4,583 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Expert in feature prioritization - the art and science of deciding what to build and in what order. Covers prioritization frameworks, roadmap planning, stakeholder management, and the trade-offs between different approaches. Knows that prioritization is about saying no, and how to make those decisions defensible. Use when "prioritization, roadmap, what to build, feature request, backlog, scope, trade-off, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in writing documentation that developers actually read. Covers README craft, API docs, tutorials, and internal docs. Understands that docs are a product—they need UX, marketing, and user empathy. Use when "documentation, readme, write docs, api docs, tutorial, how to document, explain this, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert in identifying, adapting, and participating in cultural moments and trends. Covers trend identification, format adaptation, moment jacking, and knowing when to participate vs sit out. Understands how to ride waves without looking like a tourist. Use when "trend, cultural moment, what's happening, remix, moment jacking, trending, participate in trend, " mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Don't die. Runway calculation, default alive vs. default dead, when to raise vs. cut, zero-based budgeting for startups. The math that keeps companies alive long enough to win. Burn rate is not just accounting - it's strategic leverage. Companies with runway have options. Companies without runway have desperation. Use when "burn rate, runway, default alive, default dead, how much money, when to raise, cutting costs, layoffs, cash management, should we hire, running out of money, bridge round, extend runway, ramen profitable, finance, runway, cash, burn, survival, fundraising, startup" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
World-class brand positioning expertise combining David Ogilvy's direct response wisdom, Emily Heyward's obsessive brand strategy (Red Antler), and Al Ries/Jack Trout's positioning classics. This skill answers: "What space do we own in the customer's mind, and why does it matter?" Brand isn't what you say about yourself - it's what others say when you're not in the room. Positioning isn't about creativity - it's about claiming territory in an overcrowded mind. Use when "brand positioning, positioning statement, brand strategy, category design, competitive positioning, how should we position, brand differentiation, value proposition, what makes us different, brand platform, brand values, brand personality, brand promise, brand manifesto, tagline, unique selling proposition, usp, category creation, own a word, mind share, brand, positioning, strategy, differentiation, category, competitive, values, identity" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Install a per-turn canary signal (e.g. starting every reply with the user's name and a turn counter) so silent context degradation becomes visible the moment it happens, and run a recovery protocol when the canary trips. Use when the user mentions a "canary", "context canary", or "canary check", asks to detect context rot / compaction / drift, says "you stopped using my name" or "did you lose context", asks "how degraded is your context", or wants an early-warning system for long agent