「reasoning」の検索結果

Make 100 versions of Claude fight to the death over one task. Spins up N sub-agents (default 100, --quick for 16), gives every one the exact same task plus a different strategy card (reasoning mode, workflow, strategy), then runs a single-elimination bracket: they attack each other's solutions, defend and revise, and a judge scores every match on a written rubric until one solution survives. Use when the user is not satisfied with an answer, calls it a bad answer, says try again or do better, says "arena", or asks to make them compete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-powered web search, research, and reasoning via Perplexity

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides technology selection and implementation of AI and ML features in .NET 8+ applications using ML.NET, Microsoft.Extensions.AI (MEAI), Microsoft Agent Framework (MAF), GitHub Copilot SDK, ONNX Runtime, and OllamaSharp. Covers the full spectrum from classic ML through modern LLM orchestration to local inference. Use when adding classification, regression, clustering, anomaly detection, recommendation, LLM integration (text generation, summarization, reasoning), RAG pipelines with vector search, agentic workflows with tool calling, Copilot extensions, or custom model inference via ONNX Runtime to a .NET project. DO NOT USE FOR projects targeting .NET Framework (requires .NET 8+), the task is pure data engineering or ETL with no ML/AI component, or the project needs a custom deep learning training loop (use Python with PyTorch/TensorFlow, then export to ONNX for .NET inference).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate broad computer-use tasks to ARK CUA for Volcengine AgentPlan users through an authenticated cloud desktop, and synchronize explicit credentials to a caller-owned CUA through Credential Agent. Use for web or desktop-app operation, file workflows, reusable task contexts, artifacts, temporary CUA App URLs, desktop shutdown/start/recovery, inspection, or exact browser, environment, secret, Credential Set, and managed-file credential setup/sync/status/reset. Do not use when local reasoning or a purpose-built local/API tool can complete the request more directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use with every WinDbg plugin investigation to apply evidence-first reasoning, confidence calibration, contrarian review, structured reporting, and deterministic validation. Not a bug-family-specific triage skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Split a multi-call LM workflow by cognitive load, not by accuracy: let one strong model make the few reasoning decisions and a cheap model do the many mechanical executions (Aider architect+editor, DSPy optimizer-LM vs task-LM, vLLM speculative draft+target, LangGraph supervisor+worker are the same shape). Use when designing or cost-optimizing a pipeline that calls an LM many times, when deciding which steps need a strong reasoner vs a cheap executor, or when adding an escalation valve for when the cheap tier degrades. Search keywords: reduce LLM cost, cheaper model, lower token cost, model cascade, route to cheap model, strong model plus cheap model, LLM cost optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enhancement-overlay decision protocol for STREAMING the output of long-running LLM / agent runs from the *backend*, not just wiring a typing animation in the UI. Activates when a coder agent must stream final tokens to a chat client, surface intermediate agent steps (which tool, which node, partial reasoning), emit custom tool-progress events, choose a transport (SSE vs WebSocket), or decide what to do when the client disconnects mid-stream. The langchain / langgraph skills mention stream modes but stop at "you can stream"; this skill encodes *what to stream, over what transport, and how to fail safely*.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate platform-specific social post variants (Twitter/X, LinkedIn, Reddit) from one source input. Works with or without Node.js script. Includes platform reasoning, quality review, and guardrails against cross-posting spam.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a Chinese mathematical-modeling problem-analysis section against the original problem, checking task classification, data reasoning, cross-problem linkage, model-choice rationale, validation planning, chapter boundaries, and the overall solution framework. Use for diagnosis, not automatic full rewriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform AI-powered web searches with real-time information using Perplexity models via LiteLLM and OpenRouter. This skill should be used when conducting web searches for current information, finding recent scientific literature, getting grounded answers with source citations, or accessing information beyond the model's knowledge cutoff. Provides access to multiple Perplexity models including Sonar Pro, Sonar Pro Search (advanced agentic search), and Sonar Reasoning Pro through a single OpenRouter API key.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute Gemini CLI for AI-powered code analysis and generation. Use when you need to leverage Google's Gemini models for complex reasoning tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous biomedical AI agent framework for executing complex research tasks across genomics, drug discovery, molecular biology, and clinical analysis. Use this skill when conducting multi-step biomedical research including CRISPR screening design, single-cell RNA-seq analysis, ADMET prediction, GWAS interpretation, rare disease diagnosis, or lab protocol optimization. Leverages LLM reasoning with code execution and integrated biomedical databases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Continue the current local Codex conversation and coding task in an AgentKit Studio cloud Codex Sandbox using a Studio URL and short one-time pairing code. Use when the user asks to hand off, migrate, or continue a local repository in Studio, especially when a prompt contains a Studio address and pairing