「find」の検索結果

This skill should be used when the user asks to "debug this", "fix this error", "investigate this bug", "troubleshoot this issue", "find the problem", "something is broken", "this isn't working", "why is this failing", or reports errors/exceptions/bugs. Provides systematic debugging workflow and common error patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use as a helper when the admin is assigning work but has not specified an existing Worker, so you need to search Nacos for a suitable Worker and ask whether to import it; also use when the admin explicitly says to import a Worker from the market or gives a direct nacos package URI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when admin requests hand-creating or resetting a Worker, starting/stopping a Worker, managing Worker skills, enabling peer mentions, or opening a QwenPaw console. Use agentteams-find-worker only as a helper for Nacos-backed market import or when task assignment needs you to discover a suitable Worker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover and install agent skills from the open ecosystem. Use when you encounter an unfamiliar domain, framework, or workflow that you lack specialized knowledge about, or when your coordinator suggests searching for skills before starting a task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates .NET projects from templates with validated parameters, smart defaults, Central Package Management adaptation, and latest NuGet version resolution. USE FOR: creating new dotnet projects, scaffolding solutions with multiple projects, installing or uninstalling template packages, creating projects that respect Directory.Packages.props (CPM), composing multi-project solutions (API + tests + library), getting latest NuGet package versions in newly created projects. DO NOT USE FOR: finding templates (use template-discovery), producing a detailed side-by-side comparison of templates (use template-comparison), authoring custom templates (use template-authoring), deciding cross-parameter defaults such as which framework to pair with native AOT or whether to keep HTTPS when auth is enabled (use template-smart-defaults), modifying existing projects or adding NuGet packages to existing projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides creation and validation of custom dotnet new templates from existing projects. Generates a .template.config/template.json that preserves the source project's conventions. USE FOR: creating a reusable dotnet new template from an existing project, bootstrapping .template.config/template.json with correct identity, shortName, parameters, and post-actions, adding parameters or conditional content to a template you are authoring, validating the template.json you are authoring before publishing, packaging templates as NuGet packages for distribution. DO NOT USE FOR: validating an existing template.json as a standalone task (use template-validation), finding or using existing templates (use template-discovery and template-instantiation), MSBuild project file issues unrelated to template authoring, NuGet package publishing (only template packaging structure).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activation requires either supplied .NET coverage reports/percentages/line, branch, or condition metrics, or an explicit request to collect .NET coverage for analysis. USE FOR: interpreting that evidence, including Cobertura data, partial conditions, plateaus, target arithmetic, project-wide coverage-backed CRAP, and coverage-backed refactoring safety. Analyze supplied reports directly without rerunning tests or installing tools. DO NOT USE FOR: requests with neither coverage evidence nor explicit coverage-collection intent, including hypothetical change-survival questions (use test-gap-analysis); CRAP or refactoring safety for one named target (use crap-score); or requests owned by test-tagging, find-untested-sources, test-anti-patterns, run-tests, or code-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies cross-parameter default rules when creating .NET projects with dotnet new, filling gaps consistently without overriding values the user set explicitly. USE FOR: choosing which target framework to pair with native AOT, deciding whether to keep HTTPS when authentication is enabled, recognizing that controllers and minimal-API flags are mutually exclusive, filling unset related parameters during project creation, explaining why a default was applied and ensuring an explicit user value is never overridden. DO NOT USE FOR: creating the project itself (use template-instantiation), finding or comparing templates (use template-discovery and template-comparison), authoring or validating custom templates (use template-authoring and template-validation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS USE when asked to migrate, replace, or make testable existing C# static calls with a named wrapper or built-in abstraction: DateTime.UtcNow/Now or DateTimeOffset.UtcNow to TimeProvider/IClock, File.* to IFileSystem or an existing store such as ITextFileStore, and Environment.