sessions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Family-G proof & derivation integrity forensics: does a THIRD PARTY's written proof/derivation actually establish its theorem, or does it skip an obligation, assume its own conclusion, take an invalid step, drift a symbol's meaning, or smuggle an unstated assumption? Decides from the WRITTEN proof/derivation — verdict-bearing at L1 (the LaTeX source; PDF-extracted math is unreliable, so an L0 PDF-only run surfaces info only) — never asserts 'fabricated', only that the step shown does not hold. A fresh cross-model reviewer reads the theorem/proof + an extraction-only obligation scaffold and proposes per-obligation findings, each span-anchored to the evidence ledger (claims.json); reviewer≠adjudicator. Emits proof-derivation-forensics.findings.json; NEVER computes the verdict. dimension=proof, can be critical. Triggers: "proof forensics", "check this proof", "derivation integrity", "audit the math", "证明审计", "推导有没有漏洞".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Routes to the right vibe-engineering skill for the current task and lists the full catalog. Use when the user asks which skill to use, asks what vibe-engineering can do, or is unsure how to approach a task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
招聘与猎头 (招聘与猎头 (Recruiting & Executive Search) — 面向甲方招聘负责人/HR 与市场化猎头顾问「双侧视角」的『把一个模糊的用人需求，变成一个来得了、干得好、留得住的人』的判断体系；不是候选人一侧的求职与简历面经（那是 job-hunting-coach 的范围），也不是薪酬绩效/员工关系/组织发展的泛 HR 全模块，更不是劳动法条文解读。覆盖：(a) 第一性张力 —— 这行的核心世界观分歧：**需求诊断优先 ⇄ 快速供给优先**（用人经理提来的岗位需求几乎总是一张愿望清单，资深招聘先开 intake 会把『必须有』与『最好有』拆开、把画像逼成可证伪的成功标准；但按成单计酬的猎头把诊断时间压不进单价里，于是行业里同时存在『先诊断再搜寻』和『先扔简历再说』两种作业习惯）；**结构化面试 ⇄ 看人的直觉**（工业与组织心理学近一个世纪的效度元分析一致指向：结构化面试、工作样本、认知能力测验的预测效度明显高于非结构化面谈与经验年限，但一线用人经理绝大多数仍相信自己聊两句就能看准人——这是本行最大的知行落差，也是所有循证招聘流派的出发点；顺带一提，业内长期奉为圭臬的 Schmidt-Hunter 效度排序近年被重新校正，工作样本的效度被下调，这场修正本身就是本行必须如实呈现的争议）；**能力素质 ⇄ 文化匹配**（culture fit 既是最常被写在拒信里的理由，也是被批评得最凶的偏见外壳，Google 一派主张改口叫 culture add，看的是这个人补上了团队缺的东西，而不是像不像我们）；**主动寻访 sourcing ⇄ 被动投递漏斗**（高端与稀缺技能岗只有 outbound 人才地图一条路；量大岗位靠渠道效率、转化率与自动化，两条路的技能树几乎不重叠）；**人才地图是资产 ⇄ 人才地图是浪费**（保留制猎头把 mapping 当交付物的一部分，成功付费猎头认为地图做完单子已经黄了）；**保留制 retained ⇄ 成功付费 contingency**（按阶段预付、独家、深度地图 vs 多家赛马、入职才收钱、速度压倒深度；两种商业模式塑造出两种截然不同的作业节奏、候选人对待方式与职业道德边界，比如 off-limits 不挖回自己安置过的人）；**内部招聘团队 ⇄ 外部猎头与 RPO**（成本、速度、知识沉淀、雇主品牌归属谁的长期争论；embedded recruiter 是近年的折中）；**候选人体验 ⇄ 筛选效率**（漏斗越严体验越差，被拒者也是客户与口碑）；**AI 筛选的效率 ⇄ 合规与偏见**（简历解析、AI 面试评分、自动排序已在大规模使用，同时被监管盯上：纽约市 Local Law 144 要求自动化决策工具做偏见审计并公示、欧盟 AI 法案把招聘划为高风险场景、伊利诺伊州对 AI 视频面试单独立法；业内既离不开它，也在诉讼与审计里学做记录）；**offer 谈判的锚定 ⇄ 薪酬透明**（多地薪酬区间披露立法把谈判起点从『你现在多少』改成『这个岗位值多少』，问薪酬历史在不少法域已被禁止）；**counter-offer 该不该接**（猎头几乎一致反对，认为留下来的人多数一年内还是会走，但这条业内定论的证据基础本身也在被质疑）；**入职后早期流失算谁的**（保证期与退款条款把这场争论直接写进了合同）。(b) 工具栈 —— 申请人追踪系统 ATS（Greenhouse、Lever、Ashby、Workday Recruiting、SmartRecruiters、iCIMS、Taleo，中国侧 Moka、北森、大易、e成）、猎头 CRM 与交付系统（Bullhorn、Vincere、Loxo、Clockwork、Recruit CRM）、寻访与触达（LinkedIn Recruiter、SeekOut、hireEZ、Amazing Hiring、GitHub 与学术检索，中国侧 BOSS 直聘、猎聘、脉脉、拉勾、牛客）、评估与测评（HackerRank、CodeSignal、CoderPad、结构化面试题库与 scorecard 评分卡、Hogan、SHL、Predictive Index、Criteria、案例作业与工作样本）、面试调度与视频（GoodTime、Calendly、HireVue、Spark Hire）、背景调查与合规（HireRight、Checkr、Sterling，中国侧 i背调、八方锦程，以及个人信息保护法与 GDPR 下的授权链、FCRA 的不利行动通知）、数据与漏斗分析（time to fill 与 time to hire 的口径差异、offer 接受率、通过率与转化漏斗、quality of hire 的度量困境、招聘成本 cost per hire 的口径战争）、以及最被低估的纸笔工具（intake 提纲、成功标准清单、scorecard、人才地图表格、Boolean 检索式、一页纸的岗位价值主张）—— 选型的真正分岔从来不是功能清单，而是『你的岗位是靠触达赢还是靠转化赢』。