Run deep research on a topic. Web searches, data collection, source checking, and a structured report. Use when the user needs more than a quick answer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
985 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Run deep research on a topic. Web searches, data collection, source checking, and a structured report. Use when the user needs more than a quick answer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides user research and research ops. Use when running interviews, usability tests, surveys, or synthesis to de-risk product decisions; not experiments or review mining.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits and optimizes websites for search engine visibility (SEO) and AI search citation (GEO), covering technical health, E-E-A-T content scoring, domain authority, structured data, rich results, and entity signals. Use when running SEO audits, diagnosing traffic drops or ranking losses, generating Schema.org JSON-LD, checking Core Web Vitals, crawlability, robots.txt, sitemaps, hreflang, backlinks, planning content strategy or site migrations, fixing indexing issues, or optimizing for AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and Perplexity. NOT for paid ads (PPC/SEM), social media strategy, email marketing, or general web development unrelated to search.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for a literature review, academic deep dive, research report, state-of-the-art survey, topic scoping, comparative analysis of methods/papers, grant background, or any request that needs multi-source scholarly evidence with citations. Also trigger proactively when a user question clearly requires academic grounding (e.g. "what's known about X", "compare approach A vs B in the literature", "summarize the field of Y"). Runs an 8-phase (Phase 0..7), script-driven research workflow across 7 federated sources (OpenAlex, arXiv, Crossref, PubMed, DBLP, bioRxiv, Exa) with optional Semantic Scholar / Brave MCP enrichment, with deduplication, transparent ranking, dual-backend citation chasing (OpenAlex + Semantic Scholar), self-critique, and structured report output with verifiable citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a Meta-Harness-style optimization loop NATIVELY — automatically search over the scaffolding around a FIXED base model (memory, retrieval, context construction, prompt templates, summarization, tool-selection logic) by proposing candidate variants, scoring each on a cheap deterministic eval, and keeping a Pareto frontier of quality vs cost — using native Agent / Workflow / loop tools instead of a standalone Python harness. Use this whenever the user wants to optimize, evolve, tune, distill, or search over a harness, scaffold, prompt system, memory or retrieval policy, context-assembly code, or summarizer while keeping the model fixed; whenever they mention Meta-Harness, harness optimization, scaffold evolution, automatic prompt/memory optimization, an evolutionary or Pareto search over candidate implementations, or "make the harness/agent better without retraining"; and whenever the gain must come from the code AROUND the model rather than the model weights. Reproduces the Meta-Harness paper's method natively, with no claude_wrapper.py and no metered solver API.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitate a full design-thinking engagement (Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, Test) grounded in real user evidence. Use whenever the user wants to understand users deeply and design a solution for them: "run design thinking", "understand our users", "design user interviews", "synthesize these interview notes", "build personas", "write How-Might-We questions", "prototype this concept", "design a usability test", "our users are churning and we don't know why", in any language ("tư duy thiết kế", "nghiên cứu người dùng", "phỏng vấn khách hàng", "デザイン思考", "设计思维"), even when they never say "design thinking". Also use when the user drops raw interview notes, transcripts, or survey exports and wants insights, personas, or product decisions. Not for "is there a market for X" desk questions (market-researcher).
