「review loop」の検索結果

Use when running the autonomous multi-agent build pipeline after /bdbrainstorm or /grill-me, when the user types /startcycle-graph or "run a startcycle", or when a task needs durable state, a review repair loop and an automated quality gate. Routes to the startcycle-dispatch Dynamic Workflow, which reads production_artifacts/state.json and invokes Architect, TechLead, UI/UX, Engineering, Media/EventTech, Reviewer, and Shipping in turn per .agents/graph.md's edge table — the agents never invoke each other.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a polished frontend reference screenshot through a configurable GPT-image-2-compatible generations endpoint, save and show versioned previews inside the project, revise selected previews through a configurable /images/edits endpoint, and reproduce only the user-approved design as functional frontend code with high visual fidelity. Use when Codex is asked to design, build, restyle, or recreate a web page, application screen, dashboard, landing page, or UI component through an image-first workflow, design approval loop, screenshot-driven implementation, pixel matching, or a 1:1 frontend recreation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent autonomous startup system for Claude Code. Triggers on "Loki Mode". Orchestrates 100+ specialized agents across engineering, QA, DevOps, security, data/ML, business operations, marketing, HR, and customer success. Takes PRD to fully deployed, revenue-generating product with zero human intervention. Features Task tool for subagent dispatch, parallel code review with 3 specialized reviewers, severity-based issue triage, distributed task queue with dead letter handling, automatic deployment to cloud providers, A/B testing, customer feedback loops, incident response, circuit breakers, and self-healing. Handles rate limits via distributed state checkpoints and auto-resume with exponential backoff. Requires --dangerously-skip-permissions flag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iterate on a PR until actionable CI passes and high/medium review feedback is addressed. Use for PR CI failures, review feedback, or green-check loops; do not wait for human approval, draft status, or merge gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Three-axis orchestrator: (1) clean section boundaries — naming, routes, views, ViewModels, DB ownership, cross-section access; (2) internal cohesion — no EF in service layer, caching in service only, proper interfaces, reusable ViewComponents, architecture-test coverage; (3) focused tests — grouped under the section, covering invariants/negatives/triggers, pruned of redundancy. Push-and-bot-review loop. Use when a sizable PR landed, a section shows arch drift, or /pr-review returned a non-trivial violation list. Camps is the gold-standard reference.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous Reforge-guided refactor workflow for the Humans repository. Use when the user wants Codex to target a section such as Shifts, Users, Teams, Tickets, Camps, or Store, create a dedicated worktree/branch from origin/main, run iterative architecture-focused improvements, score each stage with Reforge, gate commits through a score-blind read-only architecture review, append score and verdict details to commit messages after review acceptance, push progress, and open a PR when the loop reaches stasis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-commit verification pipeline — static security scan, baseline-aware quality gates, independent reviewer subagent, and auto-fix loop. Use after code changes and before committing, pushing, or opening a PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and verify unverified wiki pages — "review unverified pages", "verify wiki content", verification pass, after a major ingest cycle, before content release. The gate that turns AI-generated knowledge into trusted knowledge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make your AI agent learn and improve automatically. Reviews sessions, extracts learnings, updates memory files, and compounds knowledge over time. Set up nightly review loops that make your agent smarter every day.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

