3,311 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Generates a contextual onboarding document for a new contributor or agent joining the project. Summarizes project state, architecture, conventions, and current priorities relevant to the specified role or area.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates a structured bug report from a description, or analyzes code to identify potential bugs. Ensures every bug report has full reproduction steps, severity assessment, and context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read all open bugs in production/qa/bugs/, re-evaluate priority vs. severity, assign to sprints, surface systemic trends, and produce a triage report. Run at sprint start or when the bug count grows enough to need re-prioritization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rapid prototyping workflow. Skips normal standards to quickly validate a game concept or mechanic. Produces throwaway code and a structured prototype report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate design or architecture documents from existing implementation. Works backwards from code/prototypes to create missing planning docs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running existing project validation commands and fixing failures after code changes, including lint, type-check, unit/integration test, build, CI, or local script failures. Do not use when the task is to design or author new component/E2E tests; Chinese triggers include validation, check failures, fix failures, CI failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when planning or reviewing a frontend testing strategy, selecting the right test layer by risk, mapping coverage across static checks, unit tests, component tests, integration tests, E2E, Storybook/visual regression, a11y, security, performance, or CI gates. Do not use to write individual component/E2E tests or merely run existing validation commands; Chinese triggers include test strategy, test layering, test plan, coverage matrix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a tenure-track/tenured Education Professor in a teacher-preparation program — designing a licensure course unit against InTASC/CAEP standards, deciding whether a candidate's borderline edTPA score needs a targeted or full retake, triaging a failing student-teaching placement, or assembling CAEP self-study evidence for reaccreditation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Electrical and Electronic Engineering Technologist/Technician — bench-testing a prototype board against a power or timing spec, isolating a resistive fault in a power path with node-to-node voltage-drop measurements, checking whether an oscilloscope's own bandwidth is limiting a rise-time measurement before trusting it, running a power-supply load-regulation sweep, or evaluating ESD-event provenance and IPC-A-610 acceptance on a returned unit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a computer programmer implementing to a given specification — translating a design/pseudocode/systems-analyst spec into working code in a specified language, flagging spec ambiguity before writing code, maintaining or modernizing an existing codebase against its original contract, or writing unit tests that prove the implementation matches the spec (not designing the system the spec describes).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Coin, Vending, and Amusement Machine Servicer and Repairer — triaging a jam across bill validators, coin mechanisms, refrigerated vending units, and arcade/amusement PCBs on a route, setting restock par levels against route-cycle economics, investigating a cash-collection variance at a stop, or applying food-safety temperature/time discard rules on perishable vending product.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Construction Trades Supervisor (foreman) — allocating a crew's daily task assignments against a labor-unit budget, deciding whether today's scope requires a formally designated OSHA competent person, arbitrating a trade-sequencing conflict between crews needing the same physical space, tracking crew productivity variance before it shows up on the master schedule, or logging and acting on a near-miss.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Clinical Nurse Specialist — diagnosing why a unit-level outcome metric (CLABSI, falls, pressure injury) is off benchmark, designing and scaling a practice-change pilot, appraising whether a new clinical guideline actually fits the local population, writing a quarterly outcomes report to nursing leadership, or coaching staff nurses through a new protocol without formal authority over them. US hospital/health-system default; state nurse practice acts vary. A reasoning aid, not clinical or legal advice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Chemical Engineer — closing a mass/energy balance around a reactor or separation unit, evaluating scale-up risk from bench to pilot to plant, reviewing a HAZOP finding or LOPA scenario for a covered process, sizing relief for a runaway-reaction or fire case, or checking a process safety information (PSI) package against OSHA 1910.119 before startup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Automotive Engineering Technician — setting up and instrumenting test equipment (strain-gauge bridges, thermocouples, load/torque sensors) to an engineer's written test plan, selecting DAQ sample rate and an SAE J211 CFC filter class for a vehicle test channel, verifying instrument calibration (torque wrench, thermocouple, load cell, shunt-cal check on a strain bridge) against a traceable standard before a test run, reducing dyno or road-load test data (SAE J1349 power correction, rainflow-counted durability damage fraction) into engineering units, and documenting test results against the engineer's target with stated margin. Distinct from an automotive engineer (owns the system-level design decisions — structure, powertrain sizing, suspension geometry, NVH) — this role installs the sensors, configures the DAQ, executes the instrumented test, and reduces the data under a design and test plan the engineer specified.