Plans a research project as a decision map that persists across sessions, resolving one ticket per session until the design is defensible and pre-registerable. The map lives as Markdown in the repository, literature sweeps run as parallel research tickets, and the resolved map compiles into a pre-analysis plan. Use at project start, when a design has more open decisions than one conversation can hold, or when planning restarts each session. Not for executing analyses or writing the paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the marketing harness quality gates on content. Scores Four U's (Unique/Useful/Ultra-specific/Urgent), checks for banned words and AI slop, runs SEO lint for search content. Use when "score this", "quality check", "run quality gates", "check this content", "four u's score", "banned word check", "SEO lint", or any request to validate content quality before publishing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use to run an autoresearch-style experiment loop — improve a measurable artifact by trying changes, measuring against one objective metric, keeping if better and reverting if not, on an isolated git branch with a logged trail. Trigger on "/experiment", "run an experiment loop", "autoresearch X", "tune/optimize X against a metric", "hill-climb X". Follows references/sops/experiment-loop.md. Enforces the autonomy gate (objective metric + reversible sandbox + no PHI/external) before any unsupervised looping.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SEO & GEO content linter — validates Markdown/MDX files for AI search visibility using 92 deterministic rules (35 GEO, 32 SEO, 14 content quality, 8 technical, 3 i18n). Runs an autonomous lint-fix loop: scan content, read structured violations, fix them, re-lint until clean. Use when optimizing content for AI citations, auditing SEO compliance, checking GEO readiness, or running pre-publish content validation. Triggers on: "geo-lint", "lint content", "SEO audit", "GEO", "content optimization", "AI search", "citation readiness".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a local coding agent (Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, or similar) needs to operate Multica through the authenticated `multica` CLI: reading or updating issues, comments, metadata, labels, custom properties, subscribers, projects, agents, squads, runtimes, repos, skills, autopilots, attachments, or workspace state; searching issues; inspecting or cancelling agent runs; replying to a Multica issue from an external agent; creating or triaging issues; checking linked pull requests; or safely handling Multica mention/status side effects without relying on the Multica hosted agent runtime.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generalised autonomous optimisation loop — soft RLVR for any artifact a user can measure. Web runtime package: uses memory in this order: connector-backed, project-pack, none. Never assumes subprocess access or unrestricted local files. Use this skill whenever a user wants to iteratively improve an artifact — code, prompts, documents, configs, designs, content — by running structured experiments, evaluating results against a multi-dimensional rubric, and learning from each attempt. Triggers include: "optimise this", "keep improving until it's good", "run experiments on", "autoresearch", "iterate on this overnight", "try different approaches and pick the best", or any request implying repeated evaluate-and-improve cycles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan synthetic routes and judge whether a proposed molecule can actually be made, using AiZynthFinder's Monte-Carlo tree search over template-derived reactions and a purchasable building-block stock. Use this skill to configure expansion and filter policies, choose a stock file, run route search over a candidate set, and read the returned trees — solved fraction, route depth, and which building blocks a route bottoms out in. Also trigger on AiZynthFinder, retrosynthetic tree search, synthetic accessibility, SAscore, RAscore, building-block stock, reaction template, or route scoring.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build an organic-traffic operating system for any site or app: a multi-phase, resumable engine that plans and ships a BATCH ROADMAP of landing pages (use-cases, playbooks, /for/ pages, roundups) on top of real keyword research, with a persistent phase tracker. Use when the user says 'SEO machine', 'build organic traffic', 'rank on Google', 'we need traffic', 'SEO roadmap', 'batch of pages', 'pages roadmap', or 'build an SEO engine'. Distinct from `seo-audit` (one-off diagnostic) and `seo-content` (single-article writer): this skill owns the multi-page roadmap, run sequencing, page generation, internal linking, and the persistent phase tracker across the whole run. For a single alternatives or vs/comparison page, see /competitor-alternatives; for programmatic SEO templates and content at scale, see /seo-content; for off-page link building, see /off-page-seo. Resumable — every invocation continues the last run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Work with any Upstash product, SDK, or tool, including serverless Redis (caching, sessions, leaderboards, key-value storage), Ratelimit (rate limiting and throttling), QStash (message queue, cron schedules, background jobs), Workflow (durable long-running functions), Vector (vector database for embeddings, semantic search, and RAG), Search (full-text and semantic search), Box (sandboxed cloud containers for AI agents, TypeScript/JavaScript and Python), Blob (serverless S3-compatible file storage with direct browser uploads), the Upstash CLI, and no-signup scratch Redis for agents. Use when the user mentions Upstash or needs any of these capabilities in a serverless, edge, or Node.js app.