「iso」の検索結果

Systematic 6-phase debugging protocol. Structured approach to bugs with quick checks, isolated testing, 20-minute rule, and bug report template.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rollenbasierte Multi-Modell-Strategie. Modellkatalog liegt in einer lokalen Konfigurationsdatei statt im Skill-Text -- Rollen (Denker/Entscheider, Dauer-Worker, Entwurfsgenerator, Reviewer/Abnahme, Eskalation), Reasoning-Effort als eigene Achse, Abnahmepflicht für Entwurfsmodelle, Anbieterwechsel für unabhängige Reviews, Kontingente, Delegationsablauf und Kosten/Qualität kleiner Worker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts answers to the questions in a received RFP, RFQ or tender from the organisation's past responses, answer library, case studies, policies and other documents provided: one row per buyer question with a draft answer marked Reused, Adapted or Missing, its source and date, and a legal or pricing review flag on every answer touching terms, liability, warranties, insurance, data protection or price. Use when the user asks to "draft our RFP response", "answer this tender from our past proposals", "pre-fill the bid questions", "first pass at the RFQ answers" or "reuse our previous bid content". Do not use for writing the buyer's own RFP or requirements, use rfp-requirements-pack instead; for security or due diligence questionnaires use vendor-security-questionnaire-prefill; for scoring received supplier responses use rfp-comparison-pack. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a DRAFT change-communication plan from a change description: audience map, key messages per audience traced to the description, channels, sequence with dates or day offsets, owners, feedback loop and open questions, plus drafts of the first messages for the sponsor to approve. Use when the user asks to "plan the comms for this change", "who needs to hear about this and when", "draft the announcement sequence", "build a communication plan for the rollout", "write the first message to managers about this change" or "how do we tell people about this". Do not use for a clause-by-clause comparison of a changed HR policy with its previous version, use policy-change-briefing instead; for a new hire's first weeks, use onboarding-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Abstracts one contract into a key-terms table with clause references, compares each term against the user's playbook of standard positions, and returns a DRAFT contract review pack: deviations and issues, open questions and a reviewer checklist. Flags governing law and never gives legal advice or enforceability or acceptability calls. Use when the user asks to "review this contract", "abstract the key terms", "summarise this MSA", "pressure-test this SOW against our playbook" or to compare an agreement with their standard positions. Do not use for a first pass on a stand-alone NDA, use nda-triage instead, or for one clause lined up across several documents, use clause-comparison-table instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triages an incoming non-disclosure agreement against the organisation's written standard NDA positions and returns a DRAFT triage pack: a clause-by-clause deviations table with a severity band, a suggested response per clause quoted from the positions document, open questions and a governing-law flag, all for counsel to decide. Never gives legal advice or an acceptability call. Use when the user asks to "triage this NDA against our standard positions", "screen this confidentiality agreement before it goes to legal", "red-flag this mutual NDA", "first-pass the counterparty's NDA" or "is this NDA standard or does it need counsel". Do not use for a full review of an MSA, SOW, licence or any whole contract, use contract-review-pack instead; for one clause lined up across several documents, use clause-comparison-table. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a business need and its constraints into a DRAFT RFP requirements pack: traced functional and non-functional requirements with priorities, mandatory gates, evaluation criteria with weights left to the business owner, and fact-seeking supplier questions. Solution-neutral; never names a supplier or product. Use when the user asks to "write the RFP requirements", "turn this business case into tender requirements", "draft the supplier questionnaire", "structure our RFQ from this brief" or "set up evaluation criteria before we go to market". Do not use for responses already received, use rfp-comparison-pack to compare them or supplier-evaluation-matrix to score them instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Technology Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings cited to the exact passage, technology risks (architecture, build versus buy, vendor lock-in, security of design, engineering capacity), what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CTO review", "pressure-test the technical side of this plan", "what would a CTO ask about this" or "rehearse the technology seat before the review". Do not use for cash, payback or budget questions, use cfo-reviewer instead; for capacity and timeline questions, use coo-reviewer; for security controls, privacy or compliance, use ciso-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or vendor contract in character as a Head of Procurement archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage or clause, commercial risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "review this from a procurement angle", "what would procurement say about this proposal", "pressure-test this vendor contract commercially", "find the holes before the sourcing committee" or "check the renewal terms like a Head of Procurement would". Do not use for liability, IP, regulatory or signing-authority questions, use general-counsel-reviewer instead; for whether the spend fits the budget, use cfo-reviewer; for vendor security, use ciso-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Data Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, data and AI governance risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CDO review", "pressure-test the data governance in this plan", "what would a CDO say about this", "check the metric definitions and data sources" or "prepare this for the data governance board". Do not use for security controls or third-party security risk, use ciso-reviewer instead; for contract, liability or regulatory terms, use general-counsel-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck, plan or contract summary in character as a General Counsel archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage or clause, legal risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Meeting preparation, not legal advice. Use when the user asks to "run a general counsel review", "what would legal say about this", "pressure-test the legal exposure in this deal" or "prepare me for the deal committee". Do not use for price, term, renewal or vendor leverage, use procurement-reviewer instead; for lawful basis and data flows, use cdo-reviewer; for security controls, use ciso-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns an actuals-versus-budget extract (spreadsheet, export or pasted table) into a DRAFT variance table with absolute and percentage variances, favourable or adverse marking and a ranking by size, then drafts plain-language driver hypotheses for each material variance as questions to verify with a named owner, never as asserted causes. Use when the user asks to "explain these variances", "why are we over budget on this line", "write the variance commentary for the management pack", "actuals versus budget analysis" or "which lines drive the variance". Do not use for a dataset with no budget or comparison column, use dataset-insight-pack instead; for weekly operational figures against last week, use kpi-weekly-report-writer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Cua's cloud sandboxes via cua.ai. Requires CUA_API_KEY. Cloud sandboxes are isolated VMs run by trycua with billing per usage. Use when the user wants no local Docker/QEMU, wants Windows/macOS guests without Apple Silicon, or explicitly asks for cloud.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a supplied photograph into a bold one- or two-ink editorial poster using expressive cropping, visible halftone and oversized typography. Use for 单双色网点海报、专色编辑海报、risograph-like photo posters or bold monochrome editorial designs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assemble a full multi-tier content episode from a milestone session's hot context and publish it out of band, ahead of the nightly schedule: teasers go to chats right after one approval, the rest follow by topology. Triggers: "/wow", "this is a milestone", "this session is great, tell everyone".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes product-led content pages optimized for both search engines and AI engine citations. Produces markdown files with frontmatter, following page-type frameworks (comparison, guide, use case, learn, trust) with verified sources and no fabricated data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search inside past agent sessions and continue the one that matters with a single command. Uses a separate episodic session index, so raw chat noise never pollutes the curated RAG. Triggers: "/chat-search", "which chat discussed X", "did we already research X", "search old chats".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Takes existing content markdown files and builds production-final resource center pages on client websites using their existing tech stack and design system. Output is live-ready — no review pass, no placeholder content, no prototype styling. Implements hub pages, section listings, article pages, and cross-linking for Blog, Guides, Learn, and Comparisons sections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when screenshots, websites, moodboards, competitors, or visual examples are provided and the task needs design DNA extraction, comparison, remixing, or translation into an original design direction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

WooCommerce store operations through NV oOS Pro — product research, catalog cross-referencing, inventory lookups, and Shopify or Flowhub comparisons where integrations are configured.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep security audit for WordPress plugin/theme PHP code, covering issues beyond the basic sanitize/escape/nonce checklist — PHP object injection (unserialize), SSRF in remote requests, CSRF on state-changing GET handlers, mass assignment via $_POST loops, insecure file include / template injection, mail header injection, ZipSlip in archive extraction, type-juggling in auth comparisons, and TOCTOU race patterns in option/meta locks. Use after or alongside wp-security-audit when reviewing complex plugins, REST APIs, integrations that fetch remote URLs, file processors, or any code that handles uploads, archives, or self-rolled auth tokens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Given the product offering and existing page inventory, create new core landing and resource pages (homepage refresh, features, solutions, pricing, comparison, resource hubs, about) that capture core product intent using the query-fanout pattern. Use this skill whenever the user asks to "spawn pages", "generate landing pages", "create marketing pages", "build a pricing page", "add a solutions page", "build out the site", "fill in missing pages", or wants new top-level marketing/product pages. Output is one new page per route in the project's native file format (component or markdown), matching the existing page style and framework idiom.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze market conditions, geographic opportunities, pricing, consumer behavior, and product validation across Google Maps, Facebook, Instagram, Booking.com, and TripAdvisor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous DevSecOps & FinOps Guardrails. Orchestrates Gemini 3 Flash to audit Linux Kernel patches, Terraform cost drifts, and K8s compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。