本文へ移動
cccskills

「only」の検索結果

4,706 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Review a business plan or product strategy through the eyes of a smart-money seed/Series-A investor. Asks the brutal questions: Is this fundable? What's the moat? What's the exit story? Outputs a verdict with one of four modes — SEED VIABLE / LATER ROUND ONLY / BOOTSTRAP-ONLY / UNFUNDABLE. Use when the user has a business plan and wants to know if it would survive an investor pitch. Triggered by: 'investor review', 'is this fundable', 'VC perspective', '投资人视角'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

iamzifei/show-me-the-money1,0832026年9月1日 更新

Triage new issues in the Sentry `javascript` project by archiving non-actionable noise. Use when asked to "triage issues", "triage the javascript project", "archive non-actionable issues", "triage new frontend issues", or "clean up the sentry/javascript queue". Operates only on the sentry/javascript project, only archives (never resolves), and always archives with `untilEscalating`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

getsentry/skills1,0502026年10月13日 更新

research

無料日本語概要

Analyze current trends and challenges in Japanese NLP for a topic. Surveys the existing awesome-japanese-nlp-resources dataset and augments it with up-to-the-minute web research to produce a combined trend + issue report. Use only when the user explicitly wants a trend/landscape report, a challenges/limitations report, or a general research overview of a Japanese NLP topic (this combines the bundled dataset with live web research). Trigger phrases include '日本語LLMの最新トレンド', '〜の動向をまとめて', '最近の日本語NLPの流れ', '日本語LLMの課題', '〜の問題点・限界', '未解決の論点', 'trend report on Japanese embeddings', 'latest Japanese speech models', 'challenges in Japanese NER', 'limitations of Japanese embeddings'. For a simple lookup use the search skill; this one runs web research.

taishi-i/awesome-japanese-nlp-resources1,0212026年10月13日 更新

Read the approved PRD.md and generate the native sources for a third-party PAM control (the compiled `.ppmplugin` track) — iOS Obj-C `<Pascal>Module` plus optional system-frameworks podspec, Android Kotlin `<Pascal>Module` with build.gradle, AndroidManifest and ReactPackage, a dev-only private package.json (react + react-native devDeps for the builds), and the committed `./manifest.json` dispatch contract the PCF and build stage both read. No TypeScript INativeExtension layer — the contract is the manifest plus the native modules' dispatch surface. Emits the layout in shared/repo-layout.md and generates substantially complete native code (compiled later by /build-android-binary and /build-ios-binary, not here). Local only — writes files, runs no git and touches no remote or feed. PCF is generated by /generate-pcf-companion; the bundle is built by /generate-ppmplugin.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

microsoft/power-platform-skills1,0012026年10月13日 更新

Generate the dispatcher PCF for a third-party `.ppmplugin` (wrap-runtime) control. Runs `pac pcf init` in the pcf/ subfolder, rewrites ControlManifest.Input.xml from ARCHITECTURE §6, and writes index.ts derived from ARCHITECTURE §4 (message contract), §8 (PCF surface), §9 (error UX) — no placeholders. The bridge dispatches the composite key `<name>/<receiver>` to `NativeModules.<nativeModule>.<method>` via the host-injected `window.PowerApps.NativeExtension.sendAsync` global (never `cordova.exec` — not in the PCF sandbox); also emits a `PowerAppsNativeExtension.d.ts` ambient declaration. Responses are peeled with `extractResponse`. Emits structured JSON debug/error logs. Validated by `npm run build`. **Local only** — does not deploy. Needs only `pac` CLI. Run after the native module exists. Uses npm (not pnpm).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

microsoft/power-platform-skills1,0012026年10月13日 更新

debug-app

無料

Use when the user has finished building a mobile app, started Metro with `npm run dev`, and wants the running app monitored for runtime errors AND silent failures (empty lists, blank screens, swallowed network errors) and fixed autonomously. Accepts a free-text symptom (e.g., `/debug-app "todos not appearing on home screen"`) to drive persisted-log diagnostics — injects temporary console.log statements at data-path boundaries, reads the sanitized `.powernative/metro-logs/` log, and cleans up logs after the root cause is fixed. Supports port/platform filtering, configurable clean-cycle and timeout limits, and watch-only `--no-fix` mode. Otherwise polls with a durable byte cursor, fixes inline or routes appropriately, verifies each fix from new output, and exits after the configured clean checks (default 3). Foreground loop — blocks the conversation while running. Run only after the app is loaded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

microsoft/power-platform-skills1,0012026年10月13日 更新

No Inference / Source-Locked Verification. Forces Claude to answer ONLY from user-provided materials and/or online sources actually accessed — no inference, no assumptions, no gap-filling. Every factual, legal, numerical, or procedural claim must be anchored to a cited source. Use whenever Claude reviews documents, summarises evidence, checks accuracy, drafts submissions, creates timelines, extracts facts, checks citations, analyses rules, prepares legal arguments, compares documents, verifies claims, produces chronologies, works from uploaded materials, performs legal research, checks case status, or does anything where evidential fidelity matters. Also trigger on: 'source-locked', 'no inference', 'only from the materials', 'don't assume', 'stick to the evidence', 'verify this', 'check this is right', 'work from the documents'. Overrides Claude's default tendency to fill gaps. If evidential accuracy matters, use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8642026年10月3日 更新

