「implement」の検索結果

Design and visually validate implementation-agnostic website pages or modules from an approved Design System and confirmed content. Use for Module Design Solutions, Page UI Architecture Maps, media, evidence, page motion budgets, section motion intent, visual-direction images, and direction review before HTML. Do not use to write or review HTML/CSS/JS, run browser implementation QA, plan platform fields, or implement CMS components.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement tasks from an OpenSpec change. Use when the user wants to start implementing, continue implementation, or work through tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement accessibility. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with a11y-implementation-guide related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement 5S workplace organization. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with 5s-implementation related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement A/B tests with code and analytics. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ab-test-implementation related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent skill for implementer-sparc-coder - invoke with $agent-implementer-sparc-coder

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implementation guidance for creating individual agents in the Arcanea system with proper structure, capabilities, and integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete operational workflow for implementer agents (Codex, Gemini, etc.) making code changes and writing tests. Drives all work through atomic commits — each loop operates on the smallest complete, reviewable change. Defines the Code Change Loop, Test Writing Loop, Lint Gate, and Issue Filing process with circuit breakers, severity levels, and escalation rules. Requires `committer` for all commits. Includes bundled provider-aware review scripts that keep same-model shell-outs as the last resort, plus a fresh-context Codex fallback for code review and test audit. Use this skill when starting any implementation task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete operational workflow for implementer agents (Codex, Gemini, etc.) making code changes and writing tests. Defines the Code Change Loop, Test Writing Loop, and Issue Filing process with circuit breakers, severity levels, and escalation rules. Includes bundled scripts for specialist-review (code review) and test-review-request (test audit) that delegate to Claude CLI. Use this skill when starting any implementation task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fast spec-driven implementation from a committed spec. Use after /spec to implement an issue with a phase roadmap, TDD waves, map patching, review, and pre-commit validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Top-level orchestrator for Flutter feature implementation. Runs the full uninterrupted pipeline: tasks → implement-tasks-sequence → build-verify → pr-review uncommitted. Use after a PRD and tech spec are complete. Trigger phrases: "start job", "start the job", "run the full pipeline", "do it all", "implement the feature end-to-end".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Task Breakdown Command. Breaks a feature into discrete, dependency-ordered implementation tasks from a PRD and tech spec. Creates a task list and individual task files with no approval prompt. When run inside the `/start-job` pipeline, return control to that orchestrator so it can invoke the implementation phase. When invoked standalone, stop after generating tasks and prompting for the next step. Use when the user says "break this down into tasks", "create tasks", "task breakdown", or after the tech spec is complete and the user wants to plan implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 2 of the feature-pipeline suite. Use this after /fp-explore has filed issues and printed the M1 stop hook — when you need to turn a set of filed GitHub issues into an approved implementation plan and a draft PR. Triggers on: "plan the fix", "create the branch and PR", "draft the implementation plan", "ready to plan", "fp-plan", "next step after explore", "convert issues to a plan", "plan phase". Reads issueNumbers from state, writes a Problem Statement, opens a feature branch + draft PR, spawns a HEAVIER sub-agent for the numbered plan, and blocks on explicit user approval before writing plan to state. Does NOT write any code — that is /fp-implement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 3 of the feature-pipeline suite. Use this after /fp-plan has received explicit user approval and printed the M2-plan stop hook — when you need to translate an approved numbered plan into committed, pushed code. Triggers on: "implement the plan", "start coding", "commit the plan", "write the code", "fp-implement", "Phase 3", "plan is approved let's code", "next step after plan", "execute the plan", "apply the plan", "make the changes". Reads planApproved and branch from state; refuses to run if approval hasn't been recorded. Commits one atomic change per plan step, pushes after each commit, handles obstacles cleanly, and hands off to /fp-review when done. Never squashes or skips steps — the one-commit-per-step rule keeps the review history readable and rollback surgical.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

UI design and implementation for real product surfaces with taste-first critique, reference routing, project-specific design briefs, variation comparison, and implementation verification. Use when Codex should redesign, build, polish, or critique frontend UI by reading project context, exploring taste, routing through `references/catalog.md`, synthesizing `PROJECT_DESIGN.md` or `design.md`, using investment gates to avoid wrong taste/reference/scope, implementing in the existing stack, and evaluating whether the result is actually better. Best for app screens, dashboards, landing pages, query tools, product surfaces, and design explorations; not for backend-only work or tiny cosmetic edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides implementation of custom Wwise or FMOD DSP plugins from scratch — effect, source, and mixer plugin types. Use when the user wants to create a new Wwise plugin, build an FMOD DSP effect, or implement a custom game audio middleware plugin. Trigger on phrases like "create a Wwise effect plugin", "build an FMOD DSP", "implement custom game audio middleware plugin", "how do I write a Wwise source plugin", or "set up an FMOD DSP description".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implementation guide for common DSP algorithms. Use when the user asks "implement a lowpass filter", "how do I write a compressor", "reverb algorithm", "FFT convolution", "pitch shifter", or "oscillator with no aliasing". Trigger on phrases like "biquad filter", "state variable filter", "feedback delay network", "phase vocoder", "overlap-add", "PolyBLEP", or any request to implement a specific DSP processing block.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read a story file and implement it. Loads the full context (story, GDD requirement, ADR guidelines, control manifest), routes to the right programmer agent for the system and engine, implements the code and test, and confirms each acceptance criterion. The core implementation skill — run after /story-readiness, before /code-review and /story-done.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing UI from Figma, Sketch, MasterGo, Pixso, Modao, MockingBot, screenshots, design selections, design tokens, or design-to-code tasks for production frontend components/pages; Chinese triggers include design draft, implementation by design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weed the Allium garden. Find where Allium specifications and implementation code have diverged, and help resolve the divergences. Use when the user wants to check spec-code alignment, compare specs against implementation, audit for spec drift or violations, sync specs with code or code with specs, or verify whether the implementation matches what the spec says.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates 6-phase SDLC pipeline (discovery, requirements, architecture, workstreams, implementation, summary) for guided feature development. Use when user runs /core:develop command, requests spec-driven development, wants to create implementation plans with architecture decisions, or mentions "SDLC", "spec-driven", "plan feature", "development pipeline". Supports plan persistence, wave-based resume, autonomous mode, and architecture/implementation verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates accurate frontend implementations from visual references while maintaining design consistency. Use when user provides Figma URLs, screenshots, design images, requests visual implementation from reference, or asks to build UI matching a design. Automatically checks existing design intent patterns before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey any codebase as a senior advisor and produce prioritized, self-contained implementation plans for OTHER models/agents to execute. Strictly read-only on source code — never implements, fixes, or refactors anything itself. Use when asked to audit a codebase, find improvement opportunities (bugs, security, performance, test coverage, tech debt, migrations, DX), suggest features or where to take the project next (roadmap, product direction), or generate handoff plans for another agent to implement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Invoke a Rubber Duck Reviewer subagent to independently critique plans and implementations before proceeding. Use when the agent is about to implement a non-trivial plan (multi-file changes, architectural decisions, security-sensitive logic, database schema changes), after completing a self-contained unit of work (module, endpoint, feature), when stuck or facing repeated failures (same test fails 2+ times, unexpected results), or when the agent wants independent validation of assumptions and design decisions. Triggers on any non-trivial implementation task where independent critique would catch blind spots before they become costly mistakes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。