(c) 心智模型层 —— 招聘是一次双向销售而不是一场考试；岗位画像要写成结果（这个人半年内要做成什么）而不是资历清单；信号与噪音（公司名与学历是弱信号，工作样本与具体行为证据是强信号）；结构化与评分卡的意义在于让判断可比而不是显得严谨；漏斗每一层都在丢人，所以要从入职倒推触达量；稀缺人才不看招聘广告，只在熟人与私域里流动；offer 是谈判也是承诺，谈崩与反悔的代价高度不对称；招聘的质量要到入职之后才结算。(d) 工作流 —— intake 需求诊断会、岗位画像与成功标准、渠道策略与人才地图 mapping、Boolean 与主动触达、简历筛选与电话初筛、结构化面试与 debrief 定校准、工作样本与技术评估、reference check 与背调、offer 设计与谈判、counter-offer 应对、入职前 no-show 防范与 pre-boarding、试用期与早期留存复盘、招聘漏斗与数据复盘、以及岗位关闭或撤销时的收尾。(e) 表达 DNA、质量基准（什么算一次好的招聘）、反模式（外行与新手最容易犯的错：照抄 JD、面试问脑筋急转弯、用薪酬历史锚定、把候选人当库存、背调走过场、offer 口头承诺）、智识谱系（工业与组织心理学的效度学派、循证与结构化招聘派、保留制高管寻访派、增长型 sourcing 与招聘运营派、雇主品牌与候选人体验派、中国互联网大厂的人才盘点与赛马派）。) Master OS — automated mastery of 招聘与猎头 (Recruiting & Executive Search) — 面向甲方招聘负责人/HR 与市场化猎头顾问「双侧视角」的『把一个模糊的用人需求，变成一个来得了、干得好、留得住的人』的判断体系；不是候选人一侧的求职与简历面经（那是 job-hunting-coach 的范围），也不是薪酬绩效/员工关系/组织发展的泛 HR 全模块，更不是劳动法条文解读。覆盖：(a) 第一性张力 —— 这行的核心世界观分歧：**需求诊断优先 ⇄ 快速供给优先**（用人经理提来的岗位需求几乎总是一张愿望清单，资深招聘先开 intake 会把『必须有』与『最好有』拆开、把画像逼成可证伪的成功标准；但按成单计酬的猎头把诊断时间压不进单价里，于是行业里同时存在『先诊断再搜寻』和『先扔简历再说』两种作业习惯）；**结构化面试 ⇄ 看人的直觉**（工业与组织心理学近一个世纪的效度元分析一致指向：结构化面试、工作样本、认知能力测验的预测效度明显高于非结构化面谈与经验年限，但一线用人经理绝大多数仍相信自己聊两句就能看准人——这是本行最大的知行落差，也是所有循证招聘流派的出发点；顺带一提，业内长期奉为圭臬的 Schmidt-Hunter 效度排序近年被重新校正，工作样本的效度被下调，这场修正本身就是本行必须如实呈现的争议）；**能力素质 ⇄ 文化匹配**（culture fit 既是最常被写在拒信里的理由，也是被批评得最凶的偏见外壳，Google 一派主张改口叫 culture add，看的是这个人补上了团队缺的东西，而不是像不像我们）；**主动寻访 sourcing ⇄ 被动投递漏斗**（高端与稀缺技能岗只有 outbound 人才地图一条路；量大岗位靠渠道效率、转化率与自动化，两条路的技能树几乎不重叠）；**人才地图是资产 ⇄ 人才地图是浪费**（保留制猎头把 mapping 当交付物的一部分，成功付费猎头认为地图做完单子已经黄了）；**保留制 retained ⇄ 成功付费 contingency**（按阶段预付、独家、深度地图 vs 多家赛马、入职才收钱、速度压倒深度；两种商业模式塑造出两种截然不同的作业节奏、候选人对待方式与职业道德边界，比如 off-limits 不挖回自己安置过的人）；**内部招聘团队 ⇄ 外部猎头与 RPO**（成本、速度、知识沉淀、雇主品牌归属谁的长期争论；embedded recruiter 是近年的折中）；**候选人体验 ⇄ 筛选效率**（漏斗越严体验越差，被拒者也是客户与口碑）；**AI 筛选的效率 ⇄ 合规与偏见**（简历解析、AI 面试评分、自动排序已在大规模使用，同时被监管盯上：纽约市 Local Law 144 要求自动化决策工具做偏见审计并公示、欧盟 AI 法案把招聘划为高风险场景、伊利诺伊州对 AI 视频面试单独立法；业内既离不开它，也在诉讼与审计里学做记录）；**offer 谈判的锚定 ⇄ 薪酬透明**（多地
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks how code works, wants to understand architecture, trace execution flows, or explore unfamiliar parts of the codebase. Examples: "How does X work?", "What calls this function?", "Show me the auth flow"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Chooses the right FORMAT for instructions on Claude.ai — project instructions, a skill, or a standalone prompt — and gives the format-specific structure once chosen. Use when the question is which container an instruction belongs in ("should this be a skill or project instructions", "where do I put this", "how do I set up this project", "is this worth a skill"), or when someone has instructions and does not know how to package them. For the writing principles that apply inside any of the three formats, use writing-instructions. For building, testing and packaging a complete skill directory, use creating-skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits any landing or service page across 48 checks in 10 categories for LLM/AI discoverability, GEO readiness, content clarity, schema markup, internal linking, freshness signals, and technical crawlability. Produces an overall score out of 100, a per-category score out of 100, pass/warn/fail/ manual counts, and a prioritised fix list — all rendered as a standalone HTML report saved to disk. Use when a user provides a URL and asks to audit it, score it, check its GEO readiness, test its AI discoverability, run a landing page audit, or evaluate it for LLM citation potential. Also trigger on phrases like "audit this page", "score this URL", "check GEO for", "is this page AI-ready", "run a GEO audit", "LLM page check", "how would AI read this page", or "landing page score".