「output」の検索結果

Triages an Aikido security findings CSV against a local codebase. For each finding, reads the flagged file, traces the code path, and verdicts it as KEEP OPEN or CLOSE with a specific reason. Outputs a reviewed CSV and a self-contained HTML evidence report. Run this at the end of a pentest when an Aikido CSV is available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work with BioReason-Pro predictions and reasoning traces for protein function. Use when: comparing BioReason outputs against curated reviews, converting web exports to YAML, reviewing reasoning trace quality, or running the SFT/RL comparison. Triggers: "bioreason", "GO-GPT predictions", "reasoning trace review", "bioreason comparison", "SFT vs RL".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a Flutter feature Product Requirements Document through a structured clarify-plan-draft workflow. Outputs a PRD using the repository template under `.claude/tasks/<feature-name>/prd.md`. Use when the user says "create a PRD", "write requirements", "define the feature", "start a feature spec", or wants to specify a feature before techspec/tasks/start-job.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI specification planning frameworks. Use when a spec touches model calls, prompts, retrieval, tool calling, agentic loops, or evals. Covers approach selection, model and provider choice, structured output contracts, loop guards, budgets, failure modes, and eval design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigation flow (Glob -> Grep -> Read), evidence-based research with file:line references, structured output format for AI consumption. Use for pattern discovery, implementation research, and codebase investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Official Mistral AI TypeScript SDK patterns — client setup, chat completions, streaming, function calling, structured outputs, embeddings, vision, Codestral FIM, and production best practices

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Local LLM inference with the Ollama JavaScript client -- chat, streaming, tool calling, vision, embeddings, structured output, model management, and OpenAI-compatible endpoint

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Together AI SDK patterns for TypeScript — client setup, chat completions, streaming, structured output, function calling, embeddings, image generation, fine-tuning, and OpenAI-compatible endpoints

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vercel AI SDK patterns - providers, text generation, streaming, structured output, tool calling, chat UI hooks, embeddings, and RAG

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Official OpenAI SDK patterns for TypeScript/Node.js — client setup, Chat Completions, Responses API, streaming, structured outputs, function calling, embeddings, vision, audio, and production best practices

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LangChain.js patterns for building LLM applications — chat models, LCEL chains, prompt templates, structured output, agents, tools, RAG, streaming, and LangSmith tracing

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Official Anthropic SDK patterns for TypeScript/Node.js — client setup, Messages API, streaming, tool use, vision, extended thinking, structured outputs, prompt caching, batch API, and production best practices

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Official TypeScript SDK for Google Gemini — client setup, text generation, multimodal input, function calling, structured output, streaming, embeddings, context caching, and chat sessions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

