「quest」の検索結果

Converges an underspecified request into a typed IntentSpec before planning or acting. Use when the user asks to implement, add, change, refactor, fix, migrate, configure, handle, triage, sort out, look into or decide something and the request leaves decisions open (which objects, which approach, what happens on failure, which trade-off), contradicts itself, admits two readings, or rests on an approach its sources may rule out — in a codebase, a ticket queue, a research brief or a runbook — or when the user says "clarify the intent", "what do you need from me", or invokes intent-router. Looks up what its sources hold (code, history, decision records, a ticket log, an order record, the policy in force) before asking; asks only preference or irreversible questions, one at a time, with a recommended default; halts instead of guessing; checks the delivered work against the spec. Silent on a fully stated task its sources do not contradict. Not for explaining existing state ("what does X do", "why is Y slow").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internal — for Boundless team members only. Query the Boundless Indexer REST API for on-chain market data, staking, PoVW rewards, delegations, and market efficiency on prod/staging environments. Use when the user asks about proof requests, provers, requestors, staking data, PoVW rewards, delegations, market aggregates, leaderboards, or wants to fetch data from the indexer API on live networks. Also use when the user mentions "indexer" and wants to look up addresses, requests, or market statistics on deployed environments. Do NOT use for debugging local code changes, reviewing PRs, or investigating issues in the codebase itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce an intensive, cited analytical report: executive summary, multi-angle findings, contrarian views, open questions, and full sources. Use only when the user needs rigorous synthesis of a complex topic (scientific, technical, policy, or market-analytical) that cannot be answered with a short search, and wants a formal written report, not a recommendation list. Do not use for product picks, top-N lists, quick lookups, or routine "find out about X" tasks. If the request does not clearly need this kind of report, do not use this skill. Do not use for a literature review over published papers. This skill collects evidence from the open web. A request for the literature on a biomedical, clinical, life-science, or other scientific topic — papers, studies, trials, preprints — belongs to firecrawl-research-papers, which queries Firecrawl's paper index (PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv) instead of searching websites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CesiumJS core utilities and networking - Resource, Color, Event, Request, RequestScheduler, error handling, helper functions, feature detection. Use when fetching remote data, managing HTTP requests, working with colors, handling events, debugging errors, or using utility functions like defined, clone, or buildModuleUrl.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ask Questions If Underspecified workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Clarify requirements before implementing. Use when serious doubts arise and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a basic HTTP request (curl or fetch) for an API. Use when a junior developer needs a quick request example.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for asking clarifying questions when user requests are ambiguous, have multiple valid approaches, or require critical decisions. Use when implementation choices exist that could significantly affect outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

For external plan request scenarios, guides the Agent to request a clear, actionable, step-by-step plan from a stronger Agent via list_agents and chat_with_agent, emphasizing that the plan is executed by the requester, not by the consulted Agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns open-ended requests into things to think WITH instead of answers to accept. Audits the hidden assumptions inside a topic, inverts them into sharp "what if" provocations, branches each one outward, and delivers a fully-expanded mind map image plus the written wonderings. Fire this when the person signals they want to open up a space and think alongside you — "wonder about X", "what are the weird angles on X", "help me think about what this could be", "I want to explore, not decide yet" — or when they invoke /wonder or /wonderpill. Do NOT fire when the same topic is attached to a request for concrete, usable, or decided output: a named deliverable, a count ("give me 5 names"), a deadline ("ideas I can ship this week"), or a "which / what should I pick" question — those want straight answers, not a wonder pill. When it is genuinely unclear which they want, this skill opens by asking one line rather than branching. Not for factual lookups or executing a plan already chosen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns open-ended requests into things to think WITH instead of answers to accept. Audits the hidden assumptions inside a topic, inverts them into sharp "what if" provocations, branches each one outward, and delivers a mind map plus written wonderings. Portable version, no vendor-specific tools required, works on any conversational assistant. Fire this when the person signals they want to open up a space and think alongside the assistant: "wonder about X", "what are the weird angles on X", "help me think about what this could be", "I want to explore, not decide yet". Do NOT fire when the same topic is attached to a request for concrete, usable, or decided output: a named deliverable, a count ("give me 5 names"), a deadline, or a "which / what should I pick" question. When it is genuinely unclear which they want, this skill opens by asking one line rather than branching. Not for factual lookups or executing a plan already chosen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce an intensive, cited analytical report: executive summary, multi-angle findings, contrarian views, open questions, and full sources. Use only when the user needs rigorous synthesis of a complex topic (scientific, technical, policy, or market-analytical) that cannot be answered with a short search, and wants a formal written report, not a recommendation list. Do not use for product picks, top-N lists, quick lookups, or routine "find out about X" tasks. If the request does not clearly need this kind of report, do not use this skill. Do not use for a literature review over published papers. This skill collects evidence from the open web. A request for the literature on a biomedical, clinical, life-science, or other scientific topic — papers, studies, trials, preprints — belongs to firecrawl-research-papers, which queries Firecrawl's paper index (PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv) instead of searching websites.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer questions about code, architecture, and technical decisions — no implementation. Trigger on questions asking 'why', 'what does this do', 'what is the purpose of', 'explain', 'what's the difference', 'compare', or 'what are the tradeoffs' — even when referencing specific files, code snippets, or inline code. The key signal is the user wants to UNDERSTAND something, not change it. Do NOT trigger for requests to build, fix, plan, review, research, or add/modify code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an analiz question needs the human, not the code, to decide - recording it with record_open_questions, judging blocking vs non-blocking, and resuming the report after an answer

