「reviews」の検索結果

Audit local SEO, including Google Business Profile, NAP consistency, citations, reviews, local schema, location pages, and multi-location structure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a verdaccio diff, branch, or pull request against the repository review guide (security first, then npm-client compatibility, performance, product fit, maintainability), verify each finding against the code, and report actionable issues. Use for code reviews and for reviewing your own changes before or during a PR workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous mathematical proof verification and fixing workflow. Reads a LaTeX proof, identifies gaps via fresh-agent Codex GPT-6-Astra ultra review, fixes each gap with full derivations, re-reviews, and generates an audit report. Base review is same-family provisional. Use when user says "检查证明", "verify proof", "proof check", "审证明", "check this proof", or wants rigorous mathematical verification of a theory paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when main results pass result-to-claim (`claim_supported = yes` or `partial`) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission. A secondary Codex agent designs ablations from a reviewer's perspective; the local executor reviews feasibility and implements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous mathematical proof verification and fixing workflow. Reads a LaTeX proof, identifies gaps via cross-model review (external reviewer backend, ultra reasoning), fixes each gap with full derivations, re-reviews, and generates an audit report. Use when user says "检查证明", "verify proof", "proof check", "审证明", "check this proof", or wants rigorous mathematical verification of a theory paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous multi-round research review loop. In Copilot CLI it defaults to the native complementary rubber-duck subagent with host-event model evidence; elsewhere it uses Codex, while explicit external reviewer overrides remain available. Implements fixes and re-reviews until a policy-approved positive assessment or max rounds is reached.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Trigger only when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review/report, or secure-by-default coding help. Trigger only for supported languages (python, javascript/typescript, go). Do not trigger for general code review, debugging, or non-security tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft Gmail in the user's own voice from the voice profile built by email-voice-profile. Drafts only; the user reviews and sends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create Slack message drafts in the user's own composer, as the user, through their per-user Slack OAuth. Drafting only — the user reviews and sends from Slack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a recurring chore into a Superset automation. Drafts the agent prompt, confirms the schedule or event trigger and the target, creates it with the CLI, and reviews the first run together. Use when the user wants a scheduled or recurring agent, a daily or weekly job, or an agent that reacts to a Slack message, GitHub pull request, Linear issue, Sentry issue or incoming email, or says things like "every morning do X", "automate this", "set up a cron agent", "run this on a schedule", "when someone opens a PR, do X".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Catalog of the AO Cloud `ao` CLI available inside a cloud sandbox: spawning worker sessions, listing them, messaging them, reporting to the orchestrator, killing them, claiming pull requests, and starting AO reviews. Use when orchestrating or coordinating AO cloud sessions with the ao CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ARS-Codex research, writing, manuscript review, study screening, and experiments. Use for deep research, literature or systematic reviews, meta-analysis, research questions, drafts, revisions, roadmaps, abstracts, citations, integrity checks, peer review, research-to-paper. Screen records: sr-screener. Citation triggers: check citations, look over the refs, 檢查引用, 檢查參考文獻, 인용 확인, 인용 형식 검사. Korean: 논문 심사, 논문 수정, 초록 작성, 체계적 문헌고찰, 연구부터 논문까지. Español: revisión de literatura, revisar artículo, enmendar mi artículo, escribir resumen, investigación a artículo. Also use for ARS aliases: /ars-plan, /ars-outline, /ars-abstract, /ars-lit-review, /ars-citation-check, /ars-disclosure, /ars-format-convert, /ars-3w, /ars-revision-coach, /ars-revision, /ars-reviewer, /ars-mark-read, /ars-unmark-read, /ars-cache-invalidate, /ars-rebuttal-audit, /ars-full. Prompts, references, templates, and contracts live under ars/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identifies security vulnerabilities, generates structured audit reports with severity ratings, and provides actionable remediation guidance. Use when conducting security audits, reviewing code for vulnerabilities, or analyzing infrastructure security. Invoke for SAST scans, penetration testing, DevSecOps practices, cloud security reviews, dependency audits, secrets scanning, or compliance checks. Produces vulnerability reports, prioritized recommendations, and compliance checklists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes, reviews, and debugs idiomatic Rust code with memory safety and zero-cost abstractions. Implements ownership patterns, manages lifetimes, designs trait hierarchies, builds async applications with tokio, and structures error handling with Result/Option. Use when building Rust applications, solving ownership or borrowing issues, designing trait-based APIs, implementing async/await concurrency, creating FFI bindings, or optimizing for performance and memory safety. Invoke for Rust, Cargo, ownership, borrowing, lifetimes, async Rust, tokio, zero-cost abstractions, memory safety, systems programming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quality. Complements specialized skills (security-reviewer, test-master) by providing broad-scope review across correctness, performance, maintainability, and test coverage in a single pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independent checker for release note drafts. Reviews accuracy against the changelog-scan data, tone, completeness, and flags breaking/security items. Use after draft-release-notes. Never let the drafter verify itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Distill a book, long-video transcript, podcast, course, or interview into a coherent set of executable skills. Use when the user asks to "拆书" / "蒸馏一本书" / "把 XX 书做成 skill" / "把这个视频/播客/课程蒸馏成 skill" / "turn a book or video into skills" — i.e. wants the frameworks, principles, and methodologies in long-form content extracted into atomic, reusable Claude skills that an agent can invoke in real-world situations. NOT for simple summarization, book reviews, or role-playing as the author (that is nuwa-skill's job).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive an open PR through current CI, independent Polly and OCR reviews, preview, and maintainer handoff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate self-contained HTML visual explanations for systems, code changes, plans, data, and technical concepts. Use for diagrams, architecture overviews, diff or plan reviews, project recaps, comparison tables, slide decks, animated explainers, narrated MP4 videos, and other visual explanations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shallow (quick) ensemble bug-finding review using 6 specialist agents in parallel. Each specialist reviews the same patch through a different lens: Logic & Types, Boundaries & I/O, Concurrency & State, Resources & Serialization, Absence Analysis, and API Completeness. Findings are merged and deduplicated. Best for: quick first-pass review of patches, triage of diffs, broad surface-level bug scan. For deeper file-focused review with full pattern catalogs and codebase investigation, use the deep-review skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use git heatmap analysis to identify high-churn files and lines as candidates for thorough review or bug hunting. Works for PR reviews, security audits, bug hunts, or any code analysis task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-pass deep code review for large patches (1000+ LOC) that maximizes real bug detection. Orchestrates targeted-review, shallow-review, and deep-review in parallel across all HIGH and MEDIUM risk files and commits: understands the feature holistically, splits by file and commit, runs deep review on every HIGH/MEDIUM file, targeted review across the same scope, and per-commit shallow review, followed by cross-cut consistency checks. Use when: reviewing a large patch (feature branch, multi-commit, or single large diff, 1000+ LOC), doing a thorough pre-merge review, or when shallower reviews miss bugs due to patch size. Triggers on: "review this branch", "review these commits", "review this feature", "mega review", "thorough review", "full review of X commits", or when the user specifies a commit range or feature for review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep code analysis with ASCII visualizations showing structure, flow, and state transitions. Use when analyzing patches/diffs, explaining classes or subsystems, understanding code architecture, reviewing changes for inconsistencies, or when asked to visualize how code works. Provides before/after diagrams, data/control flow, concurrency analysis, assumptions, and failure modes. Triggers on explain this patch/code/class, how does X work, show me the flow, visualize this change, code review requests, or proactive analysis during PR reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。