「independent review」の検索結果

Run a targeted fresh-eyes blunder pass over code, specs, plans, reviews, closure gates, or skill edits. Use when asked to reread with fresh eyes, find obvious bugs, catch mistakes/oversights/omissions, check for embarrassing misses, or do a second independent pass before closure. Use it as the final falsification/check pass for another workflow, not as a substitute for implementation or verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA-STD-8729.1A — NASA's R&M (Reliability and Maintainability) standard covering spaceflight and support systems (Revision A, 2017-06-13). Use for NASA's objectives-driven R&M framework — the R&M objectives hierarchy (one Top Objective decomposed into four sub-objectives, paired with tailorable strategies), how R&M requirements are established inside the SMA Plan required by NPR 7120.5, the SMA Technical Authority concurrence/independent-evaluation governance, milestone vs. readiness review gates, the reliability/maintainability/availability vocabulary (Ai vs. Ao, the failure causal chain, risk as a triplet), and the R&M Evidentiary Methods catalogue (FMEA/FMECA, FTA, RBDA, RCM, LORA, plus the space-environment and parts-pedigree analyses). Scoped to NASA spaceflight and support systems and to assurance planning: it is an objectives-and-strategies standard, so it deliberately does NOT prescribe step-by-step analysis procedures (those live in the referenced NASA Preferred Reliability Practices) and is thin on facility R&M, detailed math/derivations, and non-NASA or commercial life cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use as an independent design-review pass after rendering a website; evaluates macro, meso, micro craft, applies the Design Quality rubric, identifies root causes, and prioritizes changes without defending the implementation intent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independently verify a factory pull request, including fail-closed gates, negative test proof, scope, and load-bearing review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate independent research, implementation, or verification in parallel when it can save time after dispatch and review overhead, or when explicitly requested. Keep decisions and final integration in the main agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor PRs, fix CI failures, address review comments, resolve merge conflicts, and restack stacks. Supports independent PRs, Graphite stacks, and GitHub stacked PRs (gh-stack).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent debate orchestration for Architecture Decision Records. Automatically triggers on ADR create/edit/delete. Coordinates architect, critic, independent-thinker, security, analyst, and high-level-advisor agents in structured debate rounds until consensus.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use before implementing any feature, behavior change, or refactor - settles requirements and design, then gets the design independently reviewed and approved by the user before code is written

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarially verify an implementation against its objective, acceptance criteria, definition of done, and prohibitions using fresh evidence. Use for completion gates, release readiness, or independent verification after implementation and review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate a bounded repository task to an allowlisted external coding CLI through the guarded Flow runner. Use for automatic provider selection or explicit Codex, OpenCode, Kimi, Gemini, or Kiro delegation that requires timeout handling and independent local review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate one Coval judge against independent human labels, with grouped development/test separation, class-specific errors and uncertainty. Use for trust claims or calibration; without real labels, prepare review rather than inventing ground truth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze development-set disagreements between human annotations and one Coval text LLM judge, then propose a focused prompt revision. Use coval-calibrate-metric for independent trust measurements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegating work down to subagents: briefs, report statuses, independent review. Use when writing an implementer or verifier brief, dispatching a subagent to build, fix, or verify work you own, or a subagent reports DONE, blocked, or concerns. NOT for campaign-scale doctrine (use campaign-pattern).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks. Dispatches fresh delegate_task per task with two-stage review (spec compliance then code quality).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。