「hunting」の検索結果

Vulnerability audit and dataflow analysis built on the neug CPG engine. file_audit (default, recommended): first builds a function-level summary graph (tier1) over the entire project, then incrementally builds detailed CPGs (tier2) on demand for chosen functions; both tiers coexist in a single neug database (unified schema, cross-layer refines edges; C/Java/Python/Rust). All capabilities are exposed as CLI tool subcommands (audit/overview/build/query/methods/paths), so an agent can drive the audit step by step via shell; the audit subcommand can also run the built-in LLM loop. The same tooling also supports a dataflow analysis mode (Workflow C): no vulnerability hunting, only variable-level dataflow tracing for functions of interest, producing dataflow_analysis.json. repo_audit: multi-round LLM/Cypher audit over a full-repo CPG. Use when the user asks to audit a codebase/project for vulnerabilities, scan a project with CPG/neug, run repo_audit/file_audit, find source-to-sink taint paths, or analyze dataflow inside a function. Supports C, Java, Python, and Rust.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic debugging methodology - scientific method, hypothesis testing, and root cause analysis that works across all technologiesUse when "bug, debugging, not working, broken, investigate, root cause, why is this happening, figure out, troubleshoot, doesn't work, unexpected behavior, debugging, root-cause, hypothesis, scientific-method, troubleshooting, bug-hunting, investigation, problem-solving" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

API Fuzzing for Bug Bounty workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Provide comprehensive techniques for testing REST, SOAP, and GraphQL APIs during bug bounty hunting and penetration testing engagements. Covers vulnerability discovery, authentication bypass, IDOR exploitation, and API-specific attack vectors and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

