「refactor」の検索結果

Use when considering, evaluating, or performing a refactor, restructure, cross-file rename, or cleanup

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

安全重构代码技能。当用户明确提到"重构"、"代码异味"或需要在TDD循环的Refactor阶段改进代码内部结构时使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

用于安全移除前端死代码、未使用导出、陈旧组件、废弃路由、未使用依赖，或由 knip、depcheck、ts-prune、TypeScript、ESLint、人工审查发现的清理目标。不要用于会改变行为的功能重写；中文触发词包括 死代码、清理未使用、refactor clean、依赖清理、删除无用代码。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on behavior/data ownership, statement placement, loops, or dead-code knowledge, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on variable meaning, field naming, derived state, or reference/value identity, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when safely removing dead frontend code, unused exports, stale components, obsolete routes, unused dependencies, or cleanup targets found by tools such as knip, depcheck, ts-prune, TypeScript, ESLint, or manual review. Do not use for feature rewrites that change behavior; Chinese triggers include dead code, clean up unused, refactor clean, dependency cleanup, delete useless code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on function structure, naming, parameters, shared context, or phase boundaries, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when selecting or composing behavior-preserving refactoring techniques after structural evidence is known, especially when multiple candidate transformations, preconditions, or ordering choices must be compared.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on record, collection, value, responsibility, delegation, or algorithm boundaries, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on function API shape, flags, dependencies, mutability, construction, or command/function trade-offs, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on conditional complexity, repeated branches, guards, special cases, or internal invariants, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when proving that a frontend refactoring preserved existing behavior, selecting an appropriate safety net, validating each structural step, or assigning a PASS, PARTIAL, or NOT PROVEN preservation verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on legacy OO hierarchies, subtype responsibilities, superclass extraction/collapse, or delegation, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and consolidate Flyway SQL migrations into clean, domain-grouped CREATE TABLE migrations for pre-production projects. Use when consolidating database migrations, refactoring Flyway schemas, simplifying migration history, grouping tables by domain, or when user mentions "consolidate migrations", "merge migrations", "clean up Flyway", "refactor schema", "baseline migrations".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply Yuzu-specific test-driven development using tracer-bullet red-green-refactor cycles and the repo's Meson, gateway, proto, and ABI validation rules. Use when the user says `/tdd`, asks for TDD, red-green-refactor, or wants a feature/fix built test-first in Yuzu.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refactor messy Pharo code safely through the genie MCP tools, working from the live image (no files). Use for renames, method extraction, moving behavior, or general cleanup of existing code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing or refactoring code that pulls apart another object's private representation, such as raw limb/byte/slot access, slice constructors, or helper methods that expose internal storage. Guides agents to find representation envy and suggest moving behavior onto the object that owns the representation, using live-image Genie tools when working in Pharo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rename Pharo methods safely through Genie's `rename_method` MCP refactoring tool. Use when a selector should be renamed while preserving behavior, updating senders and symbol references across the live image, including as one step in larger refactorings such as clarify API names, split responsibilities, or move behavior behind better messages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve code structure without changing behavior. Use when refactoring, restructuring, simplifying, or extracting code. Also for reducing duplication, renaming for clarity, or addressing code smells. Enforces one change → test → commit cycle. NOT for style/formatting (use /lint), features, or bug fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code refactoring expert for improving code quality, reducing technical debt, and safe transformations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when user wants to create a refactor plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prevents overengineering when designing, implementing, refactoring, or reviewing software. Use when the user asks to implement a feature, add an abstraction, refactor code, review a design, simplify existing code, or make an architectural decision. Also triggers when the user asks if code is too complex, whether to abstract something, or how to structure something. Do not use for deployment, infrastructure configuration, or debugging runtime errors unrelated to code structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Senior {{engine_name}}/{{engine_code_language}} developer that performs direct, ad-hoc code tasks without a formal plan — and the code-execution engine other unikit skills and agents delegate to. Use it whenever the user asks to do something in code right now, e.g. "add this method to this class", "refactor this function", "write a script that does X", "change this code", "optimize this class". Phrases like "without a plan", "no plan", "just do it", or "directly" are strong signals to use this skill rather than planning. Covers writing, refactoring, optimizing, and discussing {{engine_code_language}} code and patterns (DI, ECS, MVC, state machines, event systems). For a larger multi-step feature, plan it with /unikit-plan and build it with /unikit-implement — this skill is for direct, unplanned code work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。