「perf」の検索結果

After scaffolded practice, run an unassisted check with no AI help. Use to distinguish supported performance from what the learner can currently do independently.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track performance across sessions and reduce scaffolding as competence grows. Makes fading visible — the learner knows when scaffolds are removed and why. Use for sustained learning engagement where independence is the goal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes between five assessment pathways — formative, rubric/criteria, authentic/performance, peer/self, and diagnostic — with validity and equity checks. Use when a teacher needs help choosing how to assess.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesise completed KUD charts into a developmental progression matrix and per-competency narrative sections. Use when you need a programme-level view of how knowledge, understanding, and performance develop across bands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a criterion-referenced rubric with descriptive performance levels for a task or objective. Use for marking guides and general curriculum contexts. For Manning programmes where Competent = success, use coherent-rubric-logic-builder instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain and configure individual spacing algorithms using student performance data and forgetting curves. Use when personalising retention schedules in adaptive learning platforms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse student work against criteria to identify specific gaps between current performance and learning objectives. Use when reviewing submissions, planning feedback, or diagnosing learning needs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Risk-based vendor assessment framework for IT service providers, technology vendors, and third-party partners under DORA, NIS2, GDPR. Provides three-phase process (Initial Screening / Detailed Assessment / Final Evaluation), six-dimension risk scoring (Financial/Operational/Compliance/Security/Reputational/Strategic) with weighted matrices, full DORA Art. 28-30 contractual checklist, NIS2 Art. 21(2) security measures enumeration, GDPR Art. 28 documentation checks, red flags per dimension, trigger-based review criteria, and document templates. Use when: (1) Evaluating new vendors or technology providers, (2) Conducting critical ICT third-party due diligence under DORA, (3) Performing supply chain security assessment under NIS2, (4) Creating vendor onboarding documentation, (5) Establishing ongoing vendor monitoring, (6) Assessing concentration risk, or (7) Generating executive vendor risk reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

No Inference / Source-Locked Verification. Forces Claude to answer ONLY from user-provided materials and/or online sources actually accessed — no inference, no assumptions, no gap-filling. Every factual, legal, numerical, or procedural claim must be anchored to a cited source. Use whenever Claude reviews documents, summarises evidence, checks accuracy, drafts submissions, creates timelines, extracts facts, checks citations, analyses rules, prepares legal arguments, compares documents, verifies claims, produces chronologies, works from uploaded materials, performs legal research, checks case status, or does anything where evidential fidelity matters. Also trigger on: 'source-locked', 'no inference', 'only from the materials', 'don't assume', 'stick to the evidence', 'verify this', 'check this is right', 'work from the documents'. Overrides Claude's default tendency to fill gaps. If evidential accuracy matters, use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs a legal compliance audit for a Moroccan e-commerce website, focused on personal data protection (Law 09-08) and consumer contract disclosures/obligations (Law 31-08). Use this skill when a user asks to audit, check, or assess the legal compliance of an e-commerce website operating in Morocco — presence and validity of Terms & Conditions, privacy policy, CNDP declaration, mandatory disclosures, right of withdrawal, consent banner. Out of scope: compliance for other countries, Meta/Google advertising compliance (covered by another skill), definitive legal advice (results are a starting point for professional review, not legal advice).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate completed mediation-competition problems consisting of general information and confidential packets for both sides. Use when asked to validate, audit, score, quality-control, or assess competition readiness; identify factual, numerical, chronological, authority, commercial-logic, or confidentiality defects; test mediation usefulness, BATNAs, settlement corridors, information asymmetry, and opportunities for firmness, cooperation, imagination, and clarification; or produce an author-only validation report. Perform a qualified partial review when packets are missing. Diagnose by default; do not generate a new problem or edit source packets unless repairs are expressly requested. Requires access to all supplied files and a host capable of reading their formats; otherwise disclose the unreviewed material and resulting limits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews outside counsel invoices and related billing data for an in-house legal department, including LEDES or e-billing exports, OCGs, approved rates, discounts, budgets, AFAs, and staffing rules. Starts with internal comparisons before bringing in external data. Produces invoice review findings, MBR/QBR scorecards, dispute logs, and management reports. For demonstration purposes only and not professional advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GDPR Legitimate Interest Assessment (LIA) — Guided assessment for Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR using the EDPB three-step test. Based on EDPB Guidelines 1/2024, EDPB Opinion 28/2024 (AI models), the OSS Case Digest on Legitimate Interest (McIntyre 2026), CNIL AI guidance (June 2025), ICO guidance, and key CJEU case law. Use when: (1) user needs to assess whether