「name」の検索結果

Dependent picklists in Salesforce: controlling field (picklist or checkbox), dependent picklist, valueSettings matrix in metadata, API behavior via SOAP/REST, LWC lightning-combobox with dependency. NOT for creating picklist fields or Global Value Sets and replacing retired values - use admin/picklist-and-value-sets. NOT for filtering picklist values per record type or layout - use admin/record-types-and-page-layouts. Keywords: controllingField, valueSettings, controllingFieldValue, valueName, checked/unchecked checkbox controller, RecordTypePicklistValue, isDependentPicklist, getController, validFor, controllerValues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating a new custom field on any Salesforce object: choosing field type, setting API name, configuring Field-Level Security, adding to page layouts, and deploying. Triggers: 'add a field', 'new custom field', 'what field type should I use', 'FLS not working', 'field not showing on page layout'. NOT for creating the object itself - use admin/object-creation-and-design. NOT for formula field logic - use admin/formula-fields. NOT for picklist value set management - use admin/picklist-and-value-sets. Also covers: field-meta.xml, CustomField metadata, deleteConstraint, externalId, unique, precision and scale, relationshipOrder, writeRequiresMasterRead, fieldPermissions, package.xml for fields.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing between Custom Metadata Types and Custom Settings, understanding hierarchical vs list settings, deployment behavior, governor limit implications, or accessing either from Apex and Flow. Trigger keywords: 'custom metadata vs custom settings', 'hierarchical settings per user profile', 'deployable config vs runtime settings', 'getValues getInstance in apex', 'flow get records custom settings'. NOT for modelling the CMT itself or protecting packaged defaults — use admin/custom-metadata-types. NOT for records users edit as business data — use admin/object-creation-and-design. NOT for secrets — use integration/named-credentials-setup. More trigger keywords: customSettingsType, customSettingsVisibility, SetupOwnerId, getOrgDefaults, getAll, DUPLICATE_VALUE in test, SeeAllData custom settings, enableAdvancedCSSecurity, customSettingAccesses, org default profile user override.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing deployable Salesforce configuration with Custom Metadata Types, especially when choosing between CMTs, Custom Settings, and Custom Objects, protecting packaged defaults, or exposing config to Apex, Flow, and formulas. Triggers: 'custom metadata vs custom settings', 'deployable config', 'protected custom metadata', 'feature flags in Salesforce'. NOT for hierarchical Custom Settings resolution, getInstance/getValues, or their SOQL cost — use admin/custom-metadata-types-and-settings. NOT for high-churn transactional or user-managed business records — use admin/object-creation-and-design. NOT for secrets — use integration/named-credentials-setup. More trigger keywords: __mdt, CustomMetadata .md file, customMetadata folder, getInstance, getAll, xsi:type, visibility PackageProtected, MetadataRelationship, EntityDefinition field, $CustomMetadata.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Custom Notification Types for desktop/mobile push alerts from Flow or Apex: type creation, target channels, Messaging.CustomNotification invocation, recipient limits, bulk notification patterns. NOT for choosing channels, consent, or notification-fatigue policy — use admin/custom-notification-type-design. NOT for email alerts — use admin/email-templates-and-alerts. Trigger keywords: notiftype, notificationtypes directory, customNotifTypeName, customNotificationAction, setNotificationTypeId, targetPageRef, NotificationTypeConfig.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating, assigning, or checking custom permissions to control feature access beyond CRUD and FLS. Trigger keywords: 'custom permission', 'FeatureManagement.checkPermission', '$Permission global variable', 'feature gate', 'named access grant', 'beta feature flag', 'SetupEntityAccess', 'requiredPermission', 'who has this custom permission'. NOT for gating Apex service code and its tests — use apex/apex-custom-permissions-check. NOT for permission set design — use admin/permission-set-architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Router for the 159 SfSkills `apex` skill packages. Apex and SOQL: triggers, Apex governor limits, async processing, OUTBOUND HTTP callouts, security enforcement, and test patterns. Owns calling an external API FROM Salesforce; salesforce-integration owns inbound. Generic nightly scheduling without naming code belongs to salesforce-flow. Codebase security review belongs to salesforce-security. NOT for SOSL — use salesforce-data. Use when the request mentions Apex, trigger, SOQL, Apex governor limit, batch, queueable, @future, schedulable, test class, CPU time, heap, with sharing, StripInaccessible, callout, HTTP callout, HttpRequest, call an external API, consume a REST API from Apex, Named Credential in Apex, HttpCalloutMock, Apex REST service. Finds and opens the exact skill package to read; it does not contain the guidance itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure Salesforce Billing (blng__ managed package) billing schedules, invoice plans, billing policies, and billing treatments on activated Orders. Triggers: 'billing schedule not generating invoices', 'blng__BillingSchedule__c missing after order activation', 'in-advance vs in-arrears billing', 'milestone billing', 'invoice run not picking up order products', 