本文へ移動
cccskills

「exe」の検索結果

4,340 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Orientação de liderança executiva para tomada de decisões estratégicas, desenvolvimento organizacional e gerenciamento de stakeholders. Inclui analisador de estratégia, modelagem de cenários financeiros, frameworks de governança corporativa e playbooks de relações com investidores. Use ao planejar estratégia, preparar apresentações para conselho, gerenciar investidores, desenvolver cultura organizacional, tomar decisões executivas, ou quando o usuário menciona CEO, planejamento estratégico, reuniões do conselho, atualizações de investidores, liderança organizacional ou estratégia executiva.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

artubss/SKILLS-CLAUDE-CODE112026年5月17日 更新

Fornece orientação para interpretar e manipular internals de redes neurais usando nnsight com execução remota NDIF opcional. Use quando precisar executar experimentos de interpretabilidade em modelos massivos (70B+) sem recursos locais de GPU, ou ao trabalhar com qualquer arquitetura PyTorch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

artubss/SKILLS-CLAUDE-CODE112026年5月17日 更新

Triage a GitHub issue that already has the cc-issue-created label and is assumed to be ready to start. First inspect the comment history to decide whether human confirmation is needed (cc-need-human-check, highest priority); otherwise decide whether the issue should be closed as not needed, unanswered confirmation items remain (cc-answer-issue-questions), the description is stale relative to settled comment-history content and must be refreshed before execution (cc-update-issue), or it can move to execution (cc-exec-issue). Dependency checks are out of scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

getty104/claude-code-marketplace112026年7月4日 更新

core

無料

SOP for the micro-execution C.O.R.E. phase. Trigger when: - Implementing plan steps, managing code changes at commit boundaries, and verifying incremental progress. - Navigating states: Absorb, Clarify, Plan, Execute. - Prompt contains: /core, core workflow, absorb, clarify, execution invariants, commit boundary, verify assertion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nrdxp/predicate102026年9月1日 更新

Parse Windows Prefetch files to determine program execution history including run counts, timestamps, and referenced files for forensic investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

andycungkrinx91/konoha92026年10月9日 更新

Parse Windows Prefetch files using the windowsprefetch Python library to reconstruct application execution history, detect renamed or masquerading binaries, and identify suspicious program execution patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

andycungkrinx91/konoha92026年10月9日 更新

Parses and analyzes the Windows Amcache.hve registry hive to extract evidence of program execution, application installation, and driver loading for digital forensics investigations. Uses Eric Zimmerman's AmcacheParser and Timeline Explorer for artifact extraction, SHA-1 hash correlation with threat intel, and timeline reconstruction. Activates for requests involving Amcache forensics, program execution evidence, Windows artifact analysis, or application compatibility cache investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

andycungkrinx91/konoha92026年10月9日 更新

Design and execute DAG-based automation workflows using the NV oOS Pro Workflow Builder — a ReactFlow visual builder for chaining tool calls, agent runs, and actions into repeatable pipelines. Covers the visual builder UI, 9 preset categories, 10 node types, Kahn's algorithm execution engine, scheduling via Pro Schedule Manager, template variable syntax, and best practices. Use when designing workflows, debugging DAG execution failures, choosing between a workflow schedule and raw tool chaining, or building CRM/PM automation pipelines with toolkit_cpt nodes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nvdigitalsolutions/mcp-ai-wpoos72026年10月14日 更新

Design and execute DAG-based automation workflows using the NV oOS Pro Workflow Builder — a ReactFlow visual builder for chaining tool calls, agent runs, and actions into repeatable pipelines. Covers the visual builder UI, 10 preset categories (incl. AI Fashion Production, v1.1.92+), 10 node types, Kahn's algorithm execution engine, scheduling via Pro Schedule Manager, template variable syntax, and best practices. Use when designing workflows, debugging DAG execution failures, choosing between a workflow schedule and raw tool chaining, or building CRM/PM automation pipelines with toolkit_cpt nodes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nvdigitalsolutions/mcp-ai-wpoos72026年10月14日 更新

TanStack Pacer best practices for execution control in React — debouncing, throttling, rate limiting, queuing, and batching. Use when implementing search inputs, scroll handlers, API rate limits, task queues, bulk operations, or any scenario requiring controlled execution timing with reactive state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

fellipeutaka/denji62026年8月3日 更新

Use when working with Aws Codepipeline — aWS CodePipeline CI/CD pipeline management and execution analysis. Covers pipeline inventory, stage and action status, execution history, pipeline triggers, artifact stores, and action type configurations. Use when inspecting pipeline health, debugging failed stages, reviewing execution history, or auditing pipeline configurations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026年4月5日 更新

