288 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Generates one worker task prompt conforming to the CLEAR + selective CoVe task design standard and swarm-task-planner structure. Use when creating or rewriting a single task entry or task block inside a plan — providing a title and brief description as input.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when orchestration or planning agents are producing task plans, task prompts, or TASK.md instructions that must be unambiguous, verifiable, and resistant to hallucination. Applies CLEAR (Concise, Logical, Explicit, Adaptive, Reflective) to structure and write agent task prompts, then adds CoVe (Chain of Verification) checks where accuracy risk is meaningful. Activates on draft task prompts, swarm plans, migration tasks, and multi-step plans requiring independently executable steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Score your Claude Code environment on a fun 0-10 ladder (Tourist → Swarm) calibrated to the quickstart's 4 systems — Context, Skills, Integrations, Orchestration. Two front doors - an interactive quiz (zero setup, shareable) or a silent scan of your repo. Outputs a next-level roadmap plus a branded HTML dashboard or a paste-anywhere ASCII card. The default mastery skill of this quickstart. Triggers - "level", "what's my claude code level", "claude code level quiz", "assess my setup", "how good is my setup", "claude code maturity"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Live real-time dashboard for monitoring AI agent swarms with smart completion detection, clickable agent detail views, idle time tracking, and activity streaming. Auto-launches a beautiful web UI with capybara-inspired colors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in designing, orchestrating, and managing multi-agent systems (MAS). Specializes in agent collaboration patterns, hierarchical structures, and swarm intelligence. Use when building agent teams, designing agent communication, or orchestrating autonomous workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a read-only parallel Kimi review fan-out across many independent targets. Use only for explicit broad fan-out requests where one subagent per target is the point.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a team", "spawn agents", "parallel execution", "delegate tasks to agents", "use a swarm", "team workflow", "split work across agents", "run tasks in parallel", or mentions wanting multiple agents to collaborate on a complex task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI solution exploration using ant colony optimization — deploying scout hypotheses, reinforcing promising approaches, detecting diminishing returns, and knowing when to abandon a strategy. Use when facing a problem with multiple plausible approaches and no clear winner, when the first approach is not working but alternatives are unclear, when debugging with no obvious root cause requiring parallel hypothesis investigation, or when previous attempts have converged prematurely on a suboptimal approach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply ant colony optimization and foraging theory to resource search, exploration-exploitation tradeoffs, and distributed discovery. Covers scout deployment, trail reinforcement, diminishing returns detection, and adaptive foraging strategy selection. Use when searching a large solution space where brute-force enumeration is impractical, balancing investment between exploring new approaches and deepening known good ones, optimizing resource allocation across uncertain opportunities, or diagnosing premature convergence on local optima.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement layered collective defense using alarm signaling, role mobilization, and proportional response. Covers threat detection, alert propagation, immune response patterns, escalation tiers, and post-incident recovery for distributed systems and organizations. Use when designing defense-in-depth where no single guardian covers all threats, building incident response that scales with severity, or when current defense is over-reactive to every alert or under-reactive to genuine threats.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI internal coordination using stigmergic signals — managing information freshness in context and memory, decay rates for assumption staleness, and emergent coherent behavior from simple local protocols. Use during complex tasks where multiple sub-tasks must coordinate, when context has grown long and information freshness is uncertain, after context compression when information may have been lost, or when sub-task outputs need to feed into each other cleanly without degradation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI multi-path reasoning coherence using bee democracy — independent evaluation of competing approaches, waggle dance as reasoning-out-loud, quorum sensing for confidence thresholds, and deadlock resolution. Use when forage-solutions has identified multiple valid approaches and a selection must be made, when oscillating between options without committing, when justifying an architecture or tool choice with structured reasoning, or before an irreversible action where the cost of the wrong choice is high.