'evergreen billing setup', 'billing treatment configuration'. NOT for revenue schedules, GL transactions and ASC 606 - use admin/revenue-recognition-requirements. NOT for native Revenue Cloud (RLM) BillingSchedule objects - use data/revenue-cloud-data-model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quicken the codebase — an ad-hoc performance audit that reveals what drags (N+1 queries, needless re-renders, missing caching, memory leaks, redundant computation, hot-path complexity) and prescribes the fix, surfaced inline in the session. Scoped to your current diff by default, or to a path/area you name. Use before a perf-sensitive merge, when something feels slow, or when you want a targeted optimization pass. Replaces the old always-on `optimize` daemon worker (alias: /perf-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consult the Eldar — audit a project's moflo + Claude Code setup for portable, high-leverage gaps and guide remediation. Default mode is read-only audit with severity-ranked findings; --fix presents an interactive triage menu and walks the user through each chosen fix (healer, missing CLAUDE.md, sparse guidance, hook/MCP wiring, empty memory namespaces, stack→guidance gaps). Use when starting in a new project, when Claude feels lost or inefficient, when guidance/CLAUDE.md is sparse, or as a periodic health check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deliberate session retrospective — look back over what you just did, distill the durable, reusable lessons (not session trivia), and write them to the learnings memory namespace, deduped against what is already stored. Use at the END of a meaningful chunk of work to capture high-signal lessons worth keeping long-term. The curated counterpart to moflo's passive session-continuity capture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ward the codebase — an ad-hoc test-gap audit that reveals unguarded code (untested functions, uncovered edge cases, missing error-handling and integration tests) and conjures ready-to-paste test skeletons as protective wards against regression, surfaced inline in the session. Scoped to your current diff by default, or to a path/area you name. Use before merging risky changes or when you suspect thin coverage. Replaces the old always-on `testgaps` daemon worker (alias: /test-gaps).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review changed code for reuse, quality, and efficiency, then fix any issues found. Sizes review effort to the diff — trivial edits get a self-review, substantial edits get parallel agents. Renamed from /simplify to avoid collision with Claude Code's built-in simplify skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects review-blocking configuration issues including sub-1.0 version numbers, beta in app name, staging endpoints, and missing demo credentials that prevent reviewers from evaluating the app, violating Guidelines 2.1 and 2.3.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, mock up, build and review terminal UIs — full-screen TUIs, interactive CLIs and pickers, and plugin panels or popups inside a host (herdr, tmux, Neovim, k9s, lazygit). Use when designing, reviewing (from code, a live capture or a screenshot) or redesigning a TUI's layout, keybindings, states or colors, including requests that name a known TUI (lazygit, k9s, btop, yazi, helix, fzf); writing terminal mockups; building or fixing one in Ink, Textual, Bubble Tea, Ratatui or gum; mapping a color scheme (Catppuccin, Dracula, Nord, Gruvbox, Tokyo Night, Rosé Pine…) onto a TUI's theme; fixing misaligned glyphs, flicker, NO_COLOR, exit codes, signals, pipes or a broken terminal after exit; suspend or $EDITOR handoff; or profiling a slow TUI. Not for web or native GUIs, terminal-emulator, editor or shell-prompt themes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, open and — when allowed — merge a pull request for the current feature branch of a {{engine_name}} project, with or without a plan. Builds a plain-language PR text (one feature per line) from the plan's `## Modules` and task `WHY:` lines, or — without a plan — from the commits and the code changes themselves; pushes the current state (asking where to end when it stands inside a plan module), opens or updates the branch's single open PR through the GitHub MCP, and merges with a merge commit only when the merge brings nothing from the base branch. Levels: remind (text only), create, merge; capped by `git.pull_requests.max_level`. Trigger phrases: "pull request", "open a PR", "create PR", "PR description", "merge the PR". For commit messages use /unikit-commit; for reviewing a PR's code use /unikit-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an implementation plan for a feature — a dependency-ordered, actionable task list for the project. Has four modes: fast (a quick single-pass plan), full (a richer plan that can also create a git branch), ultra (a multi-file bundle — a manifest plus one deeply specified file per phase — for execution by a smaller model), and add (extend an existing plan with more tasks). Pick the mode from the user's wording: "full plan" runs full; "quick plan" or "fast plan" runs fast; "ultra plan", "ultraplan" or "ultra-plan" runs ultra; a plain "create a plan" with no qualifier defaults to fast; "add to the plan" or "extend the plan" runs add. Use whenever the user wants to plan a feature or task, e.g. "create a plan", "create a full plan", "create a quick plan", "run an ultra plan for the inventory system", "plan this feature", "add this to the plan", "extend the plan", "add a phase to the plan". Ultra runs only when the user names it — never because the feature looks large.