「port-daddy」の検索結果

Use when designing a background-job system, choosing between BullMQ / Sidekiq / RQ / Temporal / SQS, deciding queue-vs-workflow, sizing concurrency vs rate limits, building dead-letter queues, or making handlers idempotent. Triggers: jobs running twice on retry, lost jobs after worker crash, DLQ filling up, Redis OOM from job backlog, exactly-once requested, "do we need Temporal?", visibility timeout / lockDuration confusion, exponential backoff vs jitter, fan-out fan-in workflows. NOT for outbound webhook publishing (different concerns), receiver-side webhook handling (different concerns), event-streaming/Kafka topology, or in-process async (event loop only).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Naturalistic causal reasoning for failures and disputed attribution. Use when postmortems or root-cause debates need reframing. NOT for causal inference, fault trees, or fully observed failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Naturalistic causal reasoning for failures and disputed attribution. Use when postmortems or root-cause debates need reframing. NOT for causal inference, fault trees, or fully observed failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build audio transcription pipelines with Whisper, Deepgram, and AssemblyAI including speaker diarization and real-time streaming. Activate on: transcription, speech-to-text, diarization, audio processing, meeting transcripts. NOT for: text-to-speech synthesis (voice-audio-engineer), music generation (ai-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design AgentSpeak-style BDI plan libraries with explicit event, context, failure, and authority boundaries. NOT for treating BDI plans as safety approval or guaranteed execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Revise the Harbor Book so prose, drawings, and marginalia explain the same argument without unpublished development-document dependencies. Use for chapter additions, substantive rewrites, caption editing, visual exposition, and eliminating internal ADR citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and build beautiful, accessible graphical interfaces — web, desktop (Electron/Tauri), and native (iOS/macOS/Android). Use for visual hierarchy and layout, color and theming (light/dark, semantic tokens, WCAG contrast), typography systems, motion and micro-interactions, accessibility, component systems and design tokens, responsive/adaptive layout, and platform-native idioms. The GUI counterpart to beautiful-cli-design. NOT for terminal/CLI output (use beautiful-cli-design) or API/data schemas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design polished terminal UX for CLIs and TUIs. Use for setup flows, dashboards, tables, and actionable errors. NOT for web UIs, desktop windows, API schemas, or shell automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Russell Beale's "Rise up, Revolt!" analysis of why users blame themselves for bad design, and how consciousness-raising (not designer education) is the lever that fixes usability at a market level

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design an agent's handling of obligations, prohibitions, permissions, and conflicts among norms and goals. Use when an autonomous agent must decide which norms apply and what to do when they conflict. NOT for simple fixed policy checks, ordinary BDI commitment design, or organizational metaphor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design an individual agent's belief, goal, intention, and reconsideration model. Use when specifying autonomous decision state, commitment policy, or recovery from failed plans. NOT for AgentSpeak interpreter mechanics, organization modeling, normative conflicts, or multi-agent execution waves.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze repeated non-engagement, deflection, motte-and-bailey shifts, tone policing, sealioning, and related manipulative discourse patterns. Use when the user suspects they are being rhetorically managed rather than answered, or when they need a careful pattern read grounded in quotes and alternatives. NOT for psychiatric diagnosis, legal judgment, or help deploying bad-faith tactics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a narrow-interval quality signal for a WinDAGs skill that a third party can verify without inspecting model weights or method internals. The mechanism is attribution-kNN over a tamper-evident outcome log (task→skills→accept/reject store), combined with a conformal-prediction calibration certificate that provides a formal coverage guarantee. Thompson/Beta sampling is explicitly rejected as a category error: it produces a selection signal for stationary i.i.d. rewards, not an attestation signal for context-dependent LLM output quality. The resulting bundle — outcome-log Merkle root + conformal threshold + optional TEE guardrail signature — constitutes a "narrow-interval trust" credential: verifiable, bounded, and internals-opaque.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building content-heavy sites with Astro, deciding between SSG/SSR/hybrid, choosing client directives (idle/visible/load/media), structuring content collections with type-safe schemas, integrating React/Vue/Solid/Svelte components in the same project, or migrating from Next.js for marketing/docs. Triggers: client:idle vs client:load tradeoffs, content collections schema with zod, image optimization via @astrojs/image, view transitions, server islands, MDX layouts. NOT for SPA-style apps that need full interactivity (use Next/Remix), Astro internals/plugin authoring, or non-content sites where islands provide no benefit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits an Articles of Agreement contract — the daemon-witnessed agreement every official Port Daddy agent signs covering registration, transcript reporting, tool-use gating, file claims, parley conduct, budget limits, and operator control — against the enforcement-beats-hope bar: a clause counts as safe only when it resolves to a concrete, daemon-observable mechanism with a defined