3,744 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when selecting or composing behavior-preserving refactoring techniques after structural evidence is known, especially when multiple candidate transformations, preconditions, or ordering choices must be compared.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on function API shape, flags, dependencies, mutability, construction, or command/function trade-offs, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when behavior-preserving frontend refactoring focuses on variable meaning, field naming, derived state, or reference/value identity, and the selected technique needs family-specific mechanics, risks, and JavaScript/TypeScript/React/Vue adaptation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing or improving frontend accessibility, semantic structure, keyboard support, focus management, ARIA labels, screen reader behavior, WCAG 2.2 issues, touch accessibility, or assistive-technology regressions; Chinese triggers include accessibility, accessibility, a11y, WCAG, screen reader.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when generating or editing diagrams, charts, visual assets, posters, UI mockups, product images, infographics, academic figures, comics, avatars, storyboards, brand boards, or image-edit workflows, especially when exported PNGs need visual QA and bounded self-repair. Prefer deterministic Mermaid/SVG/HTML/canvas sources for text-heavy diagrams; use HTML technical diagrams for browser-ready system blueprints, architecture, deployment topology, agent runtime, memory flow, before-after architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, lifecycle, runbook, PII/data-lineage, and state-machine diagrams. Do not use for ordinary UI polish without generated imagery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when planning or implementing an intentional migration from JavaScript, jQuery, HTML/CSS, server-rendered templates, MPA legacy frontend code, or older framework code toward a modern frontend stack while preserving behavior. Do not use for routine legacy bug fixes that stay in the old stack; Chinese triggers include legacy projects, technology stack upgrades, jQuery migration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffolds a structured investigation in scratch/ for empirical research and documentation. Use when the user says "start an investigation" or wants to: trace code paths or data flow ("trace from X to Y", "what touches X", "follow the wiring"), document system architecture comprehensively ("document how the system works", "archeology"), investigate bugs ("figure out why X happens"), explore technical feasibility ("can we do X?"), or explore design options ("explore the API", "gather context", "design alternatives"). Creates dated folder with README. NOT for simple code questions or single-file searches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an EMT (Basic Life Support tier) — deciding whether a chest-pain patient gets aspirin under protocol, dosing an epinephrine auto-injector for anaphylaxis and knowing when to repeat it, applying spinal-motion-restriction criteria instead of routine backboarding, recognizing the moment a call exceeds BLS scope and requesting ALS intercept, or working a patient refusal (AMA) to a legally defensible conclusion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a dermatologist — triaging a pigmented lesion for melanoma risk, choosing a biopsy technique and reading the pathology in clinical context, staging a skin cancer to decide margins or Mohs referral, escalating psoriasis/eczema treatment by severity score, or managing isotretinoin risk under REMS/iPLEDGE rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Career/Technical Education (CTE) Secondary School Teacher — deciding whether a student is authorized to run a piece of shop equipment, diagnosing a Perkins V industry-credential attainment gap, placing a student into a work-based learning slot, resolving an articulation-credit dispute with a partner college, or triaging a CTSO competition-prep versus baseline-instruction time conflict.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a professional dancer — preparing for a company audition, managing rehearsal load against injury risk, deciding whether to dance through pain or report it, negotiating a casting or return-to-dance plan with a rehearsal director, or critiquing a performance for technical and artistic fidelity to the choreography.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Dispatcher — assigning a new job to the best available driver/technician in real time, managing an ETA slip and deciding who to notify, triaging a coverage gap in a service territory, sequencing a driver's remaining stops after a delay, or deciding whether a job needs to be reassigned versus the customer rescheduled.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Data Engineer — designing an idempotent pipeline operation so retries and backfills don't corrupt data, choosing event-time over processing-time partitioning for time-series aggregation, enforcing schema compatibility rules before an upstream change propagates downstream, adding automated data quality checks to a pipeline, or deciding between batch and streaming architecture for a specific freshness requirement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Compliance Manager — sizing and defending a compliance program's headcount/budget, deciding build-vs-buy on monitoring or case-management technology, choosing a centralized-vs-embedded staffing model, translating a new regulatory obligation into a costed resourcing ask, or reporting program coverage to executives/the board.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a systems engineer/architect working at the whole-program level — decomposing requirements across hardware/software/network subsystems, writing or reviewing an interface control document (ICD), making a build-vs-buy tradeoff for a subsystem, or tracing a verification failure back through the requirements baseline. Distinct from a software engineer (owns one service's code) or DevOps/SRE (owns operational reliability) — this role owns the technical baseline for a whole system-of-systems and is accountable when subsystems built by different teams or vendors don't fit together.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a chiropractor — screening a spinal or musculoskeletal complaint for red flags before manipulation, choosing a manipulation technique given a patient's risk profile, designing a care plan with a defined reassessment checkpoint, or deciding whether to continue, modify, or discharge a course of care.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Civil Engineer — sizing stormwater detention/drainage systems, checking foundation bearing capacity against a geotechnical report, verifying IBC/ASCE 7 code compliance for site civil work, reviewing construction RFIs against stamped drawings, or evaluating value-engineering changes for safety-margin impact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Business Intelligence Analyst — reconciling a metric discrepancy between reports, designing a dimensional model or semantic layer for self-service dashboards, setting a data freshness/latency SLA, or diagnosing why a dashboard's aggregate number is misleading.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Bioinformatics Scientist — designing a differential-expression or GWAS analysis with correct multiple-testing correction, calling and triaging variants from NGS data using genotype-likelihood confidence rather than raw allele counts, interpreting a BLAST/DIAMOND homology search, choosing or building a genomics pipeline (aligner, caller, normalization method) for a specific data-generating process, or judging whether a computational-biology analysis's statistical design actually supports the biological claim being made. Distinct from a bioinformatics-technician (executes and QC-gates an established pipeline someone else designed) and a data-scientist (general product/experimentation judgment, not genomics-specific statistics) — this role owns which method and statistical model a genomics question requires, and why.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a licensed acupuncturist — building a TCM pattern-differentiation-based treatment plan, choosing point combinations and needling technique for a presenting complaint, triaging a safety red flag (fainting, suspected pneumothorax, herb-drug interaction), or writing a SOAP note that justifies medical necessity for insurance. US scope-of-practice default (NCCAOM/state licensure). A reasoning aid, not medical advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Anthropologist/Archeologist working in cultural resource management (CRM) — scoping a Section 106 Phase I identification survey, designing a shovel-test-pit sampling strategy, evaluating National Register of Historic Places eligibility under Criteria A-D, interpreting excavation stratigraphy via a Harris matrix and radiocarbon results, or running the ethnographic field-methods branch (participant observation, informant interviewing) for a cultural-anthropology component of a project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a board-certified anesthesiologist — building a preoperative anesthesia plan and risk stratification, choosing general vs. regional technique and airway strategy, managing an intraoperative crisis (difficult airway, malignant hyperthermia, local anesthetic systemic toxicity), or writing a PACU handoff and postoperative pain-management order set.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage architecture RFCs: create, review, list, update, and transition status. Use when user mentions "RFC", "technical proposal", "architecture proposal", or wants to draft, review, list, update, or change status of RFCs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide users through structured collaborative documentation creation. Use when user wants to write documentation, update README, create architecture docs, draft proposals, technical specs, decision docs, refactor documentation, create API docs, or document code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。