API Fuzzing for Bug Bounty workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Provide comprehensive techniques for testing REST, SOAP, and GraphQL APIs during bug bounty hunting and penetration testing engagements. Covers vulnerability discovery, authentication bypass, IDOR exploitation, and API-specific attack vectors and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply semi-formal certificate reasoning to code analysis — patch verification, fault localization, patch equivalence. Use when reviewing patches, hunting bugs across scopes, comparing fixes, or when code reasoning requires tracing execution across files/modules. Triggers on code review, bug localization, patch comparison, name shadowing, scope analysis, regression checking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing a user-facing app — web, mobile (iOS/Android/React Native/Flutter), desktop, CLI, or games — for accessibility barriers or WCAG 2.2 conformance, before shipping UI changes, or in response to concerns about screen-reader, keyboard, low-vision, motor, cognitive, or photosensitive users. Not for general bug hunting or code correctness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Engineering detection rules (Sigma/YARA), detection coverage mapping, threat hunting hypotheses, Purple Team Blue side, Detection-as-Code CI/CD. Use when defensive verification is needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze indicators of compromise — enrichment, attribution, and response recommendations. Use when asked to "analyze these IOCs", "enrich these indicators", or "what is this hash".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when independently hunting Python code smells, deviations from engineering standards, maintenance hazards, or suspicious design choices in a bounded review surface.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit AuthCrunch security boundaries, triage vulnerability reports and scanner findings, reproduce authentication or authorization failures, and prepare evidence-backed remediation. Covers trust, credentials, redirects, concurrency, diagnostic logging, and dependency exposure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asking whether something in imp is actually finished - hunting stubs, placeholders, request fields that are parsed and then ignored, code paths or kernels that never run, gate-based features that silently no-op, tests that assert nothing. Triggers on "is this implemented", "unfinished", "stub", "placeholder", "dead path", "does this flag do anything", "accepted but ignored", "kernel never launched", "test asserts nothing", "neutral A/B on a gated feature". Do NOT use for structural debt / god files / duplication (codebase-audit) or for who-calls-what (code-graph).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt cloud misconfigurations exposed externally — open S3/GCS buckets, exposed IAM-tied EC2 metadata, Cognito misconfig, GitHub Actions secret leakage, exposed Kubernetes API, public Elastic / Kibana / Mongo, Firebase RTDB rules, weak AWS access keys discovered in JS/mobile. Use when leveraging leaked credentials or hunting cloud surface in scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a mental and visual map of the target application before hunting — entry points, trust boundaries, data flows, and high-value functionality. Use when user has scope parsed and wants to plan WHERE to hunt rather than diving into recon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunt Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) — test horizontal and vertical privilege escalation across user IDs, org IDs, tenant boundaries, and unguessable identifiers. Use when the user has an API endpoint with an identifier in the path/body that may be tested for unauthorized cross-user access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute one bounded read-only Proto UI autonomous-maintenance observation mission. Use for drift hunting, external-oracle comparison, repeatability control, or a no-finding maintenance run. Stop before verification or remediation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for ANY bug bounty, penetration test, or web/API/mobile security assessment: recon, testing endpoints, analyzing Burp traffic or any bug-bounty platform's MCP (HackerOne, Intigriti, Bugcrowd, YesWeHack, Immunefi), reviewing APKs, bypassing a WAF, enforcing scope, hunting a specific vuln class, validating findings, writing reports, or when you are stuck on a target and about to give up. Activates automatically for all bug-bounty and pentest sessions. Runs an autonomous, never-surrender predator methodology: refuses to conclude "secure", exhausts each vuln class to depth, proves a real attacker-path with impact and no false positives, tracks coverage so nothing is re-tested or skipped, diagnoses failed tooling from full logs, and hunts at maximum effort with intelligent token use until the goal is found. Activates and follows instructions in ANY language the operator writes in (the skill itself is English). Bundles a per-class web-exploitation KB, a writeup library, and PayloadsAllTheThings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks "what is coming next?", wants strategic forecasting, or is hunting weak signals of emerging threats before they materialise. Covers signal identification, trend analysis, and scenario development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to hunt in the organisation's own Microsoft Sentinel workspace — sweep the logs for IOC hits (IP, domain, hash, URL, account), hunt behavioural TTPs from MITRE ATT&CK techniques, run KQL against live data, or check which tables the workspace actually ingests. Discovers available tables first and only generates KQL for tables that verifiably exist, so hunts adapt to each environment's connectors. Commonly chained by the /*-investigation skills to answer "were we exposed?". Reads $SENTINEL_TENANT_ID, $SENTINEL_CLIENT_ID, $SENTINEL_CLIENT_SECRET, $SENTINEL_WORKSPACE_ID. Read-only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prototype pollution testing for JavaScript stacks. Use when user input is merged into objects (query parsers, JSON bodies, deep assign), when configuring libraries via untrusted keys, or when hunting RCE gadgets via polluted Object.prototype in Node or the browser.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when hunting Pwn Request vulnerabilities where pull_request_target workflows checkout attacker-controlled PR code and execute it in a privileged context with access to repository secrets. Trigger on: "pwn request", "pull_request_target", "checkout PR head", "npm install in CI", "lifecycle scripts in CI", "preinstall script", "postinstall script", "package.json scripts CI", "npm ci ignore-scripts false", "actions/checkout ref pull request head sha", privileged workflow running PR code, "Gato-X", supply chain via PR lifecycle scripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit misconfigured Spring Boot Actuator endpoints. This skill covers how to extract sensitive configuration details, heap dumps, environment variables, and ultimately escalating to Remote Code Execution (RCE) via `spring-cloud-starter` vulnerabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit Prototype Pollution vulnerabilities in JavaScript/Node.js applications. This skill covers the progression from polluting `Object.prototype` to identifying functional gadgets (like `child_process.spawn`) to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and exploit Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in Next.js applications, specifically focusing on insecure server actions or API routes fetching user-controlled URLs on the server-side.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when hunting self-hosted GitHub Actions runner vulnerabilities where fork pull requests can execute on privileged non-ephemeral runners. Trigger on: "self-hosted runner", "runs-on self-hosted", "fork PR workflow", "non-ephemeral runner", "first-time contributor approval", "runner images", "azure-builds runner", "outside collaborator approval", "runs-on matrix", "persistent runner", "Gato GitHub Attack Toolkit", "runner agent", self-hosted CI/CD runner abuse, "git config token", "workflow log deletion", runner C2.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。