5,193 件 ・ 関連度順
Delegate tasks to ANY CLI agent (claude, codex, aider, ...) running in a detached tmux session, with a race-safe done-signal protocol and multi-turn iteration. Use when delegating work to a non-Claude CLI agent, when the user says "tmux delegate", "run agent in tmux", "delegate to codex/aider", or when executor work should run in an observable background terminal instead of the Agent tool.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when executing and reporting the analysis/interpretation for an American Anthropologist (AA) manuscript so it survives expert anonymous review — disciplined ethnographic/qualitative inference, honest interpretation, and (for biological/archaeological work) sound quantitative analysis. Guides analysis and interpretation norms; it does not fabricate evidence or quotations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when preparing the data, code, and model materials for an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript. AgSy applies Elsevier's research-data policy, which treats software, code, and models as research data — deposit them in a repository and cite/link them, or state why they cannot be shared. Covers model-description standards and exemptions. Prepares the materials; it does not waive requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when executing and reporting the analysis for an Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) manuscript — qualitative coding and data-to-theory construction, or quantitative estimation and robustness. Makes the evidence-to-theory link transparent; it does not design the study (see asq-methods).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running and reporting the statistical analysis for an Academy of Management Journal (AMJ) manuscript — measurement validity, common-method bias, the right estimator (HLM, SEM, panel, experiments), endogeneity, and robustness. Executes and reports the analysis; it does not design the study (amj-methods) or frame the contribution (amj-contribution-framing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scrape recent posts from LinkedIn profiles using Apify. Use when you need to monitor what specific people are posting on LinkedIn, track founder/exec activity, or gather LinkedIn content for competitive intelligence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pipeline analysis composite. Pulls deal/meeting data from any CRM or tracking system, analyzes the pipeline over a user-defined period (weekly, fortnightly, monthly, quarterly), and produces both an executive summary and a detailed diagnostic report. Covers volume, qualification rates, source effectiveness, stage velocity, stuck deals, and actionable recommendations. Tool-agnostic — works with any CRM (Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Close, Supabase, CSV).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a brand's facts, a campaign brief and the product into a one-minute Meta ad strategy with its reasoning — goal, audience, objective and placements, budget split, how many ads and how different they must be (generate 3x so the user can choose), the test frame, the success metric, and safety rules for the user to accept. Decides what launch-meta-ad-campaign then executes, and re-reads the strategy after a deep check to show which assumption changed. Use it after intake and before any creative is generated or any campaign is built.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates and inspects Fabric Activator (Reflex) alerts: rules, their data sources, conditions, and the Teams or email action they fire, plus decoding an existing ReflexEntities definition. Choose it whenever someone wants to be told, or something done, when values cross a threshold. The pipeline delivering those values is eventstream-cli.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manages Fabric Dataflow Gen2 items, including creation, M editing, connections, output destinations, getDefinition and updateDefinition inspection, executeQuery, refresh history, and Gen1-to-Gen2 save-as upgrades via saveAsNativeArtifact. Use for Dataflow items or Power Query M definitions. For pipeline JSON use pipeline-migration; for Spark or Warehouse transformations use their own skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ports existing Databricks notebooks and jobs to Fabric, covering dbutils to notebookutils, secret scopes to Key Vault, DBFS to OneLake, Unity Catalog mapping to schema-enabled Lakehouses, Jobs and Delta Live Tables to Spark Job Definitions and Pipelines, and Photon to the Native Execution Engine. Use whenever Databricks code has to be converted. For Fabric notebook code that is not being migrated, use spark-cli.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks to summarize, or asks why Simulink Coverage objectives are missing, unsatisfied, or uncovered on a coverage result they already have — why specific decision, condition, MCDC, relational-boundary, or saturation/overflow outcomes weren't exercised, whether uncovered logic is dead code, or how to close the gap (a test, a coverage filter, or a design change). It reads an existing cvdata, .cvt file, sim-with-coverage output, or Simulink Test result; it never runs cvsim to collect coverage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimizes Simulink models for Embedded Coder generated code. Use when asked to optimize or improve generated code, or reduce code metrics for a Simulink model. Targets: execution time, memory footprint (RAM, ROM, stack, data copies), code size, MISRA compliance, or any semantically similar generated-code metric. Works iteratively — measures baseline, suggests changes, applies, and re-measures to confirm improvement. Triggers can be prompts similar to: optimize generated code runtime, reduce runtime, shrink code size, improve code efficiency, reduce memory usage, speed up generated code, follow MISRA compliance and so on. CAUTION: Do NOT attempt to optimize Simulink models for generated code efficiency without following this skill — the iterative measurement, gating, and rollback workflow is essential for safe optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and simplify C# property-based, model-based, and executable specification tests with CsCheck. Use for generators, shrinking, stateful command sequences, Spec guards and rules, implementation conformance, or replaying generated failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads, queries, and writes bigWig indexed binary signal tracks (coverage, fold-change, conservation, methylation-rate) with pyBigWig (Python) and the UCSC Kent tools (bedGraphToBigWig, bigWigToBedGraph, bigWigInfo, bigWigSummary, bigWigAverageOverBed) and deepTools (multiBigwigSummary, computeMatrix, bigwigCompare). Covers the central trap that a wide query returns a precomputed zoom-level summary (by default the mean, which annihilates narrow peaks) not per-base data, when exact=True/values() is mandatory, the NaN-not-zero gap-handling fork, choosing mean vs max vs sum vs coverage by biological question, and the sorted-bedGraph plus chrom.sizes build requirement. Use when extracting signal at regions, computing mean signal per gene/peak, building a browser track from bedGraph, comparing tracks, or building TSS/gene-body metaprofiles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Segment single cells from multiplexed IMC/MIBI tissue images using Mesmer/DeepCell, Cellpose, or ilastik+CellProfiler, covering whole-cell vs nuclear segmentation, the summed-membrane-channel decision, nuclear-expansion bias, lateral spillover, resolution-floor parameters, and downstream-proxy evaluation. Use when delineating cells after preprocessing, choosing a segmentation model, building a cell mask for quantification, diagnosing impossible double-positive populations, or troubleshooting over/under-segmentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs genomics experiments so technical nuisance variation (batch, lane, plate, flow cell, operator, reagent lot, processing day) is balanced against the biological variable of interest and therefore estimable rather than confounded, using constrained sample-to-batch assignment (designit, OSAT), the confounder/mediator/collider distinction, and the principle that no post-hoc correction recovers a fully confounded design. Covers detecting hidden batches with surrogate variable analysis, a decision table for downstream correction (ComBat-seq, RUVSeq, SVA) whose execution is deferred to differential-expression/batch-correction, and reproducibility metadata. Use when assigning samples to sequencing batches/lanes/plates, avoiding batch-condition confounding, deciding whether a design is salvageable by correction, choosing a correction method, or estimating the number of hidden batches. For the experimental unit, randomization, and blocking concepts see experimental-design/randomization-blocking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delimits putative species boundaries from molecular data within the de Queiroz 2007 unified-lineage framework using ASAP (Puillandre 2021 successor to ABGD), mPTP C++ (Kapli 2017 successor to bPTP; bPTP is Python NOT R), GMYC single/multi-threshold (Pons 2006; Fujisawa 2013), multilocus BPP v4 with prior calibration from data (NOT defaults; Yang 2015), SNAPP + BFD* for SNP delimitation, DELINEATE (Sukumaran 2021) speciation-process modeling to address Sukumaran & Knowles 2017 PNAS critique that MSC delimits structure not species, integrative-taxonomy congruence (Padial 2010; Carstens 2013), Dsuite for introgression testing before sister claims (Malinsky 2021), and Meyer & Paulay 2005 barcoding-gap-absence caveat. Use when delineating species from DNA barcoding data, resolving cryptic complexes, choosing among ASAP/mPTP/BPP/DELINEATE, calibrating BPP priors, distinguishing introgression from ILS, or applying the Sukumaran-Knowles oversplitting correction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs ML-based protein-ligand pose prediction and scoring using DiffDock-L (diffusion-based), Boltz-1 / Boltz-2 (foundation model with affinity), Chai-1, AlphaFold3 ligand, EquiBind, TANKBind, NeuralPLexer, and hybrid workflows (DiffDock pose + GNINA rescore + PoseBusters QC). Explicit handling of when ML beats classical docking, when classical beats ML, the PB-invalid pose problem, and rescoring as the standard production hybrid. Use when modern docking is needed: foundation-model ligand-pose prediction, AI rescoring of classical poses, or scaffold-hopping in cross-docking scenarios.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to audit test quality, find flaky test patterns, speed up test execution, or prepare for Swift Testing migration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Embeds and controls web content in SwiftUI with WebKit for SwiftUI, including WebView, WebPage, navigation policies, JavaScript execution, observable page state, link interception, local HTML or data loading, and custom URL schemes. Use when building iOS 26+ article/detail views, help centers, in-app documentation, or other embedded web experiences backed by HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Schedule and execute background work on iOS using BGTaskScheduler. Use when registering BGAppRefreshTask for short background fetches, BGProcessingTask for long-running maintenance, BGContinuedProcessingTask (iOS 26+) for foreground-started work that continues in background, background URLSession downloads, or background push notifications. Covers Info.plist configuration, expiration handling, task completion, and debugging with simulated launches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement App Intents for Siri, Shortcuts, Spotlight, widgets, Control Center, and Apple Intelligence on iOS. Covers AppIntent actions, AppEntity and EntityQuery models, AppShortcutsProvider phrases, IndexedEntity Spotlight indexing, WidgetConfigurationIntent, SnippetIntent, and assistant schemas. Use when exposing app actions or entities to system surfaces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Report the compatibility redirect to `ap-worker`; this retired role cannot perform new work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。