* to an existing reader such as IEnvironmentReader. Covers scoped files/projects, constructor injection, replacing temp-file or process-environment tests with fakes, "already registered" abstractions, and static classes whose callers/signatures must stay unchanged. Preserves DateTimeKind and call count. DO NOT USE for finding statics (detect-static-dependencies), choosing/designing a new wrapper (generate-testability-wrappers), behavior tests with no chosen seam (testability-obstacle), or test-framework migration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find caller-visible production changes existing tests would miss through pseudo-mutation analysis; verify candidates or close gaps only when requested. Includes read-only per-test composition for grading. Polyglot. USE FOR: would tests catch a bug, behavioral blind spots, surviving mutations. DO NOT USE FOR: concrete fix/feature revision proof (test-value-evidence); suite taxonomy (test-tagging); .NET coverage, Cobertura, plateaus or coverage-backed priorities (coverage-analysis); named CRAP (crap-score); new suites (code-testing); assertion/smell audits; mutation tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose MSBuild bottlenecks from binlog timelines and Target/Task Performance Summaries after build-perf-baseline establishes measurements. USE FOR: unknown build slowness, RAR >5s, analyzers >30% of Csc, one target >50% of build time, node utilization <80%, excessive Copy tasks, finding restore overhead. DO NOT USE FOR: known repeated-restore fixes (use eliminate-redundant-restores), initial baselines (use build-perf-baseline), incremental rebuilds (use incremental-build), parallelism tuning (use build-parallelism), non-MSBuild builds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DO NOT INVOKE when the primary request explicitly asks to convert, migrate, modernize, or rewrite a legacy/old-style project to SDK style; use msbuild-modernization. Migration prompts often mention ToolsVersion, explicit Compile/Reference entries, packages.config, or Microsoft.CSharp.targets, but merely reviewing or auditing a file that contains those patterns remains in scope here. USE FOR broad review, audit, lint, or maintainability/correctness checks of project/build files, including custom targets; prioritized cross-cutting findings; discrete anti-patterns; F# ordering/FS0039; cross-platform paths; and focused Import safety verdicts. Review/audit is analysis-only unless fixes are requested. For concrete property/item defects use property-patterns/item-management; use target-authoring for implementation and extension-points for NuGet auto-import/layout discovery. Exclude non-MSBuild systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The way to answer "how are my production AI agents doing?" and to run the team's agent-observability deployment — reach for it even on casual phrasing that names no tool. Trigger when the user wants to: • inspect agent telemetry — did agents error/fail/go flaky; sessions, events, latency, token usage, slowest models; eval/quality scores and whether quality dropped; • operate the deployment — ack/assign/resolve/mute/dismiss issues (alerts, reports, and audit findings) with notes; run and triage audits; see who has access and change roles (e.g. read-only); create or scope API keys (e.g. a push-only CI key); change settings; run saved or ad-hoc ClickHouse queries. Served by the `fp` CLI against FailproofAI Cloud. NOT for writing or designing an evaluator service / scoring logic (that's `agenteye-evaluator`), adding SDK/instrumentation to your app (that's `failproofai-sdk`, imported as `failproofai_sdk`), debugging the collector/daemon, or unrelated dev work (why a build/CI run failed, rotating non-FailproofAI Cloud secrets).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recipes for the lsp tool — resolving where a symbol is defined, every place it is used, type signatures and docs, file outlines, and compiler/type errors through a real language server (Go, TypeScript/JavaScript, Python, Rust). Use when navigating or explaining code by symbol, finding callers or usages, checking what broke after an edit, or deciding between lsp and text search.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive tuios from inside one of its panes. Find out where you are running, read and write other panes, run work and wait on it instead of polling, report your own state so the person sees it, and talk to the other agents and the person safely. `tuios --skill <topic>` prints the rest: fleets of agents, turn checkpoints, shipping a worktree, the Inbox and approvals, push notifications, pairing a phone, mail, other machines, clients, events, MCP, the tmux shim, herdr's command line, pane grants, configuration, agent features off, errors and recipes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and resume interrupted Copilot CLI sessions using session_store queries