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Achieve distributed agreement without central authority using bee democracy, threshold voting, and quorum sensing. Covers proposal generation, advocacy dynamics, commitment thresholds, deadlock resolution, and consensus quality assessment. Use when a group must decide between options without a designated leader, when centralized decision-making is a bottleneck, when stakeholders have different perspectives to integrate, or when designing automated systems that must reach consensus such as distributed databases or multi-agent AI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when coordinating multiple specialized agents for complex distributed tasks. Keywords: multi-agent, orchestrator, subagent, handoff, swarm, supervisor, agent topology, coordination.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in designing, orchestrating, and managing multi-agent systems (MAS). Specializes in agent collaboration patterns, hierarchical structures, and swarm intelligence. Use when building agent teams, designing agent communication, or orchestrating autonomous workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
High-level reality check when the swarm feels busy but directionally off. Use when lots of code is landing but the real goal still feels far away.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Professional finance research toolkit — backtesting (11 engines + benchmark comparison panel), factor analysis, Alpha Zoo (475 pre-built alphas across qlib158/alpha101/gtja191/academic/fundamental), options pricing, 90 finance skills, 30 multi-agent swarm teams, Trade Journal analyzer, and Shadow Account (extract → backtest → render) across 29 market-data sources (tushare, yfinance, okx, binance, akshare, baostock, tencent, mootdx, ccxt, futu, mt5, tickerall, local, eastmoney, sina, stooq, yahoo, pykrx, india_broker, qveris, longbridge, nobitex, wallex, plus optional-key finnhub/alphavantage/tiingo/fmp/gildata).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, build, deploy, and operate production AI agent systems — single agents, multi-agent teams, and autonomous swarms. Complete methodology from agent architecture through orchestration, memory systems, safety guardrails, and operational excellence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs a team of 50 LLM personas through a 30-round structured debate to predict market direction. Uses the Canvas Agent Swarm Service — the same shared infrastructure other skills use for smaller agent teams. Output is an influence-weighted consensus direction + trade recommendation with a transparent record of every argument, research query, and cross-examination.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plot per-group distributions of continuous data using boxplots, violins, beeswarms, quasirandom jitter, and raincloud plots with sample-size honesty (Weissgerber 2015), KDE-bandwidth awareness, and N-aware encoding choices. Use when comparing distributions across a small number of groups — expression per cluster, biomarker per arm, scores per condition — and the bar-of-mean default is misleading.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Processes eDNA metabarcoding from raw paired-end reads to species tables, navigating ASV (DADA2, UNOISE3) vs OTU (swarm v2) decision (Callahan 2017 vs Schloss multi-copy-16S critique), marker/primer choice (Leray COI, MiFish 12S, 515F/806R 16S, ITS2) with primer-specific bias, OBITools3 v3 command-name break (obi stats plural; .tar.gz taxonomy), tag-jumping with dual-indexing (Schnell 2015; NovaSeq 10x MiSeq), decontam as screening-not-classifier (Davis 2018), read-counts-not-abundance critique (Lamb 2019), site-occupancy modeling (Ficetola 2015), Naive-Bayes calibration limits (Bokulich 2018), and eDNA decay (Strickler 2015). Use when going from raw eDNA FASTQ to species tables, picking marker + denoising pipeline, deciding whether read counts represent abundance, applying occupancy modeling, configuring OBITools3 v3, or interpreting decontam output. Not for clinical 16S microbiome (see microbiome/amplicon-processing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write the production code that makes a pre-decided set of failing tests pass, within an explicit write_set, following an explicit behavior contract. Used by `/tdd` Step 3 and by `/swarm-dispatch` workers. The caller has already decided architecture, naming, file layout, and abstraction boundaries — this skill executes that recipe with code-structure discipline and a 5-iteration RALPH loop. No scope expansion, no design decisions, no test edits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 10.5 — move the slug's workflow artifacts (intake, scout, research, spec, approvals, swarm state, security reports, rendered diagrams) to docs/archive/<YYYY-MM-DD>/<slug>/. Runs before /commit so the committed tree is clean of work-in-flight files. workflow.json stays live and gets archived as the first step of /commit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to design a multi-agent system, pick an orchestration pattern (supervisor/swarm/pipeline), generate tool schemas for agents, or evaluate agent execution logs for cost, latency, and failure bottlenecks. Examples: 'design an agent architecture for research automation', 'generate Anthropic tool schemas from these tool descriptions', 'analyze these agent run logs for bottlenecks'. NOT for Claude Code workflow files (use workflow-builder) or single-agent prompt design (use agent-workflow-designer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。