and calibration and sensitivity flags. Provisional for panel moderation; never recommends, awards or disqualifies. Use when the user asks to score, weight or rank supplier, bid or tender responses against agreed criteria, for example "score these bids", "build the evaluation matrix", "weight the tender responses" or "rank the suppliers against our criteria". Do not use for a side-by-side comparison without scores, use rfp-comparison-pack instead; for writing the criteria, use rfp-requirements-pack instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the WooCommerce REST API v4 (namespace wc/v4, since WC 10.2) alongside or in place of v3 — verified route catalog (Customers, Orders, Refunds, Products, ShippingZones with DELETE, ShippingZoneMethod, Fulfillments, segmented Settings under /wc/v4/settings/<group>), the hook prefix pattern woocommerce_rest_api_v4_<route>_*, shared error codes, and the RestApiCache trait (WC 10.5+) for endpoint response caching. The v4 AbstractController lives under the Internal namespace and is NOT a public extension surface; plugin-defined REST routes use WP_REST_Controller directly. Use when calling WC REST endpoints, when picking v3 vs v4, or when reviewing /wc/v3/ URLs that now have v4 equivalents. Triggers on wc/v4, /wc/v4/, woocommerce_rest_api_v4_*, RestApiCache, customer-owned Woo endpoints, REST API v4 in WooCommerce context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
リファクタリングを「更新されたチームの理解と、コードが表現する過去の理解の差分同期」と捉え、今回得た新知識（要求・ドメイン知識・制約）が naming と responsibility へ反映されているか、boundary が現在の understanding を表現しているか、diff の削除行やコメントに現れる過去の design history と constraint を失っていないかを diff-time で確認する。Knowledge Delta の signal は diff（追加/削除された hunk・コメント・ADR 参照）を一次情報とし、PR 本文が供給されるときは補助に用い、不確実なら question に留める。ドメイン用語の一貫性は ubiquitous-language-naming、集約/コンテキスト境界の設計判断は bounded-context-language、投機的抽象化・caller special-case は altitude-generalization、スコープ逸脱/前提破壊は fix-scope-integrity、振る舞い変更と構造変更の分離は behavior-structure-separation、完了主張の反証は refactor-claim-audit へ委譲する
Write, configure, and deploy Netlify Edge Functions (Deno runtime at the network edge) in TypeScript/JavaScript. Use when adding request/response manipulation at the edge — auth middleware, geolocation redirects, A/B testing and personalization, content localization, redirects/rewrites, SSR at the edge, or transforming responses — or when configuring path routing, response caching, or edge error handling. Triggers on tasks like "add auth middleware", "geo-based redirect", "A/B testing at the edge", "rewrite requests", or editing files in netlify/edge-functions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cache dynamic and static responses on Netlify's CDN from Functions, Edge Functions, and proxies. Use when you add caching or cache-control headers to a function response, tune cache TTL or stale-while-revalidate, set up the durable cache, vary a cache key by query/header/cookie/country/language, purge or invalidate the cache by site or cache tag, use the programmatic Cache API (caches.open/match/put) or @netlify/cache helpers (fetchWithCache/cacheHeaders/getCacheStatus), speed up an expensive API call, add ISR or on-demand revalidation, or debug why a response is or isn't cached via the Cache-Status header.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Response timing, acknowledgment, and making the interface feel alive. Every action deserves a response at the right speed. Use when designing interactions, evaluating responsiveness, or diagnosing why a product feels sluggish or dead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dağıt:s deception-based honeytokens in Active Directory including fake privileged accounts with AdminCount=1, fake SPNs for Kerberoasting Tespit (honeyroasting), decoy GPOs with cpassword traps, and fake BloodHound paths. Monitors Windows Security Event IDs 4769, 4625, 4662, 5136 for honeytoken interaction. Use implementing yaparken AD deception defenses for Tespit etme lateral movement, credential theft, and reconnaissance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Container escape is a critical attack technique where an adversary breaks out of container isolation to access the host system or other containers. Tespit involves monitoring for escape indicators
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
tespit etmeunauthorized modifications to running containers by monitoring for binary execution drift, file system changes, and configuration deviations from the original container image.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
tespit etmecontainer escape attempts in real-time using Falco runtime security rules that monitor syscalls, file access, and privilege escalation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Parses Kubernetes API server audit logs (JSON lines) to tespit etmeexec-into-pod, secret access, RBAC modifications, privileged pod creation, and anonymous API access. Builds threat Tespit rules from audit event patterns. Use investigating yaparken Kubernetes cluster compromise or building k8s-specific SIEM Tespit rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
tespit etmeand prevent privilege escalation in Kubernetes pods by monitoring security contexts, capabilities, and syscall patterns with Falco and OPA policies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
bu skill teaches security teams how to Dağıt: and operationalize Amazon GuardDuty for continuous threat Tespit across AWS accounts and workloads. It covers enabling protection plans for S3, EKS, EC2 runtime monitoring, and Lambda, interpreting Bul:ing severity levels, and building automated response workflows using EventBridge and Lambda.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tespit etme data exfiltration attempts from AWS S3 buckets by analyzing CloudTrail S3 data events, VPC Flow Logs, GuardDuty Bul:ings, Amazon Macie alerts, and S3 access patterns to identify unauthorized bulk downloads and cross-account data transfers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
bu skill covers Dağıt:ing Microsoft Sentinel as a cloud-native SIEM and SOAR platform for centralized security operations. It details configuring data connectors for multi-cloud log ingestion, writing KQL Tespit queries, building automated response playbooks with Logic Apps, and leveraging the Sentinel data lake for petabyte-scale threat hunting across AWS, Azure, and GCP security telemetry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
tespit etme (s) prompt injection attacks targeting LLM-based applications using a multi-layered defense combining regex pattern matching for known attack signatures, heuristic scoring for structural anomalies, and transformer-based classification with DeBERTa models. The tespit etme (or) analyzes user inputs before they reach the LLM, flagging direct injections (system prompt overrides, role-play escapes, instruction hijacking) and indirect injections (encoded payloads, multi-language obfuscation, delimiter-...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PRに付いたレビューコメント(AI/人間)に対応し、返信とResolved化まで行う。Triggers on: '/pr-review-respond', 'レビュー対応して', 'レビューコメントに対応'
Responsive design engineering: production-level container queries, fluid type, 320 to 4K. Use when implementing, reviewing or testing responsive design engineering for React, Vite, Next.js or Perfect_AI projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a structured SOC incident response playbook for ransomware attacks covering detection, containment, eradication, and recovery phases with specific SIEM queries, isolation procedures, and decision trees. Use when SOC teams need formalized response procedures for ransomware incidents aligned to NIST SP 800-61 and MITRE ATT&CK ransomware techniques.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes UEFI bootkit persistence mechanisms including firmware implants in SPI flash, EFI System Partition (ESP) modifications, Secure Boot bypass techniques, and UEFI variable manipulation. Covers detection of known bootkit families (BlackLotus, LoJax, MosaicRegressor, MoonBounce, CosmicStrand), ESP partition forensic inspection, chipsec-based firmware integrity verification, and Secure Boot configuration auditing. Activates for requests involving UEFI malware analysis, firmware persistence investigation, boot chain integrity verification, or Secure Boot bypass detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。