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze PR review comments from a GitHub PR URL. Fetch review comments, verify each finding against the actual codebase, assess validity (correct/incorrect/partial), present a structured summary with recommended actions, and optionally reply to each comment on GitHub. Use when given a PR review URL or when asked to check/analyze PR feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans a live Kubernetes environment with `mirrord dump` to find an identifier mirrord can filter traffic on: a header, a `baggage` or `tracestate` member, a tenant or user id, a trace id (W3C, B3, X-Ray, Google, Jaeger), a JWT claim, a cookie, a path segment, or a JSON body field that is present on every hop of a request chain, unique to one developer's traffic, and settable by that developer. Runs mirror-only dumps on each service, sends a tagged probe request at the edge or observes real traffic, scores the candidates, and produces the matching `http_filter` (regex, jq on headers, path, method, body, or combinations) plus a per-hop report of where each identifier is dropped. Installs the mirrord CLI through a package manager when it is missing. Use when the user asks what to filter on, whether the cluster already propagates a request id or trace context, how to isolate their own requests on a shared staging cluster, how to filter on a JWT or cookie with mirrord, or wants to inspect live traffic with mirrord dump. Changes no application code: propagation gaps go to the mirrord-header-propagation skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security payloads, bypass tables, wordlists, gf pattern names, always-rejected bug list, and conditionally-valid-with-chain table. Use when you need specific payloads for XSS/SSRF/SQLi/XXE/NoSQLi/command injection/SSTI/IDOR/path-traversal/HTTP smuggling/WebSocket/MFA bypass, bypass techniques, or to check if a finding is submittable. Also use when asked about what NOT to submit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete bug bounty workflow — recon, pre-hunt learning, vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining, bypass tables, language-specific grep patterns, and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, submission checklist). Use for ANY bug bounty task — recon, hunting specific vulns, auditing source code, testing AI features, validating findings, or writing reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bug bounty report writing for H1/Bugcrowd/Intigriti/Immunefi — report templates, human tone guidelines, impact-first writing, CVSS 3.1 scoring, title formula, impact statement formula, severity decision guide, downgrade counters, pre-submit checklist. Use after validating a finding and before submitting. Never use "could potentially" — prove it or don't report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-access cloud exploitation for AWS, GCP, and Azure — what to do AFTER you obtain credentials or reach a metadata endpoint. Covers IAM enumeration and privilege escalation (iam:PassRole, CreatePolicyVersion, AssumeRole chains, GCP service-account impersonation, Azure managed-identity abuse), IMDSv1/v2 metadata credential theft, STS token abuse, S3/GCS/Blob bucket takeover and object exfil, Lambda/Cloud Functions env-var secrets, cross-account and cross-service pivoting, and turning leaked keys into demonstrated impact (read PII, assume admin, exfil data). Assumes authorized scope only. Use when you have AWS/GCP/Azure keys, an SSRF hitting 169.254.169.254 / metadata.google.internal, a leaked service-account JSON, or a token, and need to escalate and prove impact. For finding buckets/origins first, use cloud-recon; for the SSRF entry point, see web2-vuln-classes. 中文触发词：云渗透、AWS提权、IAM枚举、元数据凭证、云安全审计

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CI/CD pipeline security hunting — GitHub Actions workflow injection, secret exfiltration, self-hosted runner poisoning, dependency confusion, OIDC token theft, and supply chain attacks. Covers sisakulint scanning, manual workflow analysis, and chaining CI/CD bugs into critical findings. Use when a target has public repos, GitHub Actions, CircleCI, Jenkins, or GitLab CI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete bug bounty workflow — recon (subdomain enumeration, asset discovery, fingerprinting, HackerOne scope, source code audit), pre-hunt learning (disclosed reports, tech stack research, mind maps, threat modeling), vulnerability hunting (IDOR, SSRF, XSS, auth bypass, CSRF, race conditions, SQLi, XXE, file upload, business logic, GraphQL, HTTP smuggling, cache poisoning, OAuth, timing side-channels, OIDC, SSTI, subdomain takeover, cloud misconfig, ATO chains, agentic AI), LLM/AI security testing (chatbot IDOR, prompt injection, indirect injection, ASCII smuggling, exfil channels, RCE via code tools, system prompt extraction, ASI01-ASI10), A-to-B bug chaining (IDOR→auth bypass, SSRF→cloud metadata, XSS→ATO, open redirect→OAuth theft, S3→bundle→secret→OAuth), bypass tables (SSRF IP bypass, open redirect bypass, file upload bypass), language-specific grep (JS prototype pollution, Python pickle, PHP type juggling, Go template.HTML, Ruby YAML.load, Rust unwrap), and reporting (7-Question Gate, 4 validation gates, human-tone writing, templates by vuln class, CVSS 3.1, PoC generation, always-rejected list, conditional chain table, submission checklist). Use for ANY bug bounty task — starting a new target, doing recon, hunting specific vulns, auditing source code, testing AI features, validating findings, or writing reports. 中文触发词：漏洞赏金、安全测试、渗透测试、漏洞挖掘、信息收集、子域名枚举、XSS测试、SQL注入、SSRF、安全审计、漏洞报告

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。