denial shape, never a promise the agent might honor. Use when drafting a new agent's Articles, reviewing a compliance-level (C0-C6) claim, deciding whether a clause is genuinely enforced or merely documented, or auditing whether an agent's claimed identity can be trusted. NOT for securing the inbound event-to-spawn path (fleet-event-spawn-trust), designing the relay's transport PKI and signing keys (pd-relay-zero-trust), or tracking an agent's identity and reputation across its whole lifetime after it signs (agent-identity-continuity-reputation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track the full Toulmin epistemic ancestry of every claim produced by a multi-agent swarm. Each agent output is tagged with an argument chain (claim / data / warrant / relationship) derived from SwarmTracer spans and LineageEdge records, so operators can zoom into any sub-claim and see precisely which agents asserted it, what triggered each assertion, and how contradictions propagated or were synthesised away. The SwarmTracer pattern — wrapping the SwarmAgentExecutor to capture spans, record messages, and build a lineage graph — is the concrete runtime substrate. Argumentative lineage lifts that graph into the Toulmin vocabulary so reasoning provenance is both machine-queryable and human-interpretable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and audits deterministic, authority-filtered partitions of trust-typed context for already admitted bodies or abstract continuation slots. Use when causal context, obligations, disclosure boundaries, vector-space identity, capacity, and omission proofs must survive partitioning. NOT for spawning or admitting agents, choosing worker count, retrieving arbitrary knowledge, writing successor prompts, or granting tools, leases, identity, or effect authority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safety-case design for always-on agents with episodic memory. Covers data hygiene, privacy and security risk surfaces, cost controls, scope, user dependency concerns, retention, incident containment, and responsible deployment evidence. It identifies hazards and asks for named controls, tests, owners, and residual uncertainty; it does not provide legal, clinical, youth-safety, or jurisdictional determinations. Activate on: "agent safety", "always-on agent privacy", "agent cost control", "persistent agent risks", "AI companion safety", "agent data hygiene", "runaway agent costs", "parasocial AI risk", "/always-on-agent-safety". NOT for: architecture design (use always-on-agent-architecture), input design (use always-on-agent-inputs), application brainstorming (use always-on-agent-applications), healthcare compliance specifically (use hipaa-compliance).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to design contextual inputs for an always-on AI agent with episodic memory. Covers what data to feed the agent, how to structure observations and triggers, ambient context capture (screen, audio, calendar), context window budgeting, and retrieval strategies that keep the agent grounded in what's actually happening. Activate on: "what should the agent observe", "context inputs for agent", "ambient context capture", "agent triggers", "agent input design", "screenpipe integration", "context window budget", "what data to feed my agent", "/always-on-agent-inputs". NOT for: memory architecture and storage (use always-on-agent-architecture), application ideas (use always-on-agent-applications), safety concerns (use always-on-agent-safety).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architecture and systems design for agents that retain bounded state across sessions. Covers durable event history, owned state, derived memory, retrieval indexes, framework evaluation, recovery, deletion, and rebuild behavior. Uses constructed implementation examples and workload calibration rather than universal vendor, latency, similarity, retention, or cost claims. Activate on: "always-on agent", "persistent agent architecture", "episodic memory system", "agent memory design", "long-running agent", "stateful agent", "agent that remembers", "MemGPT architecture", "Letta deployment", "/always-on-agent-architecture". NOT for: choosing what data to feed the agent (use always-on-agent-inputs), brainstorming applications (use always-on-agent-applications), safety and privacy concerns (use always-on-agent-safety), general agentic patterns (use agentic-patterns).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design bounded applications and workflows for an always-on AI agent with episodic memory. Covers product ideas, persistence-dependent workflows, and constructed examples that make delegation, interruption, evidence, and opt-out explicit. Activate on: "what can an always-on agent do", "persistent agent use cases", "agent applications", "proactive agent ideas", "what to build with episodic memory", "always-on agent product", "personal AI assistant ideas", "/always-on-agent-applications". NOT for: building the architecture (use always-on-agent-architecture), designing inputs (use always-on-agent-inputs), safety and privacy (use always-on-agent-safety).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply AlphaGo-style patterns: learned priors plus search, mixed evaluators, self-play, and asynchronous fast/slow loops. Use for intractable search and compute allocation. NOT for basic supervised learning, tractable optimization, or domains without search bottlenecks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Temporal interval algebra for reasoning about time relationships in planning and knowledge representation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Construct a finite oriented simplicial or cellular cochain model and compute its stated linear invariants when coefficient spaces, maps, metrics, and observations are explicit. Use for scoped Hodge, rank, or residual calculations; not for attributing agent intent or authorizing effects. NOT for attributing intent, identifying a liar, or authorizing external effects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。