General workflow for auditing ML CI failures, experiment regressions, training run failures, golden metric failures, and telemetry-backed ML work-product claims from local repositories, logs, metrics, configs, and artifacts. Use when Codex needs to decide whether an ML failure is a model/convergence issue, correctness bug, data/config issue, infrastructure/runtime issue, evaluation/gating policy issue, or unsupported claim, and produce structured evidence-backed outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill any time a spreadsheet file is the primary input or output. This means any task where the user wants to: open, read, edit, or fix an existing .xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, or .tsv file (e.g., adding columns, computing formulas, formatting, charting, cleaning messy data); create a new spreadsheet from scratch or from other data sources; or convert between tabular file formats. Trigger especially when the user references a spreadsheet file by name or path — even casually (like "the xlsx in my downloads") — and wants something done to it or produced from it. Also trigger for cleaning or restructuring messy tabular data files (malformed rows, misplaced headers, junk data) into proper spreadsheets. The deliverable must be a spreadsheet file. Do NOT trigger when the primary deliverable is a Word document, HTML report, standalone Python script, database pipeline, or Google Sheets API integration, even if tabular data is involved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform git commit history into polished user-facing changelogs and release notes. Use when the user wants a CHANGELOG.md from a version tag or date range, weekly product updates, app store release notes, or Keep a Changelog formatted output with internal noise filtered out.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill any time a .pptx file is involved in any way — as input, output, or both. This includes: creating slide decks, pitch decks, or presentations; reading, parsing, or extracting text from any .pptx file (even if the extracted content will be used elsewhere, like in an email or summary); editing, modifying, or updating existing presentations; combining or splitting slide files; working with templates, layouts, speaker notes, or comments. Trigger whenever the user mentions "deck," "slides," "presentation," or references a .pptx filename, regardless of what they plan to do with the content afterward. If a .pptx file needs to be opened, created, or touched, use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adopt Prisma Next into a new project, onto an existing database, or as the first move after a bootstrap tool dropped you into a scaffold. Use for "what can I do with Prisma Next", "what can I do next with Prisma", "where do I start", "what should I do first", "just ran createprisma", "createprisma", "npx createprisma", "npx create-prisma", "first steps", "first query", "I have a scaffolded Prisma Next project what now"; for `pnpm dlx prisma-next init` greenfield setup; and for `prisma-next contract infer` + `db sign` against an existing database. Also covers the connect-write-read first-arc orientation, the day-to-day commands (`contract emit`, `db init`, `db update`, `migration plan`, `migrate`, `db schema`, `db verify`), and routing to `prisma-next-contract` / `prisma-next-queries` / `prisma-next-runtime` for the next move. Flags: --target, --authoring, --schema-path, --probe-db, --output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-review intake closing skill. After an intake is resolved (whether accepted via review/meta PR merge or rejected/deferred at triage/evidence review), run this skill to post standardized, personalized closing comments on the PR (if any) and each intake issue. Comments include: evidence pipeline findings with /trust-appraise TM output, per-row artifact scores, decisions rationale, path-to-promotion/acceptance guidance, and a mandatory badge status note including the universal Powered by Gaia badge. Use after curation completes, before or immediately after merge for accepted intakes, or immediately upon rejection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce the rendered evidence a human-gated frontend PR owes its reviewer: capture each changed surface (plus the before state for anything modified, plus mobile width), then generate one self-contained local HTML page the founder can open and review without checking anything out. Use when a PR is gated by the "Frontend changes are HUMAN-GATED" section of CLAUDE.md, or when the user says "/design-gate", "screenshot evidence for this PR", "prep this for founder review", "build the design evidence page", "what does this look like before and after". The page comes from a template script, not hand-written markup. Output is session-local and never committed. Do NOT use for non-gated changes: typo/grammar/factual fixes in an unchanged block, dead link targets, alt/ARIA fixes with no visual change, cache-bust bumps, or refactors with no rendered diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Curate Gaia bot crawler branches into real-skill catalog entries and clean up processed bot/* branches. Use when the user says: "process bot branches", "curate the crawl output", "clean up bot proposals", "run bot curation", "merge the crawler results", "review bot/* branches", "ingest crawler data", or explicitly types /gaia-bot-curate. Also triggers when the user asks to review pending `bot/*` branches, turn crawler JSON proposals into registry nodes, decide which crawled skills to accept vs reject, or batch-add skills from an automated crawl run. This skill handles the full pipeline: fetch remote bot branches, triage proposals, run `gaia dev` mutations, validate, open a PR, and delete consumed bot branches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a reference video and reverse-engineer its style into a reusable Seedance 2.0 prompting template for the Novoads API. The output is a new formula file — like seedance-2-ugc.md — that captures the video's structure, pacing, camera work, edit style and tone so it can be recreated with any product, any person, in any setting. Use this whenever someone provides a video they want to use as a style reference, says "I want to make videos like this", "deconstruct this video", "turn this into a template", "analyze this style", or drops a video file and wants to recreate that format repeatedly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify a proposed code change as Leaf Node or Core Code to decide how much AI usage and review rigor is appropriate. Use this skill whenever the user asks "is this leaf or core", "what kind of change is this", "should I vibe code this", "can AI write this", "how rigorous should the review be", or before starting any non-trivial change. Also useful as a sub-step inside other workflows (planning, PR prep, code review) when classification matters. Asks 6 diagnostic questions about propagation range, change frequency, tech-debt tolerance, examples, failure cost, and review intensity, then outputs a clear classification with the recommended approach. Trigger even when the user describes a change without explicitly asking for classification — the answer changes how they should proceed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent management workflow — task delegation, progress monitoring, quality verification with regression testing, feedback delivery, and cross-review orchestration. Use this skill when coordinating multiple agents on a shared task, monitoring delegated work, ensuring quality across agent outputs, or implementing a multi-phase plan (3+ phases or 10+ file changes).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。