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user wants intellectual understanding — learning how or why something works, not getting a task done or soliciting Claude's judgment. Trigger for: - Explicit learning requests: teach, explain, ELI5, walk me through, quiz me, flashcards, "I'm rusty on"; definitions ("what is X") - Terse concept names implying "help me understand this": "Galois theory," "transformers, from scratch" - Confusion signals: "won't stick," "keep mixing these up," "not getting it" - Learning-path questions: prerequisites, sequencing, what to study before X - Conceptual questions about mechanisms, causes, or dynamics Don't trigger for: - Tasks: coding, writing, calculation, translation, factual lookup, news updates - Personal troubleshooting; resource/textbook recommendations - Claude's evaluative verdict: opinion prompts ("do you think X", "settle this", "honest take", "is X dead / still taken seriously") and interpretive takes ("was X really as harsh as people say")

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gather phase context through adaptive questioning before planning. Use --all to skip area selection and discuss all gray areas interactively. Use --auto to skip interactive questions (Claude picks recommended defaults). Use --chain for interactive discuss followed by automatic plan+execute. Use --power for bulk question generation into a file-based UI (answer at your own pace).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a Socratic questioning sequence that develops conceptual understanding through guided inquiry. Use when facilitating philosophical discussions, concept exploration, or critical examination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a diagnostic hinge question that reveals whether students understand enough to move on. Use when planning key checkpoints mid-lesson during explicit or direct instruction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants help with public relations, earned media, press coverage, journalist outreach, or media strategy (not pull requests). Also use when the user mentions 'PR,' 'public relations,' 'press,' 'press release,' 'press coverage,' 'media outreach,' 'pitch a journalist,' 'get featured,' 'media list,' 'media kit,' 'press kit,' 'newsjacking,' 'news hijack,' 'HARO,' 'Qwoted,' 'Featured,' 'Help A Reporter,' 'reporter request,' 'tech press,' 'TechCrunch,' 'earned media,' 'thought leadership placement,' 'op-ed,' 'guest article,' 'press contacts,' or 'how do I get press.' Use this for earned media work — finding journalists, pitching stories, newsjacking, and responding to press requests. For startup/SaaS/AI directory submissions, see directory-submissions. For product launches, see launch. For social-media engagement, see social. For cold-email outreach to prospects, see cold-email.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route product-growth requests to one Gingiris specialist skill. Use when broad or explicit requests about launch, Product Hunt, GitHub/open-source growth, SEO/GEO, B2B/PLG, ASO, interviews, competitors, KOL, UGC, community, content, backlinks, or README conversion, including 出海增长、产品发布、找增长渠道、竞品分析、 用户访谈、社区运营. Ask short multiple-choice questions only when the route is unclear; then load and run one specialist rather than the full collection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read, study, and answer questions about long books and papers without loading the whole text into one context window, keeping page-anchored notes as a reusable workspace. Use whenever the user asks to read, study, summarize, analyze, review, or answer questions about a long book, textbook, PDF, EPUB, thesis, dissertation, survey paper, or any document of roughly 50+ pages, in any language (Vietnamese "đọc sách", "tóm tắt sách", "phân tích luận án"). Also use when a `{slug}-notes/` workspace from a previous session sits next to a source file and the user asks a follow-up question about that book. Not for short documents (under ~30 pages) that fit in context; read those directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Request write permission from the user before making file changes. MUST be invoked before any write attempt when the write gate is closed. Creates scoped approval via AskUserQuestion + TaskCreate, opens the write gate, and closes it when work is done. Triggers: write hook blocks an edit, agent is about to write files outside .craft/, agent needs to modify project source files. This skill requires user approval 100% of the time - never bypass AskUserQuestion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when reviewing, designing, or improving a workshop, lesson, training session, facilitation plan, talk, or educational explanation. Use it when the user provides a topic, concept, or explanation and wants better framing questions, curiosity hooks, opening prompts, discussion questions, learner reflection prompts, or ways to make participants think before being taught.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze git branches and generate structured MR/PR descriptions with domain-based change categorization — bug fixes, enhancements, technical debt, documentation, testing, build/CI, and non-functional changes. Use when preparing merge request descriptions, pull request bodies, writing changelogs from git diffs, documenting branch changes, or generating release notes. Works with GitHub and GitLab without requiring JIRA or issue tracker integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。