「solid」の検索結果

Plan, manage, and optimize a domain portfolio. Use this skill for DNS architecture decisions, redirect strategies, registrar choice, parking unused domains, multi-site setups, and domain consolidation or split planning. Triggers on DNS, domain, registrar, redirect, parking, subdomain, apex, www vs non-www, multi-site, portfolio, hreflang setup, domain migration. Also triggers when planning a new site that needs domain decisions made before launch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A platform decision framework for experimentation. When to use Statsig vs PostHog vs GrowthBook vs Optimizely vs Amplitude vs Eppo vs Kameleoon. How to migrate between them. How to coordinate when multi-platform is genuinely warranted. The decisions that compound for years and the ones you can defer. Triggers on which experimentation platform, choose Statsig vs PostHog, evaluate experimentation tools, switch experimentation platform, migrate from Optimizely, consolidate experimentation tools, multi-platform experimentation, experimentation platform decision, ab test platform selection, feature flag platform vs experiment platform, warehouse-native experiments, vendor lock-in experimentation. Also triggers when a team is asking about cost, governance, or migration cost across experimentation tools, or when an evaluation is starting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document types: SSP, SAP, SAR, POA&M, CIS/CRM workbooks. Also trigger for questions about FedRAMP Certification Classes (A, B, C, D — new baseline labels: A = pilot/transitional, B = LI-SaaS/Low, C = Moderate, D = High, per NTC-0004), FedRAMP 20x (now the primary authorization pathway), OSCAL mandate (September 2026), 3PAO assessments, continuous monitoring (ConMon), gap assessments, system boundary definition, or architecture reviews for federal cloud. FedRAMP Ready retired July 28, 2026 (Legacy FedRAMP Ready). When in doubt, use this skill — it covers the full FedRAMP lifecycle from readiness through continuous monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prune stale memory entries and consolidate the memory index

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a consolidated digest from multiple information sources

