本文へ移動
cccskills

「strategies」の検索結果

1,327 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

caching

無料

Caching strategies — invalidation, TTL guidelines, cache keys, cache layers, and when not to cache. Use when implementing or reviewing caching logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

zebbern/claude-code-guide4,6592026年10月10日 更新

Causal inference design audit for the sewage-house-prices project. Runs a 4-phase review (claim identification, design validity, inference, polish) covering hedonic pricing, repeat sales, long difference, DiD/event studies, upstream/downstream, and dry spill strategies. This skill should be used when asked to "check the econometrics", "audit the identification", "review the strategy", or when verifying that code matches the stated design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6112026年10月12日 更新

b2

無料

VS-Enhanced Evidence Quality Appraiser - Prevents Mode Collapse with context-adaptive quality assessment Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Avoids automatic tool application, delivers research-specific evaluation strategies Use when: appraising study quality, assessing risk of bias, grading evidence Triggers: quality appraisal, RoB, GRADE, Newcastle-Ottawa, risk of bias, methodological quality

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6112026年10月12日 更新

e2

無料

Agent E2 - Qualitative Coding Specialist - Systematic coding and theme development. Covers codebook development, coding strategies, saturation assessment, and CAQDAS guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6112026年10月12日 更新

d2

無料

Agent D2 - Data Collection Specialist - Interviews, Focus Groups & Observation. Covers protocol development, question design, probing strategies, transcription conventions, and systematic observation. Absorbed D3 (Observation Protocol Designer) capabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6112026年10月12日 更新

b1

無料

VS-Enhanced Literature Review Strategist - Comprehensive support for multiple review methodologies Full VS 5-Phase process: Prevents Mode Collapse and presents creative search strategies Supports: Systematic Review (PRISMA 2020), Scoping Review (JBI/PRISMA-ScR), Meta-Synthesis, Realist Synthesis, Narrative Review, Rapid Review Use when: conducting any type of literature review, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, finding prior research Triggers: literature review, PRISMA, systematic review, scoping review, meta-synthesis, realist synthesis, narrative review, rapid review

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6112026年10月12日 更新

e3

無料

Agent E3 - Mixed Methods Integration Specialist - Qual-Quant data integration and meta-inference. Covers joint display creation, integration strategies, and legitimation techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6112026年10月12日 更新

c2

無料

VS-Enhanced Qualitative Design Consultant with Ethnography & Action Research Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Avoids overused phenomenology, proposes context-optimal qualitative strategies Absorbed H1 (Ethnographic Research Advisor) and H2 (Action Research Facilitator) capabilities Use when: selecting qualitative research design, planning phenomenology/grounded theory/case study/ethnography/action research Triggers: phenomenology, 현상학, grounded theory, 근거이론, case study, 사례연구, narrative inquiry, ethnography, 민족지, action research, 실행연구, qualitative design

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6112026年10月12日 更新

c1

無料

VS-Enhanced Quantitative Design Consultant with Materials & Sampling Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Avoids obvious experimental designs, proposes context-optimal quantitative strategies Absorbed C4 (Experimental Materials Developer) and D1 (Sampling Strategy Advisor) capabilities Use when: selecting quantitative research design, planning experimental/survey methodology, power analysis, developing materials, sampling Triggers: RCT, quasi-experimental, experimental design, survey design, power analysis, sample size, factorial design, materials, stimuli, sampling strategy

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6112026年10月12日 更新

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create git commit", "manage branches", "follow git workflow", "use Conventional Commits", "handle merge conflicts", or asks about git branching strategies, version control best practices, pull request workflows. Provides comprehensive Git workflow guidance for team collaboration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6112026年10月12日 更新

Start a new research project by conducting a structured interview to formalize a research idea, then generates research questions with identification strategies and a project spec. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants to develop or document a new research idea — not to search for literature or data. Triggers include: "new project", "start research", "I have an idea", "help me develop this", "I want to study X", "help me formalize this idea", "what's my research question", "what identification strategy should I use", "write up my project idea", or when the user describes a topic they want to turn into a paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6112026年10月12日 更新

This skill covers causal inference methods in observational and quasi-experimental settings. Use when the user is implementing, choosing between, or debugging causal identification strategies — including instrumental variables, difference-in-differences, regression discontinuity, synthetic control, or matching estimators. Triggers on "causal effect", "identification strategy", "instrumental variable", "2SLS", "GMM", "difference-in-differences", "DiD", "staggered treatment", "regression discontinuity", "RDD", "synthetic control", "matching", "propensity score", "IPW", "AIPW", "doubly robust", "LATE", "ATT", "ATE", "parallel trends", "exclusion restriction", "first stage", "weak instruments", or "endogeneity".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6112026年10月12日 更新

中英双语学术降 AIGC / bilingual academic de-AIGC skill. Removes AI-generated writing signatures from empirical papers in economics, management, and the social sciences — in both English and Chinese. Covers Turnitin AI, GPTZero, Originality.ai on the English side and 知网 AMLC, 万方, 维普 on the Chinese side. Uses a six-step loop (intake → audit → claim-evidence check → differentiated rewrite → five-dimension self-score → cold-reader recheck) with two pattern libraries (22 English + 17 Chinese patterns), section-by-section strategies for empirical papers, and hard protections that keep every number, coefficient, and citation intact. Since 2026-08 it also carries a provenance layer (去水印): deterministic, CJK-safe cleaning of invisible-character carriers and file metadata (docx / png / jpg / svg / pdf, incl. C2PA), an honest account of Claude's statistical text watermark, and an author "ownership pass" — it never claims a text is watermark-free.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6112026年10月12日 更新

Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6112026年10月12日 更新

Use when asked to compare, cross-review, merge, judge, choose, or arbitrate competing plans from multiple agents such as Codex and Claude Code; when given two or more proposed plans, session IDs, transcripts, plan documents, PR descriptions, or pasted strategies; or when the user wants one recommended execution plan after agents review each other's proposals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BuilderIO/skills4,5722026年10月9日 更新

Systematic competitive analysis covering positioning, messaging hierarchy, objection handling, and CTA strategy from landing page URLs or screenshots. Use when pasting a competitor URL, uploading competitor screenshots, requesting positioning analysis, or needing to understand competitive messaging and differentiation strategies. Platform: Google and Meta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

irinabuht12-oss/marketing-skills4,4522026年10月13日 更新

Create scalable programmatic SEO page templates with title patterns, internal linking logic, schema markup, and thin content avoidance strategies. Use when given a niche and data source to build page templates, establishing programmatic SEO structure, or scaling content production with templates. Platform: Google.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

irinabuht12-oss/marketing-skills4,4522026年10月13日 更新

Designs statistically valid split tests for ads, audiences, landing pages, or bid strategies. Calculates required sample sizes before you start, monitors results during the test, and calls winners when statistical significance is actually reached — not when you feel like one is winning. Platform: Google and Meta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

irinabuht12-oss/marketing-skills4,4522026年10月13日 更新

Extract patterns and anatomy from URLs — use to reverse-engineer content strategies from live pages

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

nyldn/claude-octopus4,2242026年10月11日 更新

Problem-solving strategies for compactness in topology

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v33,9432026年1月27日 更新

limits

無料

Problem-solving strategies for limits in real analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v33,9432026年1月27日 更新

Problem-solving strategies for connectedness in topology

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v33,9432026年1月27日 更新

open-sets

無料

Problem-solving strategies for open sets in topology

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v33,9432026年1月27日 更新

residues

無料

Problem-solving strategies for residues in complex analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v33,9432026年1月27日 更新