「technical」の検索結果

Comprehensive SEO analysis for any website. Full site audits, single-page analysis, technical SEO (crawlability, indexability, Core Web Vitals with INP), schema markup, E-E-A-T content quality, image optimization, sitemap analysis, GEO for AI search, local SEO, and strategic planning. Uses Wove browser tools for real-page execution. Triggers on: "SEO", "audit", "schema", "Core Web Vitals", "sitemap", "E-E-A-T", "AI Overviews", "GEO", "technical SEO", "content quality", "structured data", "local SEO", "page speed".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, responsive design, theming, and anti-patterns. Generate a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings. Report-only — documents issues for other skills to fix. Triggers on audit the design, check accessibility, technical review, performance audit, a11y check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design deterministic technical SEO and schema.org guidance for crawlable public pages. Use this skill when the user asks for title and meta description rules, canonical and hreflang tags, JSON-LD schema, NewsArticle, Article, TechArticle, BreadcrumbList, WebSite, Organization, Person, OpenGraph, Twitter cards, sitemap, news-sitemap, RSS, robots.txt, llms.txt, publisher logo, ImageObject, or metadata templates that must match visible content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Eight tested identity approaches for Claude prompts, each shaping depth, vocabulary, reasoning style, and what Claude treats as obvious vs. requiring explanation. Use when the user wants a specific identity template — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or building a role definition. Trigger on: "give me the Strategic Advisor identity," "show me the identity template for," "I need a Technical Architect role," "build a custom role for," "show me all available identities." Also use when reviewing a prompt's identity layer or when output lacks domain-appropriate depth. Provides 8 tested approaches across strategy, technical, research, communications, and operations domains plus a template for building custom identities. If the user is unsure which identity fits their task, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating complete prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for full prompt assembly — use rootnode-prompt-compilation if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tested reasoning approaches for Claude prompts — 18 variants across 6 categories (Analytical, Strategic, Creative, Technical, Research, Comparative). Use when the user wants a specific reasoning template — retrieving, reviewing, customizing, or combining reasoning instructions for a prompt. Trigger on: "give me the Root Cause Diagnosis approach," "show me the reasoning template for," "I need the Evidence Synthesis method," "show me analytical reasoning options," "combine reasoning approaches for," "show me all reasoning variants." Also use when a prompt produces shallow output and the fix is a reasoning upgrade. Provides 18 tested approaches for analytical, strategic, creative, technical, research, and comparison tasks. If the user is unsure which reasoning method fits, use rootnode-block-selection first if available. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for project-level audits — use rootnode-project-audit if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review software architecture for coupling, cohesion, SOLID principles, API design, scalability, and technical debt. Covers system-level evaluation, architecture decision record review, and improvement recommendations. Use when evaluating a proposed architecture before implementation, assessing an existing system for scalability or security, reviewing ADRs, performing a technical debt assessment, or evaluating readiness for significant scale-up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Construct well-structured arguments using the hypothesis-argument-example triad. Covers formulating falsifiable hypotheses, building logical arguments (deductive, inductive, analogical, evidential), providing concrete examples, and steelmanning counterarguments. Use when writing or reviewing PR descriptions that propose technical changes, justifying design decisions in ADRs, constructing substantive code review feedback, or building a research argument or technical proposal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when analyzing weekly price charts for stocks, stock indices, cryptocurrencies, or forex pairs. Use this skill when the user provides chart images and requests technical analysis, trend identification, support/resistance levels, scenario planning, or probability assessments based purely on chart data without consideration of news or fundamental factors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive market environment analysis and reporting tool. Analyzes global markets including US, European, Asian markets, forex, commodities, and economic indicators. Provides risk-on/risk-off assessment, sector analysis, and technical indicator interpretation. Triggers on keywords like market analysis, market environment, global markets, trading environment, market conditions, investment climate, market sentiment, forex analysis, stock market analysis, 相場環境, 市場分析, マーケット状況, 投資環境.

Comprehensive US stock analysis including fundamental analysis (financial metrics, business quality, valuation), technical analysis (indicators, chart patterns, support/resistance), stock comparisons, and investment report generation. Use when user requests analysis of US stock tickers (e.g., "analyze AAPL", "compare TSLA vs NVDA", "give me a report on Microsoft"), evaluation of financial metrics, technical chart analysis, or investment recommendations for American stocks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assume the role of Galyarder CTO (Chief Technology Officer). Technical guardian. Enforce technical integrity, architectural determinism, self-healing formal verification, and planetary computational leverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create polished, validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle/state diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG, dark/light themes, optional trace motion, and PNG/JPEG/WebP/SVG/WebM export. Accept plain-language requirements or pasted Mermaid flowchart, sequenceDiagram, and stateDiagram input; inspect repository evidence when the diagram must reflect real code. Use when the user asks to visualize system architecture, infrastructure, cloud/security/network topology, technical workflows, API call sequences, request lifecycles, data pipelines, ETL/ELT, data lineage, state machines, or to convert/beautify Mermaid. Also use for Archify, interactive or animated HTML diagrams, インタラクティブ図, 動く構成図. When an editable .drawio file is required, use the draw.io workflow instead and treat Archify HTML only as a supplement.