legitimate interest is appropriate, (2) user asks about Art. 6(1)(f), "Interessenabwägung", "berechtigtes Interesse", "balancing test", or "LIA", (3) user wants to document a legitimate interest assessment, (4) user mentions the three-step test, (5) user evaluates necessity or proportionality under Art. 6(1)(f), (6) user discusses direct marketing, fraud prevention, IT security, employee monitoring, AI training, web scraping, or credit checks in context of legal basis, (7) user handles a right to object (Art. 21), (8) user asks about children's data, profiling, or cross-border data sharing under legitimate interest, (9) user compares legitimate interest against other legal bases. Do NOT use for: consent assessments (Art. 6(1)(a)), contract performance (Art. 6(1)(b)), DPIA workflows, or pure ePrivacy/cookie compliance questions — though the skill does address the ePrivacy/GDPR overlap where relevant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs structured compliance review, clause redlining, and drafting suggestions for legal documents (privacy policies, data processing agreements, vendor and SaaS contracts) against India's DPDPA 2023 and the EU GDPR. Flags clauses as compliant, at-risk, or non-compliant with reasoning, and proposes ready-to-use model replacement language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform language and framework specific security best-practice reviews and suggest improvements. Trigger only when the user explicitly requests security best practices guidance, a security review/report, or secure-by-default coding help. Trigger only for supported languages (python, javascript/typescript, go). Do not trigger for general code review, debugging, or non-security tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create, generate, or produce video content using AI tools or programmatic frameworks. Also use when the user mentions 'video production,' 'AI video,' 'Remotion,' 'Hyperframes,' 'HeyGen,' 'Synthesia,' 'Veo,' 'Sora,' 'Runway,' 'Kling,' 'Seedance,' 'Hailuo,' 'MiniMax,' 'Pika,' 'Hunyuan,' 'Wan,' 'video generation,' 'AI avatar,' 'talking head video,' 'programmatic video,' 'video template,' 'explainer video,' 'product demo video,' 'video pipeline,' 'copy this edit,' 'match this video style,' 'reverse-engineer this video,' 'edit like this reference,' or 'make me a video.' Use this for video creation, generation, and production workflows. For video content strategy and what to post, see social. For paid video ad creative, see ad-creative.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Professional network reconnaissance and port scanning using nmap. Supports various scan types (quick, full, UDP, stealth), service detection, vulnerability scanning, and NSE scripts. Use when you need to enumerate network services, detect versions, or perform network reconnaissance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert blueprint for console platforms (PlayStation, Xbox, Nintendo Switch) covering controller-first UI, certification requirements (TRCs/TCRs), platform services (achievements, cloud saves), and performance compliance. Use when targeting console releases or implementing gamepad-only interfaces. Keywords console, PlayStation, Xbox, Switch, TRC, TCR, certification, controller, gamepad, achievements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert blueprint for physics queries using RayCast, ShapeCast, and DirectSpaceState. Covers hit detection, volume overlap, mouse picking, and high-performance server-side intersection queries. Use when implementing projectiles, LOS, terrain grounding, or AI sensors. Keywords raycast, shapecast, direct_space_state, intersect_ray, intersect_shape, PhysicsRayQueryParameters, collision mask, mouse picking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert blueprint for Battle Royale games including shrinking zone/storm mechanics (phase-based, damage scaling), large-scale networking (relevancy, tick rate optimization), deployment systems (plane, freefall, parachute), loot spawning (weighted tables, rarity), and performance optimization (LOD, occlusion culling, object pooling). Use for multiplayer survival games or last-one-standing formats. Trigger keywords: battle_royale, zone_shrink, storm_damage, deployment_system, loot_spawn, networking_optimization, relevancy_system, snapshot_interpolation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert blueprint for rhythm games including audio synchronization (BPM conductor, latency compensation with AudioServer.get_time_since_last_mix), note highways (scroll speed, timing windows), judgment systems (Perfect/Great/Good/Bad/Miss), scoring with combo multipliers, input processing (lane-based, hold note detection), and chart/beatmap loading. Based on DDR/osu!/Beat Saber research. Trigger keywords: rhythm_game, audio_sync, timing_judgment, note_highway, combo_system, BPM_conductor, latency_compensation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert debugging and profiling for leaks, GPU/Visual Profiler, headless CI QA, orphan nodes, thread-safe logs, and custom Debugger monitors — not print/breakpoint tutorials. Trigger on OBJECT_ORPHAN_NODE_COUNT, ObjectDB growth, Visual Profiler GPU spikes, flaky headless exits, or remote device consoles. Keywords: orphan nodes, Performance.get_monitor, Visual Profiler, Time.get_ticks_usec, EditorDebuggerPlugin, headless QA, push_error, backtrace.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bevy ECS skill for runtime cost. Keywords: Bevy, parallel systems, chain, FrameTimeDiagnosticsPlugin, Handles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert patterns for 2D animation in Godot using AnimatedSprite2D and skeletal cutout rigs. Use when implementing sprite frame animations, procedural animation (squash/stretch), cutout bone hierarchies, or frame-perfect timing systems. Trigger keywords: AnimatedSprite2D, SpriteFrames, animation_finished, animation_looped, frame_changed, frame_progress, set_frame_and_progress, cutout animation, skeletal 2D, Bone2D, procedural animation, animation state machine, advance(0).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。