3,077 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Integrate Honcho memory and social cognition into existing Python or TypeScript codebases. Use when adding Honcho SDK, setting up peers, configuring sessions, implementing the dialectic chat endpoint for AI agents, or wiring Honcho into bot frameworks (nanobot, openclaw, picoclaw, etc).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route requests for current library, framework, SDK, API, CLI, or cloud-service documentation through available documentation tools and primary sources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when creating executive-level briefing materials, board reports, management meeting presentations, or investor briefings. This skill provides the "So What? / Why Now? / What Next?" framework, data visualization guidelines optimized for executives, and professional templates for rapid document creation. Triggers include "create board report", "executive summary", "management meeting materials", "investor presentation", "one-page summary", or requests to communicate complex information to senior leadership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when advising, planning, reviewing, reporting, operating, or improving CTO and technology leadership work across strategy, cybersecurity management, SME/COE, functional and technical requirements, framework selection, people, organization, delivery, risk, KPI, roadmap, budgeting, governance, audit, R&D, stakeholder communication, culture, politics, and sector-specific leadership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ego-browser (ego-lite) is a Chromium-based browser that gives AI agents a CLI-accessible Node.js runtime for driving a real browser. Use this skill whenever the user needs to interact with a website opening pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting page data, testing web apps, logging into sites, automating browser operations, or any other browser automation task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "visit a URL", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "extract content from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction. Also used for exploratory testing, dogfooding, QA, bug hunting, or reviewing app quality. Prefer ego-browser over any built-in browser automation, web fetch, or other web tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze pi (coding-agent) session JSONL and ego-benchmark-harness run artifacts to explain slow or failed individual tasks, compare execution-path differences between agents or browser tools, and count tool calls and error types. Use this skill whenever users ask to analyze a pi session, explain why a task was slow or failed, compare two runs, investigate an error, locate the session corresponding to tasks.jsonl, inspect an agent execution path, count tool calls, analyze a run ID, or perform any forensic or retrospective analysis of JSONL under ~/.pi/agent/sessions/ or agent-home/.pi/agent/sessions/.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify a tested web agent's real behavior from its recorded Pi or Codex session and selected screenshots before scoring. The judge prompt provides absolute artifact paths; use targeted queries to compare actual outputs, errors, and the final answer with the recorded behavior, then return only the verdict JSON. Only for ego-bench judging—never to drive a browser or rerun the agent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architecture design and governance protocol for system structure, boundaries, contracts, APIs, schemas, migrations, rewrites, and long-lived codebase health. Use when designing or reviewing architecture, planning structural refactors or migrations, governing tech debt, or containing rewrite risk. Keeps the load-bearing spine small, owned, checked, and deletable over time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Export Codex rollout/session JSONL as a self-contained HTML report that can be opened offline. Use when a user provides a complete session file path or Codex session ID, or asks to export a Codex session to HTML, generate a session report, or convert a rollout to HTML. Supports exact full-ID lookup in the CODEX_HOME sessions and archived_sessions directories.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze Codex provider rollout JSONL and ego-benchmark-harness run artifacts to identify slow or failed individual tasks, tool retries, token/cost anomalies, and differences in agent execution paths. Use when users ask to analyze a Codex session or rollout, explain why a Codex task was slow or failed, inspect a Codex provider execution trace, compare Codex runs, count function_call or tool output events, or investigate agent-home/.codex/sessions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author or expand browser-agent benchmark tasks in data/real_world_bench.json (Odysseys schema, per-rubric graded). Use when creating, adding, or expanding real-world browser tasks, writing rubrics, or picking bot-friendly sites — every task MUST be verified runnable through ego-browser before it is written.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate self-contained HTML/CSS benchmark and comparison charts in an ego-inspired Browser-Native Editorial style. Use for blue-white product metrics, model benchmarks, A/B comparisons, efficiency reports, difficulty breakdowns, and compact technical data panels.