プロンプト、正規表現、SQL、小さなコードを、採点基準に沿って繰り返し改良します。AIが候補を作り、失敗例を手がかりによりよい案を探すスキルです。

• 正解例に沿ってプロンプトを改善したいとき
• 合格率で正規表現を調整したいとき
• テストでSQLやコードを改善したいとき

類似企業の売上・利益率・評価倍率を比較するExcelを作成します。計算式、中央値や四分位、データの出典をまとめ、投資や買収の検討に使う比較資料を整えます。

• 同業他社との企業価値比較
• 買収検討用の比較資料作成
• 業界の成長性・収益性比較

Use when a task is too large for one model pass, needs parallel research or generation across many subtasks (like researching a dozen competitors at once), or the user asks to orchestrate multiple models, split work across a model team, run an advisor-worker loop, have a stronger model review the plan while cheap workers execute, or says "too big for one model" or "fan this out". Not for single-file edits or tasks one model handles in one pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure async-path backend code that could block the asyncio event loop is protected by a teeth-verified runtime anchor in tests/blocking_io/. Use when changing backend Python under app/, packages/harness/deerflow/, or scripts/, when running a blocking-IO triage round over the whole repo, or when a reviewer/CI asks for blocking-IO coverage. Runs a deterministic scan (changed-lines or full-repo), routes each candidate, drafts/extends an anchor, and proves it fails when the blocking IO regresses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run `@metaharness/darwin evolve {repo}` to mutate a harness's seven policy surfaces (planner/contextBuilder/reviewer/retryPolicy/toolPolicy/memoryPolicy/scorePolicy), sandbox-score each variant, and promote only measured wins. The model is frozen; the harness evolves. Closes the loop ADR-150 opens (score+genome describe; evolve changes). Degrades gracefully when @metaharness/darwin is absent (ADR-150 + ADR-153 architectural constraints).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HyperFrames CLI dev loop. Use when running npx hyperframes init, add, catalog, capture, lint, validate, inspect, layout, snapshot, preview, play, render, publish, lambda, doctor, browser, info, upgrade, skills, compositions, docs, benchmark, telemetry, transcribe, tts, or remove-background, or when troubleshooting the HyperFrames build/render environment. Entry point for AWS Lambda cloud rendering (`hyperframes lambda deploy / render / progress / destroy / policies`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the HyperFrames CLI development loop: init, add, catalog, capture, lint, check, snapshot, compare, grade-compare, preview, play, present, beats, keyframes, single or batch render, publish, cloud, cloudrun, feedback, lambda, doctor, browser, info, upgrade, skills, compositions, timeline, history, clean, docs, benchmark, telemetry, transcribe, auth, tts, and remove-background. Also use when diagnosing build or render failures. validate, inspect, and layout are deprecated aliases; use check. Covers local, HeyGen-hosted cloud, AWS Lambda, and Google Cloud Run rendering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Self-referential loop until task completion with configurable verification reviewer

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Codex is building or iterating on a web game (HTML/JS) and needs a reliable development + testing loop: implement small changes, run a Playwright-based test script with short input bursts and intentional pauses, inspect screenshots/text, and review console errors with render_game_to_text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/cs:post-mortem <decision> — Honest retrospective on an executed decision, scored against original assumptions and dissent. Closes the strategic sprint loop. Use when a decision hits its 90-day review checkpoint or its kill criteria trigger — e.g. scoring last quarter's pricing change against its pre-committed success metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive Anthropic's Claude Code CLI (`claude -p`) as a non-interactive coding sub-agent from inside Codex. Use when you want to delegate a coding/analysis/refactor task to Claude, get a second opinion / adversarial review from another model, hand off long-context planning, or fan out parallel agents. Covers the exact `claude -p` flags, permission modes, output capture, JSON/stream-json modes, session resume, parallel fan-out, and the mandatory "delegate → capture → independently verify, never trust the self-report" supervision loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive OpenAI's Codex CLI (`codex exec`) as a non-interactive coding sub-agent from inside Claude Code. Load WHENEVER you want to delegate a coding/analysis/refactor task to Codex, get a second opinion / adversarial review from another model, fan out parallel agents across files or worktrees, or run a long mechanical job while you stay the planner. Covers the exact `codex exec` flags, sandbox tiers, output capture, JSON/schema modes, session resume, parallel fan-out, and the mandatory "delegate → capture → independently verify, never trust the self-report" supervision loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomously improve a generated paper via GPT-6-Astra xhigh review → implement fixes → recompile, for 2 rounds. Use when user says "改论文", "improve paper", "论文润色循环", "auto improve", or wants to iteratively polish a generated paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze ARIS usage logs and propose optimizations to SKILL.md files, reviewer prompts, and workflow defaults. Outer-loop harness optimization inspired by Meta-Harness (Lee et al., 2026). Use when user says "优化技能", "meta optimize", "improve skills", "分析使用记录", or wants to optimize ARIS's own harness components based on accumulated experience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a bounded, source-grounded research loop, draft a cited dossier, and optionally propose a separately reviewed canonical vault merge. Use when the user wants autonomous or deep research that may access the public web. Triggers: /autoresearch, autoresearch, research this topic, deep dive into, investigate, find everything about, research and file, go research, build a wiki on.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。