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to optimize content for AI search engines, get cited by LLMs, or appear in AI-generated answers. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'generative engine optimization,' 'LLM optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT,' 'optimize for Perplexity,' 'AI citations,' 'AI visibility,' 'zero-click search,' 'how do I show up in AI answers,' 'LLM mentions,' or 'optimize for Claude/Gemini.' Use this whenever someone wants their content to be cited or surfaced by AI assistants and AI search engines. For traditional technical and on-page SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data implementation, see schema.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program," or "experiment playbook." Use this whenever someone is comparing two approaches and wants to measure which performs better, or when they want to build a systematic experimentation practice. For tracking implementation, see analytics. For page-level conversion optimization, see cro.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Remove the AI tells human readers react to in a tweet or thread: 2026 vocabulary by density, reveal bridges, staccato stacks, stacked triads, performed sincerity. Also --mode audit (280-char fit and format), --mode profile (learns how you write) and --mode interview (fills your Story Bank: the numbers, turning points and positions posts are made of). Not for writing from scratch (use x-post-writer). Keywords: humanize, de-AI tweet, AI slop, interview me, audit before posting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Edit drafts into natural prose, inspect AI-sounding patterns, or review how a specified audience might respond passage by passage. Zero Slop runs inside the user's existing AI assistant with local tools that protect source details. Use for humanizing or de-slopping writing, polishing outward-facing prose, social drafts, final editorial checks, or an explicit simulated reader review. Preserve facts, voice and format; reader simulations are hypotheses, not human feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply this skill whenever the user is navigating early-stage startups, bootstrapping, product innovation, branding, or overcoming the fear of failure. Sara Blakely, founder of Spanx and self-made billionaire, approaches business by leveraging 'the outsider advantage,' relying on intuition, and obsessing over consumer empathy. Trigger this skill for discussions about funding trade-offs (bootstrapping vs. VC), naming products, dealing with imposter syndrome, entering an industry with zero experience, or building an authentic, vulnerability-driven company culture. Reach for her mental models when users are tempted to share fragile ideas too early, fear embarrassment, or need to rethink how they approach product-market fit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever you need to reason about public health, epidemiology, preventive medicine, healthy aging, longevity, lifestyle vs. genetics, or dietary patterns. Kay-Tee Khaw, an epidemiologist at