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, and Kotlin. Analyzes PRs for complexity, risk, SOLID violations, and code smells. Use when reviewing PRs, analyzing code quality, or generating review checklists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the martech stack for gaps, overlaps and wasted spend, with a consolidation plan. "audit our martech stack"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a customized Customer Agreement starting from the Y Combinator standard form SaaS template. Tailors the agreement through structured intake questions covering fee structure, data handling, ML rights, implementation services, and more. Applies 18 always-on defaults that transform the raw YC form into a professional starting point (renamed to "Customer Agreement", data privacy section added, warranty restructured, consolidated SLA/support exhibit, etc.). Produces a clean .docx and a lawyer-facing memo explaining every change from the YC standard. Use when user says "draft a SaaS agreement", "YC SaaS", "startup SaaS contract", "customer agreement", "SaaS subscription agreement", or "I need a SaaS agreement starting from the YC form". Also trigger when the user is a startup founder discussing SaaS contracting, even if they don't mention YC specifically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screen a client, counterparty, payer or corporate against the sanctions lists published by the designating authorities themselves — the UK Sanctions List (FCDO), OFSI, the UN Security Council, the EU consolidated list and OFAC's SDN and non-SDN lists. Use when onboarding, before taking a payment, before completing a transaction, or whenever a name must be checked against sanctions. Produces candidates and provenance, never a clearance: the record names every list searched with its publication date and count, states what was NOT searched, and ends at a blank decision block. Fails closed — a cache that is missing, damaged, truncated or stale is reported NOT SEARCHED and the process exits non-zero, so nothing can read an incomplete run as clean. Matches across transliteration, diacritics, homoglyphs and initials, because nobody spells a name the way the publisher does. Standard library only; screening opens no network connection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adjudicates whether a hit generated by sanctions, PEP, or adverse-media screening is a true positive, false positive, or requires human escalation. Use whenever a user presents a screening alert, a name match against a watchlist (OFAC SDN, EU consolidated list, UK OFSI, UN list, PEP list, adverse media hit, etc.), or asks to clear a screening hit / reduce false positives / determine whether a flagged name is actually the listed party. Use even when the user describes the task casually — "is this person actually on the sanctions list", "did we get a real match", "clear this alert", "I have a hit on X" — these are all screening-adjudication tasks. Produces a deterministic determination with full audit trail (structured JSON + human-readable narrative). Designed for use by compliance analysts and screening systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Panel structure design, firm selection criteria, right-sourcing analysis, and coverage gap assessment for in-house legal teams. Build panel frameworks from scratch or formalise existing informal arrangements. Define weighted selection criteria for firm evaluation. Run right-sourcing analysis (ABC tiering) to identify work sent to expensive providers that doesn't require that level of resource. Assess existing panels for practice area, geographic, and capability gaps. Trigger on: 'design our panel', 'how many firms do we need', 'panel structure', 'firm selection criteria', 'which firms should we use', 'right-sourcing', 'are we sending work to the right firms', 'panel gaps', 'too many firms', 'consolidate our panel', 'we need a firm for', 'preferred provider', 'panel tiers', 'do we need BigLaw for this', 'convergence', 'D&I panel targets', 'how do we choose firms'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide pour la rédaction de notifications de licenciement conformes au droit du travail français. Utiliser ce skill quand l'utilisateur demande de rédiger, préparer, créer ou éditer une lettre de notification de licenciement, notamment pour faute grave, faute lourde ou motif personnel. Le skill guide la collecte d'informations précises et la rédaction d'une notification juridiquement solide avec tous les éléments obligatoires du droit français.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a formal, structured AI Act compliance assessment report suitable for legal files, audit trails, and regulatory inquiries. This skill should be used when the user asks to "generate an AI Act report", "create a compliance assessment report", "document the AI Act analysis", "create a Prüfbericht", "export as Word document", or wants to consolidate prior AI Act skill outputs into a formal documented assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance under CR26 (FedRAMP Consolidated Rules for 2026). Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document types: SSP, SAP, SAR, POA&M, CIS/CRM workbooks. Also trigger for questions about FedRAMP Certification Classes (A, B, C, D — new baseline labels: A = pilot/transitional, B = LI-SaaS/Low, C = Moderate, D = High, per NTC-0004), FedRAMP 20x (now the primary authorization pathway), OSCAL mandate (September 2026), 3PAO assessments, continuous monitoring (ConMon), gap assessments, system boundary definition, or architecture reviews for federal cloud. FedRAMP Ready retires July 28, 2026. When in doubt, use this skill — it covers the full FedRAMP lifecycle from readiness through continuous monitoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make one primary CTA feel premium: a soft band of light sweeps across it (slowly at rest, faster on hover). Reserve for the single primary button; keep it subtle. Pure CSS; the sweep stops (solid button) under prefers-reduced-motion. Do not use on secondary/destructive buttons or many at once.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A soft highlight sweeps across muted text — a quiet premium shimmer for one short label ("new", "pro", a CTA word). Keep the base text readable; one or two per view. Pure CSS; solid under reduced-motion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Give one short headline quiet premium emphasis: a slow on-brand gradient drifts through the type. One phrase per view; never body copy (readability). Pure CSS; falls back to a solid brand color under prefers-reduced-motion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A jittery electric outline traces a card — an energetic accent for one hero element. One per view. Pure CSS; a static solid outline remains under prefers-reduced-motion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wrap a learning session in a plan → monitor → reflect cycle. Use at the start of any substantial study session to set goals, mid-session to check strategy, and at session end to consolidate what changed. Builds self-regulated learning as a habit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Redesign a direct instruction sequence to include productive struggle before the explanation phase. Use when teaching concepts that benefit from failure-first approaches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consolidated expert library for professional Godot 4.7+ game and application development. Orchestrates 92 Domain Skills through architectural workflows, anti-pattern catalogs, performance budgets, and Server API patterns. Use when: (1) starting a new Godot project, (2) designing game or app architecture, (3) building entity/component systems, (4) debugging performance or physics issues, (5) choosing between 2D/3D approaches, (6) implementing multiplayer, (7) optimizing draw calls or script time, (8) porting between platforms, (9) migrating from 4.6 to 4.7. Primary entry point for ALL Godot development tasks. Keywords: Godot 4.7, AreaLight3D, HDR, Asset Store, godot-master.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert patterns for 3D level design using GridMap with MeshLibrary, CSG constructive solid geometry, occlusion, and runtime GridMap builders. Use when building 3D levels, modular tilesets, or BSP-style geometry. For sky/fog/Environment recipes, route to godot-3d-lighting. Trigger keywords: GridMap, MeshLibrary, set_cell_item, get_cell_item, map_to_local, local_to_map, CSGCombiner3D, CSGBox3D, CSGSphere3D, CSGPolygon3D, OccluderInstance3D, bake CSG.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep dive into software architecture for macOS. Covers SOLID principles, design patterns, and modular code organization. Use when designing app architecture or refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。