4.8万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Builds and maintains the design system a product is assembled from — tokens for color, type, spacing and elevation, component contracts, and the rules that keep them coherent as the product grows. Use this when starting a new interface, when screens have drifted apart visually, when the same component exists three times in slightly different forms, or when a token or component needs adding without breaking what exists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies a deliberate visual direction to an interface — minimalist editorial, industrial utilitarian, or high-polish commercial — each with its own type scale, palette behavior, surface treatment, and motion. Use this when a product needs a point of view rather than defaults, when choosing between visual directions, when an interface reads as generic, or when restyling something without changing its structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces design reference imagery before implementation — screen concepts, layout directions, and flows for web or mobile that make a verbal brief concrete enough to argue with. Use this when a brief needs visualizing before anyone builds, when comparing layout directions, when handing a developer a target, or when stakeholders are describing different things with the same words.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Raises the visual and interaction quality of an interface — layout, hierarchy, type, spacing, density, and the details that separate a considered product from a generic one. Use this when a screen works but looks unfinished or default, when a layout feels crowded or arbitrary, when a page has no clear focal point, or when an interface needs to feel trustworthy rather than merely functional.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs a security incident from detection to closure — triage, containment, investigation, communication, and the review afterward. Use this when a compromise is suspected or confirmed, when preparing an incident response plan or running an exercise, when deciding whether something is an incident, or when a breach may trigger notification obligations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Upgrades an existing interface to a higher standard without rebuilding it — auditing what is there, identifying what reads as generic or unfinished, and sequencing changes by impact. Use this when a product works but looks dated or default, when a redesign is being considered, when deciding whether to restyle or rebuild, or when a screen needs to look substantially better with limited effort.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses and improves how personal data is collected, used, shared, and retained — data mapping, lawful basis, consent, processor agreements, subject rights, and breach obligations. Use this before launching anything that handles personal data, when adding a vendor that will process it, when a data subject request arrives, when assessing exposure under GDPR or US state privacy laws, or when preparing for a privacy review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establishes what a product is understood to be, for whom, and instead of what — then turns that into the messaging every other surface inherits. Use this when messaging is inconsistent across channels, when prospects misunderstand what the product does, when entering a new segment, when competitors are being compared against you unfavorably, or before any campaign, launch, or site rewrite.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Owns data as an asset — governance, quality, the warehouse and semantic layer, analytics capability, and the governance of models built on top. Use this for a decision about how data is collected, stored, defined, or shared; when numbers disagree between teams; when deciding what to build in-house versus buy; when standing up a data function; or when an AI or model decision needs governance rather than engineering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits and rewrites landing pages, homepages, and sales pages to increase conversion — diagnosing why a page is not converting, rewriting headlines, hero copy and calls to action, and prioritizing which changes to test first. Use this when a page underperforms, when someone pastes a URL or screenshot asking what is wrong, when writing a new page, or when deciding which conversion changes are worth testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Owns the customer's experience after the sale — support, success, escalation, and the feedback loop back into product. Use this for a decision spanning support and product, when service quality and cost are in tension, when deciding what to staff or automate, when a customer relationship is at risk above the account-manager level, or when nobody owns a recurring customer problem.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Governs models and AI systems in production — intended use, evaluation, monitoring, human oversight, documentation, and the decision to deploy or retire. Use this before deploying a model or AI feature, when defining evaluation criteria, when a model's behavior has drifted, when assessing AI risk or regulatory exposure, or when deciding whether an AI system is fit for a consequential decision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establishes ownership, definitions, quality, access, and lineage for the organization's data. Use this when metrics disagree between teams, when nobody knows which dataset is authoritative, when setting up data ownership or access policy, when data quality is unreliable, or before opening a dataset to a wider audience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluates a software or startup idea against problem, market, competition, monetization, defensibility, and execution, and returns a verdict rather than encouragement. Use this when an idea needs pressure-testing before anyone builds, when deciding whether something is worth pursuing, when assessing competition or willingness to pay, or when a validated idea needs a first-customers and MVP plan. Default to scrutiny; the useful answer is usually the unwelcome one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs corporate development — deal thesis, target screening, valuation framing, diligence, and integration planning. Use this when considering an acquisition or being approached about one, when evaluating build-versus-buy at company scale, when running or reviewing diligence, or when planning how an acquired business will actually be integrated.