863 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Parses error messages, traces execution flow through stack traces, correlates log entries to identify failure points, and applies systematic hypothesis-driven methodology to isolate and resolve bugs. Use when investigating errors, analyzing stack traces, finding root causes of unexpected behavior, troubleshooting crashes, or performing log analysis, error investigation, or root cause analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Have the Claude and GPT partners critique each other's answers across a configurable number of rounds (default 1) before converging on a synthesis. Use when the user wants the two perspectives stress-tested against each other, not just shown side by side.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and evaluate paid-ad experiments with hypotheses, randomization units, sample-size and duration assumptions, guardrails, platform experiment tools, analysis, and decision rules. Use for A/B test, split test, experiment design, hypothesis, statistical significance, sample size, test duration, or experiment readout.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft a firm AI usage policy from published model policies, adapted to your practice profile — a research-and-synthesis tool whose output is a draft for attorney review and adoption, not a finished policy. Use when user says "draft an AI policy", "we need an AI policy", "build an AI usage policy", "our firm needs a GenAI policy", or similar requests to generate a first-cut internal AI policy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert SRE investigator for incidents and debugging. Uses hypothesis-driven methodology and systematic triage. Can query Axiom observability when available. Use for incident response, root cause analysis, production debugging, or log investigation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
影片与视频编辑、内容创作者在制作视频配音或有声书时，当需要克隆音色、生成情感化配音或流式实时语音合成请用此技能。支持1.7B高质量与0.6B快速双模型，一键实现多语言方言配音，让语音创作更高效更自然。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Proactive threat hunt over web/application logs — no alert in hand. Profiles the corpus, runs a hypothesis-driven hunt loop with a mandatory written ledger, confirms suspects in source, detonates a local PoC, and writes INCIDENTS.json + INCIDENT_REPORT.md. Use when asked to "hunt the logs", "find the campaign", "look for signs of compromise", or "run dnr-hunt". The no-alert entry to the detection & response track; /dnr-respond is the lead-in-hand entry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sets up and runs Atheris, the coverage-guided Python fuzzer built on libFuzzer. Covers TestOneInput harnesses, FuzzedDataProvider, instrumenting both pure Python and native C extensions, and running under AddressSanitizer. Use when fuzzing a Python package, hunting memory corruption in a Python C extension, or choosing between Atheris and Hypothesis for a Python target.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes, reviews, and debugs property-based tests — Hypothesis, fast-check, proptest, jqwik, rapid, and Echidna or Medusa for Solidity invariants. Use whenever tests should cover a whole input domain instead of a hand-picked list of examples: encode/decode and serialize/deserialize pairs, parsers, canonicalizers and normalizers, validators, numeric and Decimal types, comparators and sort order, data structures, and smart-contract state invariants. Also use when adding cases to an existing @given, fast-check, or proptest suite, when judging whether existing property tests assert anything real, and when a generator has shrunk a counterexample and you need to tell a wrong property from a genuine bug. Not for coverage-guided binary fuzzing (libFuzzer, AFL), mutation-testing campaigns, static analysis, benchmarking, or end-to-end UI tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when turning a public-equity base case, model, thesis, event, or catalyst into scenario skew, sensitivity, breakpoint, and PM action-threshold analysis. Do not use for first-pass model builds, credit-security valuation, or generic planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement reviewer feedback on a Canva design. Reads all comment threads, synthesises what reviewers want, makes the clear-cut changes directly, and flags anything that needs a human decision. Use when the user asks to "implement feedback on my deck", "address comments on a design", "apply review feedback", "fix the comments on my presentation", or "implement the feedback".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define a Proof of Life probe to test a risky hypothesis cheaply. Use when you need harsh truth before building real product.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Select the right Proof of Life (PoL) probe based on hypothesis, risk, and resources. Use this to match the validation method to the real learning goal, not tooling comfort.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill for project-scoped literature review built on Sources/Papers, with synthesis landing in Knowledge, writing handoff in Writing, and the default literature canvas under Maps/literature.canvas.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks for efficient communication, task reports, file-operation summaries, research discussion, study-note synthesis, planning, writing feedback, or responses that need conclusion-first structure, concrete evidence, risk disclosure, and useful next steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when Zotero is the literature source of truth and the project KB should receive source notes under Sources/Papers plus project-linked synthesis in Knowledge and Writing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review and validate claims using counter-hypothesis testing. Use when verifying technical content, checking references, validating API endpoints, or performing quality assurance on deliverables.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hunt LDAP Injection and XPath Injection — authentication bypass, blind char-by-char attribute exfiltration, AD user/group enumeration, XML-store XPath bypass. Covers the LDAP special-character set (* ( ) \ NUL /), search-filter-context vs DN-injection, parenthesis-balancing, AND/OR filter logic, and {SSHA}/{CRYPT} userPassword exfil on non-AD directories. Use when target uses LDAP/AD authentication, corporate SSO with a directory backend, an address-book/people-search API, or XML-based data stores queried with XPath.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct comprehensive, systematic literature reviews using multiple academic databases (PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, etc.). This skill should be used when conducting systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, research synthesis, or comprehensive literature searches across biomedical, scientific, and technical domains. Creates professionally formatted markdown documents and PDFs with verified citations in multiple citation styles (APA, Nature, Vancouver, etc.).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Chinese-first research paper writing, revision, polishing, section drafting, rebuttal, peer-review response, thesis prose improvement, and manuscript argument planning. Use when the user asks to write or revise论文正文, abstracts, introductions, methods, results, discussion, conclusions, related work, responses to reviewers, LaTeX/Overleaf text, or academic prose. Preserve formulas, English paper titles, terms, citations, and measured results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when papers are collected in Zotero but the user wants detailed reading notes, project-linked literature synthesis, collection-wide paper-note coverage checks, and a connected knowledge map inside the bound Obsidian project knowledge base.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user keeps paper notes inside an Obsidian project knowledge base and wants filesystem-first literature review, explicit agent-first Zotero ingestion, `Papers/` plus `Knowledge/` synthesis, collection-wide normalization, and a default literature canvas without Obsidian MCP.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research Coordinator v12.0 - Human-Centered Edition (Systematic Review Automation) Context-persistent platform with 24 specialized agents across 9 categories (A-G, I, X). Features: Human Checkpoints First, VS Methodology, Paradigm Detection, Systematic Review Automation. Supports quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods research, and systematic review automation. Language: English. Responds in Korean when user input is Korean. Triggers: research question, theoretical framework, hypothesis, literature review, meta-analysis, effect size, IRB, PRISMA, statistical analysis, sample size, bias, journal, peer review, conceptual framework, visualization, systematic review, qualitative, phenomenology, grounded theory, thematic analysis, mixed methods, interview, focus group, ethnography, action research, paper retrieval, AI screening, RAG builder, humanization, AI pattern detection
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。