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DECIDE-phase doctrine for an Arbor research run: when to merge, prune, combine, or finalize; how the held-out merge gate works; and the rule that the final report uses TEST scores. Load before deciding what to do with completed experiments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The Arbor research-coordinator protocol: the OBSERVE -> IDEATE -> SELECT -> DISPATCH -> DECIDE cycle over a durable Idea Tree. Preloaded automatically on /auto-research sessions. The coordinator never edits code or runs commands — executors do that in isolated worktrees; the coordinator steers the tree with idea_tree / dispatch_experiments / merge_experiment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run AI agent tasks on a Volcengine (火山引擎) cloud phone via the Mobile Use Agent OpenAPI. Use when the user asks to drive, automate, operate, or test an Android app on a cloud phone for enterprise use cases (e.g. reply to WeCom customer messages, add leads in a CRM, clock in on DingTalk, check invoicing stats, query inventory in a supply-chain app, ship e-commerce orders, approve OA requests) or personal ones (open 小红书 and search, place an order, check nearby places on a map), or to check status, fetch result, cancel, or list a Mobile Use run. Requires one-time setup to store Volcengine AK/SK locally; ProductId and PodId can be saved as a default device during setup, the user prompt is provided per run. Supports optional GPS injection (GpsInfo) with user consent (auto-asked only for location-related tasks).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a new user wants an agent to start Research Pilot from scratch, create or inspect a local workspace, create the first project, or begin project tracking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Observe the user's screen via screenpipe, detect repeated research workflows, match them against existing scientific-agent-skills, and draft new skills (or composition recipes that chain existing ones) for the patterns not yet covered. Use when the user asks to analyze their recent work and propose skills based on what they actually do. Requires the screenpipe daemon (https://github.com/screenpipe/screenpipe) running locally on port 3030 — the skill has no other data source and will refuse to run if screenpipe is unreachable. All detection runs locally; only redacted cluster summaries reach the LLM.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Curate Gaia bot crawler branches into real-skill catalog entries and clean up processed bot/* branches. Use when the user says: "process bot branches", "curate the crawl output", "clean up bot proposals", "run bot curation", "merge the crawler results", "review bot/* branches", "ingest crawler data", or explicitly types /gaia-bot-curate. Also triggers when the user asks to review pending `bot/*` branches, turn crawler JSON proposals into registry nodes, decide which crawled skills to accept vs reject, or batch-add skills from an automated crawl run. This skill handles the full pipeline: fetch remote bot branches, triage proposals, run `gaia dev` mutations, validate, open a PR, and delete consumed bot branches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end Gaia curation pipeline orchestrator. Routes each phase to its dedicated skill and keeps you on track from first discovery to closed intake. Use when starting a fresh curation run or when you want a single skill to hold the sequence together without duplicating each phase's instructions. Trigger phrases: "/gaia-full-pipeline", "run the full pipeline", "start a curation from scratch", "take this skill through the full pipeline", "curate end-to-end", "pipeline run", "full curation flow". Fused from: gaia-curate + gaia-curate-chain + gaia-curate-dynamic + gaia-curate-trending + gaia-bot-curate + gaia-draft-curate + ev-pipeline + gaia-ingest + gaia-intake-close.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect or exercise the paused gaia curate orchestration scaffold for one source URL. The command currently persists an INITIALIZED run ledger and reports status; its 25 named workflow states and transition methods are a design skeleton, not an implemented automated curation or merge pipeline. Use only for scaffold development, status inspection, or dry-run contract work. For live curation, use gaia-full-pipeline or gaia-consult. Trigger phrases: "/gaia-quick-curate", "inspect gaia curate", "curate scaffold", "quick curate status". For batch/multi-page runs use gaia-curate-dynamic; for crawler branches use gaia-bot-curate; for pending intake proposals use gaia-draft-curate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run multi-source web research with adversarial verification and produce a cited report: decomposes the question into 3-6 distinct queries (broad, specific, comparative, recency-anchored), searches and ranks sources by authority, recency, and specificity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。