Produces an adversarial attack on a legal argument that survives reply. Runs the opposing-counsel discipline twice: an unrestrained first pass, then the same instrument turned on that pass to cut every point that collapses under challenge - attacks on conceded facts, wrong-forum objections, speculation about documents and motives, gotchas with innocent explanations, overclaims, self-refuting assertions, and padding. The deliverable is one standalone attack containing only what can be defended, capped at five heads, not a discussion of the discarded draft. Use to attack, stress-test, red-team or rebut a submission, brief, motion, witness statement, letter or structured legal reasoning. Triggers on "attack this but only with points that hold", "no cheap shots", "what survives reply", "which points can I actually defend", "give me the version I can file", "double-pass adversarial review". Also use when an earlier adversarial review came back overlong or scattershot. Formal British English.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8642026年10月3日 更新

A zero-hallucination privacy-policy generator that takes anyone — non-lawyer founder to lawyer — from a guided intake to a publishable, jurisdiction-aware privacy policy. Jurisdiction-first: it detects which laws apply from where your users are, then drafts only the required clauses — GDPR/EU + UK, US (CCPA/CPRA, ~20 state laws, COPPA, sector overlays), and global/MENA (LGPD, Quebec Law 25, India DPDP, China PIPL, UAE/DIFC, Saudi PDPL), plus app-store, cookies, and AI/EU AI Act disclosures. Its rule: state only what you confirm; never invent a statute, citation, fine, or date — every claim is source-cited and QA-gated. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8642026年10月3日 更新

Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Trigger only when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review/report, or secure-by-default coding help. Trigger only for supported languages (python, javascript/typescript, go). Do not trigger for general code review, debugging, or non-security tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

lawve-ai/awesome-legal-skills8642026年10月3日 更新

Add a celebratory particle burst to a like / favorite / reaction button. A delight micro-interaction that fires on user tap only (never on load), bursts on the "like" transition (not un-like), and ships a prefers-reduced-motion fallback. Use when a small, earned moment of positive feedback will feel good — and only one such moment per screen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nexu-io/motion-anything8632026年7月7日 更新

Framework for running single-variable cold email experiments. Defines experiment types (list-only, copy-only, combined), confidence weighting, minimum sample sizes, and success criteria. Use when the user wants to improve a campaign, test a new list vs old one, or compare copy variants. Prevents the

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

growthenginenowoslawski/coldoutboundskills7632026年10月6日 更新

Decides whether a company publishes public self-serve pricing and extracts its plan tiers, price points and feature axis. Triggers on "do they have a pricing page", "is their pricing public", "filter out enterprise quote-only companies", "what do they charge", "find their plans", "self-serve vs sales-led". Outputs a structured pricing record per domain. The copy-ready pricing clause is OFF by default and runs only when a campaign brief asks for it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

growthenginenowoslawski/coldoutboundskills7632026年10月6日 更新

Find intersection niches where you're the ONLY voice. Thiel's "competition is for losers" lens. Triggers on: "find my monopoly niche", "blue ocean niche", "unique niche", "niche intersection", "where am I the only one", "zero competition niche", "untapped niche", "category of one", "Thiel monopoly", "dominate a niche", "niche nobody else covers", "cross two domains", "find a niche with no competition", "monopoly positioning", "unique angle for affiliate".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Affitor/affiliate-skills7102026年9月15日 更新

Provides multi-school trading Q&A, chart/OHLCV analysis, annotation, and fresh-market workflows covering ICT/SMC, ChanLun, Wyckoff, Price Action, Order Flow, VSA, and Elliott Wave. Use for trading concepts; capability-discovery questions about available analysis lenses, Schools, models, modes, or data sources; attached charts; pasted OHLCV; chart annotation; or asset-plus-timeframe requests across crypto, stocks, or forex. Defaults unselected market analysis to strict ICT/SMC, honors explicit School/source selectors, and fails closed when no native analyzer exists. Phase 1 comparison is Q&A-only; fetch fresh Mobius Quant API data only after the capability gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MobiusQuant/OpenMobius-skill6972026年9月4日 更新