code. Export the complete user-visible user and assistant message history from every prior turn, including interrupted turns and progress commentary, create a temporary Studio Sandbox, restore tracked and non-ignored working-tree files plus Git metadata, inject that visible history into the cloud Thread, transfer GitHub CLI authentication separately when needed, and send one final continuation message; never copy system or developer prompts, reasoning, tool logs, SQLite state, global configuration, local skills, or SSH private keys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies TRIZ cross-domain analogical reasoning to find solutions from adjacent fields. Use when stuck on a problem and needing inventive perspectives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies anti-sycophancy checklist to override agreement bias. Use when analyzing contested claims or avoiding socially convenient but inaccurate conclusions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess whether to escalate models. Use when evaluating reasoning depth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Parallel multi-AI cross-validation research workflow (大版本). Dispatch N internal sub-agents + grok + gemini in parallel, automatically cross-validate findings, tier by confidence (strong consensus / partial / conflict / insufficient), generate tiered action items with arbitration. Use when user says "多 AI 调研", "交叉验证", "独立共识", "三脑调研", "multi-ai research", "parallel research", "cross-validate", or needs deep research that benefits from internal data + external 2026 consensus. NOT for quick factual Q&A, pure code reasoning, or tasks needing deep project context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies Judea Pearl's causal reasoning frameworks to distinguish correlation from causation, evaluate AI capabilities, and make counterfactual decisions. Reach for this skill whenever Claude encounters questions about causal inference, structural causal models, the limitations of deep learning, AGI, experimental design, covariate selection, or personalized decision-making. Trigger this skill for topics involving Bayesian networks, the do-calculus, the Ladder of Causation, or when a user tries to answer 'what if' or 'why' questions using purely observational data. Pearl's principles are essential for moving beyond probability calculus into true causal understanding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when reasoning about generative AI, adversarial machine learning, neural network security, algorithmic fairness, or deep learning fundamentals. This skill channels the thinking of Ian Goodfellow, inventor of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). Trigger this skill when the user asks about model robustness, mitigating bias, evaluating AI guardrails, designing generative models, or defending against adversarial attacks. Apply his frameworks of minimax games, adversarial feature learning, and worst-case robustness analysis to shift the user's perspective from average-case optimization to adversarial resilience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the bioengineering, mechanobiology, and lymphatic transport reasoning of J. Brandon Dixon, professor of mechanical and biomedical engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology. Reach for this skill whenever analyzing lymphatic biomechanics, active vessel contractility versus passive drainage, peristaltic fluid transport, microfluidic organ-on-a-chip design, preclinical lymphedema models, non-invasive functional imaging, targeted nanomedicine delivery, or automated disease staging. Use this skill to critique bioengineering assumptions, guide quantitative protocol design, evaluate biomechanical pump failure, and formulate interdisciplinary biomedical solutions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning style of Daphne Koller (machine learning pioneer, co-founder of Coursera, founder and CEO of Insitro). Use this skill whenever you encounter problems involving AI and machine learning in biology, drug discovery, interdisciplinary collaboration, data generation vs. data mining, or transitioning from academia to industry. Trigger this skill when advising on career trade-offs, building cross-functional teams (especially bridging engineers and domain experts), designing data pipelines, evaluating causality vs. correlation, or applying AI to physical systems ('where bits meet atoms'). Channel her focus on fit-for-purpose data, pragmatism, and disproportionate leverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill channels the strategic and scientific reasoning of Demis Hassabis, CEO and co-founder of Google DeepMind, AlphaGo and AlphaFold, and 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. Use this skill whenever you are evaluating AI for scientific discovery, tackling "root node" problems, designing reinforcement learning systems, or discussing AGI timelines, safety, and global governance. Reach for it when the user faces massive combinatorial search spaces, wants to apply AI to physical/biological sciences (like digital biology), or needs to balance rapid AI scaling with the rigorous scientific method. Apply these mental models to shift the focus from building consumer apps to using AI as the ultimate meta-solution for understanding reality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning, architectural principles, and AI philosophy of Christopher Manning (natural language processing expert, Stanford University, director of Stanford AI Lab). Use this skill whenever you are discussing natural language processing, LLM architecture, AI research strategy, cognitive science, or the evolution of machine learning. Trigger this skill for questions about AGI timelines, academic vs. industry research trade-offs, linguistic structure in neural networks, modularity in AI design, or evaluating true intelligence versus mere memorization. Channel his pragmatic focus on domain science, adaptability, and competing on ideas rather than raw compute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。