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create conventional commit messages for {{engine_name}} projects by analyzing staged changes. Handles engine-specific concerns like companion file pairing, binary assets, and linking the related plan. ALWAYS use this skill when the user asks to commit, save changes, or create a commit. Trigger phrases include "commit", "create commit", "commit this", "save changes", "save my work". Even if the user simply says "commit" or asks you to commit after finishing a task — invoke this skill, do NOT commit manually via git.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate the architecture guidelines for a game project. Scans the project structure and tech stack, then produces .unikit/ARCHITECTURE.md describing the folder layout, dependency rules, and how modules communicate. Name a specific pattern or let it auto-detect. Use when the user wants to define or document the project architecture, e.g. "generate architecture", "describe the architecture", "which architecture should I use", "set up project architecture", or mentions module structure, module boundaries, project organization, or dependency rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Enter explore mode for technical work — a thinking partner for {{engine_name}} code, architecture, and implementation decisions before you write any code. Use it to investigate a technical solution, design the architecture of a feature, choose between frameworks or libraries, compare implementation approaches, analyze how existing code or a system works, or deeply root-cause a complex bug without fixing it yet. The ultra mode adds adaptive artifacts (a C4 view, ADRs, a dependency graph) to the research folder — run it on "ultra research", "ultra explore" or "ultraresearch"; otherwise run the default. Trigger on "let's explore this technical solution", "how should we architect this feature", "which framework should we use", "run an ultra research on the save system", "investigate this error deeply". Research and analysis only — it never writes code. This is the CODE / engineering explorer — for GAME-DESIGN, GDD, mechanics, or balance research (no code) use /unikit-gd-explore.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Senior {{engine_name}}/{{engine_code_language}} developer that performs direct, ad-hoc code tasks without a formal plan — and the code-execution engine other unikit skills and agents delegate to. Use it whenever the user asks to do something in code right now, e.g. "add this method to this class", "refactor this function", "write a script that does X", "change this code", "optimize this class". Phrases like "without a plan", "no plan", "just do it", or "directly" are strong signals to use this skill rather than planning. Covers writing, refactoring, optimizing, and discussing {{engine_code_language}} code and patterns (DI, ECS, MVC, state machines, event systems). For a larger multi-step feature, plan it with /unikit-plan and build it with /unikit-implement — this skill is for direct, unplanned code work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify a completed implementation against the plan in .unikit/code/plans/. Checks that every task was implemented, nothing was forgotten, the code compiles, the recorded test run still matches the code, and {{engine_name}} conventions are followed. Use after /unikit-implement completes, or when the user says "verify", "check the work", "did we miss anything". For code review use /unikit-review instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qualitative quality review of game design documents — answers "is this design good, and does it follow best practices?" — across all three GDD axes: systems, flows, and content types. Fans out adversarial lenses (completeness, clarity, pillar alignment, systems-math, fantasy-delivery, feasibility, scope) plus domain lenses that check it against the game-design rules, each prompted to find problems rather than validate; produces a severity-graded verdict and a two-bucket report (apply-ready fixes vs research), handed to /unikit-gd-apply or /unikit-gd-explore in one move. Scope is inferred: a named system, flow, or content type reviews that document; "all" runs a cross-document review. Use when the user wants a critique, quality judgment, or rules check of the design, e.g. "review the combat GDD", "review the onboarding flow". This is the subjective quality pass — for a mechanical consistency check (numbers, terms, IDs, references matching the registry) use /unikit-gd-verify.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Record a finding about the configured engine MCP server into .unikit/MCP-RECHECK-NOTES.md — the project's log of what has to be re-checked here. Use right after a call reported success while changing nothing, ate an argument, or validated a broken state, e.g. "write this down", "record this MCP finding", "the server lied — note it", "add a recheck note", "trap this". Takes three forms of input: the finding in one line, a path to a plan file (harvests the "## MCP Findings" table of that plan and nothing else), or nothing at all — then it takes findings already in the session first, and offers to scan the tables of plans touched since the last audit. The table only, never the plan body. Writes in the one allowed genre — a check to perform; never a lifted gate, never a named workaround, never a claim about what the server can or cannot do. Makes zero MCP calls and needs no editor. To replay, retire, or upstream existing notes use /unikit-mcp-audit instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。