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Matches a user’s biomedical research direction, disease problem, study aim, data modality, and resource constraints to the most relevant recent algorithms and method papers. Always search real recent algorithm literature first, prioritize the last 12 months, expand to 1–3 years only when needed, and add canonical baselines only when necessary. Every formal algorithm recommendation must include the verified primary method paper, plus published downstream papers that actually cite/use the algorithm when such papers are found, with DOI when available. Never fabricate papers, algorithm names, authors, journals, years, DOI, PMID, links, or benchmark claims. If no directly verified algorithm paper is found, say so explicitly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Project orchestrator for the screenwriting skill set (剧本项目主线调度 / 状态存档 / story bible) — a meta-skill that adds no new craft knowledge but routes a screenplay or stage-play project through stages (premise → structure → character → scenes → draft → revision → submission) and a TV / streaming series project (电视剧 / 剧集 / pilot / 一季) through a separate series stage table (engine → character network & season arc → documents/bible → pilot structure → break story & outline → draft → submission), names which sw-* skill to invoke at each stage, defines each stage's deliverable and advisory exit check, and keeps all project state in a story-bible.md file so work can resume across sessions. Use when starting a new script project, resuming one ("continue my screenplay", "where were we"), when the user asks "what should I do next" on a script, when converting a vague idea into a full development pipeline, or when the other sw-* skills are firing individually and the overall process needs sequencing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Korean and French screenwriting practice (韩国/法国编剧方法) — from the international masterclass; Oh Seung-uk (Christmas in August, The Shameless; field research in disguise, "write the emotion", first act and last act first, spaces as skeleton, reading to hostile listeners, surviving producers), Choi Seok-hwan (King and the Clown; genre as promise to the audience, "story = deepening crisis + intensifying desire", two reversals and bittersweet endings, the producer/director/writer trio), and Frédéric Auburtin (Paris je t'aime; dialogue last, Italian-style table reads, "12 lines not 13", dignity for characters, originals born from commissions, editing by emotion). Use when working in a Korean-style commercial drama or genre film, a French auteur/commission context, when planning field research, when a producer relationship is the problem, or when you need the Korean "three live together" development model or the French "emotion first, structure second" editing approach.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Genre anatomy from John Truby's The Anatomy of Genres (类型解剖 / 类型节拍 / 混合类型 / 超越类型) — genres as beat systems with a life philosophy underneath; three rules (hit every beat of your genre, mix three or four genres, transcend the primary genre), the ladder and families of twelve genres (Horror 恐怖, Action 动作, Myth 神话, Memoir and Coming-of-Age 回忆录与成长, Science Fiction 科幻, Crime 犯罪, Comedy 喜剧, Western 西部, Gangster 黑帮, Fantasy 奇幻, Detective and Thriller 侦探与惊悚, Love 爱情), each with its hero/opponent/world/plot-shape template, beat list, hard rules with failure conditions, subgenres and transcendent paths, plus a genre-mixing worksheet and a diagnostic. Kept beside sw-truby-anatomy and the Field/Snyder page maps. Use when choosing or confirming a script's genre, when a genre story feels generic or misses the beats its audience expects, when mixing genres, when a horror lacks pressure, an action lacks plot, a love story lacks opposition or a detective story lacks reveals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Japanese (and other non-Hollywood) screenwriting methods (日本编剧方法/原创剧本实战) — distilled from ten Japanese directors and writers in ゼロからの脚本術; Kosawa Ryota (three acts as 起承转合, speed by jumping), Uchida Kenji (beautiful structure, time-axis tricks), Miki Satoshi (small-material notebook, theme emerges later), Sono Sion, Omiya Ellie (dialogue from inner monologue), Kakei Masaya ("if + moreover"), Fukuda Yuichi (character = actor + flaw, audience as tsukkomi), Yokohama Satoko, Takahashi Izumi ("pain"), Yukisada Isao (situation-born originals); plus Arai Haruhiko (IP adaptation, "write what you're ashamed of"). Neighbours; sw-korean-french-screenwriting, ozu-screenplay-style. Use when writing an original Japanese-style script or TV drama, working from small material and fragments, choosing between structure-first and character-first methods, building a Japanese 企画書, designing comedy tsukkomi systems, or when Hollywood models feel wrong for a quiet, daily-life, non-goal-driven story.
Analyze, recreate, align, and verify reference-video motion. Use when the user asks to recreate, copy, match, align, pixel-align, or compare a video; when a HyperFrames or Remotion remake is judged not aligned; when fixed reference playback and reusable motion components must be separated; or when delivery needs full-frame runtime, render, decode, boundary, timing, and archive evidence instead of sampled screenshots alone.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end video production orchestration for the content-creation workspace. Use when the user asks to make, recreate, package, render, QC, or archive a video; when the user says 制作待制作队列, 按交接稿制作, 制作队列视频, or points at a handoff project folder under 01-内容生产/视频工作台/待制作/ (contract file 交接稿.md inside) or an image-card handoff under 01-内容生产/图文工作台/待制作/ (its frontmatter is the binding production contract); when a request could route to HyperFrames, Remotion, captions, TTS, download/transcription, website/product videos, motion graphics, or reference replication; or when the user needs production planning before editing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit an LLM eval pipeline and surface problems: missing error analysis, unvalidated judges, vanity metrics, etc. Use when inheriting an eval system, when unsure whether evals are trustworthy, or as a starting point when no eval infrastructure exists. Do NOT use when the goal is to build a new evaluator from scratch (use error-discovery, write-judge-prompt, or validate-evaluator instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decide when to buy a big-ticket item to get the best price — the sales cycles, model-refresh timing, and 'buy now vs wait' math for the specific thing you want. Use when asked when's the best time to buy [item], should I wait for a sale, is now a good time to buy, or when do [products] go on sale. Produces the typical discount calendar for that category, whether a new model/version is due (and if the current one will drop), a buy-now-vs-wait recommendation for your timeline, and price-tracking tactics — flagging that timing is a guide, not a guarantee.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。