「observation」の検索結果

Electronic health record analysis — phenotyping, missingness, bias, and observational study design with EHR data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Working with observational climate data — reanalyses, station records, anomalies, trends, and honest uncertainty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Estimate causal effects from observational and experimental data — DAGs, confounding control, quasi-experimental designs, and sensitivity analysis. Use when you need "what causes what," not just correlation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate user research interview scripts using Mom Test principles. Use this skill when: - You are preparing for user interviews or pilot observation sessions - You need a question bank organized by behavior, context, pain points, and workflow - You want interview guides that avoid leading questions and hypotheticals - You need per-persona interview guides - You are preparing for field visits or pilot debriefs

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance across solar physics, planetary science, stellar evolution, cosmology, and observational techniques with 2025 mission data

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, restructure, or review documentation — tutorials, how-to guides, reference pages, concept/explanation docs, API references, READMEs, changelogs, release notes, and troubleshooting guides. Distills documentation craft from Mintlify's guides (compiled from technical writers at Stripe, GitHub, Amplitude, and Anaconda), the Diátaxis framework (including the compass and per-type voice), the Google and Microsoft style guides, Every Page Is Page One, Write the Docs, and Docs for Developers: audience analysis, content-type selection, style and word-level rules, procedure writing, structure for humans and AI agents, code-example standards, page templates (templates.md), mechanical enforcement and llms.txt (mechanics.md), maintenance, and success metrics. Use this skill when the user asks to "write docs", "document this feature", "improve this page", "review these docs", "write a tutorial / how-to / reference page", "structure the docs", "write API documentation", "write a README / changelog", or when authoring any file under a `docs/` tree. For SKMTC docs specifically, this skill governs the *craft* (what makes the page good); the content split between skills, `llms.md`, and the docs tree is governed by `docs/skills/README.md`. Distinct from `skmtc-retro` (captures observations about work) and the `skmtc-*` operational skills (guide doing the work) — this skill guides writing *about* the work for readers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Abductive reasoning about causes. Takes a phenomenon, separates observations from interpretations, then spawns diagnosticians applying different reasoning lenses (technical, human-factors, process, incentive-structure, environmental, temporal, measurement-artifact, statistical) in isolation. Orchestrator evaluates candidate causes for fit-against-evidence, calibrates confidence honestly, and reports leading candidate(s) with distinguishing evidence needed. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrospective learning from a completed experience. Takes a project, incident, decision that played out, or time period; gathers ground truth (observations) separately from recollections; spawns reflectors applying different lenses (what-worked-vs-got-lucky, what-didn't, what-surprised, system-rewards-vs-intent, decisions-that-aged, what-to-tell-past-self, patterns-that-recur) in isolation; synthesizes into updated mental models as first-class output. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures biological experiments so inference is valid by construction, covering Fisher's principles (randomization, replication, local control), the experimental-vs-observational unit distinction and pseudoreplication (Hurlbert 1984; Lazic 2018), randomization mechanics (complete, restricted, stratified, rerandomization, run-order), blocking layouts (randomized complete block, Latin square, incomplete block), factorial designs and interactions, and the split-plot/nested error strata hidden inside multi-batch genomics. Use when deciding the experimental unit and what counts as a replicate, planning randomization and run order, choosing a blocked/factorial/split-plot/nested layout, avoiding pseudoreplication in cell-culture or animal studies, or specifying the random-effects structure of the analysis model. For assigning samples to sequencing batches/lanes/plates and batch-effect correction see experimental-design/batch-design; for regulated clinical-trial randomization see clinical-biostatistics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used for time series machine learning tasks including classification, regression, clustering, forecasting, anomaly detection, segmentation, and similarity search. Use when working with temporal data, sequential patterns, or time-indexed observations requiring specialized algorithms beyond standard ML approaches. Particularly suited for univariate and multivariate time series analysis with scikit-learn compatible APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured interview and observation techniques for extracting tacit knowledge from domain experts

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to design contextual inputs for an always-on AI agent with episodic memory. Covers what data to feed the agent, how to structure observations and triggers, ambient context capture (screen, audio, calendar), context window budgeting, and retrieval strategies that keep the agent grounded in what's actually happening. Activate on: "what should the agent observe", "context inputs for agent", "ambient context capture", "agent triggers", "agent input design", "screenpipe integration", "context window budget", "what data to feed my agent", "/always-on-agent-inputs". NOT for: memory architecture and storage (use always-on-agent-architecture), application ideas (use always-on-agent-applications), safety concerns (use always-on-agent-safety).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill categorizes hypercalcemia of malignancy (HCM) severity using albumin‑adjusted serum calcium into mild (<12 mg/dL), moderate (12‑14 mg/dL), or severe (>14 mg/dL). Use it when a clinician needs to stage HCM to guide initial therapy choices, such as deciding between observation, IV bisphosphonate/denosumab, or calcitonin‑based combination regimens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level black hole physics covering formation, spacetime structure, accretion disks, jets, Hawking radiation, gravitational waves from mergers, and observational evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level radio astronomy covering radio telescopes, interferometry, VLBI, pulsars, spectral line observations, fast radio bursts, and aperture synthesis imaging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level dark matter physics covering observational evidence, candidate particles, detection methods, structure formation, and alternative gravity theories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level cosmology covering the Big Bang, cosmic expansion, dark matter, dark energy, CMB, large-scale structure, and observational cosmology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level astrophysics covering stellar physics, galaxy formation, high-energy astrophysics, observational techniques, and the electromagnetic spectrum across wavelengths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up kpopper watch for background branch compatibility, scoped shared facts, and daily review. Use when asked to watch a project's graph, check worktree changes against main, share external observations, or install a kpopper routine. Ordinary followup capture recommends scheduling without enabling it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

At the end of a long working session, produce a counterfactual trace note — a backward walk through the session that identifies the small number of load-bearing moments (observations, failures, accidents, decisions) without which the final outcome would not exist. Use this whenever the user asks to "close the session", "run the butterfly", "trace back", "what actually mattered here", asks for a session retrospective, or asks how the session arrived at its result. Also use it when a session ends with a significant outcome (a fix, a design decision, a shipped artifact) and the user wants a note capturing why it happened, not just what happened. Do NOT use for simple summaries of short sessions — this skill is for causal tracing, and it only earns its cost when the session was long enough to contain real forks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户询问 ClinicalTrials.gov / 临床试验 / NCT / 试验注册 / 招募状态 / phase 1/2/3 / RCT lookup / sponsor 检索 / interventional trial / observational study / 主次要终点 / trial outcomes / 试验招募中 / recruiting status 时,通过 ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 实时检索官方注册数据。专注实时单次查询(≤1000 条/请求),典型场景: "某 NCT 试验最新状态"、"BTK 抑制剂 Phase 3 在招募试验"、"某试验已发布的主次要终点结果"。明确边界: 批量 >10k 试验 / 全库 SQL 历史分析 → aact-bulk-trials; 关联 PubMed 文献 → pubmed-eutils; RCT 自动 GRADE 评级 → medical-evidence-grading; 引用入报告附录 → evidence-appendix-sync。跨平台无锁(Claude Code / Codex / Cursor 通用)。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MITRE ATT&CK is a globally-accessible knowledge base of adversary tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) based on real-world observations. This skill covers systematically mapping threat actor beh

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。