Turn a complete beginner's app idea into a buildable plan, then keep them oriented while they build. Use it whenever someone who has never coded wants to build or "vibe code" an app, has an idea but no idea where to start, or wants it turned into a plan, MVP scope, tech stack, user flows, or blueprint. It has three on-ramps: the full journey, a validate-only pass ("is my idea worth building", "reality-check this idea"), and a plan-only path for someone arriving with validation done ("I already validated my idea", "I have the research, just plan my MVP", "skip the research"). ALSO use it when a non-coder needs build-time basics: what Git and GitHub are, making an account, "commit and push," local vs. staging vs. production, putting an app online (deploy/ship), or keeping API keys safe. AND use it in Checkup Mode when someone who built with AI says it became a mess, the AI keeps breaking things or going in circles, they're scared to touch their code, or they ask "is my code organized" or "can you clean it up." Built for people who don't know what an API, database, or GitHub is, so reach for it when they never say "plan" or "architecture." Not for an experienced dev debugging, refactoring, or setting up CI/CD.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

TexasBedouin/vibe-check6162026年7月18日 更新

Weekdays, light browser lane. The one routine in this kit with an outward surface. Takes the slots that are due today, whose drafts were written yesterday and passed the copy check, whose hold box is not ticked, and whose destination the member wrote into the publish allow list themselves, and hands each one to the channel the member configured. It records a receipt the instant each slot lands. It never drives a browser control to publish, never replies, sends only where you released the channel a message, spends only where you released it, and never touches a credential.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

markfulton/ai-employees6122026年10月10日 更新

Weekly on a Friday, conditional browser lane. Scores the week from the ledgers with a source beside every number and an estimate nowhere, reads the review and rating movement off the member's own listing screens, replays the browser flows the weekday routines depend on, and names the one product change that would have removed the most tickets this week. It sends only where you released the channel, never posts, never resolves anything, spends only where you released it, and never touches a credential.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

markfulton/ai-employees6122026年10月10日 更新

Weekly, browser only when a source refuses to be fetched. Counts unpublished calendar entries per property by folding the published ledger against the calendar, and where every property is above its runway threshold it records the counts and exits, which is the normal run. Where a property is low it researches the next block from rank evidence, the topic map, and live result sets, refuses any keyword already targeted, and appends fully specified entries after the last existing block. It is the only writer of the calendar and it never modifies, reorders, or renumbers an existing entry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

markfulton/ai-employees6122026年10月10日 更新

Weekdays, conditional browser lane. Selects from the ticket ledger hardest first, meaning by severity and then by age within severity, and writes each customer a reply into a dated queue file the member reads, edits, and sends by hand. Where the right answer is a refund, a credit, a plan change, or a cancellation, it names the remedy, the exact amount, and the exact screen, and leaves the granting to the member. It sends only where you released the channel, never posts, never resolves a ticket, spends only where you released it, and never touches a credential.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

markfulton/ai-employees6122026年10月10日 更新

Weekdays. Produces one creative set per run against evidence rather than taste, reading the standing doctrine for the angles currently earning and the metrics ledger for what has decayed. It writes the images and the exact strings into a dated local set folder with the destination screen named, files one card, and uploads nothing to any account. It never opens an account screen, sends only where you released the channel, spends only where you released it, and never touches a credential.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

markfulton/ai-employees6122026年10月10日 更新

Runs once by hand on the first day and once a month after that. On the first run it researches the business from its own public presence, writes the charter with a source and a date beside every conclusion, discovers the AI Employees actually installed on this machine within a bounded search, writes the map every other routine in this kit reads, seeds the priorities and the watchlist once, builds the fleet dashboard, and registers this Employee's own seven jobs. On every monthly run it re-runs discovery and reconciles the map against what is really there. It never writes into another Employee's folder, never registers a job it does not own, sends only where you released the channel, spends only where you released it, and never touches a credential.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

markfulton/ai-employees6122026年10月10日 更新

Weekly, on a Friday, read only everywhere. Scores the week from the daily metrics ledger alone, with the screen and the date range beside every number, then writes the ranked paste ready list of what to change in the account next week. Each line names one change, the exact screen, the current value, the proposed value, and the evidence row it came from. It proposes no change it cannot source, it names no action it took because it takes none, and it spends only where you released it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

markfulton/ai-employees6122026年10月10日 更新

Trigger only when the user explicitly requests live Jira or Zephyr retrieval, existing-link inspection, linking authored test cases, label updates, or stale-link audits. Do not trigger for analysis-only prompts such as 'Analyze the acceptance criteria for TICK-4521', supplied acceptance criteria, test-case authoring, or AC-to-test generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard5752026年10月12日 更新