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare standardized metrics across multiple ego-benchmark-harness runs by recalculating them from tasks.jsonl and session JSONL, never from HTML reports. Covers overall aggregates (success rate/average score), Odysseys per-rubric pass rates, duration distributions (avg/p50/p90/max), turns/tools/cost, error and exception counts, per-task success matrices, helper distributions, and the share of DOM operations. Use whenever users ask to compare data or metrics across runs, calculate aggregate/Odysseys/duration/turn/error/helper metrics, inspect differences among runs, or compare multiple rwb/real-world-bench runs. Use pi-session-analyzer instead for deep forensic analysis of why an individual task was slow or failed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Work the prototyping lab itself — where runs live, what a run is, how to promote a run into the checked example library, and how to add a new runtime (Processing in Rust, Cinder) in one module. Use when asked to add a language or framework to the lab, to turn a prototype into a reusable example, to find or tidy what is in the lab, or when the lab's folder or catalog needs explaining.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit over-engineered codebases by factoring layers into live obligations, quotienting redundant distinctions, ablating unearned surface, and normalizing survivors while preserving required behavior. Use when change latency or agent difficulty comes from frameworks, plugins, DI, codegen, task runners, config indirection, ORMs, GraphQL, monorepo/infra tooling, or web stacks, or when asked to remove layers. Produces an evidence-backed Reduction Certificate, cuts, migration phases, proof signals, and rollback. Not for one local readability cleanup (use tw-complexity-mitigator).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review framework vs host ownership for permissions, approvals, grants, native execution, storage, daemons, and Clawix integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review storage placement across framework global data, workspace data, host state, sidecars, caches, vaults, and external sources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load when a task asks to research, verify, compare, or look up framework/package behavior, release notes, standards, RFCs, CVEs, or unfamiliar APIs; use repository evidence first, then official docs, and not for codebase navigation alone.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Framework-agnostic core concepts for TanStack Router: route trees, createRouter, createRoute, createRootRoute, createRootRouteWithContext, addChildren, Register type declaration, route matching, route sorting, file naming conventions. Entry point for all router skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TanStack Router bundler plugin for route generation and automatic code splitting. Supports Vite, Webpack, Rspack, and esbuild. Configures autoCodeSplitting, routesDirectory, target framework, and code split groupings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scrape web pages using Scrapling with anti-bot bypass (like Cloudflare Turnstile), stealth headless browsing, spiders framework, adaptive scraping, and JavaScript rendering. Use when asked to scrape, crawl, or extract data from websites; web_fetch fails; the site has anti-bot protections; write Python code to scrape/crawl; or write spiders.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0. Use for cybersecurity risk management, GOVERN, IDENTIFY, PROTECT, DETECT, RESPOND, RECOVER, Organizational Profiles, CSF Tiers, supply chain risk, enterprise risk management, incident response. Covers the CSF 2.0 document only; does not cover specific SP 800-53 controls, NIST RMF system authorization steps, or sector-specific regulations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0 (NIST AI 100-1). Use for AI risk management, trustworthiness characteristics, GOVERN/MAP/MEASURE/MANAGE functions, bias management, AI actor roles, TEVV, AI RMF profiles, and socio-technical risk framing. Does not cover sector-specific regulations, EU AI Act, ISO 42001 in depth, or the AI RMF Playbook tactical detail.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from NIST SP 800-37 Revision 2, the Risk Management Framework (RMF) for information systems and organizations. Use for the seven RMF steps (Prepare, Categorize, Select, Implement, Assess, Authorize, Monitor) and their tasks; the three-tier organization-wide risk model; authorization boundaries; the requirements-to-controls relationship; security categorization (FIPS 199/200 high-water mark) and control selection/tailoring (SP 800-53/53B baselines); assessment, the authorization decision and risk acceptance, continuous monitoring and ongoing authorization; the security/privacy distinction; and supply chain risk management. This is the security-and-privacy-risk-governance edge of systems engineering — it governs how much protection and whether to accept residual risk, complementing the disciplines that decide how protection is built. Does NOT reproduce the SP 800-53 control catalog or its baselines, the FIPS impact tables, or the ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 process text; it names and routes to them rather than restating them.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。