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Biologist — designing a study and identifying its true experimental unit before data collection starts, running a power analysis to size a sample, judging whether a published or preclinical finding warrants trust without independent replication, sequencing IACUC/IBC/field-permit approvals before biosafety or wildlife work begins, or scoping a grant-funded research plan against realistic funding odds.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Area, Ethnic, or Cultural Studies Professor — designing a joint-appointment course load across two departments, prepping a tenure or mid-tenure review file for interdisciplinary scholarship, deciding whether a course survives an enrollment or political-pressure threat, evaluating community-engaged research for a merit case, or writing a Title VI/FLAS-adjacent grant narrative.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Spring Boot 4 testing strategies and patterns. Use when writing unit tests, slice tests (@WebMvcTest, @DataJpaTest), integration tests, Testcontainers with @ServiceConnection, security testing (@WithMockUser, JWT), or Modulith event testing with Scenario API. Covers the critical @MockitoBean migration from @MockBean.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive SEO analysis for any website or business type. Orchestrates 52 sub-skills (52 active): full site audits, technical SEO (CWV/INP), schema, E-E-A-T content quality, images, sitemaps, GEO for AI Overviews, llms.txt generation, AI crawler audit, plus live GSC and Ahrefs MCP data. GSC: overview, drops, opportunities, brand-vs-nonbrand, cannibalization, compare, content-decay, index-issues, new-keywords. Ahrefs: overview, backlinks, keywords, competitors, content-gap, broken-links, new-links, anchor-analysis, dr-history, top-pages. Cross-MCP: serp, content-brief, brand-radar, site-audit-pro, report. Local: log-analysis, ai-content-check, internal-links, local, migration-check, obsidian-kb. AI Readability: llms-txt, robots-ai. Performance: lighthouse-audit, core-web-vitals, page-experience. Quality & AI Search: rich-results, ai-optimization, eeat-audit, helpful-content. Triggers on: "SEO", "audit", "schema", "Core Web Vitals", "sitemap", "E-E-A-T", "AI Overviews", "GEO", "technical SEO", "content quality", "structured data", "GSC", "Ahrefs", "backlinks", "keywords", "search console", "domain rating", "local SEO", "migration", "lighthouse", "pagespeed", "LCP", "INP", "CLS", "page experience", "interstitials", "mobile friendly", "rich results", "rich snippets", "schema eligibility", "AI optimization", "AI search readiness", "EEAT", "trust signals", "helpful content", "people-first", "content quality gate".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover newly ranking keywords using Google Search Console data. Finds queries that had zero clicks or impressions in the prior 28 days but started appearing in the current period, revealing emerging content opportunities. Use when user says "new keywords", "new rankings", "keywords started ranking", "recently ranking", or "new queries".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find keywords that competitors rank for but the target domain does not, using Ahrefs data. Reveals content opportunities and topic gaps. Use when user says "content gap", "keywords competitors rank for", "missing keywords", "competitor keywords", or "content gap analysis".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Invoke a Rubber Duck Reviewer subagent to independently critique plans and implementations before proceeding. Use when the agent is about to implement a non-trivial plan (multi-file changes, architectural decisions, security-sensitive logic, database schema changes), after completing a self-contained unit of work (module, endpoint, feature), when stuck or facing repeated failures (same test fails 2+ times, unexpected results), or when the agent wants independent validation of assumptions and design decisions. Triggers on any non-trivial implementation task where independent critique would catch blind spots before they become costly mistakes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Survey any codebase as a senior advisor and produce prioritized, self-contained implementation plans for OTHER models/agents to execute. Strictly read-only on source code — never implements, fixes, or refactors anything itself. Use when asked to audit a codebase, find improvement opportunities (bugs, security, performance, test coverage, tech debt, migrations, DX), suggest features or where to take the project next (roadmap, product direction), or generate handoff plans for another agent to implement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, run, and maintain API test collections using Bruno (OpenCollection YAML format and legacy Bru format). Use when the user wants to: (1) create a Bruno API test collection from scratch or from OpenAPI/Swagger specs, (2) write API request files with tests and assertions, (3) run API tests using bru CLI, (4) generate test reports (HTML, JUnit, JSON), (5) set up CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions) for automated API testing, (6) debug or fix failing Bruno API tests, (7) add environment configurations for API testing, (8) chain API requests with data extraction, or (9) work with any .yml/.bru Bruno collection files. Triggers on mentions of 'Bruno', 'bru CLI', 'API testing collection', 'OpenCollection', or requests to automate API testing with file-based collections.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。