the University of Cambridge, focuses on population health and how modest lifestyle changes impact chronic disease. Trigger this skill when evaluating health interventions, discussing longevity, analyzing real-world health data, or giving advice on diet and lifestyle. Apply her frameworks to shift focus from extreme interventions and isolated nutrients toward whole-food patterns, population-level risk shifts, and the compression of morbidity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede-affiliated AI search optimization discipline. Use when the user wants to optimize content for AI search engines, get cited by LLMs, or appear in AI-generated answers. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'generative engine optimization,' 'LLM optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT,' 'optimize for Perplexity,' 'AI citations,' 'AI visibility,' 'zero-click search,' 'how do I show up in AI answers,' 'LLM mentions,' 'optimize for Claude/Gemini,' 'llms.txt,' 'OKF,' 'Open Knowledge Format,' 'knowledge bundle,' or 'agent-readable site.' The durable job: make content structurally extractable, citable, and agent-readable so AI systems surface and cite it. NOT FOR: traditional technical SEO audit (use suede-seo-audit) or launch-appeal grading (use suede-visibility-grader).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suede AI blunt A-F ship grade for a code change across correctness, security and permissions, data and state, domain truth, UX and release behavior, tests and verification, and deploy readiness, with Instant-F triggers and evidence-based grade caps on auth, payment, migration, and public-API surfaces. Use when asked to grade this, give it a letter, is this an A, how ready is this to ship, or should this merge: when the caller wants the verdict without a findings list. NOT FOR: findings, evidence, and fix briefs (use suede-code-review, or suede-code for findings plus grade); enforcing the verdict in CI (use suede-ci-gate); eval coverage for AI behavior (use suede-ai-eval).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage design work in Penpot — create projects, organize pages, build components, export assets, review designs visually, and handle design-to-code handoff. Use when asked to create designs, manage Penpot projects, build components, export tokens, set up a new design project, review a design, take screenshots, or show what something looks like.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you are about to hand off a change a player can see - the exact steps to look at it running (web game in the browser at two viewports plus a seeded Playwright smoke run for input and console errors; engine games through a headless frame capture), the checklist, and how to report what could not be observed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing tests for data or ML code — what to test at each layer (transforms, schemas, properties, pipeline smoke, model-quality thresholds, determinism and parity), how to build small synthetic fixtures, and what not to test
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a model is served online (FastAPI, BentoML) or scored in batch, when changing how a model artifact is loaded or versioned, or when adding drift, quality or prediction monitoring and a rollout plan for a new model
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。