Write and maintain technical documentation. Trigger with "write docs for", "document this", "create a README", "write a runbook", "onboarding guide", or when the user needs help with any form of technical writing — API docs, architecture docs, or operational runbooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add technical context, implementation hints, and effort estimates to user stories

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design or revise Interpreter UI for non-developers with an ultra-minimal, utilitarian style inspired by the OpenAI website and ChatGPT, not the developer platform. Use when simplifying settings, onboarding, chat, forms, empty states, or helper copy; when removing extra containers, labels, or visual noise; when replacing technical wording with plain language; when clarifying hierarchy and making the main user action obvious; when making every visible label and status understandable to an average HR admin or other non-technical user; when hiding implementation details such as logs, IDs, endpoints, paths, or protocol names; or when a screen must respect the app's existing CSS variables and light/dark theme behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) documenting a significant technical decision, its context, alternatives considered, and consequences. Every major technical choice should have an ADR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end SEO operations for B2B SaaS organic visibility. Use this skill when you need keyword research, technical SEO audits, content optimization, link building strategy, international expansion, AI/AEO optimization, schema markup, Core Web Vitals improvements, and organic traffic growth planning. Also triggers on: SEO, keyword research, can we rank for this keyword, which keywords are actually worth it, qualify these keywords, check the SERPs, keyword shortlist, too many keywords, technical SEO, link building, content optimization, international SEO, hreflang, x-default, multilingual site, translated pages not ranking, our German site gets no traffic, language switcher, auto-redirect by country, machine translation SEO, content parity, ccTLD vs subfolder, AI search, AEO, GEO, Core Web Vitals, schema markup, organic traffic, G2 listing, Capterra, TrustRadius, review-platform category page, best software roundup, listicle placement, directory submissions, do we need a Google Business Profile in [country], local SEO with no office, Google Business Profile eligibility, virtual office address SEO, coworking address business profile, business profile suspended, NAP consistency, local citations for SaaS, LocalBusiness schema, server log analysis, log file analysis, what is Googlebot crawling, is Googlebot hitting errors, verify Googlebot, fake Googlebot, crawl budget, do we have a crawl budget problem, Crawl Stats report, new pages not getting crawled.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Diagnostic Medical Sonographer — deciding whether a duplex, compression, or graded-compression ultrasound study is diagnostic versus technically limited, choosing when to interrupt a scanning protocol to escalate a real-time critical finding, setting scan technique and ALARA (TI/MI) parameters for a given exam type, or drafting the technical worksheet and preliminary findings a physician will interpret and sign.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Career/Technical Education Teacher, Postsecondary — defending a shrinking trade or health-science program against a cutback decision, backward-mapping a shop or lab curriculum to an industry credential's exam blueprint, resolving a competency-based grading dispute where a passing average hides a failed safety check-off, or setting the terms of an advisory-committee review or work-based-learning placement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive SEO analysis for any website or business type. Orchestrates 52 sub-skills (52 active): full site audits, technical SEO (CWV/INP), schema, E-E-A-T content quality, images, sitemaps, GEO for AI Overviews, llms.txt generation, AI crawler audit, plus live GSC and Ahrefs MCP data. GSC: overview, drops, opportunities, brand-vs-nonbrand, cannibalization, compare, content-decay, index-issues, new-keywords. Ahrefs: overview, backlinks, keywords, competitors, content-gap, broken-links, new-links, anchor-analysis, dr-history, top-pages. Cross-MCP: serp, content-brief, brand-radar, site-audit-pro, report. Local: log-analysis, ai-content-check, internal-links, local, migration-check, obsidian-kb. AI Readability: llms-txt, robots-ai. Performance: lighthouse-audit, core-web-vitals, page-experience. Quality & AI Search: rich-results, ai-optimization, eeat-audit, helpful-content. Triggers on: "SEO", "audit", "schema", "Core Web Vitals", "sitemap", "E-E-A-T", "AI Overviews", "GEO", "technical SEO", "content quality", "structured data", "GSC", "Ahrefs", "backlinks", "keywords", "search console", "domain rating", "local SEO", "migration", "lighthouse", "pagespeed", "LCP", "INP", "CLS", "page experience", "interstitials", "mobile friendly", "rich results", "rich snippets", "schema eligibility", "AI optimization", "AI search readiness", "EEAT", "trust signals", "helpful content", "people-first", "content quality gate".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diátaxis Documentation Expert. An expert technical writer specializing in creating high-quality software documentation, guided by the principles and structure of the Diátaxis technical documentation authoring framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。