Use when working with Aws Data Pipeline — aWS Data Pipeline workflow management and execution analysis. Covers pipeline inventory, pipeline definitions, execution status, object status, task runner health, and pipeline scheduling. Use when inspecting data pipeline health, debugging failed executions, reviewing pipeline definitions, or auditing pipeline schedules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cloudthinker-ai/CloudSkills62026年4月5日 更新

Review Jupyter notebooks for side effects, dependencies, and safe execution strategy before running or editing them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Execute detailed plans in batches with review checkpoints

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

bg-szy/TOP-SKILLS62026年9月8日 更新

Securing AWS Lambda execution roles by implementing least-privilege IAM policies, applying permission boundaries, restricting resource-based policies, using IAM Access Analyzer to validate permissions, and enforcing role scoping through SCPs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MustafaKemal0146/fetih52026年10月11日 更新

Parse Windows Prefetch files using the windowsprefetch Python library to reconstruct application execution history, detect renamed or masquerading binaries, and identify suspicious program execution patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

micsapp/micstec-skills42026年3月20日 更新

Parse Windows Prefetch files to determine program execution history including run counts, timestamps, and referenced files for forensic investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

micsapp/micstec-skills42026年3月20日 更新

exec-plan

無料

Create, manage, and track execution plans as first-class repository artifacts in docs/exec-plans/

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

gracefullight/pkgs42026年10月2日 更新

Triage a GitHub issue that already has the cc-issue-created label and is assumed ready to start. Inspect the comment history first to decide whether human confirmation is needed (cc-need-human-check, highest priority — reserved for issue-level deadlock, or for confirmation items answer-issue-questions already investigated and explicitly marked unanswerable); otherwise close the issue as not needed, delegate unanswered confirmation items in the last comment or the description to answer-issue-questions (cc-answer-issue-questions), refresh a description stale relative to settled comment-history content (cc-update-issue), or move to execution (cc-exec-issue). Any UI-changing issue is routed to the design-first flow (cc-create-ui-design) before execution; the exceptions are an issue whose description already names the .pen design to implement against, and a minor UI change that introduces no new visual decision (no new screen/section, no layout change, no new reusable component, no visual expression outside existing design tokens/components). Design files are never edited in the implementation PR. Dependency checks are out of scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

getty104/claude-task-worker42026年10月13日 更新

Implement exactly one SDD Composy task in the ready state with dependency preflight, TDD RED evidence, allowed paths, real verification commands, and the guarded transition to qa_required. Use when a ready task should be executed — 'executar a TASK-003', 'implementar a próxima tarefa', 'run task 4'. Do NOT use for changes without an approved task (sdd-quick), for autonomous multi-stage correction (sdd-loop), or for QA, review, or verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace32026年9月28日 更新

feat-loop

無料

Use when the user hands over a GitHub issue to be delivered end to end — 'resolver a issue #42', 'loop na issue 42', 'deliver issue https://github.com/o/r/issues/42' — or when an Orca worker preamble dispatches `feat-loop #N`. Turns the issue into a plan, executes it, reviews the result and runs at most 2 fix cycles until APPROVED, then opens a pull request that closes the issue. Never merges. Do NOT use without an issue (feat-feature / feat-quick), to only plan (feat-feature), to only review (feat-review) or to execute an existing plan (feat-exec).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pwdev-solucoes/pwdev-claude-marketplace32026年9月28日 更新

Decompose multi-step work into a revisable subgoal plan with stable step IDs, checkpointing, and plan-ahead execution. Load when a task needs explicit planning before action, subgoal decomposition, plan checkpointing, or ReCAP-style plan-ahead execution. Also triggers on "structured plan", "plan with steps", "subgoal graph", "revise the plan", "checkpoint plan", or multi-step tasks where naive one-shot execution would be fragile. Skips trivial single-step tasks. Pairs with dynamic-routing on failure. Distinct from process-decomposer (registry/triage) and problem-to-plan (doc deliverables).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dvy1987/agent-loom32026年8月8日 更新

Write the executable feature specification — the WHAT and WHY artifact that agents and reviewers treat as source of truth. Owns both /specify and /clarify modes. Load when the user asks to write a feature spec, write a specification, write an executable spec, define functional requirements, capture acceptance criteria as Given/When/Then, or when the spec-driven-development orchestrator routes here. Also triggers on "feature spec", "executable spec", "/specify", "/clarify", "write the spec for this feature", "specification for", "spec-driven", "machine-readable spec". Output: docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>-feature-spec.md. Hard gate: cannot Approve while [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dvy1987/agent-loom32026年8月8日 更新

Use this skill when the user asks about the agricultural exemption from Hours of Service (HOS) rules under 49 CFR 395.1(k) — what qualifies as agricultural commodity, the 150-air-mile radius rule, state-declared planting/harvest seasons, livestock hauling specifics, and how to document operations under the exemption. Cite 49 CFR 395.1(k) and 49 USC 5117.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

x3allamerican/skills32026年5月17日 更新