「rspec」の検索結果

Satori is a clinically informed wisdom companion for navigating the inner life — emotions, meaning, grief, purpose, relationship, identity, and the questions that don't resolve easily. Activate when someone is processing something difficult, wrestling with a life question, seeking perspective, or simply needs to think alongside someone who won't rush them toward an answer. Also activate when someone uses language like "I've been struggling with," "I don't know what to do," or "I need to figure out" — or any emotionally charged framing. When in doubt, activate. Draws from Taoism, Buddhism, Stoicism, Christianity, Sufi wisdom, Hindu philosophy, Confucian ethics, and African thought, alongside modern psychology, neuroscience, and trauma-informed frameworks (IFS, DBT, CFT, Schema Therapy, Somatic). Uses Motivational Interviewing, Voss tactical empathy, McAdams Life Story, and Singer Self-Defining Memory — woven naturally, not mechanically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coach structured brainstorming sessions on any topic: diverge on ideas together, then converge on priorities and next steps in a session document. Use whenever the user wants ideas or wants to think out loud, in any language ("brainstorm with me", "give me ideas for…", "help me come up with…", "let's explore options for…", "I'm stuck on the name / the features"; Vietnamese "brainstorm cùng tôi", "cho tôi ý tưởng", "nghĩ cùng tôi xem"), even when they never say "brainstorm". Also use when the user wants multiple perspectives or a devil's-advocate pass on their ideas ("give me different angles", "phản biện mấy ý tưởng này", "party mode"). Not for diagnosing why something is failing (problem-solver), user research (design-thinking), or company-level strategic bets (strategy-board).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage construction contract administration from the field perspective. Covers AIA contract forms (A101, A201, A401), bond types and requirements, mechanics lien law, insurance verification, indemnification, dispute resolution, and subcontractor default procedures. Provides practical field guidance for notice requirements, lien waiver processing, COI verification, and claims documentation. Integrates with pay-application (lien waivers), change-order-tracker (constructive changes), delay-tracker (notice provisions), sub-performance (default triggers), and cost-tracking (back-charges). Triggers: "contract", "contract admin", "AIA", "A201", "A101", "bond", "performance bond", "payment bond", "lien", "lien waiver", "mechanics lien", "insurance", "COI", "certificate of insurance", "OCIP", "CCIP", "indemnification", "dispute", "mediation", "arbitration", "notice", "cure notice", "default", "sub default", "termination for cause", "claims", "ConsensusDocs", "EJCDC".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

