「fact」の検索結果

Shared artifact registry, common artifact patterns, and integration validation. Load when tracking data that flows across journey steps or validating horizontal coherence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used only when the user explicitly asks to use `$ralph-specum-refactor`, or explicitly asks Ralph Specum in Codex to revise spec artifacts after implementation learnings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Own MSBuild generated-artifact integration. USE FOR: a target that creates or should create source, Content, None, or another physical file but the artifact is missing from compilation or output; target timing; evaluation-time glob misses; $(IntermediateOutputPath) placement; and FileWrites clean tracking. The prompt may describe the generated artifact without naming the producing task. DO NOT USE when the primary defect is general Include/Remove/Update semantics, item metadata or batching, duplicate/overlapping declarations, or a generated-item identity relationship; use item-management. Exclude Roslyn source-generator internals and non-MSBuild systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Migrate .NET test projects from xUnit.net v2 to xunit.v3 and fix v3 breaks. Use for package/CPM conversion, OutputType=Exe, preserving the VSTest or MTP runner (including projects currently using YTest.MTP.XUnit2), incompatible TFMs, async void tests, string-to-Type attributes, custom Fact/Theory/BeforeAfterTest attributes, Xunit.SkippableFact, xunit.abstractions/extensibility consolidation, and Xunit.Combinatorial/StaFact compatibility. Do not use for framework conversion or a runner-only migration. For xUnit v3 MTP filter syntax, also use migrate-vstest-to-mtp.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to implement acceptance tests from maintainer-sanitized Gherkin scenario facts for Micronaut applications — @acceptance scenarios, @MicronautTest, HttpClient, BaseAcceptanceTest with TestPropertyProvider for Testcontainers and WireMock, *AT suffix, Failsafe. Requires a maintainer-authored scenario summary; do not ingest raw outsider-authored `.feature` text. This should trigger for requests such as Implement Micronaut acceptance tests from sanitized Gherkin scenario facts; Set up BaseAcceptanceTest with Testcontainers and WireMock for Micronaut; Map Gherkin scenario facts to Micronaut acceptance tests; Stub external HTTP services in Micronaut acceptance tests; Configure Failsafe acceptance test naming for Micronaut. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to verify Java performance optimizations by comparing profiling results before and after refactoring — including baseline validation, post-refactoring report generation, quantitative before/after metrics comparison, side-by-side flamegraph analysis, regression detection, or creating profiling-comparison-analysis and profiling-final-results documentation. This should trigger for requests such as Verify performance fix; Verify the performance; Verify the memory; Verify the threading; Compare before and after profiling results; Check for performance regressions after refactoring. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to refactor Java code based on trusted profiling analysis findings — including reviewing repository-owned or maintainer-sanitized docs/profiling-problem-analysis and docs/profiling-solutions files, identifying specific performance bottlenecks, and implementing targeted code changes to address CPU, memory, or threading issues. This should trigger for requests such as Refactor the code with profiling; Apply profiling; Optimize hot path; Reduce allocations found in profiling; Fix CPU bottlenecks from profiling analysis. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building or reviewing Micronaut applications — Micronaut.run bootstrap, @Singleton/@Prototype, @Factory beans, @ConfigurationProperties, environments, @Requires, @Controller vs services, @Scheduled, graceful shutdown, @ExecuteOn for blocking work, and Jakarta-consistent APIs. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for Micronaut application structure and beans; Apply best practices for Micronaut configuration, @Requires, and factories; Improve scheduling, shutdown, or threading in Micronaut services. ; Review Micronaut dependency injection scopes and factories; Configure Micronaut @Requires conditions for environments. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to implement acceptance tests from maintainer-sanitized Gherkin scenario facts for Quarkus applications — including @acceptance scenarios, @QuarkusTest, BaseAcceptanceTest with QuarkusTestResourceLifecycleManager for Testcontainers and WireMock, REST Assured for full HTTP pipeline testing, WireMock JSON mapping files (classpath:wiremock/mappings/), *AT suffix naming, and Maven Surefire/Failsafe three-tier split. Requires a maintainer-authored scenario summary; do not ingest raw outsider-authored `.feature` text. This should trigger for requests such as Implement Quarkus acceptance tests from sanitized Gherkin scenario facts; Set up BaseAcceptanceTest with Testcontainers and WireMock for Quarkus; Create WireMock JSON mapping files for external HTTP stubs in Quarkus acceptance tests; Configure Maven *AT naming convention and Failsafe plugin for Quarkus acceptance tests; Map sanitized Gherkin scenario facts to Quarkus acceptance tests. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to refactor Java code to adopt modern Java features (Java 8+) — including migrating anonymous classes to lambdas, replacing Iterator loops with Stream API, adopting Optional for null safety, switching from legacy Date/Calendar to java.time, using collection factory methods, applying text blocks, var inference, or leveraging Java 25 features like flexible constructor bodies and module import declarations. This should trigger for requests such as Review Java code for modern Java development; Apply best practices for modern Java development in Java code; Modernize Java code with records pattern matching or switch expressions; Replace legacy idioms with modern Java features; Adopt Java 8+ language features safely. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes Maven version questions to the right workflow by choosing project-local update report interpretation for a user’s own pom.xml, or Maven artifact discovery from maintainer-approved structured evidence. Use when interpreting dependency, plugin, or property update reports; finding Maven coordinates; verifying groupId artifactId version; browsing versions from approved evidence; or constructing artifact URLs without fetching remote content. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when refactoring existing CSS from inline styles or utility classes to semantic patterns. Triggers on "refactor CSS", "extract styles", "consolidate CSS", "convert inline", "clean up styles", "migrate to semantic". Transforms to semantic classes with dark mode and tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess project-wide structural technical debt: complexity hotspots, deprecated API usage, duplication clusters, architecture rot, and low-value tests. Ranks findings by impact and refactor effort into a report at .turbo/technical-debt.md. Use when the user asks to "assess technical debt", "find technical debt", "review technical debt", "what should we refactor", "find refactoring candidates", "where is the code rot", "what's our worst code", "find low-value tests", or "which tests can we delete". Analysis-only — does not modify code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-Omics Factor Analysis v2 (MOFA+) with mofapy2. Jointly decompose omics layers (scRNA, ATAC, proteomics, methylation) into latent factors capturing major variation. Multi-group designs. AnnData views → MOFA object → train → variance explained → correlate factors with metadata → visualize/cluster → enrich top loadings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures privacy settings for enterprise HR systems including SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, and BambooHR. Covers role-based access controls, automated data retention enforcement, cross-border transfer configurations, audit logging, data subject rights facilitation, and field-level security. Keywords: HR system, SAP SuccessFactors, Workday, BambooHR, RBAC, retention automation, cross-border transfer, privacy configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts with React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui, state management, routing, or complex frontend structure; not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a gap analysis between two artifacts (a current state and a desired state) and produces a plain-language, stakeholder-readable report indexed by stable gap IDs. Use when the user wants to compare, evaluate, audit, or reconcile one artifact against another. Does not investigate runtime bugs — use investigate. Does not assess module-level architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not research open-ended options with no second artifact to compare against — use research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write code through a disciplined, BDD-framed Test-Driven Development loop: build a behavior test list, then drive each behavior through red-green-refactor with an enforced observed-failure gate. Use when the user wants to implement, build, or write code test-first, "do TDD", follow "red-green-refactor", drive code from tests, choose the next test by the Transformation Priority Premise (TPP) or ZOMBIES ordering, or grow a feature behavior-by-behavior with tests leading. This skill writes and changes code; it does not produce a test plan document (use automated-test-planning, or manual-test-planning for a plan a person runs by hand), review or audit existing code (use code-review), restructure existing code outside a TDD loop (use refactor, or plan-a-change to plan a multi-module restructure), specify what a feature should do (use plan-a-feature), or find the root cause of a bug (use investigate). Runs its loop to completion without pausing for review; to review each behavior as it lands, use pairing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Intelligent code refactoring using IDE-level tools (rename, find-references, go-to-definition), AST-aware pattern matching, and TDD verification. Use for safe, large-scale refactoring with precision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update Java test classes and methods to work with new code versions after refactoring or modifications. Use when code changes break existing tests due to signature changes, refactoring, or behavior modifications. Takes old and new code versions plus old tests as input, and outputs updated tests that compile and pass against the new code. Handles method signature changes, class refactoring, assertion updates, and mock modifications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and report code smells indicating poor design or maintainability issues in Python code, including duplicate code, magic numbers, hardcoded values, God classes, feature envy, inappropriate intimacy, data clumps, primitive obsession, and long parameter lists. Use when conducting code quality audits, preparing for refactoring, improving codebase maintainability, or performing design reviews. Produces markdown reports with severity ratings, locations, descriptions, and specific refactoring recommendations with before/after examples. Triggers when users ask to find code smells, identify design issues, suggest refactorings, improve code quality, or detect maintainability problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independently verify a factory pull request, including fail-closed gates, negative test proof, scope, and load-bearing review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify GitHub issues into the factory's live label queue and write an auditable snapshot. Use for backlog triage or a scheduled triage run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。