Run real browser QA with Playwright. Use when testing a frontend feature, verifying UI before PR, smoke testing after deploy, or investigating reported visual bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
4,261 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Run real browser QA with Playwright. Use when testing a frontend feature, verifying UI before PR, smoke testing after deploy, or investigating reported visual bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan a live web app with Playwright, extract all features, generate PRD/epics/stories with priorities and dependencies, export to Notion. Checks required MCP servers before starting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conversion rate optimization for marketing pages and lead-capture forms. Use when the user wants to improve conversions on a homepage, landing page, pricing page, feature page, blog CTA, contact form, demo form, or campaign page. For product onboarding use user-onboarding; for lifecycle email use marketing-automation; for pricing and paywalls use pricing-strategy; for A/B testing use ab-test-setup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SEO, AEO (Answer Engine Optimization), and GEO strategy for search engines and AI visibility. Use when working on "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "on-page SEO," "AI search optimization," "AEO," "GEO," "AI visibility," "optimize for ChatGPT," "optimize for Perplexity," "AI Overviews," "answer engine optimization," "generative engine optimization," "AI citations," "featured snippets," "meta tags," "schema markup," "search ranking," "content optimization," "E-E-A-T," "structured data," "search console," "SEO health check," "why am I not ranking," "AI search readiness," "backlink strategy," "link building," "domain authority," "programmatic SEO," "SEO at scale," "template-based SEO," "AEO monitoring," "AI search monitoring," "JSON-LD," "rich snippets," "schema.org," "SERP analysis," "search intent," "site architecture," "information architecture," "URL structure," "internal linking," or "navigation." For keyword research, see keyword-research-and-clustering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
S5 of see-it-ship-it: prove it works before saying so. Silent quality checks after every feature, a full review of every file before save and deploy, and the acceptance table (check / expected / actual / match) run on the local build and again on the live URL. Never 'tests passed'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a feature request into a minimal, file-level implementation plan before any code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build an Opportunity Solution Tree (OST) to structure product discovery — map a desired outcome to customer opportunities, possible solutions, and experiments. Based on Teresa Torres' Continuous Discovery Habits. Use when the team is unclear what to build next, when multiple opportunities compete, or before writing a PRD for a complex feature space.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Email/SMS lifecycle and deliverability framework for SMB Product-Builder products that send transactional or lifecycle messages (booking reminders, CRM sequences, receipts, win-back). Codifies provider selection (Resend/Postmark/Twilio/SendGrid), domain auth (SPF/DKIM/DMARC), consent and compliance (TCPA, CAN-SPAM, CASL, quiet hours, double opt-in), suppression-list discipline, and the transactional-vs-marketing split. Applied by integrations-engineer and senior-dev whenever a feature sends messages — so deliverability and consent are designed in, not bolted on after the first spam complaint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the CTO describes a feature, task, or project goal. Orchestrates the full SDLC pipeline automatically based on project type.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The methods a financial-ML result has to survive before it is evidence — purged cross-validation with an embargo, triple-barrier labelling, sample uniqueness under overlapping labels, fractional differentiation, meta-labelling, and multiple-testing correction. Written because the invariants were required of quant-researcher and nothing in the project explained how to satisfy them: a rule without a method produces either an invention or a block. Applied whenever a backtest, a feature or a label is being designed or judged.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
6-pillar architecture review framework. Adapted from AWS Well-Architected for use by great_cto's architect agent on every non-nano ARCH document. Forces explicit answers across operational excellence, security, reliability, performance, cost, and sustainability — not just feature design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find the papers that answer a research query in Firecrawl's research paper index — a corpus of paper abstracts whose largest share is biomedical and life-science literature (PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv), alongside arXiv preprints in CS, physics, and math — using semantic search, semantic and structural expansion, and in-body verification. Use this skill for literature-finding and paper-retrieval tasks of any kind, including clinical, biomedical, drug, gene, disease, and other life-science questions, whether the answer is a single paper or a full multi-paper set. The index is reached only through the `firecrawl_research_*` MCP tools or the `firecrawl research` CLI subcommands. Calling `firecrawl_search` with its `categories` option set to `["research"]` is a different feature — it filters ordinary web search to research-affiliated websites (the list includes PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv, and publisher sites) and returns page results from them, without querying the paper records in this index.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate and repair source-locked Blender models using named landmarks such as leaf tips, shell corners, eyes, smile, rim thickness, aura center/radius, and view-specific depth markers. Use when bbox/IoU is insufficient and the model must align to templates at designed feature points.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies production AI integration patterns for chat, structured output, guardrails, provider routing, and AI UX. Use when adding LLM-powered features to an application.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes implementation plans before coding: phases, plan files, specs, definition of done. Use when planning a multi-step feature or breaking a large refactor into phases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs production ML and LLM systems. Use when deploying, canarying, rolling back, monitoring drift or feature skew, promoting champions, migrating providers, or handling incidents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds ML pipelines: EDA, features, leakage checks, evaluation. Use when doing data science or explaining fairness, privacy, speech, vision-language, or diffusion mechanics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when a session's job is to DRIVE OPEN PRs TO MERGE rather than to write new code — "close out the open PRs", "review and fix the open PRs", "what's blocking our PRs", "which PRs are mergeable". It owns the In Review column: it reads each PR's gate status, verifies and fixes review findings on PRs OTHER sessions built, replies in-thread, and stops at the merge gate for the user's per-PR approval. Do NOT load it for building a feature and opening its PR — that is a build session (`genesis-development`).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and runs reproducible evaluations for AI agents, prompts, tools, skills, and model-backed workflows using realistic datasets, isolated baselines, objective assertions, rubric grading, trajectory analysis, cost/latency tracking, and regression comparison. Use when measuring agent quality, optimizing skill triggering, comparing prompts or models, or gating an AI feature release. Not for ordinary deterministic unit tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes a detailed, executable implementation plan from an approved design or multi-step requirement, including exact files, interfaces, tests, commands, checkpoints, and rollback considerations. Use before touching code for a substantial feature, migration, refactor, or cross-cutting change. Not for a one-file bounded fix or for executing a plan that already exists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigates a bug, failing test, build error, regression, flaky behavior, performance symptom, or unexpected result by reproducing it, minimizing the case, testing ranked hypotheses, tracing the first incorrect state, and locking the root cause with a regression check. Use before proposing a fix. Not for planning a new feature or reviewing a healthy diff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepares and controls software releases with risk classification, CI quality gates, artifact provenance, feature flags, staged rollout, measurable promotion and rollback thresholds, post-deploy verification, and cleanup. Use for deployment pipelines, launch readiness, canaries, production rollout, release automation, or rollback planning. Not for merely merging a completed development branch or proving one local change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explores ambiguous product or engineering intent before implementation, clarifies users, constraints, alternatives, risks, and acceptance criteria, and turns the result into an approved design direction. Use for a new feature, subsystem, creative UI, architecture change, or unclear request. Not for an already-scoped bug fix, an existing implementation plan, or a narrow code review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates and manages isolated Git worktrees for parallel agents, risky experiments, or long-running feature work while preserving the user's current checkout. Use before concurrent branch edits or when isolation makes rollback safer. Not for a trivial one-file change that is already isolated.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。