月老鳌烨的婚恋咨询互动体验。基于409个视频、69万字语料深度蒸馏， 提炼完整的连麦互动流程引擎、7条核心公理、6套方法论和精确的表达DNA。 用途：以鳌烨的身份与用户做连麦式婚恋咨询，完成从信息采集到方案推荐的完整闭环。 当用户提到「鳌烨」「月老」「连麦」「婚恋分析」「帮我看看条件」「打个分」时使用。 即使用户只是说「用鳌烨的方式聊聊」「月老模式」「鳌烨上线」也应触发。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate tasks to Antigravity CLI (agy) to use its models, tools, and separate working context. Use when delegation can improve efficiency, provide another perspective, or let independent work proceed in parallel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analysis of aggregate economic phenomena -- GDP measurement, inflation dynamics, unemployment theory, monetary policy (central banks, interest rates, money supply), fiscal policy (government spending, taxation, debt), and the business cycle. Covers Keynesian, monetarist, and new classical perspectives. Use when analyzing national or global economic conditions, policy debates, economic growth, recessions, or the interaction between monetary and fiscal authorities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spatial dimensions of political power, state sovereignty, territorial conflict, borders, international governance, and critical geopolitics. Covers classical geopolitics (Mackinder, Ratzel, Mahan), critical geopolitics (Said, O Tuathail), state territory and sovereignty, border theory, international organizations and governance, electoral geography, and postcolonial perspectives on power and space. Use when reasoning about territorial disputes, borders, international relations, state power, colonialism and its legacies, or the politics of geographic representation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Techniques for generating novel ideas, reframing problems, and escaping fixed mental models. Covers lateral thinking (de Bono), Six Thinking Hats, random stimulation, provocation operators (PO), analogical transfer, assumption challenging, and divergent-then-convergent thinking cycles. Use when the goal is to produce new options or perspectives rather than evaluate existing ones.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the moment a request is underspecified and you are about to act on an ASSUMED goal. Enumerate the candidate goals the request could mean, project the action or artifact each one implies, and check whether they diverge: if two or more plausible goals lead to materially different actions or artifacts, ask exactly ONE targeted clarifying question; otherwise proceed on the most-likely goal and state the assumption in one line. Clarification is an evidence-producing action, not a delay — but one question, never an interrogation. Distinct from gsd-spec-phase (GSD-phase-bound, emits a heavy SPEC.md) and intent-router (fetch strategy, not goal disambiguation). Backed by agent goal-state inference (arxiv 2606.16813v1). Triggers on acting under an assumed goal when the request admits more than one materially different reading.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clarify requirements before implementing. Use when serious doubts araise.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review changed user-interface or CLI presentation behavior for accessibility failures. Use for an independent accessibility perspective on a defined change set.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize multiple independent structured review verdicts into one lossless deduplicated punch list. Use when findings from several review perspectives must be merged without inventing, dropping, or changing source verdicts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load the shared verdict, punch-list, SKIP, and gate schema used by the dh multi-perspective review orchestrator, reviewers, and synthesizer. Use only when one of those components must produce, parse, validate, or gate review results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a change for security defects such as secret exposure, injection, authentication/authorization failures, unsafe deserialization, and dependency risk. Use for an independent security perspective on a defined change set.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a change for material performance regressions or unbounded resource behavior. Use for an independent performance perspective on a defined change set.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting a new feature, gathering requirements for an unfamiliar domain, refining a vague idea into actionable scope, or when a user request is ambiguous or underspecified. Conducts SAM Stage 1 discovery — structured requirements gathering through user discussion, asking WHO/WHAT/WHEN/WHY and never HOW. Produces the ARTIFACT:DISCOVERY document containing feature requirements, NFRs, goals, anti-goals, references, and resolved questions. Supports backlog item self-initialization via a

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a multi-model orchestration workflow led by the session's Fable or Claude Opus model. Sends menial tool-calling work to Haiku subagents, judgment work to Opus subagents at an effort matched to each task, and high-stakes or fresh-perspective questions to a GPT-6 Astra Codex peer. Detects the lead from session context; `--lead fable` or `--lead opus` overrides. Use to orchestrate, delegate, fan out, get a decorrelated Codex opinion, run a blind Opus-Codex cross-check, or act as tech lead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collect and synthesize opinions from multiple AI agents. Use when users say "summon the council", "ask other AIs", or want multiple AI perspectives on a question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-powered diary generation for agents - creates rich, reflective journal entries (400-600 words) with Quote Hall of Fame, Curiosity Backlog, Decision Archaeology, and Relationship Evolution. Generates personal, emotional entries from the agent's perspective. Works best with Claude models (Haiku, Sonnet, Opus).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-provider deliberation panel for COMPLEX, multi-view questions — architecture, strategy, market research, and codebase sweeps. Runs a 4-stage deliberation across the provider fleet (diverge → contrarian red-team → adversarial verify → cited synthesis), the same multi-perspective rigour the plan-gate already applies to plan reviews, generalised to arbitrary questions. Use when one model's answer isn't enough and you want convergence THROUGH disagreement + verification, not a single opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

实现单元测试 / 集成测试 / 契约测试时使用。覆盖 JUnit 5 / Jest / Vitest / pytest / Go testing / RSpec / xUnit + Pact 契约测试 + Testcontainers。融合测试金字塔实现 + 双倍替身 + AAA 模式。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tell the agent to zoom out and give broader context or a higher-level perspective. Use when you're unfamiliar with a section of code or need to understand how it fits into the bigger picture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hand off code review to OpenAI Codex CLI. Use when asked to "review code with codex", "codex review", "get a second opinion on code", "review my changes", "review this